Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapach
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:39, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Hapach
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hapach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails the core policy of Verifiability (WP:V).
1. citation (Zenkovsky): The content does not mention "Hapach" or the events described.
2. Citation 2 (Çerkes Krallar): is a non-academic, self-published website that fails WP:RS. This website makes the claim about "Hapach" and cites Zenkovsky's "Medieval Russia's Chronicles" as its source.
3. Citations 3 and 4: These tell the borders of Zichia and do not substantiate the existence or reign of this specific individual.
Since there is no reliable secondary coverage confirming the subject's existence, the page should be deleted per WP:V and WP:N. Even if reliable sources were to be discovered in the future, the article in its current state must be deleted. -- Liptink0 (talk) 05:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 14. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:11, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Royalty and nobility, and Europe. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC) - Draftify per above, sources may exist but the current state and issues previously mentioned show it isn’t suitable for mainspace as of yet The Grenadian Historian (Aka. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a) (talk) 11:45, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC) - Delete. We can recreate if better sources are found. SenshiSun (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.