User talk:JakeDHS07/Archive 3

I was going to get your opinion first. Maybe it should be left to Beer Money Inc. Because we couldn't see what was wrote on the shirts. They were referred to as Beer Money Inc. Why does TNA do stupid crap like make shirts. I love TNA but come on. These segments they do: Angle on a date and Storm and Roode acting like idiots but doing entertaining promos.--WillC 02:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The shirts said Beer Money and the name was shown as such on a on screen graphic. JakeDHS07 03:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07

Yeah I agree. I saw it later.--WillC 03:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Its cool man :). Hey we've never talked before but maybe we could be friends like you are with the other ppl on your user page? We are part of the same project after all. Surprised we never met before. JakeDHS07 05:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07

Yeah that sounds like a good idea. My name is William, I mainly just work on TNA stuff.--WillC 05:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ECWtitleJuly2008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you. It looks like shit. But it's needed to achieve GA and FA status (and keep those that are already at it) for PPV articles. Check WT:PW and it's archives for more info. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

About a month or two back. The voting was pretty close and IIRC several people that supported it now dislike it. But the FA reviewers love it and it complies with WP policy. Check the archives of WT:PW. I don't have time to dig up a link right now. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 05:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SummerSlam (2008). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have reverted three edits with no consensus, if you have a problem with the new format, discuss it and do not make changes on your own without a community discussion. One more revert and you will be reported to WP:AIV. S_RX 03:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

It's okay, just watch the history page next time to see the history and reversions of the page to avoid edit wards and breaking the 3RR rule. It is not entirely your fault as you were unaware of the new format, which gives me an idea to discuss at WT:PW. Happy editing. :)--S_RX 03:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No no, it was to add a talk page banner explaining the new format, instead of IP's and New Users always complaining about new things. But I will add your idea to the newsletter, I was going to originally add it, but I forgot to. Thanks.S_RX 03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

For RfA, you need to have at least 10,000 edits and need to be aware of most of Wikipedia's policies.S_RX 03:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ha, well just contribute to Wikipedia more often, I got my 10,000 edits in half a year.S_RX 03:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Sure go ahead. No I am not, and don't plan to be one unless I am nominated, because issues with Users in the past would hurt my nomination, but thanks for your support :)S_RX 04:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I saw your question to SRX about when you joined. I saw in your contributions that your first edit was April 8 2006. That is either the day you joined or close to it.--WillC 06:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

It's kind of complicated, what you are going to have to do is go to User:SRX/Title, User:SRX/Browse Bar, and copy and paste the formatting there. I would like some credit if you use it :)S_RX 12:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. It's Wrestleview that is a reliable source. I get them mixed up sometimes and have to check. A list of reliable sources for WP:PW can be found here. Cheers, Gavyn Sykes (talk)

I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AJakeDHS07/Archive+3 granted] rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:TNAlegendschampionship.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. S_RX 20:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC) --S_RX 20:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey dude, watch Main Event Mafia. Some dude is ignoring my warnings and keeps placing in an image from TNA Wrestling.com which he said he made. Plus keeps thinking he is protecting the page which was decided to be kept as a redirect. Also I fixed the pictures you uploaded earlier today.--WillC 07:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, also look at the user's user page. It is full of copyrighted material. What do you think?--WillC 07:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Well mainly the Rey Mysterio video needs to go. I've seen that video on Youtube and I'm sure that should go. The Owen Hart picture is from Raw is Owen, I believe. Now the ones on his talk page I have on WT:PW for someone to place them up for deletion. I've never placed any image up for deletion so I don't know how. Also I don't want to learn at 4 am.--WillC 07:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

He technically has the right to remove the notices for image deletion. Now on the vandalism warns he loses those rights. If he removes the deletion discussion templates on the images then he should be nominated for a block.--WillC 07:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, after I tell him that he should not remove the notices, if he removes them then he should be placed up for a block nom.--WillC 07:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Good job on the image deletion stuff. Well it looks like he has given up and got offline. Well I'll talk to you later, I'm going to bed. I have a big day later today. I need to go to bed earlier, the story of my life.--WillC 08:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Interesting, well that is mainly the way everyone learns something.--WillC 19:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The Main Event Mafia problem will not go away. I've given up, mainly because I don't give a shit and I want another recent article to work on to get to GA. Check out what I've done so far.--WillC 08:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not.—WillC 02:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

What do u want me to do? Point out the obvious and write down that the picture shows Jericho with the world title? No, wait... you want me to describe the old man's head? You don't write on my talk page informing me that there is no description. Obviously I know there is no description. If you have the time to write on my talk page, I am guessing you can write the description yourself. Uploading a pic is not my job, so don't harass. Alex ^T/_C Guest Book 19:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Who are you voting for?—WillC 08:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay.—WillC 19:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I'm curious why you restored User talk:Jkerl8 and what you meant by your edit summary, "Nope". Was that in response to my remark that had appeared on that page, that users are permitted to blank their talk pages?—Largo Plazo (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I answered at your talk page. JakeDHS07 15:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

What do you think?--WillC 11:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I thought it was time for a change.--WillC 18:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, just i hate my real sources with real info being deleted when it takes me 4eva to do it, sorry anyway if you have a prob wif wat i write message me plz, thanks, p.s look at ref —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iounothing (talk • contribs) 09:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I couldn't sleep. Also, Daniels is returning. Curry Man has the fired slipped. Hernandez has the World, while Homicide has the X.--WillC 12:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Get on IM.WillC 02:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

FaggotTista will win the Rumble now.WillC 21:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Why? No one learned to discuss. Now edit warrs are going to start back up.--WillC 19:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

It should be semi-protected still for vandalism. Ips aren't supposed to be able to edit it.--WillC 22:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey, that link you gave was neat!! I would've said that on the talk page, but I'm making a point not to be on there. SteelersFan-94 20:10, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!--WillC 07:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

It is WP:PW policy to not list future events in wrestlers articles. This means don't mention Sewell's match at Genesis. TJ Spyke 04:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I stated a few things. Plus just for future reference, MCMG won the IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship.--WillC 05:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

What about Adamle? Watch the YouTube video, the "Jeff Harvey" reference is what he was called a couple of times when he was first joined WWF. TJ Spyke 20:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:ECWChampionship.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:ECWChampionship.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TRUCO 04:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Droz info. Grateful--RedRooster96 22:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

You asked why section was deleted.... Seems 75.44.212.64 deleted it at 02:24, 24 February 2009, for no reason. There is a lot of editing on that page at present - and quite a few vandals - I reverted one 24h later, that deleted the college section and placed "hey went to college at mommy basebasment" - that was obvious, where just a small bit gets deleted (and nothing added), then it's hard to say (unless one is an expert on that page) if it is a vandal or a useful edit - Wikipedia rules say that one has to assume good faith unless proven otherwise. Just keep the page in your watched pages, then you can spot any editing. Ronhjones (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much I appreciate it. Cheers, JakeDHS07 05:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)