Wikiwand AI

User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 63

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 60Archive 61Archive 62Archive 63Archive 64Archive 65→Archive 70

Your GA nomination of Bean dip

The article Bean dip you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bean dip for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

CCA

Could you please in-line this reference? I think that would be far more useful. Perhaps at the end of the history section. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @Zigzig20s: I moved the link from the External links section to the Further reading section because it's a news article from The Wall Street Journal. I may not get around to incorporating the source into the text of the article, so no guarantees about this. It's also paywalled. However, I did just format the source (diff). North America1000 15:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

AfD for List of films considered the best (by year)

Hi Northamerica1000, I noticed that you relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best (by year). I'm not an AfD regular, but I strongly believe there is consensus for deletion. The creator of the article him/herself agreed about the deletion, and the page almost qualifies for G7. What was the reason for relisting, and if there is truly no consensus yet per AfD standards, what should be done? Thanks. (Disclaimer, I am the nominator) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 14:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Followup on AfD discussion

I have left you a followup question on the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGyver the Lizard. Thank you for your input. Lizzymartin (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

2016–17 Lincoln City F.C. season

Hello Northamerica1000. Can I ask that you consider reinstating the prod on this article. The season is indeed sure to occur, but Lincoln play at the fifth level in a non fully-professional league, so the article doesn't pass WP:NSEASONS. We've already had several AfDs on season articles for clubs in the same league for this season, all of which have resulted in delete (1, 2, 3), and I'm loathe to waste more time with another. Cheers, Number 57 10:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @Number 57: Done (diff). Thanks for pointing out those other discussions. North America1000 10:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
    • No problem at all, thanks for being open to changing your mind! Number 57 10:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd like to point out that not all recent discussions about 5th tier (or lower) teams have resulted in delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 AFC Wimbledon season. If you look at, for example, Category:2013–14 Football Conference by team almost half the teams have had articles. While there is no consensus that 5th tier teams can automatically have articles, there isn't a clear consensus on deletion, especially for teams that bounce back and forth to the Football League, or have significant coverage that may meet WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Just to rebut the above (and I'm sorry this has spread to your talk page but there is a long history to this), but there is a clear consensus to delete based on over a dozen AfDs (the three above plus these: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), whilst a much smaller number (three or four, one of which was deleted at the second AfD) have resulted in no consensus. Unfortunately some editors are unable to accept this... Number 57 23:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
    • And some editors seem to want to ignore the AFD discussions that demonstrate that there isn't a clear consensus to delete all these articles, wanting to ignore that some meet WP:GNG. One of the 3 original examples above was deleted on "too soon" argument; another was anything but a clear consensus (and quite frankly, I believe the closer to have been too involved in the debate to close). I believe each article should be discussed on it's own merits. I also believe that it's not clear that these articles violate WP:NSEASONS - the same rule is used to support the existence seasons articles of professional teams were players have other jobs in the off-season in other sports. It doesn't refer to fully-professional leagues, and yet some in the Footy area want to apply it to fully-professional teams in a national-level professional league. Nfitz (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
  • It doesn't come across that there's a long-term consensus regarding all of this. Overall consensus thus far may be leaning toward certain outcomes, but significant, well-established consensuses, such as those present in notability guidelines, can take time to form. Another example is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, which is not a guideline page, but is based upon years worth of AfD discussion outcomes. Perhaps an RfC about the matter somewhere would be in order, to obtain greater community input. North America1000 03:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Maybe RfC is the solution. We did discuss last year in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 95#Notability of seasons articles for Conference Premier teams however there was no clear consensus. Part of the problem is a couple of high-volume editors seem to be waging a campaign of starting with the low-hanging fruit, and using that to delete many years of articles that have existed for a long time. And then there was the threat to have me banned from Wikipedia, if I removed prods from season articles, because I think that each one should go to AfD on it's own merits. Nfitz (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2016)


Heraldic Badge of the Spanish West Indies
Hello, Northamerica1000.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Spanish West Indies

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Archaeological record • The Sims (video game)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Adam McCune

Hi. No need for an AfD for Adam McCune. If you speedy it (e.g {{Db-move}}) I can do that right away. Tassedethe (talk) 02:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tassedethe:  Done. Yes, this is the better way to go. Thanks for the suggestion. I have performed some of these deletions and page moves in the past, but I overlooked this option for whatever reason at the time. Since I'm involved at this point, I tagged the page, for another admin to perform the deletion. North America1000 02:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Patrick Burris DYK

NorthAmerica, this may seem a quibble, but the recently promoted DYK hook for Patrick Burris would read better if the word "in" were changed to "on." Is it possible to make the change? Thanks!Dnforney (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @Dnforney:  Done. Thanks for the suggestion, and I agree. See diff. North America1000 18:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
    • You rock, NorthAmerica, thanks! Is there a way to know when this will 'run?' Respect. Dnforney (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Nicholas Jordan

You were the deleting administrator on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Jordan (2nd nomination). Can you please look at Draft: Nicholas Jordan and see if it is an improvement over the deleted draft? As a non-admin reviewer, I don't want to approve an article that was deleted unless there is an improvement. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @Robert McClenon: The deleted article and draft article are not identical in that the information is organized in a different order. Both contain much the same information, in some instances with exact phrase matches, but not entirely. Some of the differences include:
  • The deleted article did not have information present in the Early life and education section of the draft
  • Information about Finstar differs between the two
  • Content about Goldman Sachs is shorter in the draft. The deleted article had more content.
  • The deleted article had 11 sources. The draft has 18.
  • Content about Deutsche Bank differs. The deleted article had more content about it compared to the draft.
In my opinion, the draft is only a slight improvement compared to the deleted article. North America1000 00:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

(DYK)

The 25 DYK Nomination Medal
Hi, I see you're not only writing great new food articles, you're nominating them, too! Here's a little overdue recognition for your 25 (and counting) DYK nominations. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bean dip

The article Bean dip you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bean dip for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens (talk) 03:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Name change

Hi, Northamerica1000! I'd simply like to tell you that I have changed my username from The Pancake of Heaven! to WikiPancake. From now on, please ping me with my new username! If there is a place where I stated myself as "The Pancake of Heaven," please let me know (minus signatures.) See my user page for more info. Thank you. :) WikiPancake ✉ 📖 14:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Re:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Schaefer

Your GA nomination of ReaLemon

Tech News: 2016-35

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2016)

Mimosa salad

A kitten for you!

Tech News: 2016-36

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

Sorting tables

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2016)

Speak to him

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News

Tech News: 2016-37

VU TANG CLAN Page

Reconsideration

A barnstar for you!

AFD review

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: September 2016

Possible BLP Violations

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2016)

Renominated Mischaela Advani for Deletion

Juanita Musson

FAC

Born for You

democracy

Tech News: 2016-38

U505

Hi I am Rajput hunjan from rajasthan all hunjan are rajputs

Can you check this? Comment

(Untitled)

Quick question

Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks