User talk:Schierbecker/Archive 4

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Columbia, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Columbia, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I’m making an effort to save the article if you have any input. Grey Wanderer (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Apache outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bayonet outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackhawk outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M4 outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M9 outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M16 outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M240b outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M249 outline.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mark, I note that you nominated the USMC Portal for deletion. You notified User:Looper5920 of the nomination as a creator/substantial contributor. I would have appreciated a notice as well. I have substantially contributed to the portal and would have appreciated the notice. — ERcheck (talk) 04:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Are you planning to delete an entire continent of portals?

(I know.  Albania is in Europe.  Bhutan and Kyrgyzstan are in Asia. And the provinces of Canada are in North America...)  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm going to get travel banned from all these countries, aren't I? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I was originally referring to a continent. I haven't named it. The French language is commonly used there as a result of colonialism.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

I think if you slay a country portal you get to be king of that nation. My empire is going to be lit. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

I should have taken on Portal:Zimbabwe a few years ago when I might have been welcomed as a liberator from Robert Mugabe (but he is now under house arrest where he belongs). My empire includes more than 900 languages, some of which are not well documented, and many unique species of flora and fauna. The day begins, as the world's day begins, when the sun rises at 150 W but on the west side of the date line, on Caroline Island and Kiritimati. Maybe I should invite botanists to search the rain forests of New Guinea for unknown species of fungus that may contain new antibiotics. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

I have nothing to with mfd of portals, regardless. JarrahTree 02:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey MS: thanks for your portal improvement work, particularly the conversion away from subpage reliance. But could I ask a favor, that you not nominate all of the unused subpages for G6 speedy deletion? If there is a problem with the new structure, it will take a huge amount of extra work to roll back the portal to the old version if the subpages have been deleted. We had to go through this back in Feb./Mar., with thousands of subpage restorations required when the new structure turned out to have very serious issues. The unused subpages do no harm. Thanks in advance. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

@UnitedStatesian: I've been wondering about that possibility myself. Can you please link me to a discussion about the subpage restorations to help bring me up to speed? On the contrary I think these orphaned subpages do quite a lot of harm. Imagine, for example, you make a graphic on Commons to replace another and waste time making sure all of the old instances are replaced on subpages that are never used. Most subpages are also violating WP:COPYWITHIN, so better to just delete them. The sooner we are to finding a permanent single-page format that works (or settling with what we have), the better. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Here is one link: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Archive 10#Portal restoration to pre-automated versions; see also related talkpage, village pump and admin. noticeboard (yes, believe it) discussions from around that time. I would also STRONGLY suggest erring on the side of over-transparency around what you are doing by notifying/involving Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals and the corresponding subject-area wikiprojects. There were a lot of hurt feelings last time around, and a repeat is likely to have disproportionately an even greater impact, IMO. And of course once we have broad agreement everything is working, we can move forward; my request is only one of timing, not that we permanently keep them around. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

I expected this nomination, after its two sister services. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Most of the military-topic portals look like they could fall, with the exception of maybe a few recent-ish microportals that haven't disintegrated yet. Think WikiProject MilHist would even be happy to see those gone. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You were busy yesterday creating analysis work that will keep some of us busy for a while.  :-\ Robert McClenon (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I think Portal:Bridges is probably going to be the only semi-contentious one. The rest are pretty straightforward. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

An interesting mix of the very abstract and the very material in topics. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mark

I see that you have been using AWB to replace or remove deleted portals. This is good principle, but in practice the AWB settings you are using have not been sufficiently sophisticated:

1. You have been replacing each portal with only one alternative, e.g. Portal:Government of the United States only to Portal:United States, without adding Portal:Politics. You also haven't been removing any resulting duplicates, if the page is already in Portal:United States.
2. Your replacements are not restricted to portal links, leading to errors such as this edit to Capital One Arena.

I have a set of very complex regexes which I have used to fix over a hundred thousand of these links without such errors. Please can you leave it to me to continue this?

I have not checked how many of your AWB edits have produced these unintended ill-effects. It seems to me that rather than checking each one individually, it would be easier to use rollback on all of them. Please will you do that? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: I'm not surprised I made a mistake on Capital One Arena. That was my last edit before I became too tired to go on last night. I've been removing redundant United States links where possible. Some slip through. Some pages fit OK into the United States bucket, but not the politics bucket. I don't think every one-term mayor of random midwestern towns belong with either Politics or United States. I'm not so sure every government agency belongs in Politics either. I've also been adding some Law portals, like here. I will be checking my edits last night individually. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Mark, if you're going to do this, then you need a better regex. Otherwise the errors are inevitable, because there's too much to check.

