User talk:Doniago/Archive 118

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you recently closed my request for a third opinion on the grounds that it was a conduct and not a content dispute. Can your explain your reasoning further? I think there might be some confusion here as framing the dispute that way was what appeared to be a part of the other user's attempt to short-circuit the dispute resolution process. Nghtcmdr (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Given there was and is at least one(!) open ANI filing involving the both of you, I think it's clear that the issues currently go beyond anything that's going to be resolved with a third opinion. I think you should let the ANI filing proceed to resolution and then re-file if needed. As-is, it looks to me like one or both of you is looking at potentially being blocked for disruptive behavior, which will likely moot the dispute. DonIago (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi again, I’ve been doing a lot of vandalism patrolling recently and made a mistake in interpreting your edit to Wikipedia:Third opinion. I now realize your edit was not vandalism, and I appreciate your patience. I’m still learning, and I’ll be more careful moving forwardSweetabena (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

NP! I figured you'd probably acted in error and appreciate your efforts to be more diligent in the future! DonIago (talk) 17:27, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:No legal threats on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 17:31, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Creep (Radiohead song) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 05:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

I added a merge tag as the List of Daria characters page is all over the place as there is main and supporting characters to the show that is found on the main article. Shouldn't this page be only related to the characters? Since this is a huge removal of information I would like to check before proceeding. 172.56.179.160 (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

I don't have a strong opinion on whether the list should be merged myself, but I think proposing the merger was a much better way to proceed than simply trying to force it, as other editors were doing recently Thank you for initiating the discussion. DonIago (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Summarize Timeline Fact Check

Hi its not possible to edit the page Astrological sign. So I come to you as you reply in the talk section. I have no account so I write to you here. I’m French speaking, and I modified the dates of the astrological signs taking in count the extreme possibilities, from someone born in Los Angeles in 2096 to someone born in Australia in 1903. For example if you will be born the 21 July 2096 in L.A. then you will be already Leo, but if you were born in Sydney in 1903 on the 24th of July then you were still Cancer. Thats why the dates are variable. I suggest you change them in the page "astrological sign" looking at the French page "signe du zodiaque" (by removing "approximate dates"… it is more precise like this !

https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signe_du_zodiaque#

Look the tab in section "constellations", you will find the REAL dates limits with all possibilities. Under column "dates tropicales calendrier grégorien".

There’s no reference as I did that myself from the charts editor of astro.com ! But those dates include ALL POSSIBILITIES from whatever year and wherever place in the world !

No book ever has made that ! But trust me ! It is really well done. The year when the astrological signs start earlier is 2096. And the year when they starts the latest is 1903. And the place on earth where it starts earlier is Los Angeles and the place where it starts the latest is Sydney. For example take that the sign of Virgo starts on a certain year the 23rd of august at 8pm time of England. If someone was born at 9pm (England time) that day, he would be born Virgo. But if he was born in Sydney at that time, in Sidney it would be already the 24th of August (7am). So if you were born à 23rd of September in Sydney that year you wouldn’t be able to be a Virgo. Thats why the sign Virgo starts later in Sydney (24 august) than Europe or Los Angeles, where Virgo starts earlier, the 23rd of august already !

As for the years the bissextile years the sign starts earlier. And between all bissextile years, the one when the sign starts the earliest is the one that is the last bissextile year before a new century that comes after a century multiple of 400 years. The last new century multiple of 400 was the year 2000. So the next new century is 2100. And the last bissextile years before 2100 is 2096.

the same with the year when the signs start the latest : it must be a year before a bissextile year. And it must be a year before the bissextile year that follows the last new century before à century multiple of 400. So it is the new century 1900. And the first year before à bissextile year this century was 1903.

So you see, I’m an expert. you can trust me. Put me as reference if you want… i am Fidel Astro !

you just can do as the French page : no référence. Just a note explaining.

I think the English version deserves to have the same precise dates ! Many people don’t know about the dates limits and it’s important to show them ! Like this they would understand that even if they are not on a frontier date (for example the 22nd of July) it doesn’t mean that if they were born on the 23rd of July then they were for sure a Leo. Maybe even the 23rd they were still a Cancer ! Even their grand-parent born 1903 in Sydney on a 24 July could still be a Cancer !

so its important to show that the dates are not only approximately uncertain around +/- 1 day, but more !

Some people born Feb 17 are already Pisces ! And others born Feb 20 are still Aquarius !

So the people born on those 4 days (!! It’s not only 1 or 2 !! It’s 4 !!!) : Feb 17-18-19-20, don’t really know what’s their sign !!!

so please find a way to modify those dates !

thank you ! 83.137.6.188 (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm not comfortable making this kind of edit on my own initiative. Please submit a WP:Edit request at the article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 01:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:30, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

It stands to reason that the fourth film in a series that features a great white shark attacking people which includes one of the actresses from the original would also be classed the same as the others even if not explicitly cited.

It is also listed under "American natural horror films" category on here. ClarkF1 (talk) 13:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Is the categorization supported by the article's verifiable content? If not, then either such content needs to be added to the article or the category needs to be removed.

Also, while that does stand to reason, sequels to films aren't necessarily of the same genre(s) as the films that preceded them, which is why we require sources for the film.

Hope this is helpful! DonIago (talk) 13:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Bangladesh on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 01:18, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello! You removed my edit in the article "Gay". I added the mention of Serbo-Croatian term gej, derived from the English word and used in the Balkans. Can this be a source? :) Thank you! – Miha (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Miha, thanks for reaching out to me! Unfortunately, that's from wiktionary, and wikis are not reliable sources just as Wikipedia itself isn't inherently a reliable source, because anyone can edit them. That said, if the information at wikitionary has a citation of its own, you might be able to use that. Hope this is helpful; please let me know if you have additional concerns! DonIago (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

I read the Wikipedia:Short Description and I don't see what is wrong with my short description. The previous short description was "1988 aircraft accident in the United States." You keep reverting my edits over and again on that article. I hope to get more clarity on this. Zaptain United (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

As I said in the note I left for you and probably in my edit summaries, your short description is a clear violation of WP:SD40, which stipulates that short descriptions should not exceed 40 characters. DonIago (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

How about "1988 aircraft accident in United States" as a short description? It is exactly 40 characters long. Zaptain United (talk) 21:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

I think you'd be best off looking at articles for similar accidents and adopting a similar format, or asking at an associated WikiProject (you can find them by looking at the top of the Talk page for the article). DonIago (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)