User talk:Tezero/archive7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czech language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Digraph and Aspiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Potential superpower sources

Tezero one editor removed a lot of material on the potential superpowers saying inappropriate material which they specially removed material but allowed other material on other potential superpower countries to stick that on another country. I think it is inappropriate for editors to remove material on one country and leave in on another as if it is there own. Referring to comments made by politicians, diplomats, scholarly publications, presidents regarding such as Russia as a superpower are appropriate and valid facts for support for countries on potential superpowers, not just one country but all countries, need your input, thanks.--198.134.105.98 (talk) 18:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Czech language
added links pointing to Conjugation, Morphology, Conjunction, Descriptivism and Charles IV
Sonic X
added a link pointing to Romance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello, Tezero. Thank you for rating Talk:Accidental gap. I had to hunt just a little a bit to find what you had edited on the page, though, since you didn't leave an edit summary. It's not a big deal, but a few seconds of your time might save many other editors a few seconds each when you edit pages on their watch lists. Thanks again for your contributions and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Cnilep, that's a reasonable request in general, but if you click the diff it's pretty clear what's been changed. Tezero (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes, but that's exactly what I meant by "hunt just a little a bit" and take up "a few seconds each". What you choose to do is of course entirely up to you, but I wanted to ask you to think about dozens of people "click[ing] the diff" and compare that effort to making an edit summary. It's not a requirement, but making edit summaries is considered a good practice. Cnilep (talk) 00:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough, Cnilep. I didn't realize that many people paid attention to low-bit-count edits on talk pages. Tezero (talk) 01:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Czech language

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Czech language you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maunus -- Maunus (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

  • I really don't mean to discourage you with my critique, I think it is wonderful that you are interested in improving language articles - we certainly need more editors with that interest. But I do feel a little that maybe you are not interested enough in languages and linguistics, to do the amount of research needed to work on this kind of academic topic. If you are really interested, then doing the research I think wouldn't feel as "work". It certainly doesn't to me. I understand that you are still in college and are just learning how to do research, which is why I do try to help you as much as I can with pointing you towards sources and ways of finding them. But if finding them and reading them feels like a tedious task, then it probably will never have the effect I am intending. Languages are big and complicated, and the discipline of linguistics was invented to try to make sense of them. That is why I think interest and background knowledge in linguistics and in the description of the language one writes about is indispensable. One definitely doesn't have to be a professional or an expert to get the sufficient background knowledge, but it is necessary to be willing to do the basic legwork. I hope you will keep working at it, and I am sure that you can do it if you put your mind to it. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 20:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Maunus, it's not that I don't enjoy reading about it. I just get frustrated when I can't really tell how far along I am or what precisely is needed. And that goes for everything, not just Wikipedia. Tezero (talk) 20:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I just responded to your recent changes to Czech language. I only just now see that you have suffered a personal loss for which I extend my condolences. As always I am not in a hurry with the review, so take the time you need. Best wishes, User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 17:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Ain't

Thanks for the review and the passing grade. This was my first GA attempt, and it went pretty smoothly, thanks to your guidance. I appreciate it - and good luck with your future GAs! Dohn joe (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Dohn joe, you're very welcome. I encourage you to build up more GAs; WikiProject Languages definitely needs more. Oh, and your talk page is quite long; I'd recommend creating an archive of all the current messages. Tezero (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contributions on video game-related articles! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Akeelah and the Bee

Notification

Since you commented at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#The State of GAC, I thought you might want to comment at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Formal decision on nomination limit. Most people who commented on the initial discussion do not seem to be following this page, because the formal decision has gotten very few responses.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Racial wage gap in the United States
added links pointing to Hispanic American, Native American and Income equality
Navajo language
added a link pointing to Morphology

