Wikiwand AI

User talk:DMacks/Archive 71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 65Archive 69Archive 70Archive 71Archive 72Archive 73

Should synthesis be included in the articles of chemical drugs?

Hello, I'm a long-time reader, but yet a new editor of Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed the "Synthesis" section that I recently added on the page of a new drug Gepotidacin. In the version history, you said WP is not a lab manual, and patents are not reliable sources. I don't understand the first point you made. Indeed, too much details on the synthetic procedure is inappropriate, but since pages of a lot of chemicals include their synthetic procedures, and a drug is also intrinsically a chemical, isn't it good to add the synthetic pathway, especially for complex ones like gepotidacin and many other new drugs?

I'm new as an editor, so I'm not familiar with the editing conventions. Please elaborate on clarifying the point you made, thank you.

I currently recovered the Syntheis section, and to meet the RS requirement, a secondary source of a review article was used instead of the patent. If you still find the section inappropriate or undue, you can modify or delete it again, thank you. Sweet Hat 325 (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

I see you've asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry and are already getting good advice there, so I'll leave thoughts there when I get a moment. But the main one was indeed relying on a patent. It took me a while as a new editor to recognize some of the "reliable source" rules such as that one. WP:RS is the key guideline on that topic. DMacks (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

OK

Thanks for the message. I think that you know that I dont really have "disdain" for organic synthesis, but I get your point. I will lay off sparring and get back to business. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-05

MediaWiki message delivery 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

ANI edit question

Would I be correct in assuming that deleting comments about one's own account by others would be a bad thing? Special:Diff/1335988351 Orxenhorf (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

You would be very correct. DMacks (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
I undid it and gave them a warning3 about it. DMacks (talk) 10:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Thanks. I figured that was better off with finding an active administrator. Orxenhorf (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Glad to help. Sorry there's the situation that needed it. DMacks (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-06

MediaWiki message delivery 17:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-07

MediaWiki message delivery 23:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Administrator changes

added Vacant0
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added Daniel Quinlan
readded Vanamonde93
removed Mkdw

Oversight changes

added Daniel Quinlan

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-08

MediaWiki message delivery 19:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi DMacks, I noticed you re-added the Muppet Wiki links on Scooter and Kermit articles. I've been under the impression that the inclusion of the Fandom Wiki on Muppet articles has historically stemmed from outdated guidelines/procedures. Am I missing something or misinterpreting? What purpose does it serve in 2026? Tvfunhouse (talk) 05:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I have no idea if links to the Muppet Fandom site are currently recommended to include or to exclude. But given the {{Muppets}} template currently has about 110 uses, it seems like something that should be decided with a central discussion. Maybe there has been? If so, pointing to it is a great WP:ES. If not, and you think it should be scrapped, feel free to start the discussion. It would also lead to deletion of the template itself (not just removal from articles)...no sense retaining a tool to accomplish a task that should be be accomplished:) DMacks (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Just was curious of your perspective in case you were aware of something I wasn't regarding the template. Thanks. Tvfunhouse (talk) 05:54, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trimethylsilyl acetate, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcohol was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

pyrimidine dimer: move & categories

Dear DMacks,

I made recently an important modification in the article “Pyrimidine dimer”. I added sections on “photochemistry”, “optical properties”, “technological applications” and modified the introduction accordingly. I also wanted to slightly modify the title to “Pyrimidine dimers” because there are many different classes of such dimers, corresponding to at least 40 different chemical compounds. But when tried “move” I saw that I was not allowed to proceed to this modification. Moreover, I tried to change the categories to , , , , and . But it seems that in this article there are hidden categories and I failed to do the change. I would greatly appreciate if you could help me with these two issues. Thank you in advance Sincerely, Serbacc (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

pyrimidine dimer:categories

Dear DMacks, As the "categories disappeared in my previous message, I send them again: Nucleic acids, Photochemistry, Mutation, Melanoma, Smart materials. Thank you Serbacc (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-10

MediaWiki message delivery 17:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Healthcare in Netherlands

Thanks for reverting that addition - moments before I hit the submit button on my reversion, lol. I also suggested WP:AITELLS in my edit summary. Have reverted several of their other contributions. Brand-new editor with picture perfect additions that take liberties with the provided sources. Sigh. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:05, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah. The asymmetry of effort is one of the most annoying aspects. DMacks (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

...rolls

T...

 ;-)

MinorProphet (talk) 06:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-11

MediaWiki message delivery 18:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

O-Nitroanisole

Hey, I dont know for sure...--Smokefoot (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Me neither. DMacks (talk) 06:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

MegaCon

If youre removing locations, many other convention pages have that too like New York Comic Con and San Diego Comic Con. The page has been tabled like this for almost 10 years as I add to it info about past shows. Most of the building locations you removed have sources but some dont and I can get to fixing that. As for last section, I agree it could be improved to read less like a guide and more like an overview in retrospect. Its seperated for ease of navigation and comic/VA guests hidden to prevent over need of scrolling. ShadowDragon343 (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-12

MediaWiki message delivery 19:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Marching band

The cited refs I added mention each school’s *band* (not just the school) as per guidelines. What did I do wrong? Country&Rockabilly54 (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

The ref in that paragraph that relates to high-school bands is . Can you help me find where in that page it mentions any of those specific Texas schools? Depending on what it says, that might not be my only objection (I also noted cherry-picking). But without WP:V, there's no need to make any further editorial judgement DMacks (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
the bands are mentioned in the sources I added. I made sure not to cherry-pick, the only schools I added were schools who had won the state championship the most amount of times in their conference. Country&Rockabilly54 (talk) 02:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
What ref is that? There was no ref in proximity to the content I removed that supported the content, so perhaps you did not add it in a useful place, or it got lost among other edits? DMacks (talk) 07:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
That’s actually my bad, I forgot to add another of my refs. Although the ones I did add did in fact support the content. If you would like I could add it back for now until we can figure something out. Country&Rockabilly54 (talk) 12:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Overlinking and Underlinking

I'm still new to Wikipedia and need help with what over-linking and under-linking is in terms of how some terms are contextually related. Could you please explain what constitutes to a good link and bad link? SuperWikiaBros (talk) 02:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-13

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

A mistake

Hello

Please you gived me a notice on my talk page, about the German National People's Party, i did not do anything there it was just a bare URL, i had no dispute with anything at all, i did not even change anything at all, i think there was a big mistake here. Issamia (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for being such great admins for this site! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:40, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

"Typo" IP editor

Hi DMacks. You blocked ~2026-59998-8 (talk · contribs · IP contribs · WHOIS) yesterday. It seems they have returned at ~2026-11419-9 (talk · contribs · IP contribs · WHOIS). Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Blocked. Thanks for the heads-up. I can't remember if this is a known LTA or just some new disruptor (doesn't really matter though). Let me know if we need more. There isn't just one IP that can be blocked for them, but there might be other tools that could be useful. DMacks (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Will do! Robby.is.on (talk) 13:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-14

MediaWiki message delivery 19:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prismanes, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimer was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Question

What made my actions a cut-and-paste move rather than a merger? I am not very experienced with this part of Wikipedia so I am asking this out of good faith. Also, if someone wants to change the location of content on a page, isn't the WP:BURDEN on them to start a requested move discussion? Thanks. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 04:39, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

The first actions I saw appeared to be simply copying one whole article to a different page-name that had been a redirect. The right way to do that is with the WP:PAGEMOVE function. As I looked more closely, I also saw merging happening, which I object to for other reasons as well. I could not easily see whether it looked more like "A+B copied to C" or "A copied to C with a bit of B added". The page-move process would help clarify the nature of the changes, independently of the actual locaation of the page itself. So I undid the whole set, pending a discussion on how to handle it. BURDEN is a good standard (it is similar to WP:BRD): anyone is welcome to propose bold changes and even to act on them on their own in many cases, up until someone objects, and then it's time to go back to ho things were. DMacks (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification, I see that I merged unrelated things as well. I will not do that in the future. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 04:48, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for re-checking and starting a discussion. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks