Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane of Orléans (disambiguation)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:58, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Diane of Orléans (disambiguation)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Diane of Orléans (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unneeded WP:TWODABS. A hatnote could distinguish the two people if warranted. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:57, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Lists of people, Royalty and nobility, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The second Diane doesn't even have her own article, just a passing mention in Duke of Orléans#Current use. No hatnote needed either. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep at least because she largely meets the verifiability criterion. It's also easy to see on Google that in Europe, the one born in 1940 is more often called "Diane de France", and her niece (and goddaughter) is better known as "Diane d'Orléans." This is certainly useful information for Wikipedia. --Berry-Touraine2 (talk) 20:47, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: even if both were notable, a dab page with just two entries would not be needed. With one not being notable and the other being better known under other names, the case for deletion is even stronger. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete - no DAB page needed if there are only two entries. What is more, the second entry looks exceedingly spurious, scattered as it is with references (which should not be on DAB pages) and no links to an article with anything of consequence about the subject of that entry. A passing mention on Duke of Orléans#Current use that she is the daughter of someone who does not have their own article is negligible at best. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete, a hatnote is more than enough. Cavarrone 09:20, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.