User talk:Puddingflossyrex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Puddingflossyrex's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:De rerum naturis has a new comment
- Is anything happening to Draft:De rerum naturis? -- Hoary (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:De rerum naturis has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:De rerum naturis has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: De rerum naturis has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Welcome!
Hello, Puddingflossyrex, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I also want to say that your article on De rerum naturis filled a really important (and kinda embarrassing) gap in the encyclopedia, so thank you very much for writing it! It is clear you're an expert on this topic, so I hope you'll consider continuing to improve the article. On Wikipedia, unlike in professional encyclopedias, we aim to cite every individual sentence to a secondary source where the statement can be verified. Scholarly editions and subject encyclopedias can be particularly handy sources for major topics like this one (since many articles won't bother to state the obvious background). It would be wonderful if you were able to add more citations. Thanks again for your contributions! ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC)