User talk:Jason at Plot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

I work with Weber Food Technology in a professional capacity and am disclosing this per WP:COI guidelines. The article I have submitted through Articles for Creation is written in neutral encyclopedic tone with independent third-party sources. I welcome editorial review and feedback. PlotMarketing (talk) 04:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weber Food Technology (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 04:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, PlotMarketing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 04:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weber Food Technology (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Press releases, routine business reporting and other primary sources do not establish notability per WP:NCORP.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your username

Hi, your username seems to relate to a business called Plot Marketing, is that right? In which case, your name will need to be changed, as usernames cannot refer to collective entities such as organisations, teams, departments, etc. If you let me know what you would like as your new name, I can rename your account. The username must imply an individual, although it doesn't need to reveal your real name. Examples of acceptable names would be eg. 'Jo at Plot', 'JMS123 Plot', 'Coffee with milk and sugar', etc. (well, I haven't actually checked whether any of those have already been taken, just trying to illustrate a point!).

Note also that Wikipedia user accounts are strictly for use by a single individual. Please confirm that only one person has access to this account. (If there are more than one of you looking to edit, each person will need their own account.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey thanks for that. Jason at Plot would be just fine. Thank you. PlotMarketing (talk) 15:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Okay, done. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weber Food Technology (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Athanelar was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The added sources about acquisitions, new CEOs etc are indeed 'secondary' but that doesn't make them any more suitable for establishing notability; they fall under WP:CORPTRIV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Athanelar (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI