User talk:YJ072

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashant Mali (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fermiboson was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't think National Academy of Inventors is an WP:NPROF pass. Otherwise none of the other sources or descriptions contribute to notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fermiboson (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, YJ072! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fermiboson (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

COI query on academic biographies

Hello @YJ072 - you have a number of drafts circulating at the moment, some of them are up for review. Can you clarify if you know or are connected to these individuals? If so we need a COI declaration as per WP:COI. This is important for this project's transparency. Many thanks - ChrysGalley (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Baym (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Under WP:NEWLLM, new articles written from scratch are not allowed to via AI / LLM. Kindly clarify your WP:COI status, as requested on your talk page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chang Liu (synthetic biologist) has been accepted

Chang Liu (synthetic biologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashant Mali (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JesusisGreat7 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Jesus isGreat7 07:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Baym (March 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Don't bother lying to use about your LLM use. We can tell.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:51, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI