Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

21 March 2026

More information Purge ...

Purge
Shortcuts WP:AFD/TWP:AFD/T WP:AFDTODAYWP:AFDTODAY

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday March 19 (Thu) March 18 (Wed) March 17 (Tue) More...

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

More information < March 20, March 22 > ...

< March 20	March 22 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Hairtown, North Carolina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE. Not even heard about it. I lived in Harnett county for my entire life and never heard of this town. Bryce M (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Carolina. Bryce M (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

National bank veto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per comments at Did you know nominations/National bank veto, article has had substantial WP:LLM problems since its first edit. User who created it has been blocked under complicated circumstances. I don't think it is practical or time-efficient to try to discern what is usable and factual from the material that currently exists here, and moreover there are already articles at Bank War and Second Bank of the United States where tightly-focused improvements could be provided instead. TheFeds 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Politics. TheFeds 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NEWLLM and WP:TNT. I found several hallucinations that don't match the provided sources. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related deletion discussions. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Mona-Sophie Kohn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former footballer and track and field athlete who doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC based on what is presented. The best source that I can find on her football career is Soccerdonna, which is just a database source. The best that I can find on her athletics career is Mama Runners Collective, which is written by Kohn-Egho herself. Other than that, all I can find is a bunch of posts on LinkedIn. Her career doesn't seem to have reached the levels that would have garnered WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Sport of athletics, and Austria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Angela Maffeis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. Let'srun (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Cycling, and Italy. Let'srun (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment I was able to find this article on her, but I'm not good at searching Italian news sources. Silver seren^C 20:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Aleksandar Miletić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He did play in at least 6 matches at professional level but I can't find any evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC when searching in Serbian. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Fotis Zannis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zannis played 6 matches in the second tier of Greece but doesn't seem to have any clear WP:SIGCOV. I found SportsUp and Sportime, both just basic loan announcements with very little detail about Zannis specifically. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Boubeker Athmani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV or evidence of WP:GNG of the subject. French Wikipedia only contains one source which is a stats profile. Fcstmani (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Algeria. Fcstmani (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

British Columbia (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PTM. Dabpage consists entirely of partial topic matches relating to British Columbia. Nothing here is actually ambiguous. 162 etc. (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. There is no ambiguity here. This is a ridiculous and artificial article. For comparison, if we look at the California (disambiguation) article we see that there are lots of songs, things and places that are called California. A disambiguation article serves a genuine purpose there. Athel cb (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Do the Clips

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article since 2009. Redirect to Do As Infinity discography#Videos? Mika1h (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

College of Applied Science Kozhikode (IHRD)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Snow keep Degree awarding institution. Lots of search results. In terms of GNG, there’s gotta be a presumption that local print newspapers supply notability. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Science, and Kerala. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak keep, please add the additional found sources, but per User:RadioactiveBoulevardier should be a minimally notable college. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 19:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to List of educational institutions in Kozhikode district – Since no sources were presented by the keep votes above. Svartner (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to List of educational institutions in Kozhikode district. The problem here is that it lacks reliable Google hits. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Kirameki Hour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is a primary source. Other language wikis are unreferenced. Searched in English and Japanese but I didn't find anything significant said about the song. Redirect to album article Door (Every Little Thing album)? Mika1h (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Gwendraeth Valley Railway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Facebook and Wikipedia are not reliable sources. GTrang (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, United Kingdom, and Wales. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 18:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Burry Port and Gwendraeth Valley Railway or merge if any sources can be found about the volunteer project. Orange sticker (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hocine Harrouche

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks WP:SIGCOV / fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Algeria. Svartner (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Khaled Boukacem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks WP:SIGCOV / fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Algeria. Svartner (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Goalpariya people

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a stub, carries an unclear notability tag, and currently provides only a brief description plus a short "Notable people" section, with no demonstrated significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Under the GNG, a topic is suitable for a standalone article only when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, and multiple sources are generally expected. As written, the page does not establish that Goalpariya people is a distinct, well-documented ethnic group that warrants a separate article. At most, this material seems better suited to a broader article on the Goalpara region or related Assamese/Bengali ethnolinguistic topics, rather than its own page. Therefore, I nominate this article for deletion per WP:GNG and WP:V. Jacklincoln47 (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and Assam. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment What do you think about the sources in the article? And a source that was present when the page was created? Kelob2678 (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Amritsar (1738)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. All encyclopedic content is covered in the articles about the leaders of various factions. Most content is background: content about the supposed subject is minimal. No evidence that the battle itself meets WP:GNG: there are two sentences at most in the sources, and in the reliable sources they are presented as matters of popular belief, not as fact. No evidence that sources anywhere refer to it as the "battle of Amritsar"; this is referred to as an ambush and counter-ambush of a handful of soldiers. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Sikhism, and Punjab. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:33, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ScalarFactor (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Rajeshwari Datta

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerns from the previous AfD still seem to apply. Janhrach (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and India. Janhrach (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Niroshan Illeperuma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Almost all sources on the page do not describe him in any capacity, only mentioning he was cast on a project. I could only find 2 other sources on him and they're both Daily Mirror (an unreliable tabloid publication according to WP:DAILYMIRROR) and paywalled. . Realtent (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Sri Lanka. Realtent (talk) 16:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Bishop Agniswamy College of Education

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Windows 4.1

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODed this 2-entry disambiguation page with rationale "Neither of the linked articles state that their subject had the name "Windows 4.1"." The PROD was removed by @Quebecguy: with edit summary "The version number prefix for both versions listed is 4.1. While never marketed as such, it is still commonly-known alternative name, see page history." But this isn't enough: either each article actually has an appropriate mention of "Windows 4.1" in it, or their entries on the disambiguation fail MOS:DABMENTION. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: I don't get it why a discussion is needed for disambiguation page (and former redirect) that has been live since roughly two decades. The internal version number of the listed operating systems remain the same in that timeframe. The version number prefix are listed on the infobox of both articles, if not, a clearer explanation can be found on the Windows 9x article, where it says "The internal release number for versions of Windows 9x is 4.x. The internal versions for Windows 95, 98, and Me are 4.0, 4.1, and 4.9, respectively". quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 16:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment - I added a reference to Windows 98 article for the version number. Couldn't find a similar reference for Windows Nashville. --Mika1h (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

John Cowperthwaite

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DAB page not needed per WP:ONEOTHER, a hatnote would suffice if needed and only John James Cowperthwaite has a standalone article. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:51, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and United Kingdom. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:51, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Note that John Cowperthwaite the JC Midge designer did have an article until 2014, and the first two nominations for this title (one withdrawn, and the second ending in deletion) were for that article. No opinion on the current dab page at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Boykisser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source 1, bedeutungonline, was added as a replacement for me removing Know Your Meme. However, bedeutungonline does not seem to be an RS either as it has no declared editors or credited writers. Source 2 does not mention the meme at all. Sources 3-7 are only passing mentions of isolated incidents where hacking/vandalism used Boykisser as one of many memes. They're just passing mentions that confirm that the meme exists, and none are WP:SIGCOV.

User Dog Oxide (talk · contribs) also seems to have some WP:OWN issues, as they reinstated source 2 despite it being completely irrelevant to the meme. I was unable to find any significant third-party coverage of the meme, just a couple passing mentions where it was one of many memes used in a vandalism attack, along with social media and Know Your Meme. It's known in furry circles, but doesn't seem to have warranted anything more than passing name-drops outside of it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: LGBTQ+ studies and Internet. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete due to lack of Significant Coverage.

Bedeutungonline is definitely not an RS. In addition to the above information, it's full of typos, goes on weird tangents, and the language on the navigation is different from the language in the article, suggesting it's not meant to be found without a search engine.

People who are interested in this can find it on Know Your Meme.

Unrelated to the AfD, but I've seen the cat on tumblr. I had no idea it was supposed to be a distinct character. SenshiSun (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Community composting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the text in this article appears to either be copy-pasted or very closely paraphrased from the cited sources. The article would have to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia’s policies, and therefore I believe it should be deleted unless someone is willing to WP:TNT. Additionally, there are signs that a LLM was used to generate citations and possibly the text as well. I₂Overcome ^talk 14:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Social science. I₂Overcome ^talk 14:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, the majority of the text was added in six consecutive edits within less than a minute. I₂Overcome ^talk 14:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete Unsurprisingly another mediocre student article. The entire environmental impact section is about composting generically, nothing specific to this topic. This is not AI, there's just a lot of plagiarism here. Literally the entire Process and Benefits sections (likely more as the nom identified) were copied and pasted directly from their sources without quotation. I always wonder what grade students get for these. User:Jdubmhc, thoughts on this student not actually doing any science writing for Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Virginia Tech/Science Writing (Fall)? User:Ian (Wiki Ed), why does WikiEd still not have better guidance against new articles being created by students when they're total crap like this? Reywas92^Talk 16:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
It appears several of the other articles written/"improved" for that course have issues as well. Almost all of them have signs of LLM use. On one I saw 1000+ byte edits ~~with decent-length edit summaries~~ being made within one ~~second~~ minute of each other, ~~which isn’t humanly possible unless you’re using some kind of bot.~~ Quite frankly, the idea that a college student asked to write content for a Wikipedia article isn’t going to use AI is almost laughable. These courses shouldn’t exist IMO. I₂Overcome ^talk 16:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
I second your comments. I have seen far too many pages written by students who are part of courses who create them directly in main/edit existing pages without enough curation. There are rare exceptions, but in general my experience is that these waste a significant amount of time by other users to repair them. I am also concerned that User:Jdubmhc, the instructor, only has 467 but is acting as an instructor for a course creating pages.
Some questions to User:Ian (Wiki Ed):
Why are novices in charge of teaching classes?

What requirements and training is their for advisors?

What reviewing is done by you and others, as against expecting us to to do it?
If needed that can (perhaps should) go to a more general RfC. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
An RfC might be needed; this discussion should probably at least be moved elsewhere since it’s out of scope for an AFD. I₂Overcome ^talk 17:51, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

It appears that several of the students at a minimum used a bot to copy and paste sections individually from a draft page, because I don’t think it’s humanly possible to make four copy and paste edits with different edit summaries in less than two seconds. I₂Overcome ^talk 17:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Struck my comments; I wasn't thinking clearly and thought the minutes in the timestamps were seconds, even though I wrote "less than a minute" earlier... I₂Overcome ^talk 19:47, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Arthur Harrison (commissioner)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a political figure, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NPOL. The strongest notability claim here is that he served for several years on a city commission, which is not a level of office that constitutes an automatic notability pass -- and no, it's not the same thing as the city council, but was a municipal committee whose members were appointed to their jobs by the city council.
But the article is not sourced anywhere near well enough to claim that he would pass NPOL #2 on this basis -- apart from one article about his appointment to the commission, this is otherwise referenced to a glancing namecheck of his existence on one page of a history book about the city, one very short blurb about his much later candidacy for another office that he didn't win, and a news brief about the death of his wife, none of which constitutes substantive GNG-worthy coverage.
There's just nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from needing much, much more than just one substantive GNG-building source. Bearcat (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, and Engineering. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: He has an entry in Men and Makers of Edmonton, Alberta (see p.67) and the newspaper clippings are promising. I'd like to !vote keep on this one but it would be nice to see some more sources... Plenty of hits on Newspapers.com, but it's a common name and searching is a bit difficult. MediaKyle (talk) 13:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - missing from the Canadian encyclopedia. Bearian (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Bearian, this comment struck me as odd. The link you've provided is to an article about the Department of Natural Resources, created 40 years after Arthur Harrison died... If you meant to say he doesn't have his own article in The Canadian Encyclopedia, that's not really a metric by which we can determine notability. The Canadian Encyclopedia is missing articles on plenty of notable people, for example, Roger Stuart Bacon and Russell MacLellan, two former Premiers of Nova Scotia who are very much notable. That's what happens when you only have about 25,000 articles. Would you care to elaborate? MediaKyle (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, I used that link to search for articles about Canadian topics. You have to enter his name and hit search. I wasn't aware that it is not comprehensive. Can you please provide evidence of notability? Bearian (talk) 12:13, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
I'm not totally confident yet that he is notable, but I would say that the entry I linked above is a good GNG-worthy source. I tend to think by virtue of the fact that we're still talking about him 70 years after he died that there's likely more out there... I was just waiting to see if anyone else comes up with more sources. MediaKyle (talk) 12:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I've added a handful more citations to the article. There is a road in Edmonton named after him. He was quoted from in a handful of American newspapers in 1914. Not sure if proves notability but it's something. GreenVolvox (talk) 23:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 08:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep, but requesting quote snippets on the Kansas citations because I'm not sure why a reporter there would talk about municipal issues in Edmonton, Alberta. (It's very far away.)

SenshiSun (talk) 20:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

You're right, that is curious isn't it? I just found one of them on Newspapers.com: "Municipality provides people playgrounds". It checks out. It seems folks down south were interested in what was going on in Edmonton at the time for some reason. MediaKyle (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep: I'm satisfied with what GreenVolvox managed to come up with. We can call this a WP:GNG pass. -- MediaKyle (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay. Does that mean I can remove the delete tag at the top of the article or do more votes need to be tallied first? GreenVolvox (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Not yet. An AfD discussion runs for seven days, this one has been relisted, and will be due to end again tomorrow. At that point, a closer will read this discussion and determine the consensus, or relist it again it unclear. You won't need to take any action, if this is closed as "keep" then they'll remove the tag at that time. You can read more at WP:INTROTODELETE if you'd like. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep as per above. Hyperbolick (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source assessment would be useful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:48, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Buddhism in Belarus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't further elaborate about what Buddhism is like in the country, as it only mentions about Buddhism being a recent phenomenon in the country, and the article mostly mentions about the main religion of Belarus, which is Eastern Orthodox Christianity, and not Buddhism. DiscoveringMysteries03 (talk) 13:36, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy Keep

Articles on religion by country are a well-established and consistent scope on Wikipedia (e.g., Buddhism in Poland, Buddhism in Russia, Buddhism in Ukraine). Deleting this article would therefore be inconsistent with existing coverage (see WP:CONSISTENCY).

Any issues with sourcing or article size are matters of improvement, not notability. Per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE, improvable articles should be expanded with reliable sources rather than deleted.Star Rider X ❯❯❯ 💌 14:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Buddhism and Belarus. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per WP:CROSSCAT. "X religion in Y country" is not automatically a notable topic. There are only two sources in the article, neither of which provide WP:SIGCOV of the topic. The first source only has a single line about Buddhism: In 2015, Belarus registered a Buddhist community Shen Chen Ling of the Bon tradition. The second source is the national census which as far as I can tell provides no information on Buddhism or any other religion. Astaire (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep The topic has received some coverage Kelob2678 (talk) 23:40, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep the sources as demonstrated by User:Kelob2678 are not insignificant, but they also show an ongoing lack of buildout on this page. Someone please add to it, but also WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 03:20, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 08:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Weak Keep or Merge and Redirect to Buddhism in Europe - some sources, but don't see significant coverage. Asteramellus (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep The topic is notable as it documents a minority religion in Belarus and contributes to comprehensive coverage of religion by country per WP:GEOSCOPE and WP:DUE.Josh Katz 12 (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Merge as a one-liner into ~~Buddhism in Europe~~Religion in Belarus or delete. (1) The sourcing is extremely weak (I have checked randomly selected The Evolution of Religious Policy in Contemporary Belarus and it contains exactly one mention, in a table stating that there is 1 (!) Buddhist religious community in Belarus. Unless solid sources are suggested, this is a material for a single line in a table. (2) The text is quite likely generated using an LLM, including the hallucinated sources (to the best of my knowledge, there is no work at all titled "Религия и общество в странах Восточной Европы" in Russian), so there is preciously little to actually merge. @Josephite 25: Could you provide us with some background on how the work Филатов, Сергей (2005). Религия и общество в странах Восточной Европы (just mentioned) made it into the text? Same applies to another claimed source Бабосов, Евгений М. (2004). Религия в современной Беларуси. --Викидим (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Merge to Religion in Belarus – This seems like a more suitable/accurate target. Svartner (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes, this solution is better. It is important to merge just a one-liner (the fact of Belarus having one congregation). The History section here seems to be hallucinated, starting with sources. --Викидим (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that the nomination does not qualify for a speedy keep closure under WP:CSK.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:36, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Nueva Iberica

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not appear to be WP:SIGCOV of nueva iberica as a music genre. Google Scholar has two hits for "nueva Iberica" + music, one is about chess and the other about sugarcane production. A regular google search gets hits on Wikiwand and the Wikipedia page List of electronic music genres where the term was added by User:Splendid entry who also created Nueva Iberica. I can't see other relevant hits. In addition the text appears to be AI-generated, has very few sources, and the third paragraph explicitly states that the term is not widely used (hence the article is WP:OR: Although the specific term "Nueva Iberica" is not widely used in the published literature, it is employed here descriptively to summarise musical practices that are independently documented in these and other journalistic sources. The article was previously nominated for speedy deletion and PROD but contested by author, see discussion on Talk:Nueva_Iberica. Lijil (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for speedy deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep may be rewritten and enreached with additional sources, but AI must be removed. And so the buck stops (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

What sources support the notability of this topic? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. The article also cites a 160-page work, but it is a thesis and therefore not reliable. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

ATN-Asian Radio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to fix this article but ran into most of the interesting articles being either press releases or routine mentions that left me questioning notability. There was a 2008 National Post article, but it wasn't very revelatory. I can't even find anything more than a Reddit post about its removal from the SXM lineup. Two possible ATDs: List of SiriusXM Radio channels, as with the others of this kind, and Asian Television Network, the owner. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 08:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Merge to Asian Television Network as the radio station itself has not received independent coverage as stated in WP:NRVE Realtent (talk) 16:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Wording clarification: I meant to say "enough independent coverage." While it has received some, I would conclude not enough. Realtent (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Shivaji College, Karwar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Karnataka. Shellwood (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Incelcore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like most (although not all) of the sources mention it in passing, and also talk about the "Incel subculture" as a whole rather than the genre. ILoveSmallEdits (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Merge whatever consensus determines to be valuable into Incel, and delete the rest. The article isn't badly written, and it's decently cited, so I think whatever isn't already present on the Incel page should be considered for adding; but I don't really feel all that strongly about it. Foxtrot620 (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
  Comment I agree that's a good alternative to deletion as there's some valuable information in this article. ILoveSmallEdits (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep This is inaccurate, the 2026 pitchfork source breaks down the genre as a rock microgenre that emerged from 4chan culture. They had mentioned the genre previously in 2020 as well. Then there is sources by the Canadian Anti Hate Network which specifically state that the style has not much connection to the incel subculture so it would make no sense to put it on that article when the only connection is the name. Would it make sense to move the citations calling films like Fight Club incelcore to that article?

This subject is also notable per the sources from the Quietus and even the Guardian. You are being disingenuous to say the sources do not talk about the scene or music given three of them which were made by anti hate networks specifically discuss the history of the scene, its music and the virginfest event. The article is specifically about the term “incelcore” which encompasses forms of internet slang and a rock microgenre as per the Pitchfork source. A merger would make no sense. Aradicus77 (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete. As the nominator said, most of the sources in this article are about the larger topic. The opening sentence underscores the confusion by defining the subject as an "Internet microgenre of rock music and online subculture".

Is the article about the online subculture or the music genre? It's not covering either topic very well. It seems like a bricolage of random facts rather than a coherent article. Trumpetrep (talk) 20:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment This is a bizarre nitpick when articles like gothic rock make mention of the subculture as well, many genres are also subcultures just see punk rock, post-punk, emo, scene… etc. Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Notability. This article is allowed to be on the site Aradicus77 (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment If the article is to be deleted I recommend a move redirect to a section at Internet music Aradicus77 (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep I think it's worth keeping because the idea that these sources only mention it in passing isn't really true. If you look at the Pitchfork and Canadian Anti-Hate Network refs, they aren't just talking about incels in general; they are specifically analyzing the music, the "Virginfest" event, and how the sound actually works. It's its own specific music scene (which is quite popular on TikTok) with its own history, and merging it into a page about a broad subculture would just make things more confusing, especially since the sources point out that incelcore music and the incel ideology aren't always the same thing. Plus, the term is clearly sticking around in culture if major papers like The Guardian are using it to describe other bands or movies. It meets the notability requirements because there's enough deep coverage here to show it's a real and documented phenomenon.

Miiversal (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep incelcore has become a large subgenre in recent years. There are also quite a few sources that mention it in more than passing. No need to delete NP2026 (talk) 23:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep, passes GNG, an example of RS is the article Incelcore, l’estetica del fallimento ('Incelcore: the aesthetics of failure') from Italian newspaper Il manifesto, and the article also cites a book, Incel in una stanza-Il cinema dei maschi brutti, soli e cattivi, which also extensively examines the genre. Cavarrone 08:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep oer HEY and per Cavarrone. --SatnaamIN (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

keep, notable enough subgenre of rock, and various sources do go into detail

Reallythatdunce (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

List of earthquakes in the Soviet Union

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does meet WP:NLIST, as there are no sources demonstrating this as a coherent grouping. Its scope overlaps with that with of the states of the former Soviet Union, like List of earthquakes in Russia. Klbrain (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 13:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep per WP:NLIST . Additionally, it is unclear why there shouldn't be a page on Soviet earthquakes, just like there are pages for many other states. The list is not a duplicate because it can be used to compare earthquakes in different republics and may have inclusion criteria different from earthquakes in individual post-Soviet states. Just like there are articles for Earthquakes in the USA and Earthquakes in Alaska. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Ahsan Habib Palash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same person as Md. Ahsan Habib Palash. — Raihanur (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Police, and Bangladesh. — Raihanur (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy delete and merge to Md. Ahsan Habib Palash. Rht bd (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Arasan Ganesan Polytechnic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails [{WP:NSCHOOL]] and NSOURCE Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Government Law College, Chengalpattu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and also WP:ITEXISTS applies Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Government Arts College, Udumalpet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:NSOURCE Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Ramco Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:03, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Providence College for Women

