User talk:Ovedc/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ovedc. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuval Dagim (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Date of birth needs to be backed up by sources. This source, which was identified as a prayer service, does not seem to be reliable source. YouTube video should not be used as a source either, if editor(s) want to write about the event covered in the video, use written coverage from reliable news media. Most of the cited sources are announcements of the subject being appointed to certain positions, while nothing's wrong about citing them, more details and sources should be used to summarize the subject performance on some of the positions, so the career section won't just look like a giant resume.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuval Dagim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ovedc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sivan Rotem (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The more relevant guideline is WP:NMUSIC. Many of the sources are YouTube which is generally considered unreliable so please see WP:RSPYT (some may be fine but some certainly are not). Also interviews are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability and see WP:NOTGALLERY. If resubmitted please provide the best three sources that support notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sivan Rotem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mine (company)

Hello, Ovedc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yair Schindel

Hello, Ovedc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yair Schindel".

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equashield (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Equashield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bat Ella (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BLP. All statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bat Ella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Simon L. Dolan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Simon L. Dolan. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon L. Dolan (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage. Not enough citations on Google Scholar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon L. Dolan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Paid edits

Hello. I had to spend at least 20 minutes earlier today cleaning up your additions to Uriel Lynn. It does not seem right that others have to give their time to clean up edits that you were paid to make. May I propose that any editor who has to spend time cleaning up your paid edits has a right to ask you to donate an amount of your fee (proportionate to their time spent on cleaning up your edits) to the WMF? Number 5 7 17:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Number 57, Hello! I am very sorry for the troubles, I have seen all your corrections, and I learned a lot from it. I will try to do the best effort to keep it more professional, thanks! Ovedc (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

You shouldn't be directly editing on your clients page anyways. I brought up concerns about your public relations editing for your clients to COI Noticeboard some time ago and you didn't comment on it. There's another concern on COI/N about your paid editing Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_164#Noam_Shalev Graywalls (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

@Number 57: Graywalls (talk) 08:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

@Graywalls: Yeah, I think we need to consider action here. It's unacceptable for volunteer editors to have to spend time clearing up after someone who is getting paid to edit. Perhaps an ANI thread might be the way forward? Number 5 7 11:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruach Tova (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Different languages of Wikipedia have different standards, having an article in one does not necessarily justify inclusion in another. The quality of cited sources here is not optimistic, with most being materials published by the subject itself, or cooperating organizations announcing events that saw the participation of the subject. Entries in databases and trivial mentions in the news do not help the case of notability either. The overall tone is also far from neutral.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruach Tova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Kobi Sitt moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kobi Sitt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and References are passing mentions. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 10:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Related Articles