Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Science. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Science|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Science. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Shortcuts


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

Science

List of fellows of the Nigerian Academy of Science


List of fellows of the Nigerian Academy of Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primarily unsourced, I favour restoring the longstanding redirect. Redirect has been restored a few times and reverted. Mariamnei (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Nigeria, Science, and Education. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, restoring prior redirect. The rationale given for removing the 2019 redirect is WP:EXEMPT1E, and I read that and WP:LISTPEOPLE as in fact the main reason to delete the list. We call someone notable iff they have a Wikipedia page here, and only ~10% of those in the list do. The editors claim that all the members would meet WP:NPROF#C3 is not valid. This was recently debated at WT:NPROF#International National Academies and C3 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Ndubisi Maduagwu, both of which ended as "no concensus". This is equivalent to saying that #C3 has to be judged on a case by case basis, not the claim here that everyone would automatically be notable. Without proof of notability the 90% of names without pages would need to be deleted, which makes the remainder not very useful. (At most an ATD would be a rename to "List of notable...", deleting those without pages, but I am not comfortable with that.)Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep: (Edit conflict); I respect Ldm1954's point of view, but I think it applies to navigational lists only; a navigational list depends on its members being individually notable, and the NPROF discussion was about whether being a fellow of a national academy makes a prof notable. It is possible for membership not to confer individual notability, but for the concept of the fellowship-list of an academy to be independently notable. The debate that Ldm1954 cites is therefore relevant only to individual fellows, not to this list. But the text I wrote before the edit-conflict was: (1) This list doesn't have to be unsourced, because reference 5 does in fact point to an archived version of a list of fellows published by the academy itself. Although primary, we'd normally trust an academy to list its own members, it's not controversial information. It's slightly unfortunate that the NAS site currently doesn't list its fellows (awaiting a site update) but there's no reason to mistrust the archived list. (2) The existing List of fellows of the Royal Society does contain red-links, admittedly not many (see for example List of fellows of the Royal Society elected in 1815) implying that we're okay about notability of the list rather than having a navigational list based on notability of the individual members. (3) This enormous example also shows that with structuring, we can cope with big lists of fellows. (4) So the fundamental question is whether we consider the Nigerian academy of science to be "important" enough for its fellowship-list to be notable. I'm biased towards "yes". Elemimele (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Kunthavai Naacchiyaar Government Arts College for Women


Kunthavai Naacchiyaar Government Arts College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero sources to demonstrate NOTABILITY and also fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College


Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:V Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Christhu Raj College


Christhu Raj College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Michael S. Engel


