User talk:Patrickrox11

Please stop adding fake episodes to List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. --Caldorwards4 23:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

If DJ patrick is an episode than why tell me? it isn't really important. If it turns out to be a real episode than they will know. I think it is a real episode since I heard rumors about it since March. If you'd like to duscuss new spongebob episode than... whatever.--Chikinpotato11 22:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

im not the one addimg new episodes, i have no idea who is, i only added Grief Counseling and Diwali

Hello. I came across you on the Spongebob Squarepants episode list and found out you're interested in hurricanes, just like me. So I thought you might want to know about the Tropical Cyclone WikiProject, which you can join by adding your name to the list of members. It's pretty cool how so many people have a common interest. I hope you join. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 00:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Just go to WP:TROP, scroll down into you reach the list of members, then add your signature at the end of the list. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 20:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Glad to see you're aboard! íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 20:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! Our Wikiproject is dedicated to high standards for writing articles about tropical cyclones, and as such our work has been mentioned by scholars and news reports from around the world. There are numerous ongoing projects occurring within the project, including providing the latest information on active tropical cyclones, and bettering existing articles for older storm articles. The next two items are template-form information letters to tropical cyclone participants. First is the ideal format for a tropical cyclone article, which we strongly encourage users to abide by due to our prominence as a leading area in information for tropical cyclones.

Dear Tropical cyclone editor,

As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.

1. Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
2. Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
3. Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexible, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
4. Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
5. Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
6. Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
7. Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
8. Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.

Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.

Here's a copy of our latest monthly newsletter.

Number 5, October 1, 2006

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. The WikiProject has its own IRC channel.

"TD's should be bolded, as they are the impetus of every storm, weak or strong."

Storm of the month

Hurricane Ioke is the most intense hurricane on record in the Central Pacific. After forming on August 19 to the south of Hawaii, Ioke moved to the northwest and hit Johnston Atoll as a Category 2 hurricane. It strengthened further as it moved to the west, reaching Category 5 strength on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale three times, twice in the Central Pacific and once in the Western Pacific. After the storm entered the Western Pacific it directly hit Wake Island. The storm finally became extratropical on September 7 but its extratropical remnants affected Alaska. Overall damage from Hurricane Ioke was light.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• 4 hurricanes formed in the Atlantic: Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Gordon, Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Isaac. Florence affected Bermuda and Newfoundland, and Gordon had effects in the Azores and Europe. Isaac is currently forecast to affect Newfoundland as an extratropical storm.
• The east Pacific saw three hurricanes and a tropical storm develop. Hurricane John and Hurricane Lane were both major hurricanes which hit Mexico, whilst Hurricane Kristy and Tropical Storm Miriam stayed clear of land. In addition, two tropical depressions formed in the Central Pacific.
• There were 4 typhoons in west Pacific during September. Typhoon Shanshan, Typhoon Yagi and Typhoon Xangsane formed in the west Pacific and Typhoon Ioke entered the basin from the east. Shanshan killed at least 9 people in Japan and Typhoon Xangsane, which is still active, killed at least 72 in the Philippines.
• Two tropical cyclones formed in the North Indian Ocean during September. Severe Cyclonic Storm Mukda formed in the Arabian Sea but did not affect land and Tropical Cyclone 05B formed in the Bay of Bengal before making landfall in India. However, the deadliest tropical system of September was a depression in the Bay of Bengal that killed more than 170 people in Bangladesh.

New and improved articles

• New storm articles include: Harry Cane of 1667, Hurricane Florence (2006), Hurricane Abby (1968) and Hurricane Lane (2006).
• New non-storm articles include: Monsoon trough, List of Pennsylvania hurricanes and Tropical cyclogenesis.
• New Good Articles include: Meteorological history of Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane John (2006), Typhoon Saomai (2006) and Tropical Storm Danielle (1992).

Main Page content

• Hurricane Katrina appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on September 29.
• There were no Did you know mentions. Please check for an interesting fact in any new articles and submit it to Template talk:Did you know.

New articles and improvements wanted

• Pacific hurricane, Pacific typhoon, North Indian tropical cyclone...
• There are many many stub and start class articles on many topics, please improve these!
• How about David Roth (meteorologist)?

Storm article statistics

More information Jul, Aug ...

Grade	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct
FA	13	16	15	15
A	6	6	7	6
GA	18	24	28	33
B	79	77	79	84
Start	180	191	200	201
Stub	8	8	8	13
Total	303	322	337	352
percentage ≥Less than B	62.0	61.8	61.7	60.8

Close

Member of the month

The September member of the month is Thegreatdr, David Roth. David Roth is a meteorologist at the HPC, who as part of his work there is producing Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Data. Dozens of the maps he has created are used in Wikipedia articles. He has produced a number of valuable articles to the project such as tropical cyclone rainfall climatology and Atlantic hurricane reanalysis, and significantly expanded several seasonal articles such as 1982 Pacific hurricane season.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask anywhere. If you don't mind me asking, what area to you plan on contributing to? Good luck, and have fun with your contributions in the future. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Umm, I'm pretty sure that you just do {| width="90%"|, then after you're done writing one column, you put | on the next line. When you're done with the next column, you place |} at the bottom of the column. I hope that makes sense. íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 22:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

On the keyboard, right 2 buttons to the left of the p is |. All you have to do is press shift and that button. I hope that helps! íslenskur fellibylur #12 _(samtal) 23:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The November issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Squirepants101 01:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I've heard about in some places (like forums), but Nickelodeon nor TVGuide have released anything about it. Unless someone can give a real link, then it's probably a rumor and it should not be added at all (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). Squirepants101 21:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• —— Eagle (ask me for help) 03:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Patrickrox11,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 21:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I've noticed that some of the episode summaries you are entering are direct copies from another website. This is a very bad thing and should never be done. This is why your edits are being reverted. CovenantD 04:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

The January issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear Patrickrox11,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. --froth^T 13:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Hurricanehink/Active

? –xeno^talk 17:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lady Gaga has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jonas Brothers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miley Cyrus, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 03:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Big Time Rush. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 03:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)