User talk:Jacksonvil/Archives/2026/March
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jacksonvil. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
March 2026
Hi, Jacksonvil. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! ~2026-12223-02 (talk) 04:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 03:16, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
 |
Hello Jacksonvil! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
River Song
Thanks for your close at River Song (Doctor Who). Can you facilitate the actual page move (the River Song disamb. page would have to be named to the disamb. title and the primary page to River Song). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- A technical request has been sent through and the pages should be moved now. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 01:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hello Jacksonvil! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Pacific Time (British Columbia)
Hello. I see that you moved "Pacific Time (British Columbia)" to "Time in British Columbia".
Do you know that you are deeming Pacific Time as not notable even though the province of British Columbia invented a new time zone that is different from the American version of Pacific Time, formally Pacific Standard Time?
How do you explain this? Since you are not an administrator, you actually have a higher bar of explaining to do. This is not a challenge or assault on you or personal attack but merely a request for an explanation and/or reconsideration of your action. Vanguard10 (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. Sorry, it's been a while.
- I have moved the page because the article does not only refer to pacific time, but also how in some parts of the state mountain time is also used. The scope of the article is more then just the pacific time zone. There is also a clear community consensus.
- Feel free to leave another message or start a move review.
- Thanks, Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 08:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Vanguard10: Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 03:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)