User talk:DMacks/Archive 70

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 65Archive 68Archive 69Archive 70Archive 71

Tech News: 2025-46

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Half-life whitespace revert

DMacks, you reverted an edit on "Half-life".

You said:. 'br' is a line-break, does not also get a whitespace.

I do not disagree. However, this is how the "More information:" HEADING, NOT THE TABLE COLUMN HEADING, looks on my Android:

"More information: Number ofhalf-lives elapsed, Fraction remaining …"

The table construction is a mystery to me.

However, may I suggest the (correct use of the) line-break in the table somehow does not translate correctly when copied to the "More information:" line ?

I would appreciate finding out how this is resolved.

Is the following of any illumination:

Using `
` in a wikitext table can affect how content is displayed within table cells, potentially causing line breaks that may not be intended. It's important to use it carefully to maintain the desired layout and readability of the table. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%3Cbr%2F%3E+causing+different+behaviors+in+Wikitable+heading&atb=v472-1&ko=-1&t=ddg_android&ia=web&assist=true

Please know my edit was made in good faith.~~ SalineBrain (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-47

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing DMacks a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Request discussion

Hello. I would like to request discussion regarding the wording in the sentence about Henri Lammens.You asked that citation is needed "Henri Lammens is controversial source". Here the the most latest references.

• The Royal Academy of Overseas Sciences biography (confirms Lammens' controversial reputation)

https://www.kaowarsom.be/en/notices_Lammens_Henri

"His virulent criticism of both historical and contemporary Islam regularly exposes Lammens"

|"Around 1910, Lammens shifts his focus to the earliest period of Islamic history. In works like Fātima et les filles de Mahomet (1912)he attempts a re-evaluation of the life of the Prophet and other key figures of early Islam. In these studies, Lammens not only stresses the inherently political character he sees Islam as having, a sentiment also expressed by other contemporary scholars. Replacing the traditionally positive depictions of the Prophet’s life by exceedingly negative images, he also marks himself off as a vigorously Catholic Orientalist, severely criticising Islam and its protagonists. Indeed, he not only targets historical Islam. Throughout his career, he publishes polemical articles on the politico-religious situation of contemporary Islam".

• A peer-reviewed academic article providing modern scholarly criticism of Lammens hostile and polemical views.

https://agj.uobasrah.edu.iq/index.php/agj/article/view/354/312

"The study of the Prophetic biography (Seerah) and its branches has occupied a significant space in the research interests of Orientalists, as they have approached Islamic topics with a mixture of curiosity and skepticism. However, their studies have varied in fairness some were objective, relying on authentic and credible sources while adhering to sound academic methodology. Others, however, were biased and hostile, basing their research on weak and fabricated sources and employing flawed methodologies.Among the Orientalists who exhibited hostility and a lack of impartiality was Henri Lammens, who harbored deep animosity toward Islam in general and the Prophet Muhammad and his household (peace be upon them) in particular. This is evident in his book Fatima and the Daughters of Muhammad, the subject of this study, in which he sought to malign the Prophet and his family in every possible way".

Can we please discuss. ~2025-31931-59 (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Take it to the article talk-page (I don't even know what article you are talking about, but this is a name with which I am not familiar). That will help attract the attention of other interested and knowlegeable editors as well. DMacks (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Premethylenomycin C lactone

On 24 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Premethylenomycin C lactone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that researchers accidentally discovered a new antibiotic in soil bacteria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Premethylenomycin C lactone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Premethylenomycin C lactone), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

  Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-48

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-49

MediaWiki message delivery 18:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

What Compels You?

Hello DMacks, this is ~2025-38896-51. I understand why you removed my edit on the page for Calico, as it was an obviously political statement. But it was also obviously true. Calico is just one of many large corporate biotech companies funded by billionaires and with the obvious goal of extending the lives of the wealthy. If they were interested in improving the health and extending the lifespan of the majority of people, we do not yet even need to come up with newfangled technology, as the causes of illness and premature death for most are well understood issues with extant solutions prevented by global political and economic structures. So what drove you to depoliticize the article in such a manner that covers the obvious intent of this research. What is your interest in presenting this information in inaccurate neutral terminology?

""Num conscientia daemonica corporata in carne intra cranium tuum an in crumena tua habitat?"

- 38896-51

WP:NPOV and WP:V are policies that require all statements, and especially opinions or analyses, to be supported by citing a reliable source. DMacks (talk) 00:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you!

You're right that that use of "light-water" was a compound adjective, and should indeed be hyphenated. I came back just a few minutes later to fix my mistake, and you had already reverted it! Wikipedia is incredible. ~2025-32080-25 (talk) 01:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Cheers! Welcome aboard. DMacks (talk) 02:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-50

MediaWiki message delivery 17:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Harold Foppele (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Block evading IP

96.33.107.226 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) is probably a block evading IP of User:Jiwood23… look at contribs - WP:ENGVAR trolling - Uw-ipevadeblock for 6 months - it should look like this:

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
or to remove tpa use  
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

. Thanks. ~2025-38650-35 (talk) 23:59, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Obviously is. But no activity on that IP since April, so I don't see a reason to block that one now. DMacks (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
@DMacks, this user has been going around trolling admins (here and on meta) to do nonsense things like this for them. They're also socking: the reports I've investigated have turned out to be one user making disruptive edits, logging out and generating a new TA, then reporting their own disruptive editing. I have blocked them as well as I can but please feel free to ping me or another checkuser if you get more requests like this. Cheers. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. That was good-hand/bad-hand troll was not one of the abusers with which I was familiar. DMacks (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you Harold Foppele (talk) 13:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

References

Allow a question please: Do you have access to ref sources? I have an article with 64 refs and I cannot access some of them. Do you or anyone you know have access? Also, am I allowed to use a figure out of a publkic paper inside an article with source quotation ? Thanks Harold Foppele (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I can usually get access to materials from a university research library near me. But they do not have everything...hard to predict without seeing the specific journal reference. Copying diagrams or other images from a published source depends on the source. Copyright law is very complicated. DMacks (talk) 06:19, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

I found Perlego.com if you need to look up references :) Harold Foppele (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

That's an interesting resource I had not heard of before. DMacks (talk) 06:19, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
I have a subscription now, so if you need any refs, ping or email me, Cheers Harold Foppele (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! DMacks (talk) 13:10, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

About my speedy deletion nomination

Okay, I haven't realized that I nominated a user talk page earlier today (Eastern Standard Time) until now. I was too busy notice my mistake. This is the second unintentional time this month. I own up to it. I never saw the page say User Talk, thus my mistake. Felicia (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

No worries:) DMacks (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Draft for Maria Dorota Czajkowska-Majewska

Sorry about the missing BLP references, my fault. I have added three of them. One is a reference about the author (M.D. Czajkowska-Majewska) from the Archive of the Science of Poland, with information about her education (Early life and education section). The second one is  the author’s CV from the webpage of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland (Academic career section). The last one is a listing of the author’s popular publications from the website of the National Library of Poland (Science outreach  section). Her research publications can all be found on her included profiles from the open sources: Google Scholar, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions. Thank you! Walerus (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-51

MediaWiki message delivery 19:00, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Will I get banned if I put on my Userpage that I post on Soyjak.party?

Yes or no. I’m not a Nazi. I just browse the Sharty cuz I like their memes. Will I be banned for this? Sammywonbor or whatever the user is called (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea. DMacks (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
This is in response to them being pinged at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Users associated with hugely problematic imageboard Soyjak Party. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:27, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the context. My answer stands. But now I can also direct to read that thread and ask there for clarification as necessary. I am going to decline to speak on behalf of the participants there. DMacks (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
On a personal level, I would suggest you break off your ties with an imageboard full of no-life bigots who dox and troll for fun. Athanelar (talk) 03:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Will I get banned for it doe? Sammywonbor or whatever the user is called (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-52

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bicyclohexyl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conformation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Fluorescence and Photochemistry

Dear Dmack, I noticed you reverted the categories for the Intrinsic DNA Fluorescence article. You mentioned that "photochemistry" is not simply the intersection of "anything chemistry" and "anything involving light." While I understand that distinction, I believe this specific category is highly appropriate here. Fluorescence is a fundamental pillar of photochemistry (as seen in any standard textbook on the subject). Furthermore, DNA fluorescence is a staple topic at international photochemistry conferences, and many of the references cited in the article are from dedicated photochemistry journals. Given that the scientific community treats this as a core part of the discipline, I think the category should be reinstated. Many thanks Serbacc (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I don't see substantive article content to support that there is much "chemical" happening with the photo process, other than that it fluoresces. While it may have applications to chemistry, and obviously fluorescence is widely used in and benefits from chemistry, this article as it stands does not demonstrate that this specific topic does. The closest I see is the lead-section statement "contribute to understanding the very first steps of a complex series of events triggered by UV radiation, ultimately leading to DNA damage.". But that's too weak a connection to my eye (appears to be only using it as a reporter for the chemistry, not actually involved in the chemistry?). DMacks (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello DMacks, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,

Abishe (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Our Rangpur friend

I saw you blocked a prbable LOUTSOCK of the person doing the disruptive page moves at Rangpur. Should this go to SPI if they do it again or would that be WP:QUACKing loud enough to skip that step? TornadoLGS (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

I'd say SPI if it happens again so we can keep a central record (plus more eyes means faster catching in the future). Looking at some deleted histories, I see an article-overlap with a much older sock-pile, but the material they each added seem different enough I think it's unrelated. DMacks (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
I'm a bit surprised the main account wasn't indeffed tbh. Or is it stale since the main account hasn't edited in a bit? TornadoLGS (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

AfD

And this is still happening. Not sure how to address it or if its even worth it. CNMall41 (talk) 04:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year, DMacks!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 10:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Re: Chembox

I used the automatic generator here...didn't know that there would be errors :( Dryrace (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

And as for the "Autoignition" error, I got it from Template:Chembox#Full_form, in the "Section7 = {{Chembox Hazards" part.--Dryrace (talk)
I would not be surprised that a tool last updated over two years ago (and deleted by its author since then) might not know about later changes to the Chembox. But for Autoignition, it's pretty simple to see what's wrong: the documentation actually says the field is "AutoignitionPt" not "Autoignition". DMacks (talk) 08:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Most of the documentation is correct except the "full form" part Template:Chembox#Full form (in "Long parameter list for {{Chembox}}" which I copied from). In this part it says "Autoignition". Dryrace (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Good catch! I updated the doc (which is a mess in many many other ways too:( DMacks (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
No worries! Glad they're fixed :) Dryrace (talk) 02:53, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Removal of contributions

Hello, I woke up to a flurry of emails that you had deleted contributions I made to a number of different pages many years ago, in my areas of interest. These are labelled 'spam' and 'self promotion'. I am not an expert in Wikipedia regulations, but the specific areas I have contributed on (youth crime in the UK/ substance use in Kenya) are under-researched and I had thought my contributions were relevant and would be helpful to others. I'm also a little confused as to why some sections I contributed have been left intact, with just my own references deleted? If the references are out of date as you say, then I would understand you deleting to update, but deleting without replacing seems a shame. I'm a clinician not an academic, so have no real reason to self-promote, but added contributions in good faith thinking they would be helpful. And as you can see I added whole sections, not just my own work. Would appreciate your feedback. JCBoyce85 (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

See WP:REFSPAM. This particular set did not come to my attention until the past few days, having been present for years as you know. I would have removed them back then if I were to have been aware of them at that time. The fact that some is also out-dated, or redundant to other refs, or a ref for something seemingly simple that is discussed elsewhere in an article, is an additional concern. And finally, WP:SECONDARY means original published analysis is generally considered a weak source. DMacks (talk) 04:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-03

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, DMacks. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allotropes of oxygen, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Conformationadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Baking powder

I did some work on Baking powder, I am not a chemist. If you are chemist, could you verify the changes I made? I found errors that I corrected.

Piñanana (talk) 05:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-04

MediaWiki message delivery 20:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI