Wikiwand AI

User talk:Info stronghold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpravalzafone (May 10)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
We can't use Reddit, so that leaves just one source and that is to a retailer...

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alpravalzafone to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Info stronghold! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpravalzafone (May 10)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Gurkubondinn, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This still cites Reddit, which is a WP:USERGENERATED source so we can't use it. See WP:RS and WP:GNG for more. Please do not remove past AfC decline templates. These are left for future reviewers so that they can review your draft and check that any prior concerns have been addressed. Removing these templates can make it more difficult for your draft to be accepted. Thank you.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alpravalzafone to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

--Gurkubondinn 22:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpravalzafone (May 13)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:
This draft contains medical, health, or psychological claims. Wikipedia requires a higher standard of sourcing for biomedical content. To ensure accuracy, content must be based on reliable secondary sources that reflect current knowledge. The draft should:
  • have high-quality secondary sources: such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or medical textbooks from respected publishers;
  • avoid primary sources: such as direct research papers, clinical trials, or news reports on early studies.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
I doubt the latter two sources meet WP:MEDRS's standards

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alpravalzafone to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks