User talk:Wikideas1/Archive 4

Thanks for your contributions to Chemmacros. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bussproofs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 03:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Wikideas1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of methematical art software for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want List of methematical art software to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blender (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OGG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on List of mathematical art software. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This article may not comply with WP policy on accessibility (MOS:COLOR ) which makes WP suitable for visually impaired users. Specifically, color cannot be used as the only way of conveying certain information. The green in 3rd column can be kept, but there must be another mechanism also.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Autoship CAD/CAM.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Wikipedia notability policies require a few INDEPENDENT sources that _discuss_ the subject of the article. Merely being referenced or named in a source is not sufficient. Press releases & the company's own website are not sufficient. Better sources are needed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 04:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Chemistry notation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Agree with nomination

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhinoceros 3D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E57.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Chemistry notation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no coherent topic here, a seeming generic title-phrase without defined meaning. It is a combination of all sorts of different ways of writing things in different contexts, with a seealso that is likewise a jumble of unrelated topics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

I have removed the proposed deletion tag. I was surprised it was added so soon after you started the article. To let you work on it in peace, I have moved it to Draft:Chemistry notation. It can stay there for up to 6 months before moving it back to article space.

I added tags to the categories; that keeps them from inclusion in any categories until you remove the nowiki tags. (We don't want draft articles in project space categories). I also tagged the Chemical notation redirect for speedy deletion; you can re-create it when you move your draft back to project space.

Chemical notation seems like a useful topic; I suggest you reach out to DMacks on what he suggests to improve the article. You might also ask for feedback at WikiProject Chemistry. I had left them a not earlier about this article at:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Proposed for deletion (PROD): Chemistry notation

Thanks for your work! A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 21:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Visi CAD/CAM.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article may not meet WP:GNG notability requirements. That requires multiple IDPENDENT sources (news outlets, for example) to discuss the product/company. The sources listed are from product's own website, or are minor technical documents, or from collaborating companies.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Wikideas1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Visi CAD/CAM, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visi CAD/CAM.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Computational Chemistry, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have been adding Tex links, particularly those related to chemistry to a number of pages. In at least one case these have been reverted twice as not relevant. These additions also raise the question of whether you have an involvement in some of those Tex versions, in which case COI questions would arise. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Iron Man (2008 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to upload and insert your own created images randomly into articles. Wikipedia is NOT an image host to promote your own work. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Wikideas1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Autoship CAD/CAM, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoship CAD/CAM.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bunnypranav}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:27, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Mhchem. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least two and preferably three reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. There's useful information about how to choose good sources and avoid bad sources here. The source on ctan.tinycomputers.io is unverifiable, as the domain name does not resolve, but in any case you need more sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Bella Render (software).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To meet WP notability requirements (WP:GNG) some independent sources must be provided. The article currently only has promotional press-release type sources; plus lots of internal company web sites. Independent 3rd part sources that discuss the product in-depth are required.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Age of Debt Bubbles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Age of Debt Bubbles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing train photos. However, TTX is not a manufacturer of railcars, they buy them from manufacturers and then pool them. Please don't keep calling them a manufacturer. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:34, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on Mathethon. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

For wp:notability you need sources that cover Mathethon. This falls pretty far short, at most it's in a list in a few of the sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Mathethon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of cryptocurrency journals. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Engineering education in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering education in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 03:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC) o

Hello, Wikideas1

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JohnMizuki, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of nuclear science journals, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JohnMizuki}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JohnMizuki (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Artificial intelligence software indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Coder (online – IDE). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coder (online – IDE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Would GitHub Codespaces be noteworthy enough to make a wikipedia page? Would like to know before I spend 3 hours doing it. Wikideas1 (talk) 17:01, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bella Render (software). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:28, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Please note that per WP:USERNOCAT, pages in your personal sandbox are not allowed to be filed in mainspace categories alongside articles. Since I've had to remove User:Wikideas1/sandbox from categories three times now, don't readd it to categories again. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 12:00, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of data science journals. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Learn to Program (book). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TarnishedPath^talk 06:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Learn to Program cover.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 07:09, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

The article Computational writing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Computational writing" is normally used for computer-generated (or aided) writing, not for what this article describes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Online–IDE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:29, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Capital Factory. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tools and equipment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harvester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of tools and equipment

added a link pointing to Car lift

Auto mechanic

added a link pointing to Car lift

Automobile repair shop

added a link pointing to Car lift

List of Python software

added a link pointing to Framework

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Wikideas1! I am a new page reviewer on Wikipedia. I have taken a look at your list article, List of PHP software and tools, and it appears to be entirely sourced by GitHub. GitHub, to my knowledge, is a self-published source which ordinarily means it should not be used on Wikipedia. I am unaware of whether GitHub is an acceptable source when it comes to software specific articles, so for this review I am relying on the information that is available in this discussion. Specifically the following:

'Github itself isn't a source, it's just a place for people to create accounts and upload code and other stuff. All content is entirely user generated. If it's GitHub documentation itself about Github as an entity or service, maybe, but otherwise no. The only reason I can think of is X provides the source code for Y on GitHub. Maybe A code does B, but I think that would be better to have a third party reliable source make the statement about what the code does rather than the, possibly, original research of reading the code and making the claim.'

With this knowledge, I am going to ask that you replace the GitHub sources with reliable secondary sources from reputable websites and publications. I have left the relevant template tags on the article so that other editors are aware of this. Thank you and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on List of SQL software and tools. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 16:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your image was inserted successfully on the page Computing education, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Per WP:AIIMAGE, Wikipedia generally doesn't use AI generated images to illustrate articles. Belbury (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of data science software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OpenML.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of hard skills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siunitx, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Please do not WP:USURPTITLE active templates without bringing forth a discussion that has reached a consensus for any change(s) proposed, prior to making the proposed changes. Your changes to Template:C sharp removed a live template and broke a handful of pages using this template. Your change has been reverted. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry. Wikideas1 (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on List of Kotlin software and tools. Another editor, Ceyockey, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Many bare URL references remain to be revised to proper format for long term viability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ceyockey}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I appreciate your efforts to update the Amtrak system map. I don't want you to get discouraged, but your current map isn't quite ready for use in the article. It's a great start, though! A few notes:

• Those datasets need cleaned up before use - they're usually a bit out of date. (I've run into the same issue myself.) Among the errors I spot are non-Amtrak stations listed as stations (Shore Line East and Atlantic City Line), the Hoosier State name still shown, the Mardi Gras Service not shown, and the Northeast Regional line still extended to the older Newport News station.
• The very large amount of information on the map, with every single stop labeled, means that it has to be very zoomed in to read the text. (Compare the current map, where all text is readable at the typical 800px view of a file page.) There's also no hierarchy of information, so nothing allows the reader to differentiate between major terminals and minor stops. I recommend thinking about what information you want to communicate, and how. It may be best to have a simpler map for infobox use, and a more detailed map for closer examination.
• There's a lot of overlapping text, especially in the densest areas of the map. If you want to label every single stop, you're going to have to do a lot of careful positioning of the names, and likely have insets for parts of California and the Northeast Corridor. The names also cause a lot of overlap - it might be worth leaving them off this map. It's always possible to create a diagramatic map (a la Cameron Booth's design) later to shown the routes.
• Please take a look at MOS:CONTRAST. The dark scheme of your map is very hard to read, especially at infobox scale, and there's not nearly enough contrast. A dark lines/light background scheme like the current map is probably better, but at very least it needs better contrast.
• Finally, please upload as a .svg file! That allows others to edit the map and keep it up to date.

Happy editing, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Pi.1415926535 here is an SVG for you. Wikideas1 (talk) 06:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chemistry notation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mhchem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of semiconductor industry occupations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of semiconductor industry occupations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siunitx".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

DB-Engines ranking

added links pointing to Firebolt, Indica, Heroic and NCache

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited After-school activity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camera Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of infrastructure in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of infrastructure in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chemistry notation".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mhchem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Wikideas1, are you using LLMs to assist with any of your edits here? NicheSports (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

I do just to get a framework to work with, but I do a lot of quality control, if you check my sandbox edits, I put a lot of work into editing it. Wikideas1 (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of computational physics software. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 10:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1,

Thank you for creating Space-based data centers.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please consider removing unsourced content in the advantages and disadvantages sections or adding citations and expanding out specific points as it relates to these data centers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

aaronneallucas (talk) 02:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on Space-based data center. Another editor, Aplucas0703, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Topic appears notable and has good coverage, even if this article may not totally reflect that.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

aaronneallucas (talk) 02:51, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of at-home jobs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of at-home jobs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of cryptocurrency journals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coder (online – IDE), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Wikideas1. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 12 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 18:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Wikideas1 (talk) 08:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mathethon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bella Render (software), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Justapedia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 18:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mathethon".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

In the graphic you added to the Administrative divisions of Iran, can you add within the caption what's being pictured? Obviously you see provincial boundaries, but is it also showing county boundaries? Criticalthinker (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Separately: There is a guideline that the text in graphics should be about the same size as the surrounding text within Wikipedia articles. —RCraig09 (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Learn to Program (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

I removed the map (File:Michigan Colleges.webp) you added to Michigan#Education and List of colleges and universities in Michigan because it is illegible. The gray text on a dark gray background is very hard to read. It looks like you've uploaded similar maps for other states, and all of them have the same coloration issues. I would suggest that something be done to either fix the maps or remove them. Imzadi 1979 → 18:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Agreed, these maps are illegible and also not well curated, as they seem to be indiscriminate lists generated from IPEDS or a similar database, without even being filtered to match the lists that they are illustrating (e.g. our college lists don't include non-degree-granting institutions such as vocational schools). Toohool (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Ditto and ditto. Please remove them so that others won't have to. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

It is a list of colleges and universities, those are community ‘colleges’. Wikideas1 (talk) 10:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Since you have refused to remove the maps, others have had to do it. If you add any more illegible maps we will be discussing it at WP:ANI. Sundayclose (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

We will have to keep an eye on this.....we also have maps for post offices, bus routes, mines etc. Moxy🍁 23:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

3 months later they decide its no good, if your manager was that late at work for quality control, they'd probably get fired. I think this is in retaliation to the Venezuela map, and putting up the colleges maps is somewhat political. I think wikipedia has officially become anti-information with this one. Wikideas1 (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

How long it took for everyone to notice the problem is irrelevant. The maps are bad whether they were done today or 10 years ago. And this has nothing to do with "retaliation" or "political". It has everything to do with legibility and quality. You do not own the maps or any of the articles in which you put them. You're welcome to make constructive contributions, or even create maps that are legible. But if you think Wikipedia is "anti-information" then by all mean feel free to stop editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikideas1, please stop restoring these images (regardless of the inconsequential colour changes) - you clearly do not have consensus for their inclusion.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I think more people should weigh in on this. Wikideas1 (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Fine, start an RfC somewhere. In the meantime, you have multiple editors here on this page asking you to stop adding the maps, representing a clear consensus against their use. The onus is on you to get consensus for inclusion before restoring the disputed content. This is basic editing protocol.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I am among those asking Wikideas to stop posting images of such poor quality (color, font size, contrast, legibility, etc.). Among those independent of the maps, the reasoned consensus seems unanimous. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop adding these maps back to articles. File:Michigan Colleges.webp is illegible. The colors are better, but except for the title text, none of the text can be read. This is true at full size, and triply true at thumbnail sizing. I have removed that from List of colleges and universities in Michigan, and I will continue as long as you are creating maps that are useless for us. Imzadi 1979 → 17:58, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

I concur with User:Imzadi1979. This family of graphics is grossly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. There is a Wikipedia guideline that text in graphics should be about as large as text in articles' surrounding narrative text. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

I looked through a sampling of the rest of the states, about half of them, and the maps all have the same problems. They've been removed from every state article. Please do not put maps back in these articles without addressing all of the concerns. Imzadi 1979 → 18:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikideas1, thank you for working on sidebar templates. Could you please clarify where did you find the approach of wrapping every list item into template {{left}} with a tag <br>? I've had to overhaul it twice already: Special:Diff/1333975119 and Special:Diff/1333324858.

Also, please take a look at guidelines for categorization of templates. Wikitext for categories should be inside <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags (examples: Special:Diff/1333324418, Special:Diff/1333974846). —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

I think it is easiest to read that way, since it is alphabeitcal, and it is always hidden untill you click on it. But apparrently you don't agree, and thats ok. Wikideas1 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

If that's the intention then the parameter |listclass=hlist should be replaced with |listclass=plainlist + CSS |liststyle=text-align:left. Constructing a fake list layout with <br> tags and manually aligning every list item is a bad idea. —⁠andrybak (talk) 02:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey thanks, yeah that looks like a way better way to do it. Wikideas1 (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:C sidebar. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of cryptocurrency journals".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of educational hardware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of educational hardware until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frap (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capital Factory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Coder".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nano Nuclear Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Nuclear Energy (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Johnson524 09:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bella Render".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page UBtech Robotics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Learn to Program".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Please note that pages in your personal sandbox, such as User:Wikideas1/sandbox, are not allowed to be filed in categories, per WP:USERNOCAT. It can't be in a bluelinked category that places your sandbox next to finished mainspace articles, and it can't be in a redlinked category that doesn't exist at all — it just can't be in any categories for any reason.

As I've had to pull the page out of categories four times in the past 19 days alone, and at least one other time prior to February 2026, do not file it in categories again, because sandboxes aren't allowed to be in categories. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Wikideas1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capital Factory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White-collar worker, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doctor and Counselor were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Outline of Java has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 6#This title could be mistaken as an outline of the island of Java, rather than the programming language, and is likely to cause confusion.|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 6 § This title could be mistaken as an outline of the island of Java, rather than the programming language, and is likely to cause confusion.]] until a consensus is reached.

Uffda608 (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Wikideas1. Thank you for your work on List of pro-democracy protests in China. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please fix the bare URLs in footnotes 1 and 7. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on CodeSandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Sadads (talk) 01:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)