User talk:Joe Roe/Archives/2025
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Joe Roe, for the period 2025. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
| The Special Barnstar | |
| Thank you for everything you do here. -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
notice at wikiproject history
thanks so much for your notification at WikiProject History, re that deletion discussion. it is nice to meet you. I see that you are highly active in a number of roles here. your input would be totally welcome at wikiproject history, any time. i hope you will feel free to post there and to participate in discussions there, any time you may wish. thanks! Sm8900 (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
- Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2025
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
NPP Awards for 2024
|
The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award | ||
| This award is given in recognition to Joe Roe for conducting 982 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 15 January 2025
- From the editors: Looking back, looking forward
The 20th anniversary of The Signpost.
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024
A lot of psephology!
- In the media: Will you be targeted?
HUMINT or humbug?
- Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last
Hallelujah!
- Essay: Meet the Canadian who holds the longest editing streak on Wikipedia
Johnny Au has edited for 17 years straight without missing a day.
- Opinion: Reflections one score hence
Some thoughts from the original editor-in-chief.
- News and notes: It's a new dawn, it's a new day, it's a new life for me... and I'm feeling free
Public Domain Day 2025, Women in Red hits 20% biography milestone, Spanish Wikipedia reaches two million articles, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next
The Signpost staff on achievements of '24 and hopes for '25.
- Op-ed: Elon Musk and the right on Wikipedia
The latest crusade?
- In focus: Twenty years of The Signpost: What did it take?
Our alumni speak!
- Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics
Applying the scientific method to a model of conflict that leads to arbitration.
- Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia
This post fact-checked by real Wikipedian patriots.
You've got mail

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 13:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2025
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2025
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
11:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).
- Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
- A '
Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
- The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.
The Signpost: 7 February 2025
- Recent research: GPT-4 writes better edit summaries than human Wikipedians
But an open language model is ready to help.
- News and notes: Let's talk!
The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- Opinion: Fathoms Below, but over the moon
Editor Fathoms Below reminisces over their successful RfA from February 2024.
- In the media: Wikipedia is an extension of legacy media propaganda, says Elon Musk
Plus, reports on the ARBPIA5 case, new concerns over projects targeting Wikipedia editors, John Green gets his sponsor flowers, and other news.
- Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5 has closed
Ending with some bans, and a new set of editing sanctions.
- Traffic report: A wild drive
The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProjects navigation
Template:WikiProjects navigation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Draftification by extended confirmed editors
@Joe Roe, by chance I ran across @NenChemist who is an extended confirmed editor who has recently been doing a large number of draftifications of academics -- an article I had tagged as part of WP:NPP was draftified. I have not checked all of them, but at least one, Yong-Ling Ruan, clearly passes WP:NPROF on both WP:NPROF#C1 and probably would pass WP:NPROF#C2 and WP:NPROF#C5 as well at WP:AfD. Can you please check into this, as I thought draftification was a normal part of WP:NPP rather than a general procedure. N.B., I have pinged @NenChemist here deliberately as I think an explanation of the large number of recent draftifications is appropriate first, rather than my going and doing reverts. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Göbekli Tepe English variety choice
Joe, I meant no disrespect in my edits to Göbekli Tepe, and I entirely understand if you prefer to have the article entirely in British English. I absolutely, categorically respect "Use British English" tags whenever editing an article. Göbekli Tepe lacked such a tag when I edited it, and there was a lack of consistently in the article's use of English; there were instances of both British and American English (e.g., in the lead: "German archaeologist Klaus Schmidt recognized its significance in 1994 and began excavations there the following year.") and the first author used both American and British English conventions. Accordingly, I attempted to make the article internally consistent, in American English. I have no objections to your edits to strictly enforce British English conventions in the article. However, please avoid introducing inconsistency in doing so, i.e., please ensure that you also change "analyzed" to "analysed", "stabilization" to "stabilisation", "stabilize" to stabilse", "meters" to "metres", etc. Thank you! Meleager91 (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Meleager91: The article has been stable on British English for a long time, tag or no tag. The first author used -ise spellings (e.g. characterised). I wrote the majority of the current text, in British English. Of course inconsistencies creep in but that does not mean you can just choose your preferred variant – I haven't introduced any inconsistencies, only reverted the ENGVAR changes you made here. – Joe (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2025 (UTC)



















