User talk:Giovanni Messe

Hello Giovanni Messe, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of the Volturno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Giovanni Messe. Thank you for your work on Mendonça Furtado. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. While I think that "The Oxford Encyclopedia of Brazilian History and Culture" is probably enough to establish notability, please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: Thanks for taking a look at the article. I’ll add more reliable sources and make sure each claim is properly supported. Could you let me know the minimum number of additional sources you’d prefer so I can update it accordingly? Giovanni Messe (talk) 07:26, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the second source. I can't give you a specific number, but I would say a ballpark of 3-5 sources is usually appropriate. Have a good day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

I saw you have been creating articles about the CSIR. Please always link to the respective Italian units involved in these battles. Wikipedia has articles for all Italian WWII divisions and articles for all Italian Army regiments active after 1945 (Please note that all unit names below are correct for the 1939 to 1943 timeframe). The CSIR units you should link to are:

• Italian Expeditionary Corps in Russia
  • 3rd Cavalry Division "Principe Amedeo Duca d'Aosta"
    • Regiment "Savoia Cavalleria" (left the division in March 1942)
    • Regiment "Lancieri di Novara" (left the division in March 1942)
    • 3rd Bersaglieri Regiment
    • 6th Bersaglieri Regiment (joined the division in March 1942)
    • 3rd Horse Artillery Regiment (left the division in March 1942)
    • 120th Motorized Artillery Regiment (joined the division in March 1942)
  • 9th Infantry Division "Pasubio"
    • 79th Infantry Regiment "Pasubio"
    • 80th Infantry Regiment "Pasubio"
    • 8th Artillery Regiment "Pasubio"
  • 52nd Infantry Division "Torino"
    • 81st Infantry Regiment "Torino"
    • 82nd Infantry Regiment "Torino"
    • 52nd Artillery Regiment "Torino"
  • 30th Army Corps Artillery Grouping
  • Skiers Battalion "Monte Cervino" (arrived February 1942)

noclador (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

• at Capture of Gorlovka you linked the 52nd Infantry Division "Torino" to 52nd Infantry Division (Wehrmacht).
• at Battle of Chazepetovka you linked the 81st Infantry Regiment "Torino" to 81st Regiment of Foot (Loyal Lincoln Volunteers).

Please check your links before posting. noclador (talk) 14:08, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Italian invasion of Monaco. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:{{{article}}}]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]]. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from it.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve made the necessary edit for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 08:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your contributions. Regarding this edit of yours, please see this discussion, as "Publifye AS" publishes AI-generated books with no human review, thus their books are unreliable (per these guidelines). Please be more careful in the future when dealing with book sources; always make sure to verify the credibility of its publisher and the authors (one of the authors is listed as "AI"). Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 11:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Rometta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you do it if I give requests? NEMURO (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

What is your request? I shall try to do it for you. Marshal of Italy talk 17:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, could you possibly make a page for this?

Sakhalin Expedition 1635–1679

It is already mentioned here;Sakhalin you can take sources from this and also from other places and create the page. NEMURO (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Well, I have reviewed all the sources it nothing more than a diplomatic exploration there isn't any battle or conflict I can make a page of the diplomatic exploration but most of the times such pages do not last long. Grazie Marshal of Italy talk 18:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, no problem. Could you create a page Turkish–Georgian War that took during the War of Independence? NEMURO (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Sure, I will make this one for you Marshal of Italy talk 07:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Thankss NEMURO (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Turkish-Georgian War (1921) created as per your request Marshal of Italy talk 12:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, one more request — could you research whether there are wars related to the Mountainous Republic of the Northern Caucasus that don’t have a page and create the page? NEMURO (talk) 14:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Also, the war did not take place in 1921; it occurred between 1918 and 1921, and they fought in 1918 as well. NEMURO (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately I didn't find any thing of the engagements in 1918 Marshal of Italy talk 14:06, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

it was on turkish wikipedia NEMURO (talk) 14:08, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

By the way, could you give me your Discord so I can express myself and my requests more comfortably? If you prefer not to, we can continue talking here — I’m fine with either. NEMURO (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@NEMURO Please note that the above discussion is not allowed on Wikipedia. It violates WP:NOTADVOCACY #1: Content hosted on Wikipedia is not for...recruitment of any kind. - Also, please remember another admin's comment. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:48, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

You’re right, I won’t do this again, but if you want, you can ban me — I’m going to quit anyway. NEMURO (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

You are right, I’m sorry, I did wrong, but it wouldn’t be a problem if you banned me. NEMURO (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I can't ban you, I'm not an admin, and you don't need to quit. I just wanted to point out that this isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Regards. Kajmer05 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

oh alright than thanks for warning NEMURO (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@Giovanni Messe. You translated this article from Turkish, right? But you haven't included a link to the Turkish Wikipedia.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._Bayezid%27in_Anadolu_Seferleri

October 26, 2025

The article creator: Kartal1071

Also, the translation looks great. Great job! Thank you for translating it.

Kartal1071 (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks and I am really sorry about not leaving the link Marshal of Italy talk 04:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

@Giovanni Messe

From what I can see, you've translated Bayezid's Anatolian Campaigns quite accurately. If you'd like, I can send you links to my other articles for you to translate. Kartal1071 (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes I would love to do it, I request you to do so. Marshal of Italy talk 06:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I'm sending it. I also have a request for you. It would be good if you published the articles you translated under the heading "Articles I Translated" on your page. Because other editors will know that you are both a translator and an article writer. They may apply to you for articles to translate, and this will be to your advantage. Kartal1071 (talk) 10:26, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

These articles were written by me. I am sending you the links so you can translate them when you have time. Thank you in advance. I hope you have a good day.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Af%C5%9Fin_Bey%27in_Anadolu_Ak%C4%B1nlar%C4%B1

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafkasya_ve_Do%C4%9Fu_Anadolu_Seferi_(1064) Kartal1071 (talk) 10:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

You are Welcome, I will translate them soon, It will be very nice of you if you added link to the Turkish Wikipedia after the translations as I don't know how to do it.Grazie Marshal of Italy talk 13:07, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Honestly, I can't do it myself, but I can ask the other editors. I wish you the best in your work. Kartal1071 (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Giovanni Messe. Thank you for your work on Siege of Alessandria (1799). Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I'm reviwed this article. The references are bit of a mess in the bib section. You've used "work" as a field property which is not used. For example, the title should Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la révolution and the "chapter" should be Campagne de 1799 – Première Période.

Also your using the volume number in the sfn tag. That is non-standard. Set the dates to 1822a, 1822b is the normal harvard standard ref and use it in the sfn tag as 1822a.

I was planning to establish a further reading section. Gachot for example isn't used and could go in. Mikaberidze doesn't seem to be used either.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 13:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Could you create a page called “Spanish–Japanese conflicts”? NEMURO (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@NEMURO, if you have any idea what that article would be about, then maybe. But Spain–Japan relations could probably cover it. guninvalid (talk) 08:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@Guninvalid nope this is Different Than relations NEMURO (talk) 09:28, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

I surely can but I need a bit of context about this conflict Marshal of Italy talk 12:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Well, could you create a page titled “Dersim rebellions (1877–1938)”? There is already a page about this in turkish wikipedia, and you can also add the 1938 Dersim rebellion. NEMURO (talk) 06:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ayalew Birru, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Shire was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Afşin Bey's invasion of Anatolia page looks great. Thank you for translating it. Kartal1071 (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Anytime Mate, will be working on translating your second article soon Marshal of Italy talk 08:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Giovanni Messe. Thank you for your work on Ignaty Przybyszewski. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 14:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papal Coalition of 1849, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papal Coalition of 1849 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Did a quick ce of your new article, a welcome addition to the East African collection. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Mate Marshal of Italy talk 11:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Korçë. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the article relies heavily on a wartime newspaper and the diaries of a participant. This indicates Original Research.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 05:51, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Konitsa (1940). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and please see article talkpage. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 06:37, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Gallabat (1940). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is likely that this article largely synthesises trivial mentions in general histories of the East African campaign to create an article. This seems likely to count as WP:OR.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 06:50, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Capture of Dabel (1940), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Boynamedsue (talk) 06:59, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Ciao Giovanni. I am a little concerned about your article "Capture of Dabel". I suspect that topic does not have sufficient coverage in terms of WP:GNG, as with the other articles of yours above. However, that is not a big problem, you can provide more sources or the text can be added elsewhere or whatever.

However, I am really worried about Capture of Dabel. The lede says the article is about the Italian capture of the place, but the body simply does not discuss this. No details whatsoever of the capture, or even mention of it, were in the article. Did you use an AI program to summarise the contents of the sources in the bibliography regarding Dabel? If so, you really must not do this. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:07, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I did use A.I to summarise the content which is a rookie mistake but did not use it for bibliography however I will ensure you this will not happen in future. And about Italian occupation, Dabel was attacked by Britishers not italians, they defended it against the enemies. Marshal of Italy talk 07:15, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your honesty. Can I take it you've been using AI in your other new articles? Boynamedsue (talk) 07:24, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

yes you can I will soon rephrase them in human language once I am free Marshal of Italy talk 07:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. The best way to do this is to go to your created articles and ensure that the claims sourced in each one are supported in the sources.

You need to avoid using AI summaries at all, it can lead to very confusing and off the point text like at Capture of Dobel. It really needs to be a simple "stop" with AI from now on.

Also, you should read WP:GNG to check on the requirements to include a new article. Most (not all) of your recent "Capture of...." articles are of questionable notability. A good rule of thumb is 2 whole paragraphs dedicated to the subject of the article in two secondary sources independent of each other. The Capture of Gallabat article did have this, for example.Boynamedsue (talk) 08:09, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Just to let you know, I am moving your unreviewed new articles (usually the very new ones) to draft space so you can fix the AI usage on them. Check the sources and restructure the articles so they are logical. I will tag the new articles you have created that are already reviewed with an AI template. When you have checked the sourcing and restructured the text, you can remove the template.Boynamedsue (talk) 08:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Giovanni, I just wanted to check on something. Can you speak Polish, Russian, Czech? It's just one of the articles you have created, Ignaty Przybyszewski, cites sources only in those languages.Boynamedsue (talk) 08:46, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

This is a translation article, I translated it from Polish Wikipedia to English Wikipedia, I have translated articles from other language Wikipedia that's why I have created seperate section called Articles I have translated Marshal of Italy talk 09:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, but do you speak Polish?Boynamedsue (talk) 09:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Ponte Perati. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and AI usage has led to a confusing article with an unclear focus. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:12, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Venetian–Hungarian War (1411–1413). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Re-write needed to fix AI and check sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Banks Ford. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Gordon's Flank Attack. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because article needs review of AI sections and Sourcing, per discussion. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Munda (214 BC). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because review of AI usage and sourcing necessary. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Mirandola (1742). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because review of AI usage and sourcing necessary.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kingdom of Italy–Ottoman relations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because review of AI use and sourcing needed.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Yoshio Nakamura (engineer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because possible fix needed for AI use and sourcing must be checked. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Aspis (148 BC). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because AI use and sourcing must be checked. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Kaluga (1617–1618). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the article requires checking for AI use and correct sourcing. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:49, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Minden (1758). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because article needs checking for AI use and sourcing. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Afshin Bey's invasion of Anatolia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because article needs checking for AI use and sourcing. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 08:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Bir Tagrift. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 02:36, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi GM. Could you clarify which languages you speak. You are not allowed to machine translate articles from languages you do not speak.

All the best

BNS Boynamedsue (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

My mother tounge is Italian, I can speak English, Polish, Turkish (average) and Russian (average) Marshal of Italy talk 08:30, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

also in my edit summaries I said GTPZero not ChatGTP Zero GTPZero is used widely even in Wikipedia to identify whether the written sources are A.I or human written Marshal of Italy talk 08:32, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your English would seem to be fine. Would you say the other languages would be European Framework For Language Learning C1 or higher?Boynamedsue (talk) 09:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Going by European Framework For Language Learning I will say my other languages are B2 at the best. Marshal of Italy talk 05:58, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Ponte Perati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ponte Perati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Boynamedsue (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Ponte Perati, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Ponte Perati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Moyale (1940) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Moyale (1940) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Boynamedsue (talk) 07:35, 10 April 2026 (UTC)