User talk:JacobTheRox/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:JacobTheRox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Your nomination of Digswell Viaduct has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Digswell Viaduct has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Carolinum, Nysa
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carolinum, Nysa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Promotion of List of Great Northern route stations
Exchange peer reviews - Robert Jacomb-Hood ?
Hi. I just listed the Bridge article for a peer review. I noticed you have an article there also: Robert Jacomb-Hood. Are you interested in exchanging reviews? I'm planning on nominating Bridge for Featured Article, and it looks like you are already familiar with the FA criteria. Let me know if you're interested. Noleander (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have not been very active at all due to being busy irl. Well done for improving such a vital article, as the more conceptually simple an article is, the harder it is to write. I will certainly help you with your peer review over the coming week, and I would be very thankful if you help with mine in return
JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 12:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I'll get started on Robert Jacomb-Hood PR on Monday. FYI, another editor also volunteered to do a PR on Bridge. The more reviewers the better ... so if you see comments in the PR from other editors, don't let that dissuade you. Noleander (talk) 12:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charlotte Merz

Hello, JacobTheRox. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charlotte Merz".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Removal of importance ratings
Hi, I don't disagree with the removal of importance ratings in edits like this, but would like to know why you're also removing other parameters such as |stations=yes. There are several instances of this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I've restored all of the
{{WikiProject Trains}}parameters that you removed on or since 1 November that were plainly not importance params. Examples:|locos=yes|operations=yes|passenger=yes|stations=yes. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)- Okay I will stop removing those. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 16:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Redrose64 Just to let you know I have removed the following parameters from East Coast Main Line Route Utilisation Strategy and will continue to remove these:
refimprove=yesimageneeded=yesinfoboxneeded=yesmapneeded=yes
- As it is no longer an article, it does not need improved references, images, infoboxes, or maps. I will stop removing stations, operations, locos etc. as I can see why those should stay. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 00:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- ... I will keep removing importance parameters from redirects because they should not be eligible for importance ratings. Importance ratings are there to categorise articles and help understand which ones should be prioritised by the WikiProject, and redirects do not apply to this because they do not need focus, monitoring, or improvement unless they are made into actual articles. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 12:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I know what importance ratings are for, and if you check, you'll see that I've not restored any of them. The ones that I've restored are nothing to do with importance - they're task forces. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oh I just realised I misread your original message as "I disagree with... not "I don't disagree with...". My bad. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 16:00, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I know what importance ratings are for, and if you check, you'll see that I've not restored any of them. The ones that I've restored are nothing to do with importance - they're task forces. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- ... I will keep removing importance parameters from redirects because they should not be eligible for importance ratings. Importance ratings are there to categorise articles and help understand which ones should be prioritised by the WikiProject, and redirects do not apply to this because they do not need focus, monitoring, or improvement unless they are made into actual articles. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 12:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, JacobTheRox. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Great Northern route stations – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 8. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 03:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025 administrator elections - schedule
Administrator Elections | Schedule
- The December 2025 administrator elections are set to proceed.
- We plan to use the following schedule:
- Nov 25 – Dec 1: Candidate sign-up
- Dec 4 – Dec 8: Discussion phase
- Dec 9 – Dec 15: SecurePoll voting phase
- If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Digswell Viaduct
On 17 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Digswell Viaduct, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to an urban legend, Queen Victoria was too scared to travel across the Digswell Viaduct (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Digswell Viaduct. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Digswell Viaduct), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Launchballer 00:02, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
| Hook update | ||
| Your hook reached 26,437 views (1,101.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 71
Issue 71, September–October 2025
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref 2025 in Nigeria
- Frankfurt Book Fair
- Tech tip: Wikipedia Library access template
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Call for Candidates
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
- November 25 – December 1 - Call for candidates
- December 4–8 - Discussion phase
- December 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
- The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
- Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
- The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
- The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
- Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase
The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.
On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Potters Bar Tunnel
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Potters Bar Tunnel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Voting Phase
The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of Great Northern route operators
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Great Northern route operators, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: December 2025 Newsletter
The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume III, Issue III — December 2025 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who Help! We've been robbed... of a new Doctor Who Christmas special this year :(
2025... I Let You Go
*vworp vworp, vworp vworp*
The Space-Time Telepgraph is back again with our final issue of the year. With 13-episodes of Who-related content broadcast in 2025, it marked the biggest year in the Whoniverse since 2017! Take a quick read below for all the Wikipedia-related (and non-Wikipedia-related) Doctor Who news that you missed, and everything you have to look forward to. Happy New Year! 🥳🎉 Would you like a
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
2019
2020
2021
2022
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 (continued) 2023
2024
2025
Notes
Contributors:
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy New Year, JacobTheRox!


JacobTheRox,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ☎ 06:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Volten001 ☎ 06:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, happy new year to you too! JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 16:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 72
Issue 72, November–December 2025
- Renewed partnerships
- Spotlight: Strengthening Wikimedia Collaborations with and for Open Science
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Botanical Garden of Uppsala University is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Botanical Garden of Uppsala University is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, a human here. I'm not sure you noticed that this has been reviewed and is awaiting your inputs? Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry I have been trying to work on the article but I am very busy irl at the moment. I have read through your comments and I will see if I can reply to them all over the weekend. Thank you again for taking up the GAN and your patience. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 21:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Botanical Garden of Uppsala University has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Botanical Garden of Uppsala University has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Promotion of List of British monarchs
Concern regarding Draft:Mark Cooper-Jones
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Cooper-Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Hashi Mohamed is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Hashi Mohamed is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 07:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Am-progressive - DYK
Hey - added some final thoughts in your DYK review. Great job with the article by the way. I will make other edits to it but nothing major (mostly copyediting, clean-up, etc.). Ping me when you take a look at the comments I left. See you around! Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:46, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 73
Issue 73, January–February 2026
- Four new partnerships
- User survey thanks
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:06, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Hashi Mohamed has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Hashi Mohamed has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Hashi Mohamed DYK nomination
Hiya JacobTheRox, my name is LivelyRatification. I've just reviewed your nomination of Hashi Mohamed for DYK and am ready to approve it, but have a couple of thoughts about the hook first -- respond to those when you can!. Let me know if you have any questions or queries. Great work on the article and good luck with future editing! --LivelyRatification (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)


