User talk:Lucygbuchanan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Berta Carew has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Berta Carew. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berta Carew (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still filled with inaccessible and archival sources, as well as likely LLM hallucinations. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources — it's fine if these sources are offline, but they can't be archival materials that haven't been published.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lucygbuchanan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Berta Carew

Information icon Hello, Lucygbuchanan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Berta Carew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berta Carew (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The first reference that I was able to check without rising from my chair was for the assertion Her father, Frank Bliss Coleman, was a toolmaker and master mechanic at the Okonite Company, one of the oldest engineering firms in the United States. The reference is to a short newspaper article* titled "Has Had No Asthma For Two Years Now". This I read. It has no mention of (i) a daughter (or indeed anything about the family of "Frank Coleman"); (ii) being a toolmaker or master mechanic (or indeed anything about Coleman's trade or employment); (iii) Okonite; (iv) the middle name "Bliss".

* More likely an "advertorial" at best. As it reads like an advert and ends "—Adv.", it appears to be merely an advert paid for by the Nacor Medicine Co.

Should GraziePrego have written the reviewer comment below in bold or in CAPS?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 04:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Berta Carew has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Berta Carew. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 05:34, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Berta Carew has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Berta Carew. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berta Carew (April 30)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nighfidelity, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for creative professionals. The draft requires:

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of a creative work than of a person. If the person is not yet notable, but their work has received multiple in-depth professional reviews, consider writing about the work instead.
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Still needs fixing. Please include the best three sources per the previous comment.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Berta Carew to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Nighfidelity (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berta Carew (August 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Avgeekamfot, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for creative professionals. The draft requires:

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of a creative work than of a person. If the person is not yet notable, but their work has received multiple in-depth professional reviews, consider writing about the work instead.
Could be a WP:NARTIST#4 pass if shown that her work is in the permanent collection of an additional museum or gallery in addition to the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Berta Carew to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Avgeekamfot (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI