User talk:KGOO510

Hi KGOO510! I noticed your contributions to Camilla, Queen Consort and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 18:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Queen Camilla, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please note there should be no intervening space between punctuation and a reference. See WP:CITEFOOT. DrKay (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Charles III. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per , please note there should be no intervening space between punctuation and a reference. See WP:CITEFOOT. DrKay (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

The last part of the Leading section is poorly written, which is acknowledged by everyone involved in the discussion. I don't understand why is not allowed to discuss and revise it? And why must insist on using “the signature events include” version? Charles's reign's major events can be described in detail. His visits to Germany and France were successful and strengthened post-Brexit ties (this is a fact), he continued to work while receiving treatment (this is a fact), and he is the first reigning king to visit Australia (also a fact). I just want to express my view. 223.16.62.17 (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State visit by Charles III to Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Jackson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Special:Contributions/223.16.62.17 while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of titles and honours of Charles III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Charles III Stakes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Please don't place link adjacent to each other, such as Sandringham House ([[Sandringham House|Sandringham]] [[Sandringham House|House]]) as you did here. Just use Sandringham House ([[Sandringham House]]). Thanks. DrKay (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! Drmies (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)