Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KreekCraft (YouTuber)

KreekCraft (YouTuber)

KreekCraft (YouTuber) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved to mainspace without consensus given. Either move this back to draft space or (imo) delete it and WP:SALT. Wikiman (Talk) 14:35, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Draftify – Agreed with Wikiman, this page should not be deleted, as KreekCraft could/could not claim the amount of reliability and notability required, however I agree in which, the page violated against the namespace–shifting standards, as the page was moved into the articlespace, during the AfC review, and this cannot be permitted. MrDevolver (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
• KEEP no case for deletion as the person is notable in their field under WP:NWEB and has WP:SIGCOV. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

  I agree in which the subject could consist, of a large enough amount of reliability/notability alongside significant coverage, however you're required to know in which, the AfC processing is what really strictly determines, for if drafts including KreekCraft, really claim the depth of reliability and notability required, and that therefore, moving a draft towards the mainspace, if the draft was already declined/rejected, does indeed violate against the namespace–shifting standards, due to in which, when a draft is declined/rejected for AfC, this obviously determines in which, the draft is not yet/is not eligible for the mainspace due to, a possible reason(s) which could cause this of occuring, and that therefore, when the draft does indeed become declined/rejected, this then triggers a valid/authorised method/consensus, of why the draft can indeed be moved into mainspace, and not just immediately move into mainspace. MrDevolver (talk) 17:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

  Note that the draft was previously declined several times before it was moved. Wikiman (Talk) 20:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

  Regardless of the amount in which, the draft was previously declined several times, couldn't we continue to atleast attempt, to search for reliability/notability for KreekCraft, regardless of if the page was deleted/salted? MrDevolver (talk) 05:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

  What are you even saying? Wikiman (Talk) 17:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

  Apologies, if that occured to be too confusing to read. What I am confirming, is in which, is there a possibility in which, we can continue, to search for reliability/notability, for KreekCraft, regardless of the declinings; previous deletions and salts? Devolver789 (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delete repost of previously deleted and salted material: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KreekCraft * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 18:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

This cant be moved to just KreekCraft as its salted already. This should also be salted imo. Wikiman (Talk) 20:32, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

• Dratify per wikiman and devolver, the source "Variety" may be used to establish notability, however many of the sources than "Variety" are not reliable, brief mentions, come from interviews. Dexerto in the references section is still used but is not a reliable source to establish notability. Move to draft page anyway. Artemhao (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

  wondering, would "KreekCraft (YouTuber)" page be move and creation protected after this afd? Artemhao (talk) 15:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

  After this AfD, if Draftify is selected as the majority result for KreekCraft (YouTuber), no, the page would not be salted. This is due to in which, when a topic/scenario is salted, this fully restricts the topic/scenario, from ever being created within any namespace (this includes drafts; the only individuals who can authorisingly, create a page of the topic/scenario, if the topic/scenario is salted, are administrators, and other high–access Wikipedian users), and to do so, they are required to for starters, delete the page, and then trigger the creation protection of that topic/scenario. However, as I've confirmed within the begin, if Draftify is selected as the majority result for KreekCraft (YouTuber), the topic/scenario cannot just be salted, due to in which, the page was not deleted, and deleting the page is required before salting the topic/scenario, and as a result, the topic/scenario cannot reclaim possibility of salting, unless the page is renominated for AfD, and the majority result is Delete. MrDevolver (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete Article has been deleted SIX times before at KreekCraft. This is simply WP:SALT evasion. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey there, original draft author, would like to say that I did NOT want the article moved to the main space. Crystalite13 (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.