User talk:Joereddington/Archive 1

Hi Joe. Would you please clarify if you have any real world relationships with people who market low-carb diets? For example you might be working as a freelancer or working for a marketing agency. That sort of thing. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 22:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

I do not (at least, I don't know of any). I did once lose some weight on one (and indeed, gained most of it back) - does that count? You are of course, welcome to inspect my career on LinkedIn with a bit of a Google. Joe (talk) 22:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Alan Turing statue surrounded by Flowers 2018 side view.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 03:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

My bad, fixed on source website, thanks for checking Joe (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I put back by Association, as most place lists include people who had lived there, not just born. The harder question is the articles on those people clearly state the connection to Luton. Some did (schooled there, etc.) but not all. Those not could be deleted. David notMD (talk) 03:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi David, just saw this. Thanks for keeping an eye on it :) Joe (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes I'm a big fan of Cirque! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cirque Spain (talk • contribs) 21:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Joe, you asked for feedback so here it is. Your use was correct as the content did need to go and you got the use of the template pretty much spot on. When you enter a start revision id you only need the number e.g. {{copyvio-revdel| url=https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.html?wbdisable=true|start=882387690}} would do rather than {{copyvio-revdel| url=https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.html?wbdisable=true|start=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Public_Prosecution_Service_of_Canada&oldid=882387690}} It doesn't make much difference but it's less copy and paste for you. It's handy to add a finish id too but as that is more often than not, the revision immediately before the one where you add the template we can normally work these out. Thanks for your efforts. Nthep (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Nthep - it's great to get feedback - particuarly when working on this sort of issue - can feel very lonely around here :) Joe (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Depth of field you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 02:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Awesome! This is exactly the prompt I needed to spend a bit more time editing :) Joe (talk) 04:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Depth of field you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Depth of field for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Joereddington. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Chirp (Twitter Client).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your edit to 2020 United States federal government data breach has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Diannaa,

I would argue, mostly for the benefit of anyone else reading my talk page, that the edit was a mildly close rewrite of sourced factual content, but I'm happy to be corrected :) Joe (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

I have temporarily undone the revision deletion so you can have a look. Here is a link to the Copyvio Detector comparison. You can see that some parts are okay, some parts are quotation, and some parts are directly copied. Since it's a timeline, I decided complete removal was the best option. — Diannaa (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Entirely fair enough, and thank you for showing your reasoning. I suspected it was close to the line at the time and clearly didn't paraphrase as much as I thought of. FWIW - most of the motivation for putting it in was to provide a bit of a structure for other bits of that article to move to. At the moment it feels very unstructured... Joe (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yahoo! data breaches you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

The article Yahoo! data breaches you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yahoo! data breaches for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Joereddington: How goes it? I had to revert the updates you did to the Forrest Galante. Your using IMDB is references, which is not a reliable source. I already removed these links when I did a cleanup of the article when the author of the article was taken to the coin noticeboard about 4-6 weeks ago. Per WP:IMDB they are no more than social media links. I'm suprised. You've been eight years yet your still using dodgy sources. Don't put them back in. If the podcast was notable and per WP:NOTNEWS it would have other standalone coverage in many other places. scope_creep^Talk 14:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Also edit requests must have good references before they can go ahead. That edit request had nothing. Are you connected or do have a relationship with Forrest Galante. If you do you will need to declare a WP:COI. scope_creep^Talk 14:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Yahoo! data breaches you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yahoo! data breaches and Talk:Yahoo! data breaches/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yahoo! data breaches you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 18:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello 94.44.225.95 (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page T-Mobile data breach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British Airways data breach you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

The article Yahoo! data breaches you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yahoo! data breaches for comments about the article, and Talk:Yahoo! data breaches/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2015 TalkTalk data breach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page British Airways data breach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

The article British Airways data breach you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:British Airways data breach for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

I've just looked at my Talkpage and discoverd I never thanked you for your review. I'm very sorry. I genuinely thought I had. I'm aware it takes a lot of time and thought to review articles - I know your comments will be very helpful. Joe (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article 2015 TalkTalk data breach has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days.

Your good article nomination of the article 2015 TalkTalk data breach has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pietrus1 -- Pietrus1 (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article British Airways data breach is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pietrus1 -- Pietrus1 (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article British Airways data breach has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Pietrus1 (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article British Airways data breach has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pietrus1 -- Pietrus1 (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page SYN flood, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:11, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of British Airways data breach at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 21:06, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Capita data breach is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Metalicat -- Metalicat (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Capita data breach has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Metalicat -- Metalicat (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

On 14 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 LastPass data breach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a key moment in the 2022 LastPass data breach saw an attacker compromise an engineer's Plex account? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/LastPass 2022 data breach. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 LastPass data breach), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

On 16 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British Airways data breach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 2018 data breach at British Airways was traced to just 22 lines of injected JavaScript on its payment pages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Airways data breach. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, British Airways data breach), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:03, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

On 10 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2023 Capita data breach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that attackers in the 2023 Capita data breach deployed ransomware to more than 1,000 hosts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2023 Capita data breach. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2023 Capita data breach), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)