User talk:Darth Stabro/Archive 9

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Darth Stabro, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Pbritti (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Darth Stabro, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

Thank you for coming to my talk! - Laughter for Christmas: enjoy the season! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points. The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026. The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive. Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants. Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points. Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

On 31 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Casey (baseball announcer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is "noooooooooooooo smoking" in the Metrodome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Casey (baseball announcer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bob Casey (baseball announcer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,888 views (787.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 15:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi you keep reporting me how do I add a source to show evidence? Thanks Trainspotting2025 (talk) 17:35, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

@Trainspotting2025: Please take a look at WP:BLP and WP:RS. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 17:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Trainspotting2025 (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I attempted to undo your counting of Super Bowl champions because it is irrelevant. There are 3 eras of the NFL: The NFL standings era from 1920-1932, the NFL championship game era from 1933-1965 and the Super Bowl era from 1966-present. All of the championships in these eras count the same according to the NFL Office in New York. It’s overall championships that matter, not just Super Bowl championships. Therefore, your counting of Super Bowl titles in addition to overall championships is a moot point as Super Bowl championships count no more than previous championships. And it confuses people who may think that Super Bowl championships count more than previous championships which they do not. ~2025-37989-06 (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

@~2025-37989-06: I have no opinion on the matter, but such a change should be discussed on the talk page before making it unilaterally. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 02:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

false positive in Perambra, added back what is removed citing not sourced. Added deleted content as it it backed by majorily from author koliyot madhavan's chayam pooshiya ormakal , which is kept at kerala state official library and can see the catalog with ISBN number onlone. Upon request you can read online. Other sources are also mentioned including authobiography of mohammed permbra, a well know drama artist in kerala, supported with other sources. X892 (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

You have deleted awards section, concert tour information, discography etc. We understand that u need citations.

What we should do about concerts and albums recorded in the 90's when no online magazines and portals existed ? We have only a scanned materials from old magazined and newspapers. How to use them ? We have video from YouTube as a proof for many concerts, How to use them ?

We have the awards (physical) but they are not (all of them) memorized online on some portals. What should we do about those awards sir ? We are wiping out 50% od someones career if we can proove tha actual facts that really happened. IS this Encyclopedia for truth or for citations from online portals and news papers ? Thank you for your help in advance. Can you imagine if some artist instad of touring he is collecting magazines by himself? David Garryson (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop constantly replying and then deleting your comments. It is far too confusing to keep track of. Please read Help:Introduction and Help:Getting started to get introduced to Wikipedia, its culture, and how to edit. Read WP:MOSBIO to learn the style that biographies are written in, and especially WP:BLPSOURCES to learn about appropriate sources for biographies of living persons. Once you have comprehensively read and understood those documents, you can take any question you might have to WP:TEAHOUSE. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 21:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

300 years ago, a Bach cantata was born: happy new year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Inviting you to check out "my" story (fun listen today, full of surprises), music (and memory), and places (pictured by me: the latest uploads) any day! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I see that you're also a Roman Catholic. The fact stands that the more correct and full and thorough and accurate term is "Roman Catholic" not just the word "Catholic" alone because that is actually a general term that does NOT NECESSARILY mean just Roman Catholicism under the Vatican pope.

And there is a consensus for that too.

And I find it amazing how Roman Catholics have a problem (for whatever reason) with the term "Roman Catholic", when that's the official term that they themselves use in their writings and in their own church buildings. Non-Catholics did not invent the phrase.

The point is that the term "Catholic Church" is actually broad and is NOT NECESSARILY always explicitly specifically the ROMAN or LATIN catholic. And the section in the Mass article is dealing specifically with Roman Catholicism. Not necessarily "Catholicism" in general. Not sure what the problem is in having the word "Roman" in there, as that's not a pejorative, and it is a term they officially use themselves, and it is way more clear and it is correct.

But there's been this trend for years now where Roman Catholics many times shy away from the word "Roman" with the term "Catholic", and just want to have it as "Catholicism". Which to be honest is a bit misleading. The question is why is this the attitude of many Roman Catholics lately exactly with this matter?

I live a few blocks away from Most Precious Blood Roman Catholic Church and that's the phrasing that they use themselves on the church building. I also live a few blocks away from Saint Joseph's Roman Catholic Church with those very words put in by Roman Catholics themselves on the building. Should they remove that word from the sign? What is the problem specifically? Where even on Wikipedia, Roman Catholic editors and contributors want to suppress that word many times in articles and in article sections. Frankly, its aggravating and even bewildering. Just being honest.

And number two, it's against Wikipedia policy to revert and disrespect a good faith accurate edit or modification like you did. Especially for "I don't like" reasons. Breaking "I don't like" and of "No Own". So you just violated that. Please don't break 3R by the way. Thank you.~2025-42500-71 (talk) 03:46, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

If you'd read Roman Catholic (term) you'd see that you're misinformed. Cheers. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 04:14, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Yeah and who puts together these articles and sections regarding things like this? The biased ones with issues such as this, who already have the attitude and uptight hang-up about these types of things. Contributors such as you, frankly. When it comes to wordings that you may not personally like because of emotional and personal bias. So it becomes A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT. And a wrap-around narrative. With an article like that. So it's a joke. You didn't address anything specific of what I wrote in my comment previous.

But even in that article it didn't say that the word shouldn't be used. It said it's well established. That's specific phrasing "Roman Catholic". To differentiate and make more clear. Even the article that you referred to. You didn't address anything specific of what I wrote in my comment previous.

Again....

There's been this trend for years now where Roman Catholics many times shy away from the word "Roman" with the term "Catholic", and just want to have it as "Catholicism". Which to be honest is a bit misleading. The question is why is this the attitude of many Roman Catholics lately exactly with this matter?

I live a few blocks away from Most Precious Blood Roman Catholic Church and that's the phrasing that they use themselves on the church building. I also live a few blocks away from Saint Joseph's Roman Catholic Church with those very words put in by Roman Catholics themselves on the building. Should they remove that word from the sign?

What is the problem specifically? Where even on Wikipedia, Roman Catholic editors and contributors want to suppress that word many times in articles and in article sections. Frankly, its aggravating and even bewildering. Just being honest.

And also it's against Wikipedia policy to revert and disrespect a good faith accurate edit or modification like you did. Especially for "I don't like" reasons. Breaking "I don't like" and of "No Own". So you just violated that. Please don't break 3R by the way. Regards. ~2025-42500-71 (talk) 04:24, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

If you have a problem with the consensus that has been established for years, go make an RfC at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Christianity or Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style rather than complaining on the talk pages of individual editors who are following the accepted practice. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 04:29, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

That's not the only consensus regarding this though. Even in that article that you referred to, it didn't say that the phrasing "Roman Catholic" shouldn't be used. The article said the phrasing "Roman Catholic" is WELL-ESTABLISHED. That specific wording "Roman Catholic Church" etc. To differentiate and make more clear. Even the article that you gave. Nowhere does it say that it should be suppressed like you're doing. I looked through it a few minutes ago. It says clearly in the article that that phrasing is valid, and actually more accurate.

And there's other consensus, FOR the phrasing. Which you're ignoring.

The Most Precious Blood Roman Catholic Church is a few blocks from me. Tell them to remove the word "Roman" from the building, if that's the case. It's there. But it's amazing. Roman Catholics historically love to censor things, that they don't like. And you guys here are a good example of that. Cheers. ~2025-42500-71 (talk) 04:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Darth Stabro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pierre Tremblay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the
	ONLINE Minnesota Wikipedia User Group Meeting Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2026 Time: 7 to 8:30 PM (CT) Meet and converse online with your fellow Wikipedians from across the state of Minnesota. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome.	Stay home, stay warm, attend online.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations anymore, please remove your username from our invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

On 9 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Chaplain Corps Medal of Honor recipients, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that all five chaplains awarded the Medal of Honor since the American Civil War were Catholic priests? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Chaplain Corps Medal of Honor recipients. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, List of Chaplain Corps Medal of Honor recipients), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Bob Casey at the Metrodome.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL 💬 ⬆ 00:21, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

On 17 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Association of Priest Pilots, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Flying Padres use aviation to spread the teaching of Jesus Christ? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Association of Priest Pilots. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, National Association of Priest Pilots), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Great topic and hook. CMD (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations, Darth Stabro! The list you nominated, List of Chaplain Corps Medal of Honor recipients, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Congrats, Darth Stabro! Excellent work. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fat pope, thin pope is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:32, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Awake (organization) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

On 15 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eric Slover, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eric Slover's wife blessed his dog tags with holy water before Operation Absolute Resolve? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eric Slover. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eric Slover), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Temple of ECK at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the
Art & Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at Macalester College Library
	Date: Saturday, March 28, 2026
	Time: 11 am to 3 pm Location: DeWitt Wallace Library, Macalester College, 110 S Macalester Street, St. Paul, MN
	Celebrate Women's History Month at the Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon! Macalester College Library will be hosting and all are encouraged to attend. Join this global campaign to connect, have fun, and help improve Wikipedia’s coverage of women, art, and feminism.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our invitation list. Thanks.

Myotus (talk) 02:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fat pope, thin pope has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Darth, thank you for picking up the GA review for Ecclesiastical trial of Stewart Ruch. Do you have additional feedback on the article? I'm not in a hurry but I am fully back from wikibreak now so have time if there are improvements you'd like to see. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971: my apologies. I'd hoped to get to it sooner but Lent and Easter got very busy; I should have a bit of free time next week to do some source spot-checking and finish up the review. I don't anticipate any issues. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 18:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

On 10 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Awake (organization), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Awake hosts conversations for survivors of sexual abuse by Catholic clerics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Awake (organization). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Awake (organization)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello Darth Stabro,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to the

IN-PERSON Minnesota Wikipedia User Group Meeting Date: Sunday, May 24, 2026 @ 1 to 3:30 PM (CT) Location: Lake Monster Brewing, 550 Vandalia Street #160, Saint Paul, Minnesota Meet, converse, and have a refreshing beverage with fellow Wikipedia editors and enthusiasts. All guests are welcome. If you don't wish to receive these invitations anymore, please remove your username from our invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

On 21 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Temple of ECK, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that hundreds of residents of Chanhassen, Minnesota, opposed the construction of the Temple of ECK? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Temple of ECK. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Temple of ECK), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 26,608 views (1,108.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Darth Stabro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roman Rite between 1964 and 1969, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Rosalind Gefre is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Few days ago, I submitted an edit request on the talk page here concerning the article Spain. As can be seen, the request was accepted and the edit was implemented.

However, the user Inherli has since reverted the change, which gives the impression that he is treating the content as if it were subject to his ownership. Could you please help ensure that my approved edit request is respected?

Thank you. ~2026-30882-97 (talk) 16:54, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

I would advise you continue the conversation on Talk:Spain. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 16:59, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Kris Lindahl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Apologies Father, but I passed the article without considering my earlier comment about the language issue. If you could please take a second to adjudicate the issue, I would appreciate having that either clarified or reworded somehow. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Rosalind Gefre has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:25, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article David Bawden is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dizzycheekchewer -- Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article David Bawden has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dizzycheekchewer -- Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

In the area? You're invited to the Minnesota User Group Wiknic July 2026
	Saturday July 18, 2026 the Wikimedians of Minnesota User Group is having a Wiknic at the Minnesota State Capitol! We will be picnicing in the shade near the Minnesota Woman Suffrage Memorial, so bring a picnic blanket, lawn chairs and a hot dish for the picnic if you like! We'll also be providing sandwiches for everyone but we encourage you to bring your own favorite dishes to share. All Minnesota Wikipedia editors and wanna-be editors are welcome! Learn more » When: Saturday, July 18, 2026 Time: 10 to 1:30 pm Place: Minnesota State Capitol Mall, St. Paul, MN
If you don't wish to receive these invitations anymore, please remove your username from our invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Darth Stabro. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Chaplain Corps Medal of Honor recipients – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 3. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:46, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

On 21 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kris Lindahl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kris Lindahl's billboards have been reacted to with anger, annoyance, and fandom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kris Lindahl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kris Lindahl), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2026 (UTC)