User talk:Gen. Quon/Archive 2

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

New Guys is now a good article :D Congrats!! NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

So what's next for you now that The Truth has passed its FAC? Deadalive? Bruce Campbell (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) What about "all things"? There's a huge collection of articles to choose from now, just indicating all the hard and great work has been put in by you, and other X-Files WikiProject members. Well done! Also, has any of your FAs ever appeared on the main page as "Today's featured article". You can nominate at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. TBrandley 02:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

My only fear is that we don't turn into those road people. :( Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Wonder if they'd want to collaborate on "Drive". That was awful of me. So awful. GRAPPLE X 03:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Good dark humor is always welcome. :P I think either "all things" or "The Sixth Extinction II". The latter is probably the closest, as "all things" and "Deadalive" both need peer reviews.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mrstheoffice.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TBrandley 23:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

If you'd like/or request the image to be deleted, you should add {{db-author}} to the image. TBrandley 00:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I have responded to your issues. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

I've responded again. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 23:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking what I added from that Spin article and getting the rest of the article into shape. Should be an easy GA now. --MASEM (t) 02:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

I have absolutely no problem with you taking that initiative (WP:OWN and all that) Music articles aren't my normal focus so that helps, but I do keep watch on most of the WAY bits. --MASEM (t) 03:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Responded. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Responded once again. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 04:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you familiar with personality rights tags? I can't say I am. Bruce Campbell (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

You are truly too amazing. I have withdrawn the nomination, however not because I quit, but for more strategic reasons. That way it can be re-nominated quicker, and a peer review can be applied in the mean-time. The goons will have picked it apart to death by then. So close... yet so far. lmao Bruce Campbell (talk) 00:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I hate bothering you - for the 80 billionth time - but it's been 2 weeks, so I'm gonna nominate this sucker again either today or tomorrow. I think it's much better this time around. Meanwhile, this passed its GA, lmao. Bruce Campbell (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Responded to both reviews. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the reviews. Really apriciate it. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:The Carpet/GA1.
Message added 23:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TBrandley 23:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

The Stag Convergence, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 10:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Can't get a direct link, but scroll down to the comments section on this and collapse the first seven threads. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

It's probably weird when something you read shows up on Wikipedia, kind of like when I see the stuff I've done referenced somewhere else. Anyway, have you seen this? There's a new one every Friday; they're very entertaining. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

On a slightly unrelated note; I've been re-watching the series and just finished season 3. I realized that the season was only one article away from a GA topic (the main article) which I worked on a bit. It's now a GAN, and I used the other season articles as a reference. Since I'm now going through season 4, I've been working on the non-GA episodes, and I'll get to more of them as I continue watching. Just telling you since you've only worked on a billion episode articles. Bruce Campbell (talk) 01:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Like I don't get it. Does no one like season 4 or something? lol Bruce Campbell (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I watched the entire series regularly as a kid. I'm just retwatching it again. I'll comment on the A-class articles in a bit (ie. before your next FA nominations, for sure). There's just so many articles with potential. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

I'll be firing "Ice" through the ACR soon so I'll get to any reviews I haven't already commented on while I'm doing that. I just noticed yesterday that at WP:GA/Theatre, film and drama only The Simpsons is represented by more GAs than we are, and they have 24 seasons to work with, not the 13 that we do; and even at that, only 11 of those seasons have actually been worked on as nothing's been done for Millennium season 3 or The Long Gunmen season 1 (though we could, maybe, open the project up in future years to cover other related shows like Harsh Realm or Space: Above and Beyond, maybe. Who knows). GRAPPLE X 22:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

The last AV Club article mentioned that it wants to review The Lone Gunmen series, so we can probably start on that eventually. Maybe not all of them, but some, at least.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

While you'll never beat The Simpsons people, wont X-Files be the first show ever on here to have all of its episodes at GA level? So take that Groening. Plus Carter is supposedly working on another series, though that could get dropped again... Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I think you're right. We only have, what, three episodes, a movie, and one season left till the bulk of this is done, right (sans characters).--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

FYI: This came out today. I should warn you that it might not make you happy. Glimmer721 ^talk 00:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files (season 3) passed its GAN and I think the season is now ready for Good topic consideration? Each of the individual episode articles are all still in find condition I believe. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions! I got a section in mind that I like to work on, but if there's any problem, please let me know. I'm open to suggestions, any corrections and/or additional info if there are any. Again, thanks.207.237.167.6 (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Right now, in mind, Role in Adventure Time, Relationships, and External links... I would like to fix and add a couple of things that are related to the character in the respective section. Please, feel free to add any reliable sources that will benefit this page. I too hope this will be the 1st Adventure Time GA and thanks again for your contributions. 207.237.167.6 (talk) 19:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

It seem like Marceline will be soon become the 1st Adventure Time GA. I was think about Occupation which stated "Next in line to rule the Nightosphere" I think of change it to "Princess of the Nightoshpere" which Marceline father is lord of the Nightosphere. Can you give me your output of this statement. Also if you have any question about Marceline, I can help. I'm review, fixing and add a couple of things that are related to the character in the respective section. Again thanks for your contributions.207.237.167.6 (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

I like it, it is much better than what was originally stated on the page. I also found something in the episode "Memory of Memory", where Finn attempts to stop Marceline's father from eating Marceline's french fries, Marceline's dad mumbled "Princess" while eatting the fries. Maybe, you can help me put this in a connecting bridge for the section if neccesary. Again, thank you so much for your contributions and if you have any question about anything for me, please feel free to ask. 207.237.167.6 (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

After I read the Talk:Marceline the Vampire Queen/GA1 and I think the Relationships section should use some changing up. I think I will start adding some addition info like some of Marceline's view points and some general ideas in the Relationship section soon. 207.237.167.6 (talk) 18:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Gen. Quon, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Done - I made some major changes to the reviews section; I changed several quotes because they didn't tell me much about the episode, and I found more interesting quotes from sources and used those instead. Details are in the edit summary and diffs. I also think that the sentence, "Shearman and Pearson rated the episode five stars out of five, and called it, "as [a] delightful ... comic fable"." adds nothing to the article - its too short, over-elided and ungrammatically phrased. It looks like elements of the source text have been added piecemeal. I apologise if I'm wrong but I've seen this done before and I cannot check that source because I don't own a copy. Anyway it's up to you. Please feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit; good luck with your planned FA nomination. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:The Field Where I Died/GA1.
Message added 18:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TBrandley 18:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that I reviewed your nomination of Marceline the Vampire Queen as a good article, It is on hold until Nov. 11 afternoon CST to fix the issues addressed in the review, you can read my remarks here Talk:Marceline the Vampire Queen/GA1 Dmartin969 (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Just as a heads-up, I'll be reviewing the article for GA. I'd be cool to see another dc Talk song with a chance of becoming a GA, especially the one mainstream hit they had. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Aside from a few issues, I'm ready to pass it. You can find the comments on the page. Toa Nidhiki05 21:56, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Alright, passed! Great work on the article. Toa Nidhiki05 20:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I was working on Synchrony (The X-Files) but almost immediately came up with an issue... virtually the entirety of the productions section is attributed to I Want to Believe: The Official Guide to the X-Files, but the page number wasn't referenced, so there really isn't anything I could do since it's not online. I presume you have the book? Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, dang. I have the book. If you give me a few days, I'll add those numbers in there.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh thank you! I think the whole thing is just from 1-2 pages. Btw, the Terms of Endearment FAC passed and I wanted to know if you mind if I worked on your "Home" for my second attempt? Bruce Campbell (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

It was me who put that - though the version I used is in Portuguese, was afraid the page could be wrong. Anyway, added that (Quon can correct me if it's wrong), plus expanded the AV Club description. Can you add stuff from the other books or send me? igordebraga ≠ 04:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'll continue with the GA process then and finish off the article. Bruce Campbell (talk) 04:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

The Sixth Extinction II is pretty close to passing its FAC, probably only need an image review at this point. Do you have something lined up after it? Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

I think Deadalive is in better condition, it's a bit more of the livelier article (though somebody just tagged it with a [disambiguation needed] lmao). Grapple X brought up a good point in the project talkpage about having an endgame, like achieving some kind of Featured Topic. Is there some sort of pattern or process you use when deciding which ones to pick, or is it just preference? Bruce Campbell (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Also "Home" is kinda almost ready and I'm not sure about the condition of "Ice", so I hope they all don't get in the way of each other. (also it's perfectly ok if you just reply to me on your own talk page) Bruce Campbell (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

I think I might just go with "Deadalive", as it will give season 8 (hopefully) an FA, and then we'll have FAs in each article from 4 to 9. That's pretty good. Right now, I'm hoping to get Milagro, The Unnatural, Field Trip, Millennium, X-Cops, all things, Deadalive, and Vienen up to FA. One of these days, I hope to go for gold and also get Two Fathers/One Son, Monday, Tithonus, First Person Shooter, Closure, Hollywood A.D., Requiem, Within, and Existence up to FA. That's a lot to do...--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Not a fan of the earlier seasons? Bruce Campbell (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, I love the earlier seasons, as they remind me of my childhood. However, for some weird reason, 6 and 7 are my favorites (don't ask... even I don't full know). I have mixed feelings about 8 and I hate 9 with a passion. I just feel since the last four don't get much love, I may as well be nice to them. Quite a few of the ones I'm workong on are favorites of mine (Triangle, Unnautral, Millennium, X-Cops, Deadalive, Vienen), but many more I think suck (First Person Shooter, Closure, Existence, anything from season 9). So it's a weird situation with me... I've always meant to work on "Jose Chungs'..." and "Clyde Bruckman's..." but I have just been too lazy. I bet there's a ton of info on them...--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I think basically all 4.5 of the episodes Darin Morgan wrote easily have the potential. He was like a classic episode writing machine. The X-Files seems like the only show that literally has like 70+ episodes of FA potential (maybe next to like, The Simpsons). We need more project members. lol Bruce Campbell (talk) 18:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Also, I found a Cinefantastique article entirely about the writing of "Home". Would you like me to send that to you?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

If it's not too much trouble. Thank you. Bruce Campbell (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Do you think there's any thematic commentary for "The Host", or is it just one of those B-movie episodes? Bruce Campbell (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't know. A quick scan of some of the e-books I used didn't turn up anything. That episode, however, of any of them, seems like a likely FA candidate, though.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)~

I'm amused that you're humble enough to just support the nomination of Home instead of adding yourself as a co-nominator... anyway, can you send some pages regarding the missing fourth season articles (Unrequited (The X-Files) and [[Elegy (The X-Files]) so we can finish off the topic? (and think I'll try improving The Host when I can as well) igordebraga ≠ 23:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I just thought I'd give credit where it's due. Bruce Campbell really went to town on it since I last edited it. I'll try to send those articles ASAP. This week is kind of busy for me, but I will try my best.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh I certainly would have added Quon as the co-nomiator as he was both the GA submitter and top contributor. Personally it really made no difference to me. lol I'm free tomorrow so I'll start working on the season 4 main article if no one else wants to do it. Bruce Campbell (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Is the main article being combed for GA? Bruce Campbell (talk) 19:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

It's been on Grapple and I's list for a long time. Maybe if we all combined our efforts, divided up the sections, and tried to take it on. Would you be interested?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Of course! Also there are some worrying comments over at the Sixth Extinction FAC... Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I've been working on the Nielsen Ratings part, so I'll probably start there. As for the Sixth Extinction, oh boy... I tried cleaning it up, but who knows what they'll decide.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

What a disaster today has been for the project. lol I had to withdraw the Home nomination but I already fixed all the comments that were brought up so it wasn't too awful. Who has a lot of free time, likes spooky stuff, and is amazing at copy-editing? Bruce Campbell (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Also I'm glad Sixth Extinction held up but it seems like it'll be a close call. I would have commented further but there's nothing objective I really could have brought to the discussion that you and Grapple haven't already addressed. ^^ Bruce Campbell (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Might be useful for the main article: SFX's latest special edition has an article on The X-Files, listed under "gamechanger". Unfortunately my browser won't let me zoom in on the preview though... Glimmer721 ^talk 18:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files A-Class review/Milagro (The X-Files)/archive1.
Message added 20:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TBrandley 20:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the FAC, I'm afraid I don't currently have the time to perform a copy-edit, and I'm not sure a quick copy-edit is the answer. You may have gathered that there is, for want of a better word, some cracking down by reviewers at FAC and prose is a tricky thing to get right. I have noticed myself that some X Files articles have a few prose issues; this is not to say that the articles are not good, but that they still need a polish. The editors who are commenting care deeply about FA and only want the absolute best to be promoted; that is perhaps why they see things that a more involved reviewer may not. What makes this trickier is that some prose reviewers give examples only, and it can be frustrating not knowing what problems they are seeing. But asking for a copy-edit does not always resolve every issue, and an effective copy-edit requires a long time spent re-visiting the article. Rather than one person doing this, it is better to have many uninvolved editors have a look. Neither Peer Review (which can be a bit of a graveyard at the moment) nor the GOCE is the answer on its own, as the quality of review/copy-edit depends on who takes a look. I find it is better to find 3 or 4 people to look before going anywhere near FAC, and approach them directly. The more eyes, the better the result. Unfortunately, some editors prefer to avoid TV articles, but that can't be helped I'm afraid. I would suggest not just relying on copy-editors, but to find someone really, really good at prose to help and even if they only copy-edit a section, look at what they do and why. Also look at this article and some of the prose exercises on Tony1's user page; these pages are invaluable for improving prose. If you can see what it is that reviewers see, it reduces the need for copy-editors and avoids some of the problems that one or two articles may have had at FAC recently.

Sorry if this is TL:DR! My first FAC was a massacre on prose grounds, and I know how frustrating the process can be! Although I cannot really help this time, please ping me if you ever want me to take a look at anything before FAC (although that is by no means a guarantee of success!) or if you need the names of any good prose people. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

• I have to agree with Sarastro here, my first FAC was a folly on prose grounds (this one), while my second was touch and go there despite a copyedit from Malleus (here). I'll be glad to copyedit articles before they are nominated for FAC, assuming I have the time. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Home (The X-Files)/archive1, you stated "Just a question, why is Television Without Pity unreliable? It's owned by NBCUniversal and is just a review site run by writers who have editorial oversight." I went to respond, but I see the FAC has been archived. I used Television Without Pity in a Grey's Anatomy article that I was submitting for FAC this past September. Source expert Nikkimaria told me that the website's authors seemed dubious and not notable. The website is almost definitely reliable, it's just they're not notable enough for anyone to care what they think. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sadie Harris/archive1 for brief discussion. Also, as for the X-Files article you wanted me to look at; I've been meaning to get to it, but I've been rather busy. I'll most likely be able to take a look this weekend. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Had a quick scan now and the article is in great shape (certainly better than it was last summer!). I think it would now meet the GA criteria with little difficulty, touch wood. Good luck! Lemonade51 (talk) 21:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Hijacking this thread: I just watched "Monday" and I think the plot in the article is a little inaccurate. Especially the line "The time loop continues ad nauseam until Pam cannot take it any more. She runs into the building during the hold up and throws herself in front of Mulder just as Bernard once again attempts to shoot him." Despite leaving out a lot of developments that took place in the previous loops, this isn't even true. Mulder calls Scully and tells her to bring Pam into the bank, first of all. What do you think? Glimmer721 ^talk 02:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

It's probably a good idea to change it. I think I wrote it when I was patching up season six last year. Now that you mention it, it does need to be changed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll get on it if I have the time. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:04, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The review for Sanguinarium asked for more critical response, can you help out (or clean up what might be missing?) igordebraga ≠ 05:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

To be honest, your best bet might be to withdraw it for the moment and work on it away from FAC. From a quick look, I can see quite a few little things that need tightening; nothing major, but that layer of polish to the prose needed for a FA. There is not much point in my adding these to the FAC; it would be quite a list which would not do you any favours. You have two opposes which probably would take quite a bit of overturning and it would go down better if you did this work somewhere else. If you do withdraw, I would be more than happy to do a detailed review or copy-edit, either informally or as part of PR. Either way, I may be able to have a look next week, but I'm a little busy both on and off wiki this week. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem at all; I'll get to it in the next week. Ping me if I've not done anything by next Monday. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

• I think it's looking pretty good at this point. You might want to read through again--sometimes copyeditors will introduce small mistakes when they go through (leaving out a word or something). It's the Quis custodiet ipsos custodes problem, more or less. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I've almost completed a review at Talk:The Whale (The Office)/GA1; once three minor items are clarified, I think this one's good to go. -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for reviewing that article. I believe I have addressed everything. BTW, I love this section title.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about "The Boat", I had no idea there was a GA review on it!! Also, I won't be able to edit "The Target" until Thursday to bring it up to GA status, due to all my finals in school. Hope that's okay!! Ohh and only 15 more episodes left!! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your significant contributions that helped promote The Whale (The Office)--and many more, it appears--to good article status. Here at Dunder Mifflin, we call that fine work. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thanks a ton! :) I try my hardest.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

No it's okay. He just never informed me that the review had started, so I had no idea that it started, so it's good that you took over. Plus, I assumed you were more irritated at me since I wasn't editing it haha. And same here!! My favorite episodes are Work Bus and The Target". I literally think every episode this season is great, and the only bad one will probably be The Farm. It's sad to see it go! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

I was working on "Training Day" and bringing up to GA status, but help would be welcomed! If you don't wanna help that's fine, but if you do I won't mind. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Skyfall by Hahc21. Project News: A record, and issue and a future. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 190 articles passed in December! GA Task Forces: Results from the drive Member News: Two crucial users leave the project Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 3 January 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to throw everything off the cycle, but I won't have enough free time to work on "Lice". I can work on the episode the week after that though. Sorry for any inconveniences this might cause! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries! I can do it. It'll give me something to do.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

		The Good Article Medal of Merit
		For having helped promote more than 185 articles to Good Article status, I hereby award you this Good Article Medal of Merit. Keep up the good work! Khazar2 (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Just passed "China (The Office)" -- nice work as always. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!! :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Gen. Quon, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested for the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my changes if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Done - please feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit, and good luck with your planned FA nom. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

I've taken a look, almost there. :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 20:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Pass, congrats! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 20:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Gen.! Would you please do my favor and review Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 1) a review for good "list" status? Would really appreciate it! :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 18:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch! Hope I wasn't to harsh with my Adventure Time statement... --Khanassassin ☪ 19:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

It was that small sub-text format, wasn't it? :) --Khanassassin ☪ 19:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I've taken care of the issues (along with Paper Luigi), except one: What's wrong with the Fitzgerald cite ("In the photo of Fitzgerald, you should probably read the cite for the 'very particular' reference.")? Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 13:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

That was my favorite episodes of all time - the fight between Jim and Pam brought me nearly to tears, and then Brian's appearence completely blew my mind - thank god for Greg Daniels. And yeah, I do the first episode, you do the second episode - that way the whole system doesn't get messed up. And my schedule is a bit filled so two episodes would be a bit to complicated lol. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The only episode I didn't really like was "Lice" (Why did Darryl randomely not wanna date Val?). But I completely agree. We're officially in the second half of this season. It's gonna be interesting to see what Daniels and the writers fit into the next 11 episodes. The only sad part is that Michael/Steve won't be back :/ -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

That would be perfect!! Just a little phone call with Pam; that would be the perfect end. I hope that really does happen, but if not "Goodbye, Michael" would be a good enough end for the character. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 05:30, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Refs #112 (The Geek Appeal of Pendleton Ward's Adventure Time) and #121 (Thank You – Festival Program) on Adventure Time are showing up all funky looking. I tried fixing them, but I can't seem to find the problem. Any idea what's up with that? Btw, excellent job on improving the article! Keep up the good work :) Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 23:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

I started the review at Customer Loyalty (The Office); a few minor issues need your attention when you have a chance. Thanks as always for your work on these. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

You're a machine, General Quon! Thanks for your work on yet another Good Article--now kick back and relax, you deserve it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:03, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Well done for getting The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati passed. Not everyone would have stuck with it at FAC. And I think the article is an impressive piece of work. Hopefully plenty more to come. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, it was a bit of work, but I feel it was worth. I really wanted to see it promoted.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, congrats from me too. Glad to see that. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! And thanks for the help. I'm glad I stuck with it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Since you're usually good with finding a free image to use in production sections, I was wondering if you had any ideas for Genesis of the Daleks. It really needs something but there are no free images of any of the people mentioned, and not even one of the quarry where some of it was filmed. (There are free images of Baker and Sladen, but they are hardly discussed, and then there is one of Terry Nation which I would use but it's non-free.) Thanks, Glimmer721 ^talk 19:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm stumped. The dry ice part wasn't a very long or important scene, and the section is close to the other picture. I think I'm going to go with a Dalek like "Asylum" to explain the writing. Glimmer721 ^talk 17:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Goliad and Stormo really need to come back and Princess Bubblegum really needs to die because she sucks. (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 321Wikiman (talk • contribs)

I removed a comment by you and an anonymous editor at Talk:Vandalism (The Office), because I felt it violated WP:NOTAFORUM. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 07:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Whatup Gen, I reviewed yo' Adventure Time season article again, go check it out! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 18:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Yo Gen, it's ya boy Khanassassin up in here again, I responded to ya at the GAR review, man, check it out; PASS, sucka! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Haha, thanks! I appreciate the review, man.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've just noticed that you created Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Deadalive/archive1 and tagged the article talk page, but didn't list the FAC at WP:FAC. Would've done it for you, but thought you might want to update your sig (for the current date), so I'll leave it to you to transclude it at FAC. Good luck!. Maralia (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for that. I always forget something when it comes to FAC. Thanks for the heads up!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

It's me again, I reviewed Adventure Time. The article is with strikingly few faults. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 20:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Yo, yo! Pass! And shame on you for promoting only another 389053 GAs this month! Back in the day, you did like 495040. Just messin' around; but you are a frickin' WikiMachine, dude, congrats. --Khanassassin ☪ 16:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I have reviewed the Moving On (The Office) article that you nominated for Good article status. There are few things that I left on the review page that should be addressed/clarified before I can pass the article.--Dom497 (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Was that really notable outside the fandom?. JSH-alive/^{talk/cont/mail} 15:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Gen.! You have just a few minor issues left at the Adventure Time season 4 article, it's pretty much a confirmed Pass, congrats! So... would you mind leaving a comment/support/oppose here? :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 20:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Congrats on the season 4 promotion! And I think I've mostly taken care of your comments at the FAC. :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 13:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I believe I've resolved the rest of the issues - except that "hard clothes" thingy, heh. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 07:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey Gen, I just hope Goliad does show up in The Suitor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 321Wikiman (talk • contribs) 21:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "The X-Files (season 3), The X-Files (season 4), The X-Files (season 5), The X-Files (season 8), The X-Files (season 9)".

I agree. I laughed a bit, and thought the scene between Dwight and his nephew kinda sweet. But yeah, you're right. Dwight as a lead character, surrounded by "wacky family members" just wouldn't work. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I KNOW. Without Michael, he's just a waste of space. Let's pray that Greg sends him to jail/hell/something horrible in the finale. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I completely agree!! He's not even that important of a character. He doesn't really need a send-off. The first one was the only one really needed. If he does, then I'll forever praise Greg Daniels. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

With the X-Files project wrapping up and The Office ending, I was wondering if you were interested in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (I know you did "Welcome to the Hellmouth" a while back). I've started watching the series (recently saw "I, Robot... You, Jane") and I noticed the project was very outdated (the articles haven't even been assessed within the project, for one, so there's not much organization/navigation). I've done some cleanup, but I didn't know if you knew of any good sources. I do know The A.V. Club has reviews. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to (I got "Hellmouth" and Adam up to GA). If I have some free time in the future (which I probably will), I'd love to help out. The project definitely needs some help. You're right, a lot of it is really outdated.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I did some work on "The Harvest". I think I'm going to do general cleanup as I watch. I found an archive for the website used for ratings (), though I'm not sure how reliable that is considered. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I'd be willing to at least help clean-up the first season. That would be a good project.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, especially since it's only 12 episodes and much of the season page can be taken up with how the show was created and casted. I found the BBC episode guide and DVD Talk to be helpful with "Witch". Glimmer721 ^talk 00:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Cool. I'll try to see what I can do over the next few days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 13:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

What would you say the importance ratings should be for the Buffy project? I started adding the episodes under "high" since they make up the majority of the canon, but what has already been tagged is mostly inconsistent. Rupert Giles, for instance, is "low" and he's one of the main characters! I was thinking "top" would be reserved for the major characters, Whedon, and the TV show itself. Maybe the season pages? Glimmer721 ^talk 18:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

I think that's actually pretty fair. Characters should be important. I would say mythology episodes are really important, but unlike The X-Files, Buffy mixes the mythos with monster-of-the-week storylines. But yeah, this project needs work.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:01, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Onomatopoeia Flobots.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. I've been a little pressed for time lately, so it may be quite slow. I've also a few other commitments, so it is possible that it may be more than a week before I get to it. If I haven't done anything in a fortnight, ping me. One little thing I noticed is that the lead is a little cumbersome; it may be worth seeing if you can use any of the lead from The Sixth Extinction II, particularly the more formulaic first two paragraphs. I'll put future comments on the talk page. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MarcelineRough.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Just stalking your edit history a little bit, since Alapalooza is on my watch list, I'm wondering if you were aiming towards making Weird Al's Discography a good topic? I ask because I've had bringing "Weird Al" Yankovic discography to featured list status on my "to-do" list for a while, but have never really had the motivation to work on it... although I notice now that someone has really improved the list since I added it to my "to-do" list. Wow. Canadian Paul 22:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Polka Party! to Good Article status. Thanks as always for your prolific contributions on comedy topics--you're really improving Wikipedia's coverage. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks a ton for reviewing it as well as this! :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure. I've been YouTubing all the songs from the album as I reviewed and it's really taking me back. =) -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Who would want to marry Princess Bubblegum, she sucks and is not Finn's girlfriend anymore. I just hope she dies and stays dead. Do you think Goliad and Stormo will be in "The Suitor"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 321Wikiman (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Maybe they're keeping Goliad's return as a surprise? Don't forget how Mr Muto hinted her return,http://www.formspring.me/MrMuto/q/416093207235940513.