Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Beyond Sandbox
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Beyond Sandbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seemingly non-notable game. The sources on the article are primary, and a search didn't reveal any others that show notability under the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree, sources and general notability don't meet WP:GNG, couldn't find any additional reputable sources in my own search. Stormh99 (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete - there simply isn't anything here.
The page cites a rating on Metacritic, but that isn't even true; there isn't even a user score, much less a single actual critic.Oh, that referred to the 'meta store' (thank you, Facebook...), not Metacritic. The point stands the same; user reviews don't count towards notability. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete - As per above. I can't find any critic reviews, which for video games are typically the best sources we can find, with exception for games that somehow get press outside of the review space for some noteworthy reason. This is an early access title, so it may simply be too soon. ASUKITE 22:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: Per others. No reviews or significant coverage, no notability established, fails WP:GNG. MidnightMayhem (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete - no proper reviews yet and no other coverage of note Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:08, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see that the article meets WP:SIGCOV. It looks like an advertisement for the game. Pololo1320 (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete I have never seen a new article where the drafter has deigned to cite an empty Metacritic page for the sake of furnishing citations that hasn't been deleted. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not able to find significant coverage or any actual reviews beyond Reddit threads and Tiktok videos. --tony 16:14, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.