User talk:ZDRX
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Start a new discussion thread |
| This is ZDRX's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 | He is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 | Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 | This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Assamese cinema Talk page
There is currently a discussion at Talk:Assamese_cinema#Clarification regarding box office figures regarding an issue. You can join the discussion if you like. Goswami21 (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Revert on Nadoda Rajputs
Hi, I don't understand why you reverted my edits on Nadoda Rajput.
The author presents two alternative beliefs regarding the etymology but the article contained only one of them while omitting the second (I added second ). The author gives equal weight to both beliefs, I don't understand why only one was mentioned in the article.
I added a link and corrected a few details (here )to the source to make verification easier.
Some content misrepresentating the author's view was corrected .
The lead paragraph also presened that one belief as an established fact (removed by me ), which did not align with lead guidline.
I think it is pretty much constructive and provides WP:NPOV rather than caste promotion on Wikipedia.
If we go with the opinion that the source (The People of India by Kumar Suresh Singh) is not a reliable source, then all the content from that source should be removed instead of selectively removal. Senapatiji (talk) 07:34, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Use of the Alert/first template
Hi ZDRX. I see that you used an {{alert/first}} template on the talk page of an editor that has received many previous CT notices, where the editor has a long list of Ctopics/aware areas. In such cases, alert/first is inappropriate, and instead a brief note or a regular alert template should be used. --Hipal (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2026 (UTC)