Michael S. Engel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significant portions and overall volume of the article are likely COI editing by Engel himself or by close associates, almost all IP edits have come from the Lawrence, Kansas area. Additionally there is no significant coverage of Engel in neutral secondary sources. Kevmin § 01:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, Kansas, Missouri, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. He has enormous citation counts for a taxonomist, easily enough for WP:PROF#C1, his multiple society fellowships also pass WP:PROF#C3, and his University Distinguished Professor title passes WP:PROF#C5. Any one of these would be enough. The badly justified nomination fails to address the correct notability criterion, WP:PROF, for which independent secondary sources are totally irrelevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with editor David Eppstein above. I think consensus should continue as it has been implied for more than 20 years, the life span of this article on WP. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 06:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    If this is your reasoning, then I have a fairly serious question: given that the page was created by Micael Engel, and all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel, aren't you giving a green light to any editor who decides that they are notable, and take steps to maintain therir own self-edited article without interference via anonymous IP edits? This article has been flagged - appropriately, given what WHOIS says about the IP edits - as a COI issue for over fifteen years. Why was it not deleted long ago? Again, if the only reason you are voting to keep is because the article has not been deleted yet, that does not seem appropriate for a self-created and self-edited article. Dyanega (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    It's simply not true that "all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel" -- see January 2023 for example. Athel cb (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, the edits in January 2023 are a good example. All of these were changes to existing text, mostly providing citations, not the addiion of new material. Fixing a bad or broken citation is not a substantive edit, it is routine maintenance. That list of eponyms was added in edits by Engel himself, nearly always via the anonymous IP addresses in Kansas. Prior to that January 2023 set of edits, several eponyms had been added in a spate of edits June of 2022, from a dial-up in Miami, when Engel was attending the meeting of the Florida Entomological Society (see this edit history). Coincidence? Note the content and targets of all of those edits. Is it odd that no one ever suggested the article be deleted back then? Maybe, but I don't see how that justifies letting COI abuse be "grandfathered in" just because no one called for deletion before. Dyanega (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. Regardless of who created the article and who subsequently edited it, the GoogleScholar record is very impressive. h = 70 is a lot for an entomologist. (It would be very respectable, though not stupendous, for a biochemist, a subject I know more about, but it is more than just respectable in a lower-citation field.) Notice also that a high proportion of the well cited papers have one or two authors, so it's pretty clear that he did much or most of the work. A curious point that I noticed is that the editor who now wants the article deleted made a series of eleven edits in January 2023 with no suggestion that it should be deleted. Athel cb (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    It should be noted that a notable portion of the later papers in the CV are published though a journal that Engel personally started and served as chief editor of, removing the peer-review portion of the science entirely. Actively avoiding peer-review to increase the paper count is not a good situation.--Kevmin § 17:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    The highest number of citations is for a Cambridge University Press book, and the highly-cited articles are in journals including PNAS and Nature. In this situation, I don't see how his also publishing in a journal he edited affects the determination of notability (particularly since we don't even need to look at C1). Nor do I think that publishing in a journal one co-founded is necessarily unethical. If it's the Journal of Melittology you mean, everyone's status seems to be declared above board. His papers from the period when he was chief editor say that he was chief editor (for example). It's not substantially different from having a departmental newsletter or posting notes on one's own faculty website, only it's packaged as a journal for convenience. Maybe that's shady, maybe not; it's up to the scientists in that field to determine whether they're using that journal to push bad papers. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Question. What is the policy-based reason for deletion here? Unclear whether the rationale is lack of notability or something else. YFB ¿ 18:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:PROF on two criteria (C3 and C5) independent of citations. The existing text isn't so bad that problems with it can't be fixed through ordinary cleanup. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Unsure I don't think there is an issue of notability as an academic taxonomist. He was co-author on Evolution of Insects and has papers in major journals. If the article was written by neutral editors, there would be no problem. But it wasn't. I think the issue of COI with a large number of IP edits is a major problem, which doesn't go away just because it's being going on so long. A long history of COI doesn't make it less of an issue. It seems that keeping the article would be rewarding the violation of COI rules, although the article is not unacceptable. Keeping the article does add something to the encyclopaedia (hence keep), but overlooking violations of the rules doesn't help the credibility of Wikipedia (hence delete).  —  Jts1882 | talk  09:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    I'm similarly of two minds on this but it does seem as though punishing the article for the sins of the author, so to speak, may be at odds with the policy intent. If the article meets the criteria for inclusion (subject to cleanup / depuffery) then surely the conversation should be about whether sanctions on the COI editor/IP are appropriate - which would be a discussion for another venue. YFB ¿ 21:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Also Unsure and for the same reasons Jts1882 gives; the notability issue is a bit of a distraction, but I'll say that he is not more notable than a large number of other entomologists who have no entry in Wikipedia at all. Yes, I know quite well that this is not how things work, and it's a logical fallacy. "Person X has a Wikipedia article, but person Y is more notable and does not" is, all things being equal, a terrible argument. The difference here is that the only reason this particular person HAS a Wikipedia article is because he created it, and maintained it, and added to it for a very long time. In other words, all things are NOT equal here. This brings me to a question that I hope someone can answer: is it possible to permanently block an article from anonymous edits? If Engel cannot be prevented from anonymously editing this article, then I would vote to delete it rather than allow him to continue to do so; if a block CAN be instituted, then I would vote to keep. Dyanega (talk) 15:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Dyanega: Yes it is possible, the article would need to be at least semi-protected to prevent new or unregistered users from editing it (see Wikipedia:Protection policy). Monster Iestyn (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep My first AfD, but i think that Engle has enough reason to keep around. Even if the meat puppetry is problematic, with some work by 3rd party editors the article can be cleaned up and stay. He seems to full fill WP:PROF in plently of aspects. I'd agree with Dyanega that protection could be instituted on the article to prevent IP edits, considering we don't know for certain that there is a COI, this would likely help confirm it. Plus, the article is relatively well written, bountifully sourced and his contributions to his field seem to be notable. FranticSpud (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Government College, Meenchantha