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping Dogs

Hey, Tezero, how's it going! I was wondering if you could help me with Sleeping Dogs (video game) since I really need help with it. Ever since I joined Wiki I have been trying to tackle the article alone but I can't seem to do it by myself wit the amount of experience I have. Is there any way you could help me take it to GA? I know you usually only edit other gaming related articles, but this one is rated B class so it should be an easy thing for both of us. What do you think? Thanks for everything in advance, URDNEXT (talk) 12:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey, URDNEXT, my bad. I was working on this a while ago when you asked me, but I kinda forgot, especially since you seemed to have other editors in on it. I think it's pretty close; Gameplay needs citations, the expansions could use a bit of real-world information (such as the release information I moved there way back when), and the Post-release part of Reception needs expansion. (IIRC, I came up with basic points from the reviews along which this section could be constructed when I was last working on it - do you know where those are?) Tezero (talk) 15:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Here you go, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:URDNEXT&action=edit&section=10. Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 15:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Did I get it right? Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) "great open world with a ton to do, great combat and variety of satisfyingly violent attacks, decent but flawed narrative, and a few bugs" + "music/audio". That's it. Thanks, URDNEXT! Oh, and about Czech, I've very recently taken to reading online articles in it (as well as working substantially on its article, which I hope will pass GAN soon). Tezero (talk) 16:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
That's awesome! Hope it passes too. By the way... Do you think you'll have to start Sleeping Dogs from the ground up? Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
URDNEXT, the whole article? God, no. Just Post-release, probably. I'll see if I can start building a new version later today. Tezero (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Alright, thanks! Cntact me if you run into any problems! Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 16:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Re

A belated welcome back. I wanted to let you know that I appreciate the pings for giving me a heads up, even though I haven't responded to a bunch of them due to time restraints. Good to see you around czar  15:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey

Don't forget Sleeping Dogs? You told me to remind you. URDNEXT (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I haven't forgotten, URDNEXT; I've just been doing other things today. Hey, do you own a physical copy of the game? If so, you can use its instruction manual to cite things in Gameplay. (I've never played it; I'm not much for Western open-world games.) Tezero (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately I only have the digital copy, but I'll find one on Google. URDNEXT (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Bingo! http://www.manualplanet.com/pdf/games/square-enix/sleeping-dogs-pc-manual.pdf You're welcome! URDNEXT (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Bybthe way, are you gonna do just the Post-release section? Because this way I can avoid editing the parts you will. URDNEXT (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
URDNEXT, I've cited some things in Gameplay using the manual (thanks, by the way); I can stick to Gameplay and Post-release if that'd make it easier. Tezero (talk) 21:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
That would save my ass (lol). I'll take on the plot, release then. Thanks! Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 21:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Potential GA

Thanks a lot for working on Potential superpower. I think there are some more articles that I've created or expanded and they may achieve GA status. But what you have to say? These articles include;-

Got few more, but these few would matter enough for now. I know that they may have dead links or dailymail links but they are large/balanced enough? OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 13:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

OccultZone, I think Cher is the closest, followed by Rape in India (some short paragraphs, a few missing citations, inconsistent citation format), Rape in Sweden (somewhat inconsistent citation format, may need expansion), and Superpower (inconsistent citation format, some possibly unreliable sources [happytellus, heritage.org, etc.]). Consider setting up a peer review for one of them. Tezero (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

The Nerd has responded

Hello, Tezero. You have new messages at Supernerd11's talk page.
Message added 14:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 14:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Sonic: ATS

Great job on the article. Since I assume that one of your goals is to raise awareness of the work, I thought I'd mention that I downloaded it earlier to see if it lived up to the Reception section's hype. Haven't played a Sonic game since the 2D ones, but this definitely lived up to the legacy. Very nice music, too. Thanks for helping to turn people on to a quality game. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

JimmyBlackwing, thank you! That's a general goal I have when getting articles to GA and FA status, one that my userpage doesn't really get into because I don't think of it consciously very often. I mean, neither of the main page FAs I've had so far has been a well-received game, but... hey, now people remember that they exist, haha! I like to think that I'm one of the crowd who doesn't like how few high-quality articles Wikipedia has on their topics of choice, but am one of the few who's broken out of the cage of inferiority and done something about it. (Wikipedia had one Sonic-related FA [which was half-Mario] and two GAs, one of which would shortly be delisted, when I started working on Sonic articles. It seemed unfair that Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, and Halo, which I didn't think were any more popular than Sonic, had plenty of them.) But yeah, this is an enjoyable game and I hope you won't be the only one to check it out as a result. Tezero (talk) 00:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

So

How's it going with Sleeping Dogs? URDNEXT (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

URDNEXT, I've been reading the reviews a little more thoroughly to decide on organization for Reception. I may start actually editing there today. Tezero (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Awesome! I think Rhain will also be handling development too! Tezero URDNEXT (talk) 14:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
URDNEXT, how does Post-release look now? I went through every single source today and think I've represented the main points pretty well. Tezero (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
You're literally making me cry! Thanks so much, man! You don't know how much this means to me. Thanks you again! URDNEXT (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The Nerd has responded

Hello, Tezero. You have new messages at Supernerd11's talk page.
Message added 22:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 22:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Check

Hey Tezero. Since you're pretty involved in the FA reviews, can you take a look at Manila Metro Rail Transit System, which has been listed for FARC half a year ago? The discussion is here, so any input is welcomed. This nominee has been stagnant long enough, I think.--Retrohead (talk) 11:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, I can take a look, Retrohead. Thanks for alerting. Tezero (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
What's up! Tezero! URDNEXT (talk) 13:49, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I know, I know, I'll be there, URDNEXT. I just have to tutor someone this morning. Please be patient. Tezero (talk) 13:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I was just saying what's up... Tezero. URDNEXT (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Systemic bias

Your suggestion seems to be a misunderstanding both of what systemic bias is. Systemic bias is not the same as systematic bias. A systemic bias is a bias that is inherent in the system. It is not an individual bias for or against anything, but the fact that some topics and interests are disproportionately represented in the wikipedia system due to the way the system works. For example the fact that interests of white youngish middle class americans are disproportionately represented relative to the interests of Rwandan or Bhutanese people, simply because smaller portions of those people speak English and have access to the internet, and the expertise it takes to use wikicode, use sources etc. It is also the source of the fact that we tend to have detailed high quality articles on topics of interest mostly to young american men, and almost no coverage of topics of primary interest to women - simply because there are much fewer female editors, probably due to some bias in the way that people individually choose to contribute to wikipedia or not. The systemic bias entails this, and not any unconscious bias on the behalf of any particular individual editor. Native American topics are subject to the systemic bias because there are a much smaller portion of native american editors writing about topics of interest to them. Not because other editors discriminate (though sometimes they do), or because they are individually biased. Within native american topics there is also a systemic bias favoring North American natives over south American ones, which is a simple result again of wikipedia usage being more prevalent in some places and more accessible to certain groups relative to others. You can read al about this at WP:SYSTEMIC. I once watched an editor try to make the arguments that Jews had a conflict of interest in relation to writing about judaism and antisemitism. That argument didnt turn out pretty. Your argument suffers from the same flaws. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 14:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Maunus, I already said I'm not going back there. And for the record, "didnt turn out pretty" doesn't mean that editor was wrong; it only means the mob mentality acted up. Please don't try to re-involve me in a project that likes conflating real-life atrocities against Native Americans with biased editing for the sake of drowning out logic. Tezero (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I am not trying to involve you in anything, but trying to tell you what systemic bias means and why your proposal was ill conceived. And for the record of course it is both wrong and stupidly so to suggest that Jews should be more careful to avoid bias than non-jews when writing about Judaism or antisemitism. As for your unpleasant experience at the talkpage I dare say that given that you were acting like a white elephant in a china shop the outcome was predictable.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 14:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, Maunus, it was predictable; I should've gone with my hunch that social-science-related WikiProjects are all trigger-happy to accuse anyone who disagrees of being racist and launch into personal attacks instead of policy-based arguments because that's the only thing they understand. It does seem your assessment of "systemic bias" is more correct than mine; I was thinking of "systematic bias". That being said, I think people of all ethnicities can be biased about them and ought to keep an eye on their own possible biases, and I don't think Wikipedia would be out of line in suggesting this. Tezero (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Of course everyone can be biased, that is exactly why we don't need to tailor messages about trying to avoid bias to any groups in specific. In anycase, no hard feelings from my part, just wanted to clear up the terminology.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and Objectives

Hey man, sorry if it's annoying but, thank you for your work in the Sleeping Dgs article! I wanted take this opportunity to also see if you're gonna take on the gameplay section as well. Also, apparently Rhain hasn't been active as of the past week, so I'm gonna take on the marketing and release for him. I belueve by the end of the week we can get a new GA on our hands! What do you think? URDNEXT (talk) 21:25, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Also, I read in your userpage that you suffered from depression before, and I got curious to know how everything is going. Is everything alright now? I hope so, as I know what depression is like when I suffered from it last year. It was incredibily terrifying and I lost the motivation to do everything I loved and even, to live. If there's any problems you need help with, just contact me! URDNEXT (talk) 21:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome, URDNEXT; I am still planning to finish Gameplay and I can help with anything else that needs it. I do have a lot else on my plate, though: most notably, the reviewer of the Czech language article noted that the History section was severely incomplete, though it was about the best I could do with the sources I had, so he's provided me some more and I need to steadily be working on it so the GAN doesn't close as fail. There are also a couple of GANs by other users I'm tending to, and I have to prepare Sonic X for FAC and write the grammar section of the Navajo language article from the ground up. In other words, I'm busy all around on Wikipedia, but with what time I have for this, I'm more than open to keeping on going.
Also, it's nice to know you're there if I need someone. (And of course, you can hit me up if you need a shoulder.) To be honest, no, I haven't been feeling the best lately. My days are starting to run together, with little excitement in each one and little hope of picking up before college starts back up. I'm working on a long-form written piece (a fanfic, if you must know), but lately have had writer's block that's impeded me sticking to a clear schedule for ongoing readers. And I found out recently that three once-close friends (two of them dating back to elementary school) have unfriended me on Facebook and Steam within a short time for no apparent reason. At least working on articles and seeing real progress made fairly quickly still brings me pleasure. Tezero (talk) 23:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Tezero There's no rush to finish the gameplay section, so take your time to make the best you can. I had several people block me on facebook for no reason before too, so I know what it's like to have that. I sucks I know, but remember that your real friends are the ones that are there for you no matter ehat conditions you're under, if you're busy, if you're poor, if you're sick, or anything else. You see, I like to call this situation the piranha filter. This is where you know if someone is your real friend or just a phony. Remember to value only the people that care about you, and don't give a shit about the ones that disrespect you. If they don't want to be around you, then fuck them, you're worth more than that. I once had a bff from all the way from first grade in elementary. He was awesome and we were like brothers, but somewhere along high school, he started ignoring me. For some reason, he wouldn't pick up the phone, and when he did, he would purposefully hang up on me, and then act like it was a "technical problem". I later found out his parents (except for his dad, who's awesome) also had a grudge against me. I eventually got over it and noticed how in life, no matter what, you gotta fight for your happiness. Even if that means putting some people away from your life. Just forget them, get over it, and move on with your life, that simple. I can garantee you eventually you'll meet new people who are gonna care about you, and then you'll have new friends to replace the fake ones that came before. Know that I'm here for you too, so when you think no ones cares about you, remember the people who are here for you, either your parents, your family, you other friends, focus on them, not the people who ignore you. I remember when I went to college, (film degree by the way), I would try to make friends in the classes, and most people would ignore me. I thought that everyone in the world was a douchebag and hated me, but eventually in the 2nd year, I met some new people, and they became my friends, we still keep contact today, and sometimes we hang out when we are able to. What I learned from this is no matter what, good things are coming, that's a fact. And aldo, that we can't, no matter how hard we try, make everyone like us. I'm also a writer, and when I started around High School, I would try to make the best script in the world, something that everyone would love. Soon enough, I got my reality check when I screened a small short film in class, and half the class booed me. I almost went on a rage rampage, but then my teacher told me something I never forgot, "You can't please everyone in life, so stop trying to be accepted by everyone, because it won't work. The biggest historical figures like Beethoven, Mozart and Da Vinci, all got hated on by people back in their day, heck, even Jesus was heavily ignored by a lot of people. What would happen if Martin Luther king chose to believe in the people that ognored him? He wouldn't have never achieved nothing in his life. Neither would Lincoln, Franlkin, and Washignton. Instead of caring about the people who ignored them, they chose to be around the people who cared about them, and prove the other guys that they're wrong. So focus on the good stuff, doing that, you should be fine."

Also, as I'm a writer too (songwriter, movie, and video games, i write a lot lol), I totally understand that writer's block can be a pain in the ass. But what I learned from Bruno Mars, is that you cant fight inspiration. If it comes it comes, if it doesnt, then just do something else and wait till you can do it properly. Dn't force inspiration because it can end up harming you creativity, and you may end up with material thats not good enoguh. But there are some methods that you can try if you really want to crank a script/piece out. Fr example, when I can't write about something, and writer's block blocks me, then I just write about writers block. Of life gives you a lemon, you make lemonade. Simple as that. Writers block is just a voice in your head that keeps you from doing something. This video helped me a lot, https://youtube.com/watch?v=rcKtcXbjwD4, you should definetely give it a try! About the schedule, I think you dhould keep track of when your inspiration strikes the most, and follow that. For example, some people write better when they go for a walk, so therefore, they should go for walks more often if they wish to write stuff more. See where I'm going? I recommend you organize yourself according to the 80 over 20 approach. That means you prioritize the most important stuff, over the less imporant stuff. For example, say you are doing college, and trying to constantly put out pieces weekly. You should re arrange your schedule to finishing the most important stuff first, then when you have time, do the other stuff. I Wikipedia is getting on your way, then you should try to give t less time. What's more important, a virtual medal or your degree? Sure, Wikipedia isnt bad, but if its hirting your life, specially your social life, you should focus on the other stuff more. Maybe a wikibreak if you really need to do something else? It's up to you. Try to focus 2-4 hours a day for studies and college everyday then spend the rest of the day doing stuff you like. Say taking a walk for example, or playing videogames. Even doing wikipedia too! But I recommend you try to (if you already don't) try to go out more. Maybe get a girlfriend, or hang out with friends a a bar or something. I'm sure you can find people that share intests with you, specially since college has so many people around campus. Take this chance to be more social (again, if you already don't), and I'm sure you can get that stress out from you. Go to parties, meet new people, watch more movies, play more games online, and as long as you don't exagerate, or let it take over your whole calendar, you can make you life a lot better! Doing stuff diferrent than the usual is good to keep things fresh and interesting. I like traveling with my girlfriend to places we haven't gone before, or watching random films on netflix, just for fun! Just like the beatles once said, "don't carry the world all on your shoulder". If Wikipedia is taking over your life, you should re arrange how much time you're putting in it. And prioritize the most important stuff, like the FAC, and the articles on GA. The other stuff can wait, since they don't have the amount of commitment the GA, FAs have.

Last but not least, write a list of things that make you happy, and one about things that don't. If your current schedule makes you bored and sad, there's something wrong with it. You HAVE to focus on the things that make you happy, and leave behind the things that make you sad, just like I said before. Because if you don't live live happy to the fullest, when you're older, you can end p regretting not doing these things, just like my uncle. Who wished he would have studied more when he was younger. Ask yourself, is what I'm doing something that I imagine myself doing HAPPILY when I'm 30/40 or even 50 years old? Is this the way I want to spend my limited time on Earth? Because we have one life, and even if you don't believe it, you can't deny that we have to live it to the fullest. I can't imagine myself doing something other than music, films and games. Sure it a lot of stuff for me to handle, but its what makes me happy, and something I want to do for the rest of my life, just because I love it so much. I look at my friends and ask, are these people good influences in my life? Or are they just drunken/party people that are going nowhere in life other than drinkng, partying and doing useless stuff. Parties are fantasic, but in excess, it can easily turn bad. So do what you love, hang out wi people you love, otherwise, re arrange your life. Because nobody knows if today is the last day in your life, so you have to fix whats wrong with it. URDNEXT (talk) 00:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

I hope this sheds some light on your problems, Tezero! If you find any priblemd, just contact me, alright? URDNEXT (talk) 01:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Silver the Hedgehog artwork.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Silver the Hedgehog artwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

I have been watching your recent edits from the sideline. I was a little uneasy with your removal of the grammar section, and now I saw the culling of the unused references. Generally linguistics editors like the article bibliography to be comprehensive, because the bibliogprahy is extremely useful for other linguists who read the article. I think a better solution than removing references because they are unused is to make sure they are used. That way you also know that you have a high quality article that represents the entire body of literature. When I write a language article, especially about little known languages, I try to make sure that every single published source is cited in the article or at least in the further reading section. The article ideally should be a comprehensive review of the literature on the language, this becomes particularly important when different linguists disagree about some aspect of the interpretation of the language. Then the article has to present both interpretations. I would never let a language article go through FAC if it does not have this degree of comprehensibility, or if it leaves out differences in interpretation of important phenomena between different linguists.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

About the grammar section, please understand that it was gigantic, about the size of the full Swedish language article (an FA). Obviously I still have to expand the section; it doesn't even talk about nouns, and there's more to be said about verbs. I was also a little uneasy about the sources, but I know I won't even be able to locate them all, let alone use them all; for now I'll put the unused ones back in the form of a "Further reading" section. How does that sound, Maunus? Tezero (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Oh, and you know the grammar section isn't entirely gone, right? It's in a separate article now. I maintain that that's much easier to navigate. Tezero (talk) 01:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I dont find inability to locate central sources to be a convincing argument, not having access to the most important sources is an argument for not working on the article, not for excluding the sources. For example Hoijer's early work is indispensable (though often superceded) and Parsons Yazzie and Speas grammar, being the most recent and acclaimed is also pretty much indispensible. many of the individual articles about specific linguistic topics also have their places, either here or in the grammar article. I am not completely adverse to the culling of the grammar section, although I do consider the grammar section to be the meat of a language article. It is possible to have a grammar article and then a summary of that article in situ. But it would have to describe all the main elements of Navajo grammar, and provide the reader with an overview of the typology and grammatical structure of the language. As for the sources I think you should start by copying them to the talkpage, then as you work you can incorporate them as you go.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Maunus, something I think you don't understand is that I'm not removing these sources from use - they weren't being used. They were just there as a statement of "Here, this exists!" From that, the article can only move up; I'm not sullying it by not having access to them. I'll look for what I can. Tezero (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
No, I do understand that. But you should also understand that someone added them to the bibliography in order to help the readers and future editors looking for sources to improve the page.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I know that, Maunus. I'm one of those editors, so I figured it was okay to move them to my sandbox so I could add them back as I found them. (I did listen when you mentioned this in the Czech article; it's just that I also thought a laundry list of sources looked unseemly, but hey.) I don't really know of any way to tell which sources are the most "important", so I'm just making do with what I can. Tezero (talk) 01:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
There is only one way to find out which sources are most important - reading them all and see which are mentioned most by other sources and how. That is what in science writing (including encyclopedia article writing) one would call research, and which in academia we call to do a literature review. Dont worry about it, if you think some sources are superfluosu then perhaps they are, but please preserve the information available so that other editors in the future can benefit from it. And keep in mind that a FAC needs to be comprehensive.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Maunus, I'm obviously not done with Navajo yet, but I've worked in a few of the sources and found a few others. Do you have any thoughts on my recent edits? (Or on Czech, for that matter? You haven't been over there in a while.) Tezero (talk) 03:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
The grammar section is becoming a section now, but it lacks examples and prose description of the way the grammar works, it is almost a bare inventory of grammatical categories. Not very helpful for someone who wants to know how the language works. Also I don't like the list format at all, I think most of this is much better presented in prose.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Maunus, I'll change it back, then. I'm trying to find illustrative examples as we speak. Tezero (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Don't move backwards. Move forwards! You're on the right track. Just needs some more meat to go with the bones.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Canvassing

Tezero, your wording right here makes it pretty clear that your intent was to recruit help - that's canvassing. You really cannot be advocating such things. Please do not do that anymore. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

I suppose I was being too optimistic about the neutrality of her requests. Apologies, Sergecross73. Tezero (talk) 03:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Good point. Your suggestion was not great, but her wording was really what made it cross the line. Don't worry about it. Sergecross73 msg me 03:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for leading and helping me on Turkey's GA nomination mate its good to have a cooperative editor like you in here (You gave me my first barnstar and I give my first to you by the way). Take care. elmasmelih 20:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Navajo language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heishi and Taxonomy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Apart from the honorable work you have done for GAs, I really liked your comments on Administrators' noticeboard. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 16:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Gun politics in the Czech Republic

Hi, I just wanted to ask you whether the GA criteria actually require each and every sentence to be sourced? It seems a bit ambiguous here. The thing is that I am having a hard time finding a source for "In reality, the psychological test is rarely requested." There is abundance of blogs and online forums and mine and my friends' personal experience all support this, but it seems that I won't be able to source it. Thanks in advance for considering this. Cimmerian praetor (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Cimmerian praetor, it's true that not every single sentence has to be sourced. However, demands for sourcing have increased in the last few years; this has been the cause of the majority of FA and GA removals. The only things that can go without sources are blatantly obvious details, such as that the sky is blue. (While working on the Czech language article, I left uncited the statement that the name Dvořák contains the letter ř. I did, however, have to cite that this letter is rare outside Czech.) Not only is the fact that the psychological test is rarely requisted not an obvious detail; it's original research. It's perfectly okay to leave the information out if you can't find a source. Tezero (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
I have deleted/rewritten that one and added all other necessary citations. The only issue might be with:
Carrying guns in schools and campuses is not prohibited by law and there are no so called "gun-free zones".[1]
since it is obviously next to impossible to prove that something is not, rather then proving that something is. I have added unspecific citation to the firearms act as a whole, which does not contain any such gun free zones, but feel free to delete it if you are not satisfied with it. I might add a few details here and there, but I think it is ready to go. Thank you for your care! Cimmerian praetor (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Eh, it's fine. I've passed the article; nice job, Cimmerian praetor. Tezero (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, it is good to be appreciated. Thanks a lot for the review! Cheers! Cimmerian praetor (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping Dgs GA

Your GA nomination of Navajo language

Film

Warning

Sleeping Dogs

Problems

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Dogs (video game)

Hey 2

Four Award

WikiLove

Project M

Occidental language (interlingue)

Urgent Sleeping Dogs

Warnings

Block

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Dogs (video game)

Sources

A barnstar for you!

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Dogs (video game)

Sonic TFA nomination

We did it!

New GA

What's up

FA congratulations

Super Mario Bros. 3

Tony Hawk reception

Your GA nomination of Freedom Planet

Help

Your GA nomination of Freedom Planet

DYK for Sleeping Dogs (video game)

Your GA nomination of Freedom Planet

September 2014

Sonic X

Rest in peace

My condolences

Hey

'all things' FAN

Sleeping Dogis

Project M (again)

Winter is coming...

AKB48 on GOCE request

Image problems

Request

So.

Your GA nomination of Czech language

FUR

We

Question

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI