User talk:Jpdfive

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 99 (number), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 99.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Can you please explain why you think WP:NAMB does not apply here? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:17, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Because it is ambiguous, if they werent, the same link to Queen Elizabeth Hospital wouldnt already be in place on the QE hospitals in Birmingham, Bristol, Glasgow, Welwyn (QEII), Australia, Barbados, and Malawi. I know its necessary because I ended up on the wrong page, looking for a different one, before I'd even edited it. There are 13 hospitals with exactly the same name that have wikipedia pages, 19 with variations. Jpdfive (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

But if you were looking for information about a hospital in, say, Birmingham, why would you select the page that has "London" in the title? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:02, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Jacob Hill.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TheNewMinistry. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ozzy Osbourne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheNewMinistry (talk) 02:58, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

The images you added did not show the funeral precession as described, three of them showed exactly the same thing. Dunno what the sandbox bit means, i effectively just undone an edit. Jpdfive (talk) 06:49, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jpdfive. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "LandFlight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)