Government College, Meenchantha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad


Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail WP:NSCHOOL and GNG,. often only with single sources for the entire page

Government Institute of Science, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
S.B.E.S. College of Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Shivchhatrapati College, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dr. (Sow.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Kala Mahavidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Vasantrao Naik Mahavidyalaya, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  1. Government Institute of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  2. S.B.E.S. College of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  3. Shivchhatrapati College – Keep - Found borderline SIGCOV in some Marathi language articles.
  4. Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Ambajogai#Education
  5. Dr. (Sow.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Kala Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  6. Vasantrao Naik Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Mary Matha Arts & Science College


Mary Matha Arts & Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep A Malayalam-language search yielded sources (now added) that I believe make the article meet notability criteria

nahleghini (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

@Nahleghini Can you please point out which are the WP:THREE sources, that you think are sufficient to meet GNG? Amongst all the current sources in the article, all English sources are PRIMARY. The first Malayalam source is just a TRIVIAL mention. The second Malayalam source is ROUTINE coverage; I don't see any SIGCOV. Only the third Malayalam source has SIGCOV. So, we have a single source as of now. Please point out at least one or two more with SIGCOV. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Bharat Ratna Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Government Arts and Science College


Bharat Ratna Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Government Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn’t find anything appropriately notable outside of Wikipedia for this page. Fails WP:NSOURCE and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Seethalakshmi Achi College for Women


Seethalakshmi Achi College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Idhaya College for Women, Sarungani


Idhaya College for Women, Sarungani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Raja Doraisingam Government Arts College


Raja Doraisingam Government Arts College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Sri Sarada Niketan College for Women


Sri Sarada Niketan College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Madurai Sivakasi Nadar's Pioneer Meenakshi Women's College


Madurai Sivakasi Nadar's Pioneer Meenakshi Women's College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOURCE and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Arts and Science College, Karwar


Arts and Science College, Karwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

MES's M. M. College of Arts and Science, Sirsi


MES's M. M. College of Arts and Science, Sirsi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Milad-E-Sherief Memorial College, Kayamkulam


Milad-E-Sherief Memorial College, Kayamkulam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and NSOURCE Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Syed Hameedha Arts and Science College


Syed Hameedha Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Alagappa University Evening College, Rameswaram


Alagappa University Evening College, Rameswaram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outdated (permanently closed) college. Also little coverage failing NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Pookoya Thangal Memorial Government College


Pookoya Thangal Memorial Government College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Nalanda College of Arts and Science


Nalanda College of Arts and Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 06:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

N. S. S. College, Manjeri


N. S. S. College, Manjeri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

College of Applied Science Kozhikode (IHRD)


College of Applied Science Kozhikode (IHRD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Snow keep Degree awarding institution. Lots of search results. In terms of GNG, there’s gotta be a presumption that local print newspapers supply notability. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

College of Applied Science Thamarassery (IHRD)


College of Applied Science Thamarassery (IHRD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is pretty much just a WP:BROCHURE. Also fails WP:V Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

R. Sankar Memorial Arts and Science College


R. Sankar Memorial Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Against redirect that has no source to support its existence. RangersRus (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Sree Narayana College, Cherthala


Sree Narayana College, Cherthala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Servite et contribuere (talk) 03:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Redirect? Need policy based consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 08:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Science Proposed deletions

  • Flow arrangement (via WP:PROD on 17 January 2025)
  • Reiner Kümmel (via WP:PROD on 16 January 2025)
  • Measure (physics) (via WP:PROD on 7 December 2024)
  • Evolution equations in high-energy particle physics (via WP:PROD on 4 December 2024)

Science Miscellany for deletion

Science Redirects for discussion

Deletion Review

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI