User talk:Plutus/Archive 1

Since it was a long time since I had accessed the account, I had forgotten the password. Please try to understand my situation. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. Cactus0rme (talk) 02:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plutus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

It has been at 3 weeks since my block was started, and I have taken this time to understand more about the Wikipedia policies and community and what I did was wrong to it and reflect on my actions. I understand the decision made by the administrators and understand why they had decided on blocking me. It was for my own well-being and the well-being of others. I made several mistakes that I ask forgiveness for. I know my behaviour was wrong and promise not to repeat it. If I do get unblocked, I would first try doing the beginner task at my homepage and would try to get someone to mentor/adopt me. I would also try to get the article: Kartick Chandra Paul republished as it was deleted when I was blocked. But mainly I would be editing and sometimes, when I am ready, create some articles which are notable and good enough to be on Wikipedia. I have created a draft about Kartick Chandra Paul in Simple Wikipedia; https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartick_Chandra_Paul. However I do not know how to use infoboxes in simple Wikipedia, thus did not create one but I have tried many time but fail; seaa history. Thank you for your time and I hope you are willing to approve my unblock request. CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 01:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Good day to you Cactus0rme, I am not an administrator so I'm unable to review your request, however I'm simply giving my 2 cents, as per Yamla's comments, Wikipedia is a volunteer website, meaning no one is forced to or has to respond to your unblock request, you'll just need to be patient whilst an admin looks over your unblock request, check out the Guide to appealing blocks page to get a good idea of how to make a good request, that gives your request the best possible chance of succeeding should the reviewing administrator agree. Pinging admins also isn't the best idea, as it conflicts with the aforementioned volunteer statement above, give it some time and an admin will eventually get around to reviewing your request, just make sure you read through the relevant pages on how to make a good request. --AutisticAndrew 00:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay--CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 01:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Plutus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

It has been at 3 weeks since my block was started, and I have taken this time to understand more about the Wikipedia policies and community and what I did was wrong to it and reflect on my actions. I understand the decision made by the administrators and understand why they had decided on blocking me. It was for my own well-being and the well-being of others. I made several mistakes that I ask forgiveness for. I know my behaviour was wrong and promise not to repeat it. If I do get unblocked, I would first try doing the beginner task at my homepage and would try to get someone to mentor/adopt me. I would also try to get the article: Kartick Chandra Paul republished as it was deleted when I was blocked. But mainly I would be editing and sometimes, when I am ready, create some articles which are notable and good enough to be on Wikipedia. I have created a draft about Kartick Chandra Paul in Simple Wikipedia; https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartick_Chandra_Paul. However I do not know how to use infoboxes in simple Wikipedia, thus did not create one but I have tried many time but fail; seaa history. I will also only use this account now onwords and promise not to abuse using other accounts. Thank you for your time and I hope you are willing to approve my unblock request.

Decline reason:

Per Yamla's comment below: There have been far too many issues in far too little time for us to consider an unblock at this stage. Additionally, this request doesn't convince me that you fully understand what the issue with your conduct was. --Blablubbs (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed sockpuppetry, matching jpgordon's findings above. There's no reasonable chance anyone will unblock you at this time. Your only real option is WP:SO which requires six months with zero edits. If you make no further edits (with this or any other account), that would mean waiting until at least 2024-12-21. You've been significantly abusive over your many accounts. --Yamla (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Plutus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello admins, I was wondering if I would be unblocked now. I have followed Yamla's suggestion and waited 6 months. During that time, I edited simple english wiki. I have over 8000 edits edits there and created over 70 pages. I also have rollbacker rights on the wiki. I have understood the reason I have been blocked. I understand the using multiple accounts to harrass others is both hurtful to me and the users. I have read through through WP:Blocking_policy,WP:Contributing to Wikipedia,WP:FAQ/Editing and reading through Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I promise not to repeat it again. If I am unblocked I will try to be a better human being and be compassionate about others. Thank you.--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I have unblocked. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

• @Spicy: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 15:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm still not impressed by someone whose reaction to a minor conflict with other editors is to create multiple attack accounts. And I notice that this account has managed to get itself indeffed on two other wikis. But you should take this as an opinion and not an iron-clad refusal of an unblock. If you want to, go ahead. Spicy (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    The block on bugwiki was already discussed on meta for using the wrong language. On commons, I think they said I copied the action of kne of my sockpuppets that was already blocked. You can see my comments on my commons talk page

    Thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

    I thought bug wiki used indonasian, but i was wrong I guess. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

    @Spicy I feel like I got better and more mature based on the past 6 months, which can be reflected on my work on simple en wiki. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

    The utrs appeal was not by me (some LTA), discussed with EPIC. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 23:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Prince of Erebor were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Cactisisme, this draft looks promising. However, not every claim in the article is currently sourced. Please note that every sentence in a biographical article needs to be supported by a citation. You might also want to review MOS:BIO for guidance on the proper format for writing a biography. —

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liu Qingyang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Prince of Erebor Thanks for your honest opinion!! Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, Cactusisme, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you are working on Draft:Anne Demerson. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ipigott Thanks Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

• Let me know when you would like me to take a new look at Anne Demerson. If you draw on the equivalent French article, you should mention this in an edit summary in accordance with Help:Translation.--Ipigott (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC) I see there is a summary of her career here.--Ipigott (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Ipigott Yes I plan to do that. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Ipigott I submitted the draft for review. I placed a stub tag on it. Little information on french wiki. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 10:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

• I have moved the draft to article space. You might like to expand it on the basis of your extensive source. Let me know if you need more assistance. Happy editing!--

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelsey Barnard Clark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, Could you please elaborate, if you will? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 08:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme Pls add some reliable sources. Taabii (talk) 08:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, News articles, I suppose, Madam? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 08:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme I respect you, pls read Wikipedia:Reliable sources for a better understanding of the reliability. Happy editing. Taabii (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, Thanks for your kind help, madam!! Wish you a great and wonderful day!! — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 08:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, sorry if I was a bit rude (dont hate me please) — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme Nothing personal here. Happy Editing. Ask me if you need any help, I'll be happy to help. Taabii (talk) 09:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, Are the sources I currently have reliable — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme Read WP:RS and you'll understand it. Thanks. Taabii (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, oh, that was a long read. o.o — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme Good things take time. Taabii (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

┌───────────────────────────┘
Taabii, Is anyone gonna review it? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme Patience is appreciated. Taabii (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Taabii, been a few weeks? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

There are currently more than 1700 pending submissions to review, with more than 900 of them pending for at least four weeks, so it is necessary to be patient. Absolute junk or absolutely immaculate articles tend to go through fairly quickly, but for other articles that require more scrutiny, there's a lot of work for not a large number of people. Wikipedia has no deadline. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

@CoffeeCrumbs Oh alright Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 01:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello, Cactusisme! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 11:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

• Arcticocean
• Wugapodes

Euryalus

CheckUser changes

• Firefly
• L235

Oversighter changes

• Firefly
• Guerillero
• L235
• Moneytrees

Technical news

• Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
• A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ouchtata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

SafariScribe, Can you help me improve it? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 07:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ouchtata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

KylieTastic, But Amdoun, has the exact same style as this and it is commune in tunisia. — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 02:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cactusisme. Thank you for your work on Lycalopex ensenadensis. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:20, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cactusisme. Thank you for your work on Vulpes gigas. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:22, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I did, but here is another. From the NY Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/15/world/man-in-the-news-witness-to-evil-eliezer-weisel.html

Thanks 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B130:DE4E:B027:4457 (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:B130:DE4E:B027:4457 which one is this? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects&action=edit&section=19 --2603:7000:2101:AA00:D031:BF63:13AB:4225 (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:D031:BF63:13AB:4225 Please put a new request. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 07:05, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Is that really needed? The initial request already had what you asked for, when you denied it saying you needed a ref. Looks like a snafu easily fixed by you--2603:7000:2101:AA00:D031:BF63:13AB:4225 (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:D031:BF63:13AB:4225 Please open a new request as the previous one will be archived. I will personally take a look at it. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:41, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Resubmitted. Thank you. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5F5:F483:B682:20F4 (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5F5:F483:B682:20F4, Accepted — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

"Nigger Toe" is a real name for Brazil nut. If that's the case, why do the pages "Nigger toe", "Nigger toes", and "Nigger Toes" exist? I only wanted you to request this page because there wasn't a singular phrase with the uppercase "T". Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Kjjj6uhhhhh It's a blacklisted name, so I can't create the page. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Cactusisme, I think you probably shouldn't have created many of the redirects suggested by this editor. If you check their talk page history, you can see that they've been disruptively creating new redirects as their main activity here, even after being warned about it and having had them repeatedly deleted.

@Kjjj6uhhhhh, if you're here to help Wikipedia and not to troll us, there are so many more helpful things you can do than fiddling with redirects. I can help you find something useful to do. Can you tell me why you decided to create new redirects in the first place? I want to know why you got interested in that so I can help you find something you'd like doing. -- asilvering (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

@Asilvering Oh, yes I received a message on discord about it. Can you take at the redirects I created for this User. I just got to know about it. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 22:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

There is nothing else to do. Besides, it is really difficult to create an actual page. Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

@Asilvering Pinging Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 08:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)