User talk:Salcanzonieri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rik L Rik (Richard Elerick) (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Salcanzonieri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Submission of Rik L Rik page

I don’t understand why it was declined? Every single paragraph and sentence was referenced, and it is a notable personality and a major influence on many other bands that are already have pages on Wikipedia.

Pleas explain to me in a clear and concise way why it was declined and what do I have to do to fix it? Also, is there a copy of what I wrote available because I don’t think I can write it all over again with all those references you didn’t tell me I had to make a copy. Please tell me what is wrong with the submission and what needs to be done. 2600:1700:CC0:6E90:686C:74E8:BED7:8297 (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Reliable sources

I made extensive use of his obituaries, if they’re not reliable sources then what? 2600:1700:CC0:6E90:686C:74E8:BED7:8297 (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rik L Rik (Richard Elerick) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thatguy1987 (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rik L Rik (Richard Elerick)

Information icon Hello, Salcanzonieri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rik L Rik (Richard Elerick), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rik L Rik (Richard Elerick) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still don't see notability beyond the LA area.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rik L Rik (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Significa liberdade were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Based on the title of this article, the main topic is Rik L Rik. However, The lead, as well as the rest of the article, focuses on the band. Much of the article consists of long quotations from primary sources without context. This needs clean up to either focus on F-Word or Rik as the primary subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rik L Rik

Information icon Hello, Salcanzonieri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rik L Rik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI