User talk:Dravecky/Archive 12

On February 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Human Target (1992 TV series), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't believe there wasn't already an article. Could you give me a hand on this one? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing. I've given it a strong once-over, fixed some spelling and other errors, done a bit of formatting, expanded the refs past bare URLs, and converted them to the now-preferred list format. I'll try to give it more time later today or tomorrow. - Dravecky (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Because of word that the new league formerly called "Arena Football 1" has decided to take on the new Arena Football League moniker, I thought it would be a good time to revive Wikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football League. The team I adopt for this project is the Milwaukee Iron (my home team), and I am leaving this message on your talk page to (hopefully) get you back interested. I notice that you frequently edit the Dallas Vigilantes page, but being from Huntsville, Alabama, might also have a bit of Alabama Vipers fandom in you, so if you're interested, pleae sign up on the members list and we'll get things going. Rejoice, for ARENA FOOTBALL IS BACK! Tom Danson (talk) 18:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

First of all, good job with the references at 2010 University of Alabama in Huntsville shooting. Originally, I was formatting references with more than one author as you have—with the name of the first author listed as author and subsequent authors as co-authors—however, I began to enter the names of all of the authors in as co-authors, unless there was an indication that one was a primary author assisted by others. What do you think of this format?--Supertouch (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

As long as it's applied consistently, I'm mostly neutral on the subject. Obviously I prefer the format I applied but it's not a particularly strong preference, especially in the scenario you present. - Dravecky (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Here I was all set to drop by to let you know that this update was in the works, and you'd already discovered it was complete before I had! Mlaffs (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)