User talk:Pastore Italy

Given the number you have made can you complete some of the other requests? Let me know when you have and I'll take a second look as well to make sure its reasonable. EDIT: It's good to spread the work :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

it is usually extremely informal below GA standard which the computing assessment page handles. I.e. I'll have a quick read through the article and see which category it is in. I'll do a couple of more formal reviews either on an article talk page or on my/your talk page over the next week so you can see what to do. I don't think anyone is too bothered - if it's borderline B/C then either would generally be fine to give. But it's worth seeing how it works. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 15:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

These links you proposed here are alreay done by interwiki-bots. You do not need to fix all these links by hand. An overview and documentation of pywikipediabot you may find on m:Pywikipediabot. There are several links to other language codes. And btw. #redirect does not work between different language codes. You have to use a direct link like [[:en:User talk:Pastore Italy]] which leads to this page here. On en-wiki and some other wikis you may use {{softredirect}} but this only displays this link and a redirect icon. Greetings Xqt (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Ciao Pastore,

I am also not a native English speaker: I just used a spell-checker of MS Word. And I don't have anything to do with IT risks so I can't judge the quality of the article. What I know is how to find EU legislation and how to find out if it is e.g. already expired or replaced by another piece of legislation. But it remains your job to read it all and incorporate it into the article. Regards

Dzsi (talk) 11:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for taking so long to get round to it, but I had a look at Stuxnet this evening and I think its B class - it has a good lead, lots of sources and covers the topic reasonably and is pretty well written - especially once you get into it you can be quite quick and only take 5-10 minutes to look at the article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Asset (computing) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

The source's CC-BY-NC-SA is incompatible with Wikipedia's license. --Pnm (talk) 02:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Same goes for copyrighted content in Factor Analysis of Information Risk. --Pnm (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The article Impact (security) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impact (security) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pnm (talk) 03:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to IT risk management has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Pnm (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I've just reverted your addition of Bruce Schneier to Category:Computer security books, because he is not a book. I notice that you appear to have added a few other people to the category. I don't think that's what the category is for, but I'll take it up on Category talk:Computer security books. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

See also Talk:Bruce Schneier#Is Bruce a book? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I see you have listed yourself as a participant at Wikiproject Computing Assessment, as being interested in evaluating computing-related articles. There is a discussion right now at Talk:Apple media events about the article Apple media events. The questions are: 1) Does the article Apple media events fall under Wikiproject Computing; and if so, 2) What Importance (Top, High, Mid, Low) should it be assigned? Your participation is appreciated! Thanks... Zad68 (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Pastore Italy,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Pastore Italy! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Threat (computer security), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc2828.txt.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Threat (computer security) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Threat (computer security), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Threat (computer security). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Threat (computer security) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Threat (computer security) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Unstirredshading23 (talk) 16:02, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Risk factor (computing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://courses.cs.taltech.ee/w/images/d/dd/Risk_it_framework.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Unstirredshading23 (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)