As to don't think every one-term mayor of random midwestern towns belong with either Politics or United States ... this isn't categorisation. It's linking. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I have just deleted several Portal:New York City/Selected biography/x pages with your claim "portal no longer relies on subpages". But there is now a red link on portal:New York City asking for one of these pages. Please resolve the situation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

• I think it is still busted: all of the other portal content (categories, news, wikiprojects, etc.) has disappeared. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

• Now those sections are all back, but we are getting big Lua errors, "The time allocated for running scripts has expired." It's deja vu all over again. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

• @UnitedStatesian: I purged the server cache. Looks good from my end again. Try now? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

• It does, but can we be certain the Lua errors are not going to recur? UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

• Maybe surmountable. I'd like to poke at these a bit more to see what breaks them. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

• I think that testing should be done in a sandbox, and in the meantime the portal rolled back to the version that does not break. I will request the subpages be restored to allow the rollback. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm notifying you that I think you did poor job in not notifying me (the only recent editor) about the cycling portal MfD. BaldBoris 16:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Learn to count. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey MS, the copywithin template should not be placed on a portal mainpage, since it does not contain any copied text, only transclusions. I have removed it from the mainpage; please feel free instead to attach it to any portal subpages where you believe it is warranted. Thanks, UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

User:UnitedStatesian this seems pedantic. Would you also insist that {{Update}} only be applied to portal subpages? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Not pedantic at all: the copywithin template refers specifically to a page's edit history, which of course in the case of portal mainpages cannot be fixed to solve the problem. Update, on the other hand, could be repaired in a variety of ways. I would also encourage you to follow {{Sofixit}} as a far superior alternative to doling out tags onto pages. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Did you get a notice that the deletion discussion for Portal:National Basketball Association had been tagged for speedy deletion as G6? If not, you should have, because I did that when I bundled the two basketball nominations. Oh well. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

I didn't get one. I contested the nomination. It could be redirected, but the edit history needs to stay. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

For proposing the deletion of the Missouri portal. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you! Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello Mark, this is Pieter Felix Smit from Amsterdam Netherlands. Good stuff you do! I hope its not too much work to protect this page against vandalism.

I propose to still put Edward Snowden in the Roswell UFO incident page for two reasons:

1: Snowdon is the first one (as far as I am aware) who, with full clearence into the most top secret files, spent many nightshift hours searching through all the USA's confidential government papers to find anything related to aliens. So his research would also have covered any Rosswell stuff. I think the fact he found nothing is highly relevant for anyone reading the Roswell page.

2: Conspiracy believers are more likely to believe Snowdon, then they would believe regular scientist.

As this article is likely to be seen often by Roswell believers, it would become more persuasive for them?Pieter Felix Smit (talk) 12:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, User:Pieter Felix Smit.

I haven't seen sources make the connection to Roswell. Wikipedia requires other gatekeepers to make value judgements about relevancy, but does not give its editors the same privilege. To make the connection for them would be original research. In any case, Snowden may be overstating the thoroughness of his search. there are many ways to conceal something (e.g. code words) from someone who does not know precisely what to search for.

Regarding persuasivity. I try not to think of Wikipedia as activism. Wikipedia is not for righting great wrongs. History takes

Another issue with your addition is that you cited a YouTube clip from The Joe Rogan Experience, a WP:Primary source. A secondary source would be more appropriate, and would provide more context.

It's an interesting bit of trivia that might belong on UFO conspiracy theory. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 07:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Moxy 🍁 07:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Conduct in portal space and portal deletion discussions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, ToThAc (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Just a friendly heads up that you forgot to sign your statement over at ArbCom. ;) AddWittyNameHere 01:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 20, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, SQL^{Query me!} 20:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Both of those scripts that you removed from the list seem to work for me... — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 19:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Portal:Weather. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RunningOnBrains^(talk) 19:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mark Schierbecker! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:48, Sunday, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Hi Mark Schierbecker! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:48, Sunday, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Template:Uw-vandalism0 has been nominated for merging with Template:Uw-vandalism1. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Train of Knowledge (Talk|Contribs) 01:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Pinterest Homescreen (Apr. 2013).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Main battle tanks of Bosnia and Herzegovina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Tanks of Bosnia and Herzegovina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:LockerDome logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Armoured fighting vehicles of Bosnia and Herzegovina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

A tag has been placed on Category:Military vehicles of Bosnia and Herzegovina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect America (film). Since you had some involvement with the America (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:The Sacred Band of Stepsons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect IPhone Five. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16#IPhone Five until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The Incognito Guy ^{(Browsing privately)} 06:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

HI Schierbecker/Archive 4,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weapon testing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weapon testing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paisarepa 05:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:H. D. Curtis Lick Observatory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

I want to be adopted. I've been editing for a month but I keep making mistakes. I only edit outer space related articles. There is a discussion about me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Wikipedia. When you respond, please {{mention}} me. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I saw that you want people to contact you on Google Plus on your adoptee (adopter?) page and I just wanted to let you know that, Google Plus has been gone for a while now. You might wanna remove that link so people don't get confused. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect White iPhone. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 1#White iPhone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Wheeled FCS Manned Ground Vehicle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Look, maybe find something else to do until you're able to conduct yourself with due moderation. You are starting to skirt the line. El_C 02:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• You aren't god. You have tools that were entrusted to you. You have not used them appropriately. Your actions have consequences. Block me too if you want. Schierbecker (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Okay... Anyway, you are of course free to advance that position, but again, dispassionately rather than with the gods and whatnot. And maybe focus your efforts on the ANI thread rather than on that user talk page. A lot more folks will see your comments there. Just sayin'. El_C 02:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You added in content here. It was reverted here. You reinstated it here. It was reverted again here, which you then again reinstated here. Finally, again reverted and you reinstate it. This is disruptive edits warring. You need to stop it. This behavior could lead to you being blocked from editing. I recommend you to review the WP:BRD cycle. Thanks, Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 02:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

I wouldn't have reverted if I wasn't 100 percent sure the talk page would resolve to include police criticism in the lede! Schierbecker (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Respectfully, that's not how it works around here. If there was 100% support, there wouldn't have been 2 editors who removed the content. Again, don't edit war. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 02:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Good luck! Schierbecker (talk) 02:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

"M2020 tank" is not "neutral disambugation". It is commonly named "M2020" not "M2020 tank" so it's missleading. I also know the real name of the tank remains unknown. Eurohunter (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

When possible, natural disambiguation is preferable to parenthetical disambiguation. Schierbecker (talk) 01:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Schierbecker. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M8 Armored Gun System you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Nothing wrong with the disambiguation page you created on AH6. But... that created trouble on Template:Expressway 1 (South Korea) and I am unable to solve. Is it possible that you correct the two links to AH6 in that template? Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 19:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

I saw that and I was also perplexed. I'll take another look tonight. Schierbecker (talk) 20:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea how you have fixed this, but it is. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

User:The Banner. I was stumped, so I asked for outside help. A kind editor from WP:HWY fixed it for me. Schierbecker (talk) 09:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

I just took another look and they have replaced the road-template. It is gone and that matters. The Banner talk 10:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways#Template:Expressway 1 (South Korea). They left an explanation here. Schierbecker (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Schierbecker,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 30373 articles, as of 06:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

1. [a]

   not including another ~6,000 redirects
2. [b]

   The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

The article M8 Armored Gun System you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:M8 Armored Gun System for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

On 2 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article M8 Armored Gun System, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that eight years after the U.S. Army canceled the M8 Armored Gun System, the 82nd Airborne Division requested that prototypes from the program be sent to Iraq? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/M8 Armored Gun System. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, M8 Armored Gun System), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,412 views (867.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 18:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Schierbecker,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Schierbecker,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Schierbecker. You've recently added the short form ref Zaloga 1995 to the Bradley Fighting Vehicle article, but no cite exists in the article to define what that means. Could you add the require cite, or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Note that if the content is referenced, I'll revert it. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

I fixed it. Schierbecker (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry going error blind, I do apologise. The article was still in the list of articles with errors because of a different reference. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Armoured fighting vehicles of South Vietnam indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Military vehicles of South Vietnam indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mobile Protected Firepower, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Mr.weedle. Statements repeated in the lede are not required to be cited per MOS:LEADCITE. Schierbecker (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Correct - my bad, Huggle can sometimes make this very difficult to discern. Apologies for the mistake! Mr.weedle (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for looking out. Schierbecker (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)