User talk:Surturz/Archive 1

Hi, I hope you don't mind that I added a section heading and an explanatory note to your Signpst comment - at first sight I couldn't see what it had to do with Edina, and I thought I'd save other readers some effort by clarifying and describing the source. PamD 13:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. --Surturz (talk) 02:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

lulz Timeshift (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Seems Abbott is Australia's Bush lol... what a laughing stock Australia is, what a shame. For all the faults of the US electoral system, at least their presidential primaries see incompetents and extremes like Abbott crash and burn. Timeshift (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Possible Liberal Party of Australia leadership spill, 2015 AfD... i'd say the amount of keep/renames to deletes would be around 61 to 39, wouldn't you? :D Timeshift (talk) 00:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Very droll :-) --Surturz (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I think I have edited between 10 and 15 of them -- it would be neat to have a tool to compare any editor with that list though <g>. Collect (talk) 13:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions last night to the "In the media" of the Signpost, If you are interested, we can always use all the help we can get. Gamaliel (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

For not closing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Stub properly, so that the entire MFD log was encased in a closure template. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Bahahaha! --Surturz (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Then say something else besides that, and/or actually engage with the discussions that have been said and the arguments that have been made against some of your suggestions. The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Just a note because you contributed to the MfD discussion. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation) has been procedurally closed and a new discussion has been created at AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Inactive userpage blanked has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Still think "the left" is underestimating Abbott? Do you seriously think Abbott can last until the next election, and, win it? The Manager Of Government Business is accusing the Prime Minister of branch-stacking the SSM vote! What a shambles! Oh the lulz. He's trying all the dog whistling he can think of but it just simply ain't 2001 anymore! Polls stuck around 54-46 to Labor. No govt has come out of this level of deep and extended poll rut and survived. Gawn!! Timeshift (talk) 02:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Ahh, a first-term govt tearing down their first-term PM. I could say so many things but you'd simply label them droll. So let me just ask one thing, because I can't find it. Can you locate on which wiki page you said (paraphrasing) "the left" needed to give up on their "anti-Abbott obsession" which would "cause them to be in opposition for a decade"? kthx :D Timeshift (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thor actor. Since you had some involvement with the Thor actor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Blaze The Movie Fan (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Surturz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thor actor for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Frmorrison (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:Inactive userpage blanked has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  20:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Template:Inactive userpage blanked has been nominated for merging with Template:Userpage blanked. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)