User talk:Howicus/Archive 2

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

I noticed that you prodded Fishpond.co.nz and Mighty Ape. I have removed the prod from the former only because another editor removed the prod from Mighty Ape. These two companies are direct competitors and are probably of approximately equal notability. The two articles should be treated equally on Wikipedia, unless of course someone can find significant sources for one of them but not the other. I have no connection with either other than having placed occasional orders with both. Feel free to take them to AfD.-gadfium 20:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi thank you for helping me and i have a lots of other questions about using Wikipedia so i hope you don't mind helping me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcustom41019999 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. If you have more questions, you can ask them here, or at the Teahouse, or by adding a {{helpme}} template to your talk page and asking the question there. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and yup, I made it thinking about Indie. One of my fav movies ever is Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade :D Miss Bono ^{[hello, hello!]} 19:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

I've never actually seen that one...I've seen Raiders of the Lost Ark, half of Temple of Doom, and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. I've heard Last Crusade is pretty good though. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

I have seen the whole saga :D-- thanks for the comment :) Miss Bono ^{[hello, hello!]} 16:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Big Bang Theory. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This is the second time I've gotten this message from someone :) . I'm already on the new list; and trying to be more active. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 14:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ransom theory of atonement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Four Award. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

"Primary topic" is not a matter of which article you think is more important. It means that when you type a term into the search box, you go to the primary topic article. If you type in Sacred Band, you go to a disambiguation page. Sacred Band of Thebes is therefore not primary topic and should not have a hatnote. The guideline uses the examples defamation and Defamation (film). The "Defamation (film)" article is not primary and therefore does not have a hatnote. Epaminondas of Thebes (talk) 04:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Well, I noticed that when I start typing "sacred band" into the search bar, by the time I get to "sacred ba", the first option in the drop-down list is Sacred Band of Thebes, which I think many users may click on. So it's not which one I think is most important, but which article(s) people may end up at. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and a Google search for "sacred band" put Sacred Band of Thebes as result #1. All in all, I think many readers will end up on the Sacred Band of Thebes page, so that page should have a link to the disambiguation if that's not the Sacred Band they were looking for. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

To get to the article, either through the search box or Google, the reader currently has to click on "Sacred Band of Thebes", so I don't see how removing hatnote creates any ambiguity. Anyway, we can get around this problem by moving Sacred Band to Sacred Band (disambiguation), and then setting the redirect to Sacred Band of Thebes. Epaminondas of Thebes (talk) 04:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

It is waaaay too late for me to think clearly about this...I don't know, do what you feel makes the articles easiest to navigate. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm one of the users on whose page you left a cookie! Thanks for the cookie! I have a couple of questions and i would be grateful if you can help me out. I have run into some trouble with the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Nithyananda.. One of the users who is editing there is a PR person of "nithyananda" himself. I'm betting for this user to come back and revert my edits because this particular user has been in many edit wars on the same article before. I would be really grateful if you can give me a link to the detailed rules regarding these following topics:

Wikipedia's rules regarding self-publishing and Biographies. Wikipedia's rules regarding references (And what qualifies as a reference). Wikipedia's rules on edit/revert wars.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lookinhotbra (talk • contribs) 18:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Sure, the relevant policies here are Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Edit warring, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (if you think that one editor is closely connected to the subject), and WP:Identifying reliable sources. Those should cover it, I think.

Two things though...first, if someone reverts the edits you made to the Swami's page, do not revert back, as that's how edit wars start. Instead, discuss the edits on the talk page. Second, which account do you think is the PR person? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the useful links!

I have also left a message on the talk page. The possible PR person is the user named Acnaren , He has been a wikipedia member since 2009 and only does edits on the swami's page. He had also previously removed any statements in the article regarding the crimes committed by the swami even though they were referenced using leading indian daily newspapers. Thanks!

Lookinhotbra 18:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lookinhotbra (talk • contribs)

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject ArbCom Reform Party. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Acnaren came back and reverted all my edits on Swami Nithyananda.I had deleted some articles on that page because they violate wikipedia's policies of WP:NOR and WP:SPS, Acnaren started edit warring without even discussing on talk page. Acnaren has also been deleting pretty much every article with valid references from national newspapers. Please advise on how to deal with this type of vandalism and revert wars...A couple of other users had also raised these rule violations on the talk page, But these notifications of wikipedia's rules were ignored, and they seem to kinda have a monopoly over the page bulldozing any other user even if we stick to the rules..Can i report these users to someone??? Please help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lookinhotbra (talk • contribs) 05:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I think you and Sean.hoyland are working the problem out nicely. My suggestion would be to propose any further large changes on the talk page first, before you make the edit. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Archive.rs RFC. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:VPIN. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of zombie films. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Can this be removed from archive because it isn't resolved?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_78

The story so far is that we have an airforce user providing a speed at a specific altitude and the company who produce the aircraft verifying it as possible. I can't understand why substantiated new information like this isn't sufficient for an article update.

The other side is relying on a magazine reprint of legacy press release figures and calling it a secondary source. As regards this let me draw your attention to the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:USEPRIMARY#.22Secondary.22_is_not_another_way_to_spell_.22good.22 From from the above: "Characteristics of a secondary source: "A secondary source usually provides analysis, commentary, evaluation, context, and interpretation. It is this act of going beyond simple description, and telling us the meaning behind the simple facts, that makes them valuable to Wikipedia." Jane's fulfills none of the criteria mentioned in the sentence above wrt the Typhoon Mach figure and has remained stagnant (not updated) since 2003. There is no discussion of the initial press released speed figure nor analysis of it. Z07x10 (talk) 22:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Furthermore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:USEPRIMARY#Not_a_matter_of_counting_the_number_of_links_in_the_chain: "Consider the simple example above: the original proclamation is a primary source. Is the book necessarily a secondary source? The answer is: not always. If the book merely quotes the proclamation (such as re-printing a section in a sidebar or the full text in an appendix, or showing an image of the signature or the official seal on the proclamation) with no analysis or commentary, then the book is just a newly printed copy of the primary source, rather than being a secondary source. The text and images of the proclamation always remain primary sources."

In this instance Jane's is not a secondary source.Z07x10 (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm gonna be honest with you, and say that I have no idea what to think about the dispute. Re-list it on DRN if you want, but I don't think I'll be able to provide much more help here...my apologies. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sidebar update. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

In this edit you mentioned that lists do not need as many citations. I am kind of confused about the policy because I am just listing people for whom we already have articles, and their date of birth and date of marriage are both listed on those articles. Someone is removing both my reference notations (which list that data) and entire entries, but I am confused about why. If they are taking issue with this information, shouldn't we be addressing that on the specific people's pages rather than on a list overview? Ranze (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'm not entirely sure why they're removing names myself...you'd probably be better off asking TheRedPenOfDoom directly, either on Talk:List of child brides or TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 15:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Audie Murphy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Giorgio-class cruiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deficit reduction in the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Bullying. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi I've tried to start the Steelbro page but it seems a bit too hard having done the work two months ago. As there are multiple references within Wikipedia to this company I don't understand the problem here. I will leave this to someone with more motivation to share this history, as I won't resubmit. Pity. I guess you're trying to be helpful, but it's not been very successful. Regards greg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg.muirsmeath (talk • contribs) 11:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Not sure how that happened - your only connection to the article was that you commented on it. Cheers! Julie JSFarman (talk) 15:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 16:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mafia state. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my userpage's vandalism. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 16:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reward board. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Of course it doesn't have so much information yet. The article was just started. The subject as such is of course vital and relevant. Do remove your deletion request. Arms Jones (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Since the article is so short, I'd recommend expanding London Borough of Barking and Dagenham#Coat of arms first, and then splitting off the section if the Coat of Arms section becomes too big. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daniel Craig. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Star boys' singing procession. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Armenian American. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Whad up bro?

LegalizeDA.HERBandFREEyourSOUL (talk) 19:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

.

LegalizeDA.HERBandFREEyourSOUL (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

|}

Hey howicus whats up i dont appriciate you creepin" on my page and trying to get it shut down bruh? Really you want to BRO DOWN BRO?? LIKE for real dude im tryn fur sum ladiez on muh page so i can gett it ya know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LegalizeDA.HERBandFREEyourSOUL (talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, sorry it took me a bit to get back to you, I had to log off shortly after I tagged your page. The problem with that page is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social network. There was nothing on your page that was like an encyclopedia at all; it looked like you were trying to set up a "hangout" page, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

More information Just collapsing this so it takes up less room ...

Just collapsing this so it takes up less room

Baildsa page deletion inquiery I am sorry about the outgoing link. Now the article is fixed. Please, comment on it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CristinaMishka/Baildsa CristinaMishka (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Well, that article needs more independent, reliable sources like newspapers or magazines to show that the band is notable. Facebook and the band's own website are not reliable sources, though the other two look a bit better. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Please find them provided. I could use some help on verifying them by you, and also some pure wikiediting/coding to change the title form Bailds to Baildsa. The provided links are in English and Bulgarian so google chrome translator would be useful to understand, what they say. Find them here, and I expect your comment. http://www.hcspirit.com/news/baildsa-edna_tipichno_balkanska_grupa_ot_gurcia_idva_za_bg_turne.html http://www.mikamagazine.com/index.php/news/2477-baildsa-na-turne-v-bulgaria http://www.reakcia.net/2013/11/18/grutskata-banda-baildsa-na-turne-u-nas/ - Youth Students Journalistic Radio with interview with the vocal of Baildsa http://www.moreto.net/events.php?n=226521 - A Varna guide article http://metalhangar18.com/site/okontchatelnite-dati-ot-turneto-na-baildsa.mh18 - Metal Music site with interview http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2446915 - Trud - The biggest newspaper in Bulgaria - independent article about the tour http://www.iamgreek.nl/arts-and-culture/2013/09/18/baildsa,-a-special-balkan,-reggae,-gypsy,-punk-band-from-thessaloniki/ - Article and interview on a site for Greeks in Holland. Looking for your reply CristinaMishka (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Found another one, this time Greek -- http://www.noizy.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1425:synentefksi-me-tous-baildsa&catid=85:2012-02-05-07-12-06&Itemid=622 CristinaMishka (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC) I'm afraid interviews aren't independent sources, since it's a member of the band talking about the band. This one looks like a good source, though: http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2446915 . Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Help page comment Hello, Howicus, I responded to your comment on the help page. If you'd like to follow up, I'd appreciate it. Question on page dated Dec 11, 1.7 Creating "bulk" pages. Thanks. SkoreKeep — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkoreKeep (talk • contribs) 04:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:List of vaporware Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of vaporware. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis —Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)‎ Consider joining the Tyop Contest! tyop typo Hi there! You're invited to participate in the first ever Tyop Contest! The Tyop Contest is a friendly competition between Wikipedia users to correct typos. The contest will be run from February 1 to March 1, 2014. Depending on the typo you correct, you gain a certain number of points. The user with the highest number of points at the end wins the contest! Considering joining? Enter yourself! -Newyorkadam —Preceding undated comment added 23:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC) A beer for you! Thanks for the tips and help on getting started. I'm very new to editing on Wikipedia and I want to help contribute to this great website. Cheers! Gundamvirus (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Liberty University Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Liberty University. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 December 2013 WikiProject report: Babel Series: Tunisia on the French Wikipedia This week, the Signpost interviewed the Tunisia WikiProject on the French Wikipedia. Traffic report: Hopper to the top An animated Google Doodle for computer programmer and naval rear admiral Grace Hopper generated another record-breaking hit count for the year, though the count for the list overall was lower than for that of the previous holder. Discussion report: Usernames, template data and documentation, Main page, and more Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include... News and notes: Nine new arbitrators announced A little more than six days after the close of voting, the results of the annual Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) elections have been announced. Of the 22 candidates, 13 managed to gain more supports than opposes, though only one gained the support of more than half of the voters. Eight were elected to two-year terms, and a ninth will serve for one year. Featured content: Triangulum, the most boring constellation in the universe Seven articles, three lists, and eight pictures were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week. Technology report: Introducing the GLAMWikiToolset This week, the GLAMWikiToolset, or GWToolset, is being deployed to the Wikimedia Commons. It allows for GLAM organizations to batch upload content based on various metadata stored in an XML schema. In the past this has been done by various bots, but now it will be easier for GLAMs to do it directly. Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 07:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Amador Báez de Alpoim Hello Howicus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amador Báez de Alpoim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Muhammad Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Cindy Bir article sources Thank you for your help with my question about my Cynthia Bir article. I disagree that YouTube is off the chart for a source. All the spirit and wording of all the policies stress that reliability is a balancing of many factors. YouTube is generally not a reliable source per se because 99% of its users are not professionals or notable organizations, however, many such do utilize YouTube as a means of publication. The video I referenced was a a National Geographic episode, and NG is a WP-recognized entity. The proof that it's official is substantial. Beyond appearing completely official by its content (the people it features, etc.), the user account is the official YouTube account of Ryan Doyle (who's featured in the video), who's WP entry (which I started) has stood solid long-term. (Other Fight Science videos are posted from various accounts, and by YT policy, you shouldn't post the same video twice, so it's entirely feasible that NG would allow Doyle to be the poster for this video.) If by this information you still think the video is a poor source, could you please direct me to the policy information you feel supports your view? Honestly, I'm a bit fatigued arguing the reliability of notable sources that utilize YouTube as a means of publication. It's our only job to filter information, so why should we rule out a source simply because it requires heavy filtering to get at the reliable sources? Perhaps I shouldn't have listed it as the first source? Maybe I should put it lower so it doesn't raise an immediate eyebrow? I'm confused why you think personal biographies can't be utilized in combination with objective sources, especially from a reputable University. From everything I know, solid sources can be used it combination with sketchy sources in a balanced whole. By your logic, wouldn't this rule out all autobiographies ever published as being able to be quoted in encyclopedic content? Thank you so much for your help! (You can reply here.) Squish7 (talk) 03:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Well, to be honest I don't see why you're using the YouTube video at all...you're only using it to cite her nickname (right?). Second, involved sources like interviews or autobiographies can be used to cite facts, but not to show notability. Including them at this point will only slow the review process down. If this still doesn't make sense, please let me know...it's very possible the mistake is at my end. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Ah, well it's key because she is often known by "Cindy", even professionally (just google "Cindy Bir" to see), and that's the most reliable source I could find that officially titles her "Cindy Bir". I also thought it was an excellent source in general, i.e. to support her basic notability, and that could be used for other purposes (or that I could have used to support other sentences.) That something is on YouTube doesn't water the source down once it's been shown to be official, which I've done. It's an excellent video documentary of her, and has lots of other information someone might want to use. Squish7 (talk) 06:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Ok, I think I see your point about the video, and I don't have any objection to including it. Sorry for the trouble, this sort of thing is an exception to the rule. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Thanks for your help. In retro, maybe I shouldn't have been trying to solicit analysis before the waiting period. I can see now why it's there; it may take close attention to verify everything is done correctly. I think I can post it now though or a revision of it so thanks. Squish7 (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Merry Christmas! Pratyya (Hello!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Pratyya (Hello!) 05:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Talk:Bill Greiner Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bill Greiner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 December 2013 Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments Analyzing edits to the-then 46 largest Wikipedias between July 9 and August 8, 2013, a study identified a set of about 8,000 contributors with a global user account who have edited more than one of these language versions in that time frame. Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings Five articles, two lists, and five pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia. Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include... WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos We saved one last special report for 2013. After our well-received review of great WikiProject logos a couple years ago, it was only a matter of time before we collected a new batch of interesting iconography that showcases the creativity of the Wikipedia community. Hopefully, these logos will also inspire other projects to liven up their drab pages. News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions A significant move by the Wikimedia Foundation has been to broaden the types of activities it funds to develop several different programs for judging and allocating that funding, and to set up volunteer committees that initially assess applications for funding. Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools Last month, the OAuth extension was deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. OAuth is a standard used for allowing users to authenticate third-party applications, also known as consumers, to take actions on their behalf. Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 06:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Happy New Year! :D Newyorkadam (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newyorkadam (talk • contribs) 15:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Happy New Year, Howicus Pratyya (Hello!) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2014. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2014 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2014 goes well for you. Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message. --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Please comment on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 27 Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 27. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 01 January 2014 Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic In fact, the majority are relatively evenly split between three themes: people of interest, television, and websites. Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year In 2013, the arbitration committee closed 10 cases, 9 amendment requests, and 26 clarification requests. In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer? On New Year's Day, an article by Tim Sampson published in The Daily Dot and republished shortly after on Mashable covered the currently ongoing medical disclaimer RfC. Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia Dariusz Jemielniak's book is the newest about Wikipedia, published in Poland in 2013 and with an English edition forthcoming in 2014. News and notes: The year in review This was the year in which one journalist described the flagship site, Wikipedia, as "wickedly seductive". It was the year Wikipedia's replacement value was estimated at $6.6bn, its market value at "tens of billions of dollars", and its consumer benefit "hundreds of billions of dollars". But it was also the year in which one commentator forecast the decline of Wikipedia—that the project is in trouble from its shrinking volunteer workforce, skewed coverage, "crushing bureaucracy" and 90 percent male community. Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer Current discussions on the English Wikipedia and around the Wikimedia movement include... WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition The year 2013 has come and gone, adding 50 new WikiProject Reports to our long list of projects we've had the privilege to meet. Last year saw the continuation of our Babel series, featuring WikiProjects from other languages of Wikipedia. We also expanded our selection of special reports, offering readers a growing collection of helpful tips and tools as they participate in WikiProjects. Featured content: 2013—the trends Over the past year 1181 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured picture candidates (FPC), which promoted an average of 46 pictures a month. This was followed by featured article candidates (FAC; 32.5 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 18 a month). Technology report: Looking back on 2013 2013 saw a lot of changes to MediaWiki software and Wikimedia infrastructure. Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC) The Guidance Barnstar The Guidance Barnstar For all your hard work with helping people on #wikipedia-en-help. (t) Josve05a (c) 02:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC) a1 thanks a lot matey, I owe you one. Cheers (Dave006 (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC)) Quick deletion process Hello Howicus, Though I agree of expanding endlessly Wikipedia contents is senseless but many famous persons/places have their pages both in English and in their native language. It is the same in this case. Due to that intention you can immediately delete Budapest either in Hungarian or in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koti.hung (talk • contribs) 18:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC) The problem with your article is that you submitted the Hungarian version of the page to the English Wikipedia. It's fine to have the article in two languages, but the Hungarian page should be on the Hungarian Wikipedia. Try writing the Hungarian version here . Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Completely right. Somehow I missed that point. Koti.hung (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Close