User talk:Oknazevad/Archive 20

Oknazevad,

I have been the one editing the T-Mobile, Sprint and Dish Network pages. I thought that the merger was completed.

I have one question though is Sprint now dissolved and can we put July 26, 2019 in the dissolved box ?

Here are the edits so far,

1. The subsidiaries of Sprint now belong to Dish Network. Boost Mobile Virgin Mobile USA Open Mobile

2. I went to each page and cited that the owner has changed. ^[1]

3. I then went to T-Mobile page and put Sprint as a division.

76.223.244.197 (talk) 18:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

No, today was just a regulatory approval, with conditions . The actual sales are not yet complete. Sprint still exists, is not yet owned by T-Mobile, and have not sold Boost or Virgin to Dish yet. Be patient, and don't rush, which leads to incorrect articles. oknazevad (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

All completely understandable. 76.223.244.197 (talk) 18:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Oknazevad. I agree that there may be some problems with the revision you undid, but as I mentioned, this is an instance of WP:BABY, meaning by undoing the revision, you removed some aspects of the revision which were not problematic. Could you please go back and consider directly which parts of the revision were, to your mind, incorrect, and which parts were not, and manually edit those pieces? Also, I was in the process of fixing the revision myself and adding some references, but you undid my reversion so quickly I had no time to complete my task. If you revert someone's contribution, and someone else comes along and reverts it back, consider how it appears to immediately revert it a third time yourself. Respectfully, PhobosIkaros ✉ 23:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

The problem is none of the three parts of the edit are worth keeping. The infobox does not support a theme song parameter (and it would be misformatted anyway), the parenthetical on the one driver's name is unneeded and unexplained, and the third part of the edit was incorrect info that broke a citation. It was unsalvagable.

Also, I'd just like to point out in your subsequent edit that you used IMDb as a source. IMDb is not considered a reliable source as it's user-generated content. A different source would be better. oknazevad (talk) 15:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, Oknazevad. I understand your perspective and respect your editing choice. --PhobosIkaros ✉ 14:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Oknazevad,

I don't know why you removed the color section of the officer ranks on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Armed_Forces_ranks_and_insignia. This is an official layout, and as being member of the Canadian Armed Forces, I do confirm that they in fact exist. Publications aren't available for public release.

The system is based on the British one since 2016. I added this section since there is nothing public that explains those colors;

Thanks for your understanding.

Cheers.

Refs: A. Internal memorandum 11110-1 (G7-4), 26 feb 2014, OPERATION ORDER - CANADIAN ARMY IDENTITY B. CAO 33-19 - PUBLIC FUNDING TO RESTORE CA CORPS’ IDENTITIES C. CFSS Materiel Authorization (D01102CFS) - ARMY- BASIC CLOTH REGULAR & RESERVE, 20161005

as long as it's sourced, I have no objections. oknazevad (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

The high-end blends I added from https://www.johnniewalker.com/en-us/our-whisky/john-walker-and-sons/ are NOT the "special bottlings"...THOSE are found at https://www.johnniewalker.com/en-us/our-whisky/limited-editions/ .--12.144.5.2 (talk) 17:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

	~by the way ~
	Very nice to meet you. ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 03:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Nice to meet you too! Look forward to working with you. oknazevad (talk) 05:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Railroad electrification in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hudson Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Oknazevad. Is this a proper way to cite a source? #46. I just came across that article today. Thanks ~mitch~ (talk) 16:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Well, an email isn't exactly the best source. I tagged it as such. It's also not appropriate to include the entire text of an email in a ref. oknazevad (talk) 22:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Yea, the whole email part is what I was wondering about. Thanks ~mitch~ (talk) 22:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prop (stage, screen). Since you had some involvement with the Prop (stage, screen) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Oknazevad, re: this revision diff: The source in question, while it is a primary source as you state, no longer exists; see here. Well, actually, the link goes to a general webpage in Sesame Workshop.org, as do many of the old character descriptions and puppeteer bios, which the SW removed as they're continually improved their website. I've been methodically going through this list and updating it, and as you can see here, I have been using the SW website, as well as several other websites, as primary sources where there's no other support for the list entries. Of course, if you had visited those links, perhaps you would've seen that. Also, your revision broke the link to SW's bio of Jennifer Barnhart, so could you fix that, please? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Then the solution is to use archive links from the internet archive, not remove the material outright. oknazevad (talk) 22:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

I've found, for most of the SW links in this article, that no archive links exist. It doesn't mean that we can't re-add the material once reliable sources are found. This is a FL, with strict adherence to WP:RS. The broken links and outdated content are why it shouldn't be a FL any longer, and cutting material that no longer has RS is the way to improve its quality to previous standards. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

All due respect, but USA ain't paying $50 million a year for a "developmental" brand. plus WWE flat out called NXT their third global brand alongside Raw and SD. NXT is now a big boy brand, there's no 2 ways around it.

Vjmlhds (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Still not equal to Raw and SmackDown. Please discuss at the wikiproject. Changes like that need broad consensus, and a lot of buy-in from many participants, not the unilateral change of one person. oknazevad (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Not equal according to who? You? If the actual company that owns it calls it equal (essentially), then why is it even an issue? Vjmlhds (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Parroting company line is promotional and a violation of NPOV. It's a significant issue in pro wrestling articles. oknazevad (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

The vast majority of Vjmlhds's edits did not call NXT equal to Raw. They stated it started as developmental and are not a global touring brand. Stating that is not incorrect, and the sourcing supports it. Any changes saying its a 3rd major brand definitely need to be discussed, but I see nothing wrong with just stating what the sources clearly state. - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 19:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

But his edits did plainly elevate NXT to equal to Raw. That's what I have issues with. oknazevad (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

This revert did not say it was equal to. Plus you removed other info too - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 19:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Galatz for backing me up. I have since added a reference from CBS Sports (a reliable source) that calls NXT WWE's third major brand, so it ain't just WWE tooting it's own horn, or me just blindly echoing them. Vjmlhds (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

The Nwa was a part of Impact Wrestling in the early 2000's it was originally called NWA TNA using both worlds and tag team championships you should allow this into the NWA page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howieman43 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I am well aware of the history, being I watched it happen. The NWA article already covers this. Do not copy entire sections from one article to another like that! Stop your useless edits or you will be blocked for gross incompetence. oknazevad (talk) 01:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Whiskey is grain-based. It is either made with Rye (Rye Liquor) or Wheat ("Corn" Liquor, a designation dating back to Colonial times). Hotspur23 (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Absolutely not. Bourbon is made with corn/maize. Period. And you ignore malt whiskey, which is made from barley. Maybe you should actually read the references instead of introducing easily disproven errors. You clearly lack competence in the subject matter and absolutely must stop editing in the area or I will pursue a topic ban for gross incompetence. oknazevad (talk) 01:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop spuriously tagging files with speedy deletion notices based on your sole opinion of policy. I, to put it bluntly, dispute your interpretation, and do believe these files meet the non-free content use criteria based on their use as the primary means of identification of the differing editions of the game, which is the exact subject of the article in question. In short, you cannot single-handedly dictate their deletion. Clearly there's a difference of opinion here, and I desire that we find an appropriate forum to solicit additional opinions. If there's consensus that my interpretation is inappropriate, I will not object, but I don't like the idea of one editor declaring only his interpretation valid. oknazevad (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

• • @JJMC89: oknazevad (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition Player's Handbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:D&D 1983 Basic Rules cover.jpg
• File:D&D Basic Rules 1981.jpg
• File:Dungeons and Dragons 3rd Edition Player's Handbook.jpg
• File:Dungeons and Dragons 4th Edition Player's Handbook.jpg
• File:Dungeons and Dragons 5th Edition Player's Handbook.jpg
• File:The Classic Dungeons & Dragons Game 1994 boxed set.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

May need some additional eyes (or at least another opinion) on this one. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I've watchlisted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

	Stop editing the things I edit please
	I am just trying to show fans that most wrestlers dont go by their real name and if they want to they can know them Raymond5150 (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

No. oknazevad (talk) 20:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

There is no point to include no related titles with the original world title. Even if are world titles, are 100 years appart, like ROH and AEW. "One purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics; however, articles linked should be related to the topic of the article." IWGP, ROH, WWE Universal and AEW titles are no related in any way with the original world championship, so there is no point to include them in an article. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I disagree that they are unrelated as topics. I think you're getting hung up on the idea that "related" here means "claims lineage from". That's not what that means, as that guideline is for all articles, not just wrestling related ones. They're still related in that they're widely recognized world heavyweight championships in the generic sense. That's exactly the sort of "similar but nut directly derived" thing see also sections are meant to include. oknazevad (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

It's a very vague relationship, like including Nick Mondo in Undertaker's article just because "are pro wrestlers". Are 100 years appart, promotions are no related. The titles has no relationship with the article, there is no place for them in the see also section. Tangentially it's the key word, no just "both are world titles". --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I edited History of Sesame Street to fix a lint error, specifically, a Bogus file options lint error. My edit was correct, but you reverted me. Right now, the Information page of History of Sesame Street shows under the heading "Lint errors" the list of lint errors, which is "Bogus file options" – 1. But even if this were somehow serving as a technically valid alt text, it would still be wrong. see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#How to write alternative text, which shows a picture of Queen Elizabeth II wearing a hat, with this caption:

Unless it appears in an article on fashion, the alt text should not be "an elderly woman wearing a black hat"

So, if this image does need an alt text, it should not be "An African American man, in his late 50s, wearing a blue and white striped shirt and a dark blue jacket, at the right, holding a red puppet on the left. Both are looking towards the right." None of this is of interest. What is of interest is that the man is Kevin Clash, the portrayer of Elmo, and that the puppet is Elmo, a prominent character on Sesame Street, and perhaps that the picture was taken at the Peabody Awards Luncheon in 2010. Moreover, an alt text needs alt= to work. So my change was correct on three grounds. First, I fixed a lint error. Second, even if it weren't a lint error, the text was poor and contrary to Wikipedia's manual of style for an alt text. Third, it wasn't set up as a proper alt text anyway. Please reconsider your reversion. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Firstly, you are correct that the markup was missing, and I fixed that. But you're incorrect about the need to change the content. Alt text is supposed to describe in plain terms what is in the picture on a purely visual level, to describe exactly what is seen so that blind readers using screen reader software can have the image drawn for them, as it were. The caption describes things like who is in the image, the alt text describes what they look like for those who can't actually see the image. oknazevad (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Do you think MJF and Dustin are part of the Elite, or at least, associated? I watched every Dynamite and PPV, but I didn't heared about MJF and Dustin joining The Elite. Looks like everyone is following their own path. Cody has his own stable, The Nightmare Family (Cody, Brandi, DDP, Dustin and MJF) but looks like a different stable that The Elite. I only heared The Elite twice, when Omega and The Young Bucks wrestled together. But for example, Omega and Page weren't presented as The Elite. BTW, I don't like the associates section, since it's a open-member section where users includes every wrestler they want. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

According to cagematch, The Elite only wrestled 3 times, all of them, Omega and The Bucks. No mention of Cody, Hangman or Dustin. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Well, the Elite definitely includes Cody and Hangman; they even have specific Elite t-shirts like Omega and the Bucks. Dustin and MJF (until last Saturday) were associates, as they worked with Cody, but aren't members. Beyond that, there's not much else to say. oknazevad (talk) 12:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please do not do this again. Instead, please join in the discussion at Talk:List_of_James_Bond_films#Problems_with_recent_changes_and_suggestions_for_compromise_solution and leave the WP:STATUS QUO intact until that discussion has come to an end. Please note that your edit reintroduced errors and flaws, so PLEASE be careful when knee-jerk reverting. - SchroCat (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Stil edit warring against clear consensus. Every single other editor has reverted you. oknazevad (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Crassly stupid thing to do. - SchroCat (talk) 15:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:TNA Heavyweight Championship.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit on Irish whiskey, I think it's fair. (There used to be a "thank" link on page histories, I can't find it anymore!) 203.106.220.73 (talk) 07:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You reverted a change I made to the lede of Coca-Cola, saying, "But it wasn't refined cocaine, so that is an inaccurate statement." But the article in question said (and still says), "When launched, Coca-Cola's two key ingredients were cocaine and caffeine.", citing sources that say "it contained two key ingredients which have long held a fascination for members of the human race - cocaine and caffeine" and "the soft drink, which was marketed as a tonic, contained extracts of cocaine as well as the caffeine-rich kola nut". If you disagree with this statement, could you cite a source showing that these claims are wrong? -Silence (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

The point is the cocaine and caffeine aren't the source of the name, which is what the sentence is about. The product is "Coca-Cola", not "Cocaine-Caffeine". oknazevad (talk) 11:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wharton Field House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Basketball League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎ 11:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :) BOZ (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ecosphere disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Ecosphere disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

I noticed you undid an edit specifying the name of the first MLB team. Can I ask why? I don't disagree with your decision, I'm trying to learn proper Wikipedia writing and it's not something I would have thought to do. a11ce (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Because it removed the link for no reason. Also, the Cincinnati Red Stockings were the first all-professional baseball team, but not part of the modern MLB organization, as they predate the formation of the Major Leagues as we know them. oknazevad (talk) 16:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)