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

RVS College of Arts and Science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Science. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Angshuman MBA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Found no reviews. The Bengali Wiki didn't help. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

United Kingdom railway station categories

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article entirely reliant on primary non-independent PDFs from the Department of Transport, Network Rail and UIC (an industry body of which Network Rail is a member) with no primary, independent, reliable sources available online. All other mentions of it when searching Google are mirrors of this article, more non-independent PDFs from the DfT and Network Rail, two (as far as I could find, potentially more) user generated message threads (one of which ironically comes to the conclusion that Wikipedia is making this a thing out of nothing), and this one site from 2015 which very well may be largely sourcing this article. The UIC document trivially and fleetingly describes the UK system in a broader document on railway station categorisation and thus also does not meet WP:SIGCOV. Article thus clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Strong keep for two reasons. Firstly, of course an article of this type is going to be primarily reliant on official documents, and so of course it will have the issue of using mainly reports and standard documents as its references. I don't understand what you're saying about Network Rail. The stations categorised are National Rail stations, which is an organisation to represent the TOCs; the buildings are owned by Network Rail but managed by the TOCs (or by Network Rail); the Department for Transport set the ratings (so what's the problem with a document of theirs explaining how they set ratings, as opposed to a secondary source obviously just quoting the document?).

My second reason is that there is no clear article to merge into. Even if you think the article does not meet GNG for a standalone article, it surely should be included in the encyclopaedia? So where does the information go: National Rail, Network Rail, Department for Transport, Transport Scotland, Rail transport in Great Britain? So where is the information going to go, or are you suggesting just outright deleting it (which I think isn't productive at all). JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 14:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, an article of this type will be reliant on primary non-independent sources. That is why it does not meet WP:GNG and should not be included.

Regarding merging it elsewhere, this article does have a lot of flaws and the way it's written doesn't lend itself to merging directly into a larger article as a subsection. Ideally if merged it would be for the most part rewritten, but it would probably fit as a subsection under Rail transport in Great Britain#Stations, or with some refactoring for that section to include actual content that isn't a list, under #Industry bodies. Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep. A useful reference. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
WP:USEFUL: content being A useful reference doesn't justify it having its own article. The content can be merged into Rail transport in Great Britain if consensus resolves as such, as per my earlier reply. Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
WP:GNG doesn't apply to lists, which is basically what this is. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
This isn't a list, the most list-like part is when it's listing the 8 categories that exist in the first section with their descriptions, requisites and examples. That list is an MOS:EMBEDded list, as it merely supplements the article. The article largely contains article-length information about the categories themselves, their accessibility requirements, etc. The article would be a list if it listed all the stations by their category or similar.
Regardless, notability guidelines do apply to list articles (per WP:NLIST). Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 15:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete or merge the salvageable content if there's a suitable target. These categories exist purely for statistical purposes and have no public-facing function. I've never seen them discussed anywhere other than Wikipedia and Commons, where we're weirdly obsessed with them, even in the railway press. Compare and contrast, for example, grades of listed buildings, where the relevant government bodies publish detailed criteria and guidance documents, which are frequently commented on by third parties. Note that we already have a category tree under Category:Railway stations by Department for Transport category, which is probably the best way to convey this information. And to address the comment about list criteria: this is not a list. It includes a list of examples, but a comprehensive list would duplicate the lists at UK railway stations. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
How is a list of categories not a list? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
The article also contains large amounts of encyclopedic information, and the list only complements the article content. The list in United Kingdom railway station categories#Categories is not a stand-alone list (also known as a "list article"), but instead what is known as an embedded list, which is a different concept of which much different standards apply. Besides, as per my earlier reply to you, notability guidelines do apply to list articles (per WP:NLIST). Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 15:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note to closer: A reminder that if consensus is that it should be merged (instead of deleted outright) into another article then the article should not be deleted to preserve the article history (for CC BY-SA attribution) and should instead be redirected to whatever section. Respectfully dissenting, Coleisforeditor (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
at least change the name. This list only applies to Great Britain. Network Rail (and Great British Rail obviously) only operate in GB, The rail network in Northern Ireland is managed independently. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep This is effectively a list and I believe it passes WP:NLIST. As pointed out above, though, it should be renamed to List of Network Rail station categories or something similar. Black Kite (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't see that name as accurate, as the categorisation is done by the Department for Transport and Transport Scotland for stations on the National Rail network, some of which are owned/managed by Network Rail. I simply suggest "Railway station categorisation in Great Britain" or "Great Britain railway station categories". JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 20:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Tui Amar Rani

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Found one TOI review, but that ain't multiple. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Naqaab (2018 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Found no reviews in RS. The Welsh and Bengali Wikis didn't help. Won't mind withdrawing if reviews are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Floating Kingdoms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. The article is constructed from WP:USERG sources like MobyGames and GameFAQs. The Metacritic page is empty. There's two situatonal review sources I can see: JayIsGames and Gamezebo: see WP:VG/S for why these aren't strong for notability. Just not enough here sadly. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 10:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete, fails WP:GNG. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:00, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete Found nothing. Timur9008 (talk) 18:26, March 21, 2026 (UTC)
Keep While sources are limited, Floating Kingdom article meets notability under WP:GNG through independent coverage. The game has received reviews from third-party, independent such as JayIsGames and Gamezebo, which provide substantive discussion of its gameplay, strengths, and weaknesses, not trivial mentions. These are independent of the developer and publisher, and thus qualify as reliable sources for reception under WP:VG/S if it used appropriately. Also the lack of a populated Metacritic page doesn't negate notability, as Metacritic is not a requirement for video game articles. Many casual and niche titles, especially from the late 2000s of downloadable PC games, were not widely aggregated but still received coverage from established gaming websites. The article can be improved by expanding reception and adding more context, but WP:BEFORE suggests that deletion is "premature" if sources do exist but have not yet been fully "utilized" and. Given that at least two independent reviews provide non-trivial coverage, the topic demonstrates potential for expansion rather than deletion And about weaker sources such as MobyGames and GameFAQs, these can be removed or replaced, as they are not essential to establishing notability, we can improve this per WP:BEFORE. Lychneii (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
With respect, this is some way off from being sound analysis. WP:GNG requires independent coverage from WP:RS. WP:VG/S clearly states both review sources are situational and that Jay Is Games does not contribute to notability. Mentioning that the other sources are WP:USERG databases is evidence there's nothing in existing sourcing that contributes to notability. WP:BEFORE is not a relevant policy to cite when no WP:RS have been identified to contribute to WP:GNG. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Aeronautics (magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many issues with this page, the most obvious of which is that it's entirely AI slop. The original form of the article was intended to promote an AI website called aeronauticsmagazine.com, but that has since been removed. The user contesting the PROD asserted that this is a WP:SIA, but I don't see how it meets any of the criteria to exist as one: it isn't navigationally useful as none of the entries are bluelinked, there's no evidence that the topic of "magazines called Aeronautics" is notable, and the third criterion ("Short, complete list") states Lists in which no entry is notable are rarely appropriate. Even if the topic is notable and encyclopedic, WP:TNT applies, as there are no inline citations, making it unreasonably difficult to determine where the AI has hallucinated. lp0 on fire () 09:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists, and Suspected AI-generated articles. lp0 on fire () 09:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
I still think it meets either the first or third criterion for a WP:SETINDEX. The essay WP:TNT applies ONLY to articles "hopelessly irreparable" (first sentence). So keep and prune. Will give it a radical try. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Done Shall we add https://aeronauticsmagazine.com in EL? Why should it be considered an AI website (whatever that means)? (Not saying it's notable but to avoid confusion (mentioning: an unrelated website, affiliated with Amazon LLC)) ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
so Keep! ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Lohia family

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independent coverage that discuss "Lohia family". --Altenmann >talk 23:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Indonesia, Singapore, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete: Per nom. Zuck28 (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete – WP:PROMOTIONAL / WP:NEWSORGINDIA content. Svartner (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

~~*Delete~~ (in light of page creator's comments, I will abstain from this one) ~~WP:PROMO family page, with real notability only on the individual's pages. This is excessive to retain separately.~~ Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 16:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: The nominator failed to make note of the AfD nomination in the edit summary and to notify the page author (me) of the AfD. The closer should exercise judgment in deciding whether this alone should warrant relisting. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep. In addition to the media coverage already cited in the article, the family, together with its business operations, has been covered as a group (i.e. not just mentioned in articles focusing on individual members) by academic sources including this report from Japan's Institute of Developing Economies, four pages in the book South Asian Migration (2015) published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing, and to a lesser extent, a paragraph in Big in Asia (2002), published by Palgrave Macmillan. The family is also the subject of a 1995 article in the Far Eastern Economic Review (Proquest abstract link). These should be enough to satisfy the GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Cambridge Scholars Publishing is not considered reliable. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
I would also like to ask Svartner and Iljhgtn specifically how they think the article as it stands is promotional. For what it's worth, I'd point out that I created the article as an overview to explain the structure of the family's ownership of Indorama Corporation and Indorama Ventures, as the information isn't a good fit in either of the company articles. Also, neither company is a subsidiary of the other, so redirecting IndoramaIndorama to either one of them is NOT appropriate. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Fair enough, I am choosing to abstain then and struck my earlier comment. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 23:52, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 09:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S5A-0043🚎^(Talk) 09:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Karen Howes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable interior designer. Sources are reliable but not WP:SIGCOV or independent. I have offered the page creator advice on how to potentially improve but there have been no substantial edits for about 10 days now. WP:BEFORE returned no independent sources. I don't have access to The Times profile but I assume it is an interview and therefore not independent. Orange sticker (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women. Orange sticker (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete, agree with nom as not notable per WP:SIGCOV Realtent (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Sandra Katushabe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:N. Nothing beyond routine coverage of appointment. KH-1 (talk) 08:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Bilateral relations, Travel and tourism, Uganda, and Belgium. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Does not meet notability requirements.--Ipigott (talk) 09:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Habibullah Khan II

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Habibullah Khan exists AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 07:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect(?) I am a bit confused on what is happening here; I don’t think anybody would have complained if you redirected the article. Something happened on Habibullah Khan, not sure what, a weird hijacking if I’ve ever seen one. Pinging @DuncanHill:, who was involved. 1brianm7 (talk) 08:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
I believe I had messed up, considering the fact that I did not know on how creating pages would work, as well as their consequences.

So, here's my approach:

1) Delete Habibullah Khan II

2) Move Habibullah Khan to Habibullah Khan II

3) Paste content of Habibullah Khan from old revisions onto the empty Habibullah Khan page AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'll explain.
It appears they're trying to change the article to another Afghan "Habibullah Khan" that was ruler of Kabul in the 1820s, versus this Habibullah Khan, who was ruler of Afghanistan in the 1900s.

A bit confused on this AFD. @AfghanTsakhtan You should just make another page for the 1820s Habibullah Khan, as the current Habibullah Khan page is dedicated toward the Afghan monarch of the 1900s. Perhaps you could name it "Sardar Habibullah Khan", instead of changing the topic (and trying to delete this). Noorullah (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

I listed my solution above, it may work. Habibullah Khan will be an empty page, and content can be posted onto there… whereas the old Habibullah Khan can be moved to Habibullah Khan II, and its revisions will remain there too. AfghanTsakhtan (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Afghanistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per G7. Also a redirect Habibullah Khan (Emir of Afghanistan) created by the nominator probably should be deleted as well. Obviously, the page on Habibullah Khan, the ruler, shouldn't be moved anywhere. If the page is moved, it should be done via WP:RM, not WP:CUTPASTE. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Guy Staines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure that the subject is notable enough. The basic outline of his biography is that he was imprisoned, converted to a different religion, and, after his release, went to a war zone and died. That is essentially all there is. Htanaungg (talk) 06:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 06:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per Wikipedia:ONEEVENT, Wikipedia:ANYBIO, Wikipedia:CRIME Realtent (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

He did get mentioned in a lot of articles about Australians joining the jihad particularly in articles about his sister in law Amira Karroum, and Khaled Sharrouf who was killed about the same time. He never got an article specifically dedicated to his life but neither did many other jihadists considered notable by Wikipedia.

If others don’t think he’s notable I will bow before the decision of the collective but I believe he qualifies. Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Could be redirected to Amira Karroum#Aftermath and impact on family? But keep per WP:GNG seems OK as coverage is about his whole life not just one event or crime, and is sustained (from 2007 to 2016-2017 in various media outlets). ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Beykent Educational Institutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NORG owing to the lack of CORPDEPTH and failed WP:SIRS. My BEFORE didn't yield anything useful. The Turkish Wiki is filled with PRIMARY sources, so didn't help. Won't mind withdrawing if someone can find sources. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, and Turkey. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Yenice Çağ Private High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything useful. Won't mind withdrawing if sources are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Turkey. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Alberto Cicerone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has a large number of sources displaying trivial mentions. There are a couple of more substantial mentions in the local press of Avezzano, a small town in Abruzzo. However, I do not believe that a local newspaper in a town of 40,000 people can give coverage that satisfies WP:GNG. If this view is not shared, happy to withdraw. Boynamedsue (talk) 03:50, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep, but improve. Improve, don't remove. If Italian wikipedia has enough sources to keep, we can surely beef up this article. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_CiceronePluribussin' (talk) 04:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

