Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boucherih Mohamed

Boucherih Mohamed

Boucherih Mohamed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG used non English sources EditorTimes (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related AfD discussions. EditorTimes (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I was considering nominating this myself but EditorTimes beat me to it. The subject appears to fail NACTOR and I'm not entirely convinced that the media coverage is strong enough for GNG. Lean delete.-KH-1 (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

  In addition to notability concerns the article shows signs of possible promotional editing. The image is uploaded as "own work" by the uploader and much of the sourcing appears to be low-quality or potentially non-independent media coverage. This raises concerns under [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:PROMO]]. Combined with the lack of significant independent coverage, the subject does not meet WP:GNG. EditorTimes (talk) 06:17, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:50, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The nominator has since been blocked indefinitely as a likely-compromised sock. No opinion on the article, but KH-1's comment may be enough of an "unbolded delete" to allow the nomination to continue. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:09, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

  I probably should note, for the record, that non-English sources are allowed when necessary and their use (as long as they are still the requisite quality) is not a reason to delete. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – Fails WP:GNG. The article does not demonstrate significant coverage in reliable independent sources; most references appear to be routine mentions or primary sources. Notability for a standalone biography is therefore not established. — Herinalian (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator has been blocked and locked as a sock, so we need more input from editors in good standing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.