User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive
Draft page enquiry!
Hello @SafariScribe!
Thank you again for your earlier review of Mr Bhattacharjee's draft page (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjib_Bhattacharjee) and for noting that the subject may likely meet WP:ANYBIO. I truly appreciate your time and thoughtful input.
Since your initial assessment a few months ago, I’ve gathered and organised a broader set of sources that I believe now clearly demonstrate notability under WP:GNG. Sanjib Bhattacharjee has now been featured in multiple independent, reliable publications with significant coverage of his work as a road safety campaigner and civic advocate. I’d like to share a few key updates that I hope will help reconsider the article.
The strongest evidence of notability comes from independent, editorially controlled sources that have covered Sanjib Bhattacharjee’s work and recognition without direct involvement from him. These include:
- The Pioneer – A national Indian daily that published a full-page article on his British Empire Medal (BEM) and civic impact
- The Assam Tribune – Coverage of his recognition as an Assamese resident making international contributions
- Tripura Bhabishyat – Bengali-language editorial highlighting his public service
- Gati Dainik – Two separate articles, including an editorial on road safety and education reform
- Headlines Kolkata – Bengali-language coverage with analysis and a video feature
- Road Safety GB – UK national safety body profiling his award and contributions
- Intelligent Instructor – UK-based professional journal with multiple articles on his training work and BEM recognition
- NRI (non resident Indian) TODAY – Diaspora publication with a full profile on his cross-border advocacy
- The London Gazette – Official government record of his BEM award
- Press Association (PA) – Inclusion in the New Year Honours list
- Ilford Recorder, The Waltham Forest Guardian etc. – UK media mentions and image coverage related to his award and civic activities
These sources are independent, reliable, and provide significant coverage - not promotional content or interviews.
While The Statesman published a full-length interview with photograph and commentary on his campaigns, I understand that interviews may not count as independent coverage under WP:GNG. I’ve therefore treated it as supporting material, not central to the notability claim.
Sanjib’s campaigns span both the UK and India, with documented impact in driver education reform, eco-safe and defensive driving, instructor training, and community engagement. Coverage across Assam, Tripura, West Bengal, and Delhi - in both English and Bengali - demonstrates international relevance (not only in the UK, but in India too).
I understand that your earlier decision was based on limited sourcing at the time. With these expanded references and clearer documentation, I hope the article now meets the notability threshold and is ready for approval. I’m very open to any further feedback or suggestions you may have. Thank you again. Flyhigh223! (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
- I will check the draft later. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @SafariScribe, for taking the time to check the draft — I truly appreciate your attention and consideration. While many of the recent articles were prompted by the BEM recognition, they go well beyond the award itself. The coverage documents a sustained career in road safety education, ADI mentoring, policy advocacy, and community engagement across both the UK and India. These sources reflect long-term impact and multiple domains of public service, not just a single event. I hope this broader context helps clarify the notability under WP:GNG. Flyhigh223! (talk) 07:34, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @SafariScribe! Just wanted to check if you have received the above? Thanks so much 😊 Flyhigh223! (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Flyhigh223! Thank you for your consistency. O have accepted the draft on the ground of passing WP:NBIO. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:14, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, first draft approved 🥳 Flyhigh223! (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Flyhigh223! Thank you for your consistency. O have accepted the draft on the ground of passing WP:NBIO. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:14, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @SafariScribe! Just wanted to check if you have received the above? Thanks so much 😊 Flyhigh223! (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @SafariScribe, for taking the time to check the draft — I truly appreciate your attention and consideration. While many of the recent articles were prompted by the BEM recognition, they go well beyond the award itself. The coverage documents a sustained career in road safety education, ADI mentoring, policy advocacy, and community engagement across both the UK and India. These sources reflect long-term impact and multiple domains of public service, not just a single event. I hope this broader context helps clarify the notability under WP:GNG. Flyhigh223! (talk) 07:34, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2025)
The hierarchy of biological classification's eight major taxonomic ranks. A family contains one or more genera.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Biting • Firefighting Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Father Figure
@SafariScribe Hey! How's the review for Draft:Father Figure (Taylor Swift song) going? I've seen you're inactive for quite awhile. Thanks! HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 22:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Promotion of List of works by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
The Mountain (Gorillaz album)
Hi, this is a while back, but I noticed something about a draft you rejected. Timeline: (1) an editor without any contributions submitted the draft, (2) that same editor copy-pasted to the existing redirect of the page, without any attribution, violating WP:CWW, and (3) the draft was rejected. I don't know if this is an issue that needs further attention, but I feel bad for the editor whose work appears to have been plagiarized by another and then rejected. Fundgy (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I've attributed editors in an edit summary and someone requested the page histories to be merged. I suppose you can ignore my above message at this point! Fundgy (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Fundgy, I am sorry that I didn't reply. I have been busy with some printings since morning. I have checked to see when I declined the draft but couldn't. Please what is expected of me? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:58, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- You're all good! I didn't expect to you message quickly or anything; things quickly ended up resolving on their own, so you can ignore all this. I mostly just wanted to let you know that you rejected the draft on the basis that the content had already existed in the mainspace, which is totally valid, but there was a attribution issue that wasn't immediately obvious. What I assume happened is that an editor found the draft, submitted it, got impatient, and copied its content to the existing redirect.
- Sorry to bother :) Fundgy (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
AFC draft follow-up
Hi SafariScribe, thank you again for your thoughtful review of Sculpture (film). Your encouragement truly inspires me to continue contributing with care and precision.I have recently submitted a biographical draft at AFC: Draft:Ramin Hosseinpour, and since you kindly supported my previous submission, I thought you might be interested. It is based on independent coverage and written in a neutral tone.I would greatly appreciate any feedback when you have a moment. Thank you again for your dedication to helping contributors improve Wikipedia.Vodnir (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, thank you for the praises and I hope you wouldn't always commend your fellow editors even when the draft gets declined. You should note that we don't review drafts by author's request, nevertheless, I have always picked interest in helping editors as soon as I could. The draft on question seems to be copied directly from sources. You should be aware of copyright and how dangerous it is herein. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Request to restore Draft:Papa & Barkley for further improvement
Hi SafariScribe! :)
Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. I understand your concerns about source reliability and independence. Since your review, I’ve compiled additional independent, secondary coverage from multiple reliable outlets that meet WP:RS and WP:GNG criteria:
- Forbes - three reported business features about Papa & Barkley:
- MJBizDaily - independent trade publication with professional editorial oversight:
- Cannabis Business Times - industry journal owned by GIE Media, covering executive leadership and corporate operations:
- GreenState - a Hearst / San Francisco Chronicle publication with independent editorial governance:
- New Cannabis Ventures - financial media site that profiles market expansion and investment trends:
- Mainstream mentions that provide general-interest context:
These provide sustained, multi-year, independent coverage (2018–2024) from reputable publishers and demonstrate that Papa & Barkley satisfies Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines.
Would it be possible to restore the deleted draft so I can revise it with these new citations and clarifications regarding each outlet’s editorial standards?
Thank you for your time and for helping new contributors learn the process. Verónica Sofía Robles (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- So here is my review for the above sources: the Forbes articles are all interviews ranging from Kimberly Dillon, Chief Marketing Officer to the CEO, and then member of the board (see WP:INTERVIEW). They were just saying about their experiences in the company and those things doesn't add any notability to the company.I am satisfied with the MJBizDaily articles. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Verónica Sofía Robles, i have gone ahead and accepted the draft. Happy editing! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined SerpApi Draft
Hello,
I saw that you declined a revised draft I submitted for a page about SerpApi.
Thank you for your review! I wanted to get some clarification on what you believe is missing to show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.
Multiple citations were included that I believe meet the criteria of in-depth, reliable, secondary and strictly independent of the subject. Most notably the following:
"Meet the Google-Scraping Startup Used by ChatGPT, Cursor and Perplexity". The Information. Retrieved 2025-10-08.
"ChatGPT's real-time answers: what powers them". Tom's Guide. 2025. Archived from the original on 2025-09-15. Retrieved 30 September 2025.
Goodwin, Danny (26 August 2025). "ChatGPT's answers came from Google Search after all: Report". Search Engine Land. Retrieved 30 September 2025.
Can you please review these and let me know if you still believe these do not meet that criteria? And if so, can you please clarify the reasoning?
Thanks in advance, and looking forward to hearing from you. Ryan-serpapi (talk) 18:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Ryan-serpapi, I justify the response made here or generally, here. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Question about Draft: Melvin Donalson review
Hi SafariScribe,
Thank you for reviewing my submission for "Draft: Melvin Donalson" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Melvin_Donalson). I appreciate your comments regarding WP:GNG and WP:OFFLINESOURCES, and I'd like to make sure I understand your feedback before revising further.
I've removed the birthdate per the guidance on WP:BLP.
The current draft includes the following sources:
- A review of *Black Directors in Hollywood* in *Film Quarterly* (Vol. 58, No. 4, 2005, pp. 54–56) by Ed Guerrero
- A review in the *Quarterly Review of Film and Video* (Vol. 23, No. 5, 2006, pp. 460–465) by Kwakiutl Lynn Dreher
- Academic citations in *The Cambridge Companion to Hip-Hop* and *Estudios Irlandeses*
- Inclusion in university syllabi and institutional reading lists
Would these sources count toward establishing notability under WP:GNG and the academic-specific criteria? Or would you recommend replacing or supplementing them with other kinds of sources (e.g., profiles in mainstream media or biographical coverage by independent secondary sources)?
Thank you for your time and guidance.
WordComposer (talk) 03:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- @WordComposer, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately I don't think the articles you provided above solves the issue as they are not about him. I have searched for many sources about him but couldn't. I saw only One review of his book, but it isn't enough to meet WP:NBOOK. I see this subject being notable in the future. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2025)
A woman in a crocheted cape
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Genus • Biting Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Query regarding draft decline reason (Laxmi Narayan (painter and sculptor))
Hello SafariScribe, Thank you for reviewing the draft. I noticed the reason for decline stated the article "exists" under the title **Laxmi Narayan (painter and sculptor)**. I have searched thoroughly and cannot find any live article under this exact title or a similar one (Laxmi Narayan Maharana). Could you please clarify which article is considered the duplicate? If there is no live article, could the draft be moved to the mainspace, or should I resubmit after clarifying the notability? Thank you for your assistance. 2409:40E2:122E:E644:7046:7FFF:FE0C:5C1E (talk) 05:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- this. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Reply: Clarifying identity of Laxmi Narayan Maharana (Painter)
Hello SafariScribe,
Thank you for clarifying.
I understand the confusion; however, the article I submitted is about **Laxmi Narayan Maharana** (born 2004, a self-taught artist from Odisha), while the link you provided is for **Laxmi Narayan Sharma** (a politician). They are two distinct individuals.
Since there is no existing article for Laxmi Narayan Maharana, the draft is not a duplicate.
I have strong sources to establish the artist's notability (WP:ARTIST). Could you please **reconsider the decline** due to the mistaken identity?
If it helps, I will rename the draft to the full name, **Draft:Laxmi Narayan Maharana**, to prevent further confusion.
Thank you once again for your time. 2409:40E2:122E:E644:80E0:99FF:FE7D:4B9E (talk) 06:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you.
Hello, Thank you for helping and approving my wikipedia page, Another Big Night Down The Drain. Ever since the band found me in a old record and cd shop (like the article mentions that the cover is a hand drawn suicide, that's actually how it got my attention), they had been one of my favourites. From that day forward, it had been a dream of mine to write a wikipedia page on their albums. Seven months later, prayers payed off. Thank you so much for helping my dream come true. God bless you, Xenon Xenonvibes (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @Xenonvibes, thank you. I love the fact that your dream eventually came true and that you're happy. Thank you too for improving Wikipedia, the world especially of music is proud of you! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:35, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Maybe?
this, this & this int’l recognized Nigerian execs to check. 102.89.47.124 (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, I have reviewed the drafts and they are really impressive. Nevertheless, while I thank you for taking time to write or observe them, I also want to highlight that we don't normally review drafts upon requests. You can also create a user page if you are interested in Wikipedia. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Gabriel Ojeleke Abegunrin
Hello, SafariScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gabriel Ojeleke Abegunrin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:10, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorted! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Is It a Crime?
Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion.
Note that Is It a Crime? should likely target the new Is It a Crime disambiguation page. I've reverted this edit. Note that the incoming links will need to be updated. 162 etc. (talk) 01:56, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @162 etc.. I slept off without competing the clean up. I have also updated the incoming links for "Is It a Crime?". Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
AFC Submission
Hello Safari, I have submitted a draft for AfC: Draft:Reap (fintech). I will be unavailable for an extended period, so I would be grateful if you could kindly review the draft when convenient. You may accept or decline it according to Wikipedia’s guidelines; any feedback is also welcome. Thank you for your time and help. BiomeScribe (talk) 04:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for the compliments but I can't see the draft you are pointing at. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have deleted the page. BiomeScribe (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
DCWC closing update
Two weeks ago, the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners.
vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on covering abortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points.
simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles about jumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row,
BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!
Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to both
BeanieFan11 (submissions) and simongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags!
BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador,
PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to both Spookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) and
vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year, simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!
Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...
We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of The Thing Around Your Neck is under review
Your good article nomination of the article The Thing Around Your Neck is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
| Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
| |
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2025)
A sign at an anti-monarchy protest in the United Kingdom
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Cape • Genus Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
October thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in October! My latest: Roberta Alexander, - listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi SafariScribe. Thank you for your work on Anselm Umoren. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add many more sources - primary secondary sources - and add in-line citations at the end of each sentence. Please also establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Mariamnei, mi dispiace ma non capito sotra. Quella persona é un vescovo del diocesi di Abuja. Anche é stato lavorato come la superiore generale di Missionary Society of St. Paul of Nigeria. Quindi voglio comprendere la cosa hai detto per "non é famoso" per WP:GNG. Per la bibliographia, un referenza é molto okay. Va bene comunque! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments and sorry for my delayed response. In general, you need more than one source for any article to establish notability. When the person is alive, you also need to add a footnote to each sentence backed up by a reliable source. Please try to add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and to footnote each sentence. Thanks and have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2025)
The Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory, granting a 99-year lease on the New Territories
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Criticism of monarchy • Cape Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
draft rejection fix!
Hello @SafariScribe! Thank you for reviewing Draft:Jamshid Khoshdel !! Since your note I’ve added BBC Persian confirming the 2011 national award, two ISNA interview features (2004/2007), a published biographical entry (ISBN), Jam-e Jam review (via Magiran), ShortFilmNews coverage (Bogotá/Didar + 9th Independent Documentary selection), and ISCA on Three Men and a Lake. I’m avoiding primary/self-published sources except for credit verification. I'm to welcome any further suggestions on sources or tone. Thanks! :3 Cheekyicythang (talk) 04:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- That's wonderful. Please can I see the link to the draft? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Peter Mbah when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Lagos: Supernatural City, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Lagos: Supernatural City where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. SeteQuatroCinco (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately @SeteQuatroCinco, I have reverted your edit as it was a wrong move. And also please familiarise yourself with how Wikipedia works before rushing into such edits. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Boipelo Dikgaka Draft
Good day
I would like to understand why all the sources in Boipelo Dikgaka submission are said to be unreliable? Kolobetsoo (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi,
Well, the problem is that those sources doesn't fulfill WP:RS especially in all its criteria. To sum up, your draft fails WP:GNG. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of The Thing Around Your Neck has failed
Your good article nomination of the article The Thing Around Your Neck has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 00:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
All Hallows Seminary moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to All Hallows Seminary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Dclemens1971, really? Didn't you check the possibility of passing AFD before the so-called draftifying? I found many sources which you could have seen too. Please Wikipedia exists because there are many stubs. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Safari Scribe. No, I didn't do a BEFORE search because that is not required before draftifying a page that has a single, non-independent source. Frankly, I would hope that as an AFC and NPP reviewer, you would take the time to ensure that new pages you create at least demonstrate a pass of an applicable notability guideline before placing them in mainspace. Please don't expect other reviewers to do that work on pages you create. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)