User talk:Laserman-69420

Welcome Laserman-69420!

Talk Page

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from Center for Science and Culture without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You also failed to leave an edit summary. Doug Weller talk 14:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Center for Science and Culture, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Jaiden Animations. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sugar Tax (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jaiden Animations. Please stop removing names without explanation. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Professor Dave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~2026-80954-2 (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Green anaconda, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green anaconda, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Boa and Constrictor were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 23:57, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Please don't make disturbing edits as you did here. When someone asks for a source of for clarification, please consider doing just that, as opposed to making a non-encyclopedic remark like that. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 14:50, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Torus (Company). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Professor Dave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Dave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Agent 007 (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Post-anal tail. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mathglot (talk) 03:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Günter Bechly has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 17 § Günter Bechly until a consensus is reached. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Please use Help:Edit summary when you edit WP-articles, to help other editors understand what you are doing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Laserman-69420! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Jaiden Animations. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Jaiden Animations, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. There is no evidence or source linking the two. Simply saying they are related because there are the same names involved will not cut it.. Realtent (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axolotl, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toothless was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)