User talk:Dean Dudeist Priest

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, René Lévesque. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:31, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Didn't think I was "discussing" ...but rather correcting a section that sounds like Fandom and NOT a dictionary, and I added a fact with citations, though not likely totally correctly, but will return* to fix the two citations for the one quote/fact. The top of page notes lack of citations for the horribly politicized page, seemingly written by his political party; literally calling for citations.

If people come to engage in a discussion with my fact posted, they should be told not to discuss ...but that page needs improvement, citations, and definitely de-politicization.

Perhaps my note explaining why I added a "Controversy" completey and oddly absent from the page, inexplicably for a politician, especially a politician so often acvised and written about as being a separatist and racist. Without my note, the page gives the impression the politician was noble and without fault.

• limited time on computer due to disabilities, cancers, heart disease, open heart surgery, broke neck/back, etc...

~2025-35000-62 (talk) 02:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)