I've checked those sources as well, that article wouldn't meet WP:GNG in my view. Like I said, if we can get an agreement that local newspapers confer notability, it's fine, but I don't think that is the practice.Boynamedsue (talk) 10:06, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Architecture, and Italy. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 04:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Millennial optimism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Millennials as WP:ATD-R. The article was originally intended to be redirected to that article in late February. Minutes later, it was published as its own article, which I think is more in line with the Millennials article instead of a separate article or just delete it. Pahiy (talk) 03:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Jibran Dar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill unelected politician failing WP:NPOL. Article was created evading a salting. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, India, and Jammu and Kashmir. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 04:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep – The subject has received coverage in independent reliable sources, including regional newspapers such as Rising Kashmir, Greater Kashmir, and National publications which have reported on his political activities (e.g., involvement with Aam Aadmi Party and related developments). This constitutes significant coverage beyond trivial mentions, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines for politicians. The article is being improved with additional citations. Editkashmir (talk) 09:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete The sources lack sigcov, the best coverage is this piece in which he accuses the TV show of being rigged. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Nicaragua Christian Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to List of schools in Nicaragua as WP:ATD-R. Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded directories and social media handles, but no SIGCOV in RS. Won't mind withdrawing if more sources are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, Nicaragua, and North America. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Mud Center, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another got nuthin' case, and especially the claim about Red Bank in the article, which is naturally unsourced. Mangoe (talk) 22:13, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment: There does seem to have been a there there, to the point where they applied for incorporation in 1938 with about 500 residents. So while it doesn't seen to meet WP:GEOLAND as never formally designated, it's probably worth a redirect somewhere (or a "merge" albeit with all-new cited prose). Articles in 1948 and 1963 described it as part of Howell, which appears to be a neighborhood of Evansville. A 1982 article indicated it as an Evansville neighborhood, as did a 1987 column and its follow-up (which also indicated it was known as Pleasant Village). It does appear to be within Evansville city limits. Evansville, Indiana#Neighborhoods would seem like the obvious redirect/merge target, but it's currently just a single sentence about NRHP-listed districts and doesn't actually discuss neighborhoods. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Evansville, Indiana#Neighborhoods as the preferred WP:ATD option for a place that doesn't merit standalone notability and as suggested by User:Pi.1415926535. Alansohn (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Blitziko (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?)(Expect a response in ~10 days) 11:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep: Though beyond the publisher extra paywall on newspapers.com, I can tell the archives of the Evansville Press have numerous articles about Mud Center. I added one. If now within Evansville city limits, i'm not opposed to merging the content into there.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last relist. Delete, Redirect or Keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep with the stipulation that the text of the article change from "unincorporated community" to "unincorporated neighborhood" or "neighborhood" of Evansville, because that's what it plainly is. Not much to go on but at least it's a known place. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Thessaloniki Forum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this is a hoax article. I can't find any evidence that this existed. For example, I'd expect to see it mentioned in this case study about the PAOK club (pages 192-194), and it's not. It was created in 2006 by an editor who was banned in 2009 for reasons including making a mix of real articles and hoax articles - see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive588#MetroStar - with no substantial contributions by other editors (just copyedits and other minor edits).

I proposed this article for deletion, and User:ApexParagon seconded with the following rationale: "Note that one editor attempted to provide references to the article today (March 19) in good faith, but the references were not actually related to this subject. The added references mentioned 'Thessaloniki forums', but they were very clearly not referring to the alleged sports arena this article is about, and instead were talking about literal public speaking forums. I have attempted to find references for this myself, and I could not find any evidence that this sports arena actually existed."

A temporary account removed the proposed deletion tags, so I'm now nominating the article for deletion. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Greece. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball, Handball, Ice hockey, and Sport of athletics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete as a likely hoax which, in any case, fails WP:V. Pretty annoying that the PROD tag was removed without any sort of explanation or rebuttal, but oh well. ApexParagon (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete spent a lot of time, trying to find a source. All I could find was Forums held in Thessaloniki, like 'economic forum' etc... Trying to save the article, I added a couple of refs, but removed them as no evidence this exists. Now surprised PROD vanished! Davidindia (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete as likely hoax. I searchrd in Greek and can find nothing. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 10:28, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - never seen any evidence of hockey being played at the venue, or in Greece at all back in 1972. Seems like a hoax. --Hockeyben ^{(talk -} ^contribs) 20:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Edward Farley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No matches at the top level. Unlike other minor cricketers there is no obvious redirect here, as the article subject represented Jersey years before they had Twenty20 or ODI status. Leonstojka (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and United Kingdom. Leonstojka (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment. A difficult one. We have both List of Jersey ODI cricketers and List of Jersey Twenty20 International cricketers, but he doesn't qualify for either, because he pre-dated them. Need to have a think about this. Definitely non-notable, though. Jack (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Makeship

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'll rip this bandaid off since this is off the main page. With all due respect to Baby Globe, I think this page in it's current state is very much borderline and imo does not meet WP:NCORP in it's current form.

Most of the references provided do not pass muster of the high bar of third-party, significant coverage. To give examples, the KSLTV, the Shacknews, the Creative Bloq, VICE and The Guardain Nigeria News only mention the company in passing after talking at length about the occassion/backstory of the collaborator for whom the plushie is being made. These should not be considered significant coverage of the company. Similaly, InnovateON.ca article appears to be a poster boy of WP:CHURNALISM, and the Techcouver article is a interview.

For what it's worth, I could be convinced that The Toy Book and Vancouver is Awesome are reliable third-party coverage, however, you could also make a argument that the The Toy Book article is a dressed up press release about another product launch (something that is explicitly discouraged by WP:ORGTRIV). I'm also not sure how independent/reliable Vancouver is Awesome is as a source.

These concerns alongside the parallel discussion on the talk page about the page's notability has led me to nominate this page for deletion. Sohom (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Products. Sohom (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete I was rudely interrupted while working on User:Polygnotus/Scripts/SourceTable, and I should probably post a full source review here, but long story short Sohom is correct that the company is non-notable and a quick Google search will confirm that. It doesn't meet WP:GNG nor WP:NCOMPANY. Some WP:CORPTRIV and some product reviews. Polygnotus (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Canada. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 02:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment In addition to the sources included in the article, I was able to find the following with a quick Google search: / (two different sources reporting on Makeship receiving an industry award for new businesses), // (same article on the company syndicated in three local BC newspapers), , / (two other articles discussing Makeship and other local businesses from Techcouver), (mention in a book on the indie game industry). One of the founders was also included in Forbes' 2023 30 under 30 for his co-founding of Makeship. I would urge those participating in this discussion to keep in mind that notability is determined by the existence of sources on a topic, not by the current state of the article and its references. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 08:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Not seeing anything that meets the strict standards of NCORP. Vancouver is Awesome just regurgitates what the founder and a paid influencer have to say about the company, along with this source. The Toy Book is just reporting a company announcement. The Vancouver Tech Journal article is paywalled, but unless someone is able to access it, I presume per WP:TRADES that it is unlikely to count as independent coverage. Even if it is independent, it would still only be a single source. Other sources are clearly WP:CORPTRIV or non-independent. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: As per Helpful Raccoon. Sources are mostly trade journals, reporting what amounts to press releases or making passing comments. The company might be on the verge of notability, but it is not currently notable enough for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bocanegris (talk • contribs)

Development of Sgt. Rock (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFILM, this in development film should not have an article until filming commcenes or notability is proven. It has not yet achieved that status, and is a WP:CONTENTFORK of Sgt. Rock#Film and DC Universe (franchise)#Sgt. Rock that copied from Development of Blade (upcoming film). — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 01:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, and Comics and animation. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 01:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete We don't do this article style for films still in development, and the article reads as more gossip than fact. Nathannah • 📮 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete: Article is clearly not even ready for namespace, regardless of notability. In addition to what was discussed above regarding WP:NFILM, this article appears to have been rushed as there are tons of cite errors, a display issue with the announcement section, etc. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 02:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I will also note that there is already a well-developed draft for this planned film ready at Draft:Sgt. Rock (film), so that further makes this article moot. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 02:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete Per the other nominators. Pahiy (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. The coverage in the draft is good, but principal photography would need to start before it could meet NFF. So on that note, this article that has only a portion of the sourcing and content, fails NFF even more. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:27, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Jarmo (game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an old, effectively unreferenced article (there are just two ELs to game description on fansites). The game has dubious WP:GNG, but ironically, a recent article about it in a Polish game portal I consider reliable and that does help a bit with GNG also explicitly notes our (Wikipedia) article has quite a few errors. Adding to this poor style ("An interesting aspect of...", etc.), I think this warrants a[ WP:TNT approach, with the article, if deemed notable, to be recreated one day from reliable sources. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Poland, and Turkey. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Tor Bonnier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out of the current references, four are from the Stockholm School of Economics, which he received an award for two are from the Nationalmuseum, which showcases his products, one is a short mention in Svenska Dagbladet, and the rest are from other companies he worked for or received awards from. Hence, he doesn't pass WP:NBIO. Nighfidelity (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Sweden. Nighfidelity (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment. If he has received awards from the Stockholm School of Economics and been shown at the Nationalmuseum, how can he be non-notable? Station1 (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
The SSE awards were given to him as he was employed by them for a while, and the Nationalmuseum are merely database entries on two telephones he made. Nighfidelity (talk) 15:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
He was not employed by Stockholm School of Economics when he received the award. FYI, he has never been employed there. Saadstockholm (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: the article creator (@Saadstockholm) made several drafts relating to the Bonnier family. (The Karl Adam Bonnier Foundation and Karl-Adam Bonnier) back in 2020, both of which were declined. Nighfidelity (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes, I did. The articles at that point did not have enough external verification links. However, this article has several. Therefore I hope it passes. The Bonnier Family has many notable members, including people not being mentioned in this list. Thanks! Saadstockholm (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

BehindWoods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has a lot changed since the last AfD? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Film, Television, Entertainment, Companies, Internet, Websites, India, and Tamil Nadu. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment - @Kailash29792:, are you advocating for deletion?--CNMall41 (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes, because the source is unreliable per WP:ICTF and the past AfD. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment - I created the stub as it was listed here as a redlink: Wikipedia:Most-linked-to redlinks#1–100 2 -Bogger (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep or Merge: A site can be unreliable, but notable. As long as other pages list behindwoods as a source (c. 20 wikilinks, but over 500 mentions), keeping this page, and including content on its authority/reliability would seem prudent. Merge options: List of Tamil-language magazines ? -Bogger (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
It's not a magazine. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:34, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
What about Media_in_Chennai#Web_media? Merge there. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Good idea, if the AfD closes with consensus to delete or merge. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:49, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Merge to Media in Chennai per above. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Merge Merge to Media in Chennai. The site lacks sufficient independent, high-quality coverage for a standalone article Ludorth Ludorth Ludorth (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Vishv Umiyadham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable under-construction temple. Lack of WP:SIGCOV, sources are either promotional articles about the construction company or related to a visit by the Indian Prime Minister. There is nothing substantial about the subject in any reliable and independent source. Zuck28 (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Religion, Hinduism, India, and Gujarat. Zuck28 (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep – I totally disagree with the nominator. The rationale provided does not accurately reflect the available sources and appears to overlook the nature of the coverage about this project.

First, the argument that this is a "non-notable under-construction temple" is not convincing. Construction status itself is not a valid criteria for deletion.

Second, the claim of "lack of WP:SIGCOV" does not seem valid with the available references.

Third, the suggestion that "the sources arepromotional" is also questionable. Independent reporting that discusses the engineering aspects, scale, and construction of a project cannot simply be dismissed as promotional without clear justification.

Fourth, the claim that the coverage is "only related to the Prime Minister's visit" is misleading. When the Prime Minister of India participates in a foundation-stone ceremony media coverage mainly discusses the project itself.

It appears that the nominator User:Zuck28, is repeatedly raising concerns about the article without fully addressing the topic and sources already cited.🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 04:23, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to List of largest Hindu temples#Under construction as a n WP:ATD. That page already includes all relevant information about the temple, which makes the current article a duplicate. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

List of ambassadors of Russia to Kiribati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced list of non-notable, non-resident ambassadors. Lacking secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Bilateral relations, Lists, and Russia. AusLondonder (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to List of ambassadors of Russia to Indonesia as that page more or less covers the relevant material. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Catfurball (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Muhammad Isa al-Bakr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to Wikipedia:Notability (people). فيصل (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Qatar. فيصل (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep - Prima facie case of notability based upon the number and quality of the sources. The burden for dead people is on the nomination, and I don't see how this passes. Bearian (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep plenty of sources well over three that meet WP:Notability Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:24, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:08, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Madid Ahl al-Sham#Muhammad Isa al-Bakr. Looking at every source currently present in Special:Permalink/1343352669 (excluding the dozen links to YouTube and X/Twitter), most of the references appear to mention al-Bakr briefly at best but usually not at all, instead centering on Madid Ahl al-Sham (4 5 6 8 15 19) or other associated topics (1 2 16). Notability is not inherited—while this article appears to demonstrate significant coverage of al-Bakr at first, a closer look shows that much of the content and sourcing is actually in fact about other, only tangentially related, topics. Of the remaining sources, several are from non-independent advocacy organizations Amnesty International (25 28) and ANHRI (24 27). 26 might be the only source present in this article that could meet WP:42. There's also 3, but that only has about a paragraph of stuff relating to al-Bakr. That’s 1.5 out of WP:THREE, which is not great, especially for a (potential?) WP:BLP in a controversial subject area. My own external search for WP:NEXIST did not yield anything much (though it was probably not as thorough as my analysis above, and there were many false positives—if additional sources are found or my !vote rationale may otherwise be flawed in any way, please ping me!). As far as WP:ATDs go, I don't believe significant merging is needed—most of the things that could potentially be merged from here have been adequately covered already in the relevant articles. I've made some sub-headings and I think a redirect to Madid Ahl al-Sham § Muhammad Isa al-Bakr could work nicely. GoldRomean (talk) 07:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Joël-Denis Bellavance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a journalist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and must be shown to pass WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about them and their work -- that is, a journalist's notability is not established by sources in which he's the author of coverage about other things, and requires sources in which he's the subject of content written and published by other people.
But three of the four footnotes here are his staff profiles on the self-published websites of his own employers, which are not support for notability as they aren't independent third-party analysis, and the one source that actually represents a media outlet doing journalism about him still comes from one of said employers, and thus still isn't independent enough to carry a GNG pass all by itself as the article's only non-primary source.
And while the Charles Lynch Award would be a valid notability claim in an article that was properly sourced, even it isn't highly meganotable enough to bestow an instant notability pass onto a badly-sourced article -- and even the award's article is citing a bad source for his victory as well, so it can't just be pulled over to magically fix the sourcing problems here.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source an article about him properly, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from needing better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

His name does appear online 16,000 times, but it's usually just passing mentions of his presence or brief appearances on live TV, but I don't have any objections to this if someone else experienced says it should be deleted. Good actions only (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

The number of times a name does or doesn't appear online in a Google search isn't a notability criterion per se — especially when it comes to journalists, the number of Google hits the person gets doesn't immediately distinguish between primary sources that aren't support for notability (staff profiles, his own bylined work, glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't about him, etc.) and actual notability-building coverage and analysis about the impact of his work. We have to evaluate the type of sources that are or aren't available, not just the number of Google hits that he gets. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete Not enough strong secondary sources focuses solely on the subject of the article to warrant a page. Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Charles Lynch Award as an WP:ATD. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Agnieszka Dulej

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater; fails WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Skating, and Poland. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Sławomir Janicki – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Dasnagar Government Polytechnic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:24, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Of note is that this has been tagged as a potential NORG failure since July 2023, the same month the article was created. (No opinion at this time.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

NGM College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Govt First Grade College Ankola

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG. Also note the vandalism ("Founded in 1750") in the infobox Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Karnataka. Shellwood (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Ankola#Education as an WP:ATD. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Jikkyō GI Stable

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article consisting of exactly 4 sentences (the last of which is grammatically incorrect) and exactly one source, which I believe is unreliable. The only sources I could find for this game were YouTube, Fandom, and a few other WP:UGC sites. JHD0919 (talk) 00:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Horse racing. JHD0919 (talk) 00:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete Found an All Game Guide entry but that's about it. Nothing on the Internet Archive. Timur9008 (talk) 18:23, March 21, 2026 (UTC)
Delete No reviews found on MobyGames, which is typically good at listing reviews of games who were only mentioned in magazines. EnvironmentalDoor (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom, above, and WP:ONESOURCE. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Pope's College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ITEXISTS applies and fails NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 00:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Quaid-e-Millath Government College for Women

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:15, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 00:38, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete, most content is about the history of it, not the college PeriodicEditor (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to List of Tamil Nadu Government educational institutions as an WP:ATD. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Rajeswari Vedachalam Government Arts College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:NSCHOOL. Also WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 00:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Tamil Nadu Government Arts and Science Colleges as an WP:ATD. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Speed Vegas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a gokart/car racing venue that doesn't seem notable. The Wall Street Journal article about it's bankruptcy is good but probably doesn't meet NCORP. The Las Vegas Review-Journal is also reasonably neutral but fails WP:LOCALCORP. The rest of the sources follow a very promotional local news or sponsored post formula. MelbourneIdentity (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Motorsport, United States of America, and Nevada. MelbourneIdentity (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Speed Vegas seems to be notable as a business, receiving national news coverage that takes for granted its notability, and Las Vegas is now a large enough region that even local coverage there has regional significance. However, the page has numerous problems in terms of its promotional tone. If it is not to be kept, which MelbourneIdentity makes a good case for, I would migrate to Draftspace to allow for continued improvement. PickleG13 (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ Delete (updating my !vote to Delete since I now agree with agree user:HighKing that upon further review the sources really do lack necessary depth) with User:PickleG13 that the article has WP:PROMO issues, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 05:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Delete The sourcing fails WP:SIRS, as the local news coverage is mostly promotional or WP:ROUTINE. There is only one national source (WSJ) which discusses the company with any depth, and that is also routine. The other references are either passing mentions or promotional in nature. The fact that the article has PROMO issues isn't relevant to the deletion discussion. MightyRanger (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2026 (UTC) - Blocked sock. SatnaamIN (talk) 00:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:24, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep: agree that it has promo issues, but coverage in established local outlets provides non-trivial independent coverage sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. SanneMonte (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Keep credible coverage about the facility and the business at a level that meets notability, even if some editing and pruning would help. Alansohn (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Delete Note that using reasoning based on "coverage" is *not* a reason to !vote Keep. This is an organisation therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. So can either of PickleG13, Iljhgtn, SanneMonte or Alansohn go a little further and provide a link to sourcing and point out which section/paragraph within that source contains in-depth independent content? I'm unable to locate any but I'm willing to take another look if other sources show up. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

*keep besides WSJ, several articles talk indepth about the company. For example KTLA is a major LA TV network, so I don't see how it could be a PR or promotional. Then we have Las Vega Magazine, Las Vegas Review Journal, 8news now another TV station, and Motor Trend a major Automotive publication you can buy on the newsstands.Alabamanian (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Blocked sock. SatnaamIN (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

- It isn't just the amount of references, the audience size and whether the information is independent also matter when determining if a company meets NCORP. Local news sources that talk to companies are often not totally independent or a sign of real notability. @HighKing: was trying to explain that the quality and nature of the sources really matters for something like this. MelbourneIdentity (talk)
  Yes. I was convinced enough to change my !vote from a Keep to a Delete. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 22:20, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, saying a source has indepth information without going on to analyse whether the information meets ORGIND's requirements for *independent content* is akin to including Press Releases (or regurgitated Press Releases) as content because they are also full of indepth content. Thankfully our NCORP guidelines have more robust guidelines in place. A full analysis of the sources show that one is a barely disguised ad full of announcements and forward looking statements and a quote, another is almost entirely based on an interview with someone who served as CEO, and his wife who is director of communications, another is a barely-disguised ad in a local news outlet which again relies entirely on the CEO's comments and information, and the last an interview with the founder. None meet NCORP criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 19:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: The nominator has since been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry (and one of their socks has also commented here). No opinion on the article itself at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:24, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete The WSJ source is about a lawsuit, which the article quotes, but it lacks secondary analysis. The KTLA article relies on information provided by the Director of Communications for SPEEDVEGAS Las Vegas Magazine looks like an ad, SpeedVegas has changed things up considerably, promising an even more memorable experience the second time around, etc. The Las Vegas Review Journal is titled SpeedVegas critic now CEO of high-speed operation, so it is not about the company. 8News quotes the director of communications for SpeedVegas. The MotorTrend article is based on the information provided by Founder Aaron Fessler. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The nominator and two other voters blocked as sock puppet account.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Periyar Arts College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

P.K.R. Arts College for Women

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 00:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Science. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Shri Sowdeswari Women's College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 00:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Yitzhak Ben-Bashat

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MEMORIAL article that fails WP:NBLP. Non-notable ordinary soldier whose only coverage in sources is a couple obituaries after his death and brief passing mentions in routine announcements before his death. Most of the coverage of his death was from the IDF website, not even from news outlets. Renominating after two years as the last discussion produced no consensus and had poorly substantiated !votes. Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel, Military, and People. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 22:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - I checked all the sources in the English and Hebrew articles. Most of them are passing mentions. One or two of them cover his death and life before in a couple paragraphs. I got similar results when searching his name in Hebrew and auto-translating some of the top results. I don't think this passes WP:BIO1E. InfernoHues (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Golani Brigade#Gaza_war. The only piece with sigcov is about his death. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak keep or redirect – as a senior IDF officer killed in the Gaza war, the subject has received some independent coverage; however, this appears largely tied to the incident itself rather than in-depth biographical coverage, making standalone notability under WP:GNG borderline. A redirect to the relevant article on the Gaza war or a list of casualties may be more appropriate if broader coverage cannot be demonstrated. JournalJane (talk) 18:32, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:07, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Attur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they also all fail WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL as poorly written Indian colleges:

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 00:34, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Science. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep These pages should be redirected somewhere, and this mass nomination format prevents proper selection of the target. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles