User talk:VortexPhantom/Archive 1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur q requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you recently removed content from Science Olympiad Foundation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Stop publishing this draft! The page has no sources and is not ready for publishing. You will be reported for disruption if you keep on doing so. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok, will be careful on this. VortexPhantom (talk) 10:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:34, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok, will be careful on this. VortexPhantom (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur q. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it barely has any content and needs more context for publishing to mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

The article Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability. An identical Draft has been reviewed 3 times and declined as not notable but the author of the Draft has simply posted an identical version to Mainspace. There is no evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   10:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shemford Futuristic School, Muzaffarpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muzaffarpur Junction railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I understand that common strategies section must be deleted, but why you deleted my another paragraph on latest update without explaining, is this the role of pending changes reviewer, does articles does need update or you want it remain outdated?? ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk 06:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

I saw contributions you have been making at WP:TEAHOUSE and noticed that your signature is really hard to read as it has blue text on a black background. You may wish to consider making it more WP:ACCESSIBLE; there's help at MOS:CONTRAST. Bazza 7 (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I have changed my signature

VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi VortexPhantom. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India-Nepal Railway Connectivity Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Please do not put loads of unnecessary horizontal lines in you talk page posts. In your post at Talk:India you added so many horizontal lines in one post that it looked like six separate sections.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)