Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 April 2

Yeghikian

Yeghikian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Current sources in article are all primary. Searches on Google News and newspapers.com only turned up false positives. Previous AFD in 2015 closed as "no consensus" due to zero participation after three relists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - one album with nothing to speak of for independent coverage, a gig report, and one snip on a TV show does not notability make. I can't find anything recent at all. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:35, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Seven years without a proper source is enough. BD2412 T 00:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Game Boy family

Game Boy family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough to meet WP:CONTENTFORK or WP:SPINOUT in my opinion. Largely redundant information found in each handheld's article or pages such as Sixth generation of video game consoles. Looks like this article existed before many of them. Information about cartridges I've copied to Game Pak and GBA

There is potential for a Game Boy article about industry impact. Unfortunately, this one is too generalized so it falls inline with what was discussed previously: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Boy Advance family, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS family and Talk:Nintendo 3DS/Archive 7#Merger proposal. « Ryūkotsusei » 23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. « Ryūkotsusei » 23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. « Ryūkotsusei » 23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. « Ryūkotsusei » 23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. « Ryūkotsusei » 23:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, redundant to other articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to Game Boy to preserve attribution of the merged content. Jclemens (talk) 01:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per the precedent mentioned at the similar articles in the nom. All have closed as delete. Like the others, it's redundant to the parent article. Sergecross73 msg me 02:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - the above precedent makes total sense, let's do the same thing here. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment. I'm curious about how this is different than say PlayStation and Xbox or, to use a non-gaming example, iPhone . Calidum 14:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

  This article is not about the "Game Boy" its about the "Game Boy Family" which isnt notable PerryPerryD Talk To Me 14:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

  Did you check my links? The PlayStation article is about the Playstation brand, not the console. Ditto for the Xbox and iPhone articles. Calidum 14:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

  Calidum - I think the difference is that Game Boy is just one video game product line from a video game company, whereas PlayStation or Xbox represents every video game platform that respective company ever created. If we were, for example, talking about smartphones, I think "PlayStation" would be more like the article "iPhone", where "Game Boy and Game Boy family concurrently existing would kind of be like iPhone 13 and List of iPhone 13 models concurrently existing. That's my personal take away anyways. While I think the Game Boy article needs to go, maybe there's a valid argument for getting rid of the PlayStation/Xbox brand articles too. Sergecross73 msg me 21:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

  But the Game Boy article is only about the original Game Boy. The Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance are covered separately. Calidum 13:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

  And I think that's fine, because they're all different things. But when you concurrently have these Game Boy family, Game Boy Advance family, Nintendo DS family on top of that - that's the extra level of redundancy that these discussions have eliminating. Sergecross73 msg me 14:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Snow Delete. WP:SNOW. Not Notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD (talk • contribs) 14:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect to Game Boy. If Nintendo DS#Later models is any indication, this article is just basically Game Boy, Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance and so forth put together. It's superfluous to the content that's already in each of the separate articles on each Game Boy system. This is different from Xbox and PlayStation which talk about those respective brands and aren't just a list of every console that's called "Xbox [something]" or "PlayStation [number]". Game Boy family is just a list of every console that happened to share the "Game Boy" name.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 23:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to Game Boy or Delete per Mythdon's rationale SPF121188 ^{(talk this way) (contribs)} 18:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Edward Fortyhands

Edward Fortyhands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are either unreliable or do not mention the subject at all. A search only found unreliable blogs, listicles of "fun party games", seemingly self-published "games for adults" books, or tangential name-drops in works of fiction. Previous AFD from 2011 withdrawn due to passing name-drops in magazines, but these do not seem to be substantial coverage. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm not even sure what notability criteria would apply to a topic like this, but I can't imagine that there are any that it meets. If not outright deleted, it could possibly be merged into Drinking game. BD2412 T 00:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• At some point since 2010 the reference to ISBN 9781439156315 has been removed. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. The few passing mentions and frat-boy level coverage is not sufficient to meet WP:GNG IMHO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete not much found for sourcing, the New York Times surprisingly has nothing about it. Oaktree b (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Osei Bonsu (football)

Osei Bonsu (football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many players with this name but this particular Bonsu appears to fail WP:NBASIC. The two references provided are trivial mentions of the subject and searches in DDG and ProQuest as well as other places are not yielding anything substantial at all. Bonsu has also never played in a league listed at WP:FPL. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ghana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable player, fails GNG. GiantSnowman 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Article appears to fail GNG. Jogurney (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - this page is not according to Wikipedia guidelines. Therefore I plead for deletion Serdaigle1995 (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

N. Jehangir

N. Jehangir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO - needs independent sources or deletion. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete The company he founded may be notable, but I don’t see the kind of sourcing we require for a BLP. Mccapra (talk) 22:43, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 03:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Same previously deleted content copy pasted Onmyway22 talk 09:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - repost of previously deleted article, see EverybodyWiki Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ondřej Mastný

Ondřej Mastný (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has yet to play a game at professional level and I'm not seeing a WP:GNG pass from the internet searches attempted. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Czech Republic. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, fails WP:NFOOTY. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable youth player, fails GNG. GiantSnowman 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Agree, too early to know if this player will become notable or not. Sandbox piece at best. Govvy (talk) 09:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - it's WP:TOOSOON for this just-turned 19 years player, but it might not be long. Jacona (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom, a search didn't populate the WP:SIGCOV that would be required for a standalone article, in my opinion. While they may in the future meet that threshold, at current the subject does not. GauchoDude (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. I am not able to find WP:BASIC-level coverage of the individual. He would have also failed the old WP:NSOCCER, so I don't see any reason that this shouldn't be deleted while the guideline is being revised. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

H808Beats

H808Beats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not impressed at all by the sources. All of them are clearly paid-for press releases. With disclaimers such as The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content. and Sponsored: Advertising Content, the sources fail our standards for independent sourcing as per WP:IS. Aside from that, there is no evidence that this producer passes WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete - No indication that this passes WP:GNG RoanokeVirginia (talk) 21:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, lack of independent and reliable references. Brian O'Conner 21:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete - notability as per WP:NMUSICIAN is not substantiated. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep There are major news websites which the article is not "Sponsored" some of them include :

Benzinga
Digital Journal
Times World USA

Santa Maria Times

ABC News

FOX News

Which cover WP:NMUSICIAN 1) "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself"

AND 12) "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekrad (talk • contribs) 23:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, didnt pass WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. Akevsharma (talk) 06:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• In re the above sources offered: the first link is a news release distributed by a newswire; the second is the same news release; the third is sourced to IssueWire - I tried to link to one of their pages explaining how you can buy their distribution services and got dinged by the blacklist filter (!!), there; the fourth is... well, guess. The last two don't link to ABC or Fox. These are all purchased PR distributions that have been posted as page filler. Totally fails WP:NMUSIC. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 06:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I agree with this analysis. Anything marked as Music PR or relating to IssueWire is a press release and not acceptable. I stand by my opinion to delete this article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Note to closing admin: lots of SPAs surfacing here.

For those who are unaware of how news wires work, a client buys distribution of their press release, the news wire sends it to everyone and their dog, and many places pick it up and just slap it on their website to fill pages and collect hits. The sources here are two press releases, with zero news value, despite how many SPAs say otherwise. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep The fact that its the same articles redistributed by many major media means that it passes the WP:NMUSICIAN as for the last two links they are indeed FOX and ABC affiliated sites check the logo .. In addition I will include the IMDb profile of the producer and the verified google knowledge panel

https://g.co/kgs/1ipuCU

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm13498668/bio?ref_=m_mn_ov_bio

I believe that all the above facts and sources are more than enough for the page to stay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkezzz (talk • contribs) 10:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

They are hosted on some website called marketminute.com rather than the actual ABC or Fox websites. Clearly not the same thing. IMDb is unacceptable as per WP:IMDB. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Thats exactly why its called "Affiliated Networks" you need to do your research on that. And since ABC news is an acceptable source the article needs to stay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkezzz (talk • contribs) 11:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I have requested further opinion on marketminute.com at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep The article on Benzinga seems legit also its one of the most reputable websites for businesses stocks and financial information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutrich (talk • contribs) 12:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep [Arizona Republic Newspaper (AZ Central)] has also published this news story I believe there is no question about his noteworthiness anymore! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ρίτα βεριφαιντ (talk • contribs) 13:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
  

  That's sourced to a PR service, AB Newswire. Lamona (talk) 03:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

• Comment Adding major newspapers: Pittsburgh Post Gazzete and Buffalo News WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

@Spiderone: (FYI) On the account with Greek letters, see also this. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nominaton, fails Nmusician and GNG Josey Wales ^Parley 16:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep: Producer passes NMusician as per publications on reliable newspapers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.74.47.146 (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Most, if not all, of the sources, seem to be just press releases that offer no substantial in-depth coverage. Despite citing many sources, none of the sources seems to be WP:IS and they seem to be just press releases pushed out by PR Newswire or similar companies. That said, this article failed WP:GNG. In addition, the user that created the article is blocked for sockpuppeting and there is no substantial change after the creation of the article. I think if this article didn't go into AFD it could instead be speedily deleted through WP:G5.SunDawntalk 03:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn’t meet WP:NMUSIC.-Xclusivzik (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. The extensive failures by socks to advance a credible argument for keeping, in combination with the lack of coverage of this group, shows that this is extremely non-notable. That there is heavy socking and references to ads are being used, I suspect UPE, so salting would help to but the Kibosh on that. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

John Robinson (Canadian actor)

John Robinson (Canadian actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced Ficaia (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ficaia (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, and Canada. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Almost every mention of this actor on Google is a mirror of this article. I haven't been able to find anything in the way of independent references to him or his work. Unfortunately can't meet WP:GNG without good sources, and I don't see them. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment The name is too common to find any sources, but I'd be willing to reconsider if we can dig some up. Oaktree b (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. As always, the notability test for actors is not just "a list of roles is present" — the article has to be supported by reliable sources that establish the significance of at least some of his performances, such as by verifying that he won or was nominated for major acting awards (Oscar, Emmy, Canadian Screen Award, etc.) or by analyzing the roles in enough depth to count toward WP:GNG (as opposed to just glancingly namechecking his existence in a cast list). His strongest potential notability claim is as the lead character in Zero Patience, but on checking ProQuest for that I don't find coverage about him, I just find coverage that mentions his name in the process of being about the film — and even if we accepted that anyway, NACTOR #1 still requires multiple significant roles, not just one. Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

King Tweety

King Tweety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NF, all coverage is just reproduction of the same press release, no independent coverage by reliable sources, draftification would be appropriate seeing as the film may receive more coverage once it is released BOVINEBOY2008 18:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Comics and animation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
• Draftify Clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Currently fails WP:NF DonaldD23 talk to me 20:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Draftify per WP:TOOSOON, can be taken back out of draft space once more substantial content exists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Knut Albrigt Andersen

Knut Albrigt Andersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Musician does not appear to meet musician notability criteria; see: WP:MN

Socksage (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Norway. Shellwood (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• For things these old, you ought to check the newspaper archives and similar (not sure if relevant since outside of US, but still....). If no sources can be found there, then Delete in its current state. Rlink2 (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
  • You should be telling us whether sources can be found. Otherwise that is not a meaningful contribution to an AFD discussion. The closing administrator knows what notability is. Xe needs you to find out how it applies. Uncle G (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

    @Uncle G, Ok, I will keep that in mind. I too thought it was boerdline, hence why I said we should find more source..

    I do not have access to JSTOR so I wouldn't have found that anyway. Thank you for the advice. Rlink2 (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

• The Thorsen 2003 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFThorsen2003 (help) source already in the article is a non-trivial biography of the subject's life and work. The research not done by Rlink2 above turns up things like JSTOR 23506400 and recital dates and recordings in catalogues, so with one full biography and ancillary sources like that there is it seems just enough for an encyclopaedia article here, although I would prefer more. This is very much a borderline case. Some of the things from the main source should not have been used verbatim or in Wikipedia's voice, too. Uncle G (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

I should note, before I made this AfD discussion page, I had already checked for more information about this musician by doing a cursory search that included looking into digitized Norwegian newspaper archives, and had come up empty. That I (an Anglophone who knows little about Norwegian pianists) did not find anything doesn't mean there is nothing there. Agree that this is a borderline case -- clearly I lean towards Delete, seeing that I made the nomination in the first place. Socksage (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As a borderline case, this discussion might benefit from a few more days of consideration.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are there any more sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Maureen Mbondiah

Maureen Mbondiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, article resulting from a lot of the subject's self-publicism, see comments below for detailed discussion Elemimele (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

• This article was nominated for deletion in July 2021 (not by me, though I was involved in the debate). Mbondiah runs a very small, run-of-the-mill business in provision of care, and has undertaken a few small business and charitable activities in Zimbabwe, as well as raising awareness of women's issues. Her businesses have generally been very small, often failed; her charitable activities are similar and difficult to confirm, and she fails to meet notability as an author. But she is excellent at self-promotion, which I think hoodwinked the article's creator, and derailed the last AfD. She has got herself nominated for a lot of awards of the sort run by organisations who make their profit by selling seats at awards ceremonies; she has claimed awards in interviews that have names similar to existing awards, but cannot be traced, and last time we had to go to quite a lot of work to weed out stuff that didn't exist, or differentiate between nominations and awards. She produces a lot of google-hits but it's all interviews, articles in local newspapers that were probably commissioned by the subject, facebook pages, and youtube interviews.
• In detail, the "Womanhood Global Magazine" existed, but we need independent evidence that enough people actually read it for it to contribute notability. It doesn't seem to exist any more. Momentors existed: "Momentors Leading women Ltd." was a company registered by Maureen Mbondiah in May 2020 with assets of £1, dissolved by compulsory strike-off in Oct 2021. Contributing to Ruth Strutten's book doesn't make her notable; 300 people contributed to that book! "Tales of Womanhood" is self-published via a print-on-demand self-publishing organisation. The "Against all odds" charity based in the UK of which she's patron is bothering me, because I can't find it, only a similarly-named "Against all odds still standing" which does not appear to be anything to do with Maureen Mbondiah. There is no charity registered in the UK as "Against all odds", only a facebook page. I think maybe the article has accidentally piggy-backed its notability off the wrong charity. I can find no independent evidence that the orphanage is functioning. Which leaves us with one small shopping centre, a minor talk-show with no secondary sources to indicate anyone listened, and 5 awards, two of which she didn't win, and all of which are borderline at best.
• I'm sorry to have written a wall of text. The problem is that with Maureen Mbondiah, it is in the detail that her notability fails, so we have to check the details. Elemimele (talk) 10:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Zimbabwe, and United Kingdom. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mu chord

Mu chord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The "mu chord" appears not to be a thing, except within the universe of Steely Dan. I could find no references to it that were not directly connected to Steely Dan, and no notable person referencing the term except in direct connection to Steely Dan. Suggest merge with Steely Dan. -Jordgette [talk] 16:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Merge to Steely Dan, not notable on its own but worth mentioning in their article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• This looks like a good candidate for a merge to Steely Dan, as noted. It's definitely a unique part of their approach, but it's also very unique to them, so a discussion in their article is probably more appropriate. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Brady R. Allred

Brady R. Allred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having removed a large mass of spamming in the article (which is currently unsourced), I attempted to find sources for this article, only to find that very few exist, and that none of the sources I could see constitute significant coverage. As far as I could see, the subject fails to meet WP:BASIC; and I am unsure he would meet WP:NMUSICIAN either. JavaHurricane 16:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Utah. JavaHurricane 16:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

  Delete: I can't believe this passed the first AfD. Did we lose some valuable references along the way? I checked the article as it stood just after the "keep" closed . Nope, worse than at present. And it still has no real references. Some have been removed since the Afd, but they weren't worth anything. Mostly primary source, or verification that X played Here. No secondary source to indicate the performance was notable in any way. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Things like this would be useful in verifying a couple of the basic facts asserted in the article, But it's a bare mention, and a primary source. Even a sportsbio might blush a little! (Too soon? Too soon.) Just doing lazy google-grade research here, but I'm really not seeing much in the way of proper secondary coverage at all. In fact, our article for the European Grand Prix for Choral Singing itself, impressive and all as it sounds, is primary sources too... Whiff of 'jobbing pro' rather than obvious actual notability here. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP:Basic, promotional in nature. Misleading links. NiklausGerard (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

List of aircraft accidents and incidents by number of ground fatalities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An arbitrary list criteria which fails WP:LISTN and WP:OR. There is no reliable source which makes a distinction about aircraft accidents involving more than 50 fatalities and those involving less. There's maybe a distinction between those involving any and those involving none (i.e. fatal accidents vs. other less tragic ones, including hull losses without loss of life), but not at an arbitrary number of fatal casualties. Given that no other source has made this compilation or anything ressembling it, then, this is by definition "original research which has not been published anywhere else". On top of the obviously OR and unsupported statements such as attributing a near exact number to each plane involved in the 2001 attacks.

On top of that, this is duplicative of other lists which separate these accidents into more plausible groups (by year of event, or aircraft type involved, or commercial aircraft accidents only [given most GA accidents are not notable, that's a valid distinction]), and the arbitrary criterion for inclusion (why 50? why not any other natural number) is not a good reason to have a separate list.

The only useful content, the "History" section, is obviously about aircraft accidents in general, except for a few select mentions of "firsts" (and whether these are truly firsts or not is hard to verify without an actual secondary source doing the OR instead of a Wikipedia editor).

The same concerns apply to List of aircraft accidents and incidents by number of ground fatalities, including the OR bit, as well as the arbitrary selection (is there really a significant difference between accidents involving fatalities on the ground and those which do not? most fatal accidents which result in ground fatalities also include on-board fatalities; the few that don't are odd-ball cases, which might be WP:ITSINTERESTING but for which no reliable source which shows actual notability (as opposed to subjective interest) exists. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Comment I think it's reasonable to have a list article for notable fatal aviation accidents that contains a table ordered by the number of fatalities. Does such a table exist in another article? If not we certainly shouldn't delete this one.----Pontificalibus 16:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and rename the nominator is essentially complaining about the title. Listing aircraft accidents by number of casualties makes perfect sense and the list was good enough to get featured quality (though maybe that should be reviewed per WP:OR concerns). Nomination feels very “baby and bath water” here. Dronebogus (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep and rename List of deadliest aircraft accidents and incidents. It's perfectly reasonable to list superlatives in a category with a cutoff even if it's arbitrary. List of largest cruise ships has a cutoff of 135,000 tons. List of largest cities has those above 5 million. List of tallest buildings in Chicago has a 600-foot cutoff while List of tallest buildings in Philadelphia has a 400-foot cutoff and List of tallest structures in Tokyo just lists the top 50. List of the oldest living people arbitrarily has 50 items. Deadly airplane accidents is a notable thing to list, but we can't have them all for 50 fatalities was chosen for selection criteria. Grouping by year or aircraft type does not provide this overall context. I do think it's also relevant to have a listing for ground fatalities. Reywas92^Talk 21:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with Reywas92 about the rename. If a list is too long a discussion on the talk page can be had about a cut off point. Dream Focus 22:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
  • None of the addresses the OR concerns, which at this stage would remain even if the list were to be cut down: a look at the sources confirms that these are individual accident reports, they're all mostly from one source (Aviation Safety Network - which brings up issues of WP:NOTMIRROR), and of course the whole listing is dramatically too extended. It would definitively require a decent amount of WP:TNT. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

    WP:NOTCLEANUP Dronebogus (talk) 05:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep – per others here. United States Man (talk) 04:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep and rename per Reywas92. There are plenty of lists out there, e.g. 100 worst accidents (Aviation Safety Network), Deadliest commercial airline crashes in history (CNN), The Most Deadly Plane Crashes In Aviation History (Aviation Voice). There is no WP:OR issue here. The numbers of fatalities are a matter of record. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep and rename per others (though I'm hardly neutral). Many of the same issues were brought up in the first AfD for this list in 2013...Godot13 (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep. If the name of the article is the only reason being cited for deletion, while the content of the article is a notable topic, then the answer is to rename the page. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Richard Barman (photographer)

Richard Barman (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the references are primary and/or "profile page"s. In a WP:BEFORE search, nothing turned out — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: Interestingly the author Camorabug (talk · contribs) declared a COI, which was removed by Richard barman (talk · contribs) a few hours ago (see diff). This is just a promo. I would have tagged it for a CSD § G11 but given that the user author removed my tags of Notability and advert (diff), it is only apparent the CSD will be removed and I'll be forced to go to AfD. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. I cannot find any sources that show exhibitions or collections. Most of the sources are primary or promotional. The claim of being published by "vouge" (sic) is dubious. Reference take the reader to PhotoVogue library. The referenced 35AWARDS 2017 fails verification. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - My sense is that it is WP:TOOSOON for this photographer. It seems this article is likely a COI creation or autobio. Nevertheless, it does not meet WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG, as all I'm finding in a BEFORE search is social media. Netherzone (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete this PROMO COI article that fails N. Theredproject (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Pure promotion that does not pass WP:NARTIST in any way. --Kbabej (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ashok Rajan

Ashok Rajan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Lacks WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS/WP:RSP. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete The entire article is based on non-reliable references. Fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete sources are weak. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Javad Hassan

Javad Hassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG, WP:RS/WP:RSP. Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Meena Ada

Meena Ada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources found, non-notable fictional character. PROD tag removed by IP with no explanation. Also see Danny LAR (at AfD) and Chester Joyt (moved to draft). Bsoyka (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Bsoyka (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment is this even real? I can't say that I understand the context of this at all, and the links in the article don't help. Borderline A1, perhaps. Jclemens (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, although sadly, we don't have the relevant SD criteria... in any case, fails WP:V, WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Loyola High School (Kolkata)

Loyola High School (Kolkata) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Christianity. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete not notable : WP:NSCHOOL Hectorname (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Human breeding

Human breeding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a stub of the same topic that is already covered in depth at Eugenics. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Note: the article was deleted at 13:40 on 2 April 2022 by Bbb23 ‎(G3: Vandalism). --Gronk Oz (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Franchesca Salcedo

Franchesca Salcedo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG —Príncess Faye (talk) 12:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Príncess Faye (talk) 12:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Príncess Faye (talk) 12:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete I found nothing that would be a reliable source. Aha! Thanks to Beccaynr for finding the name to use. I suggest therefore that this is keep but as "Chesca Salcedo" with a redirect from "Francesca". Having the correct name should avoid folks not finding sources in the future. Lamona (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:NACTOR/WP:BASIC - she appears to be better known as Chesca Salcedo, and has coverage of her career in Cosmo Phillipines (2022), The Phillipine Star (2018), PEP (2018), KAMI (2018) 2, a mention of an important role in the Daily Tribune (2019), and a mention of a role in The Phillipine Star in 2016. Beccaynr (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep per Beccaynr. Meets WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC with sources presented above. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep Cruzita in Marimar and Babaeng Panda in Kambal Karibal are among her notable roles. Meets WP:NACTOR with sources presented by Beccaynr. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Stephanie Schaer

Stephanie Schaer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following an August 2021 RfC, participating in the Fed Cup no longer guarantees an article and, in fact, it has been removed from WP:NTENNIS. No relevant hits in Google News or DDG. I found some hits in ProQuest but they are all, without exception, passing mentions in results summaries for minor tennis tournaments. Based on the above research, Schaer does not seem to meet WP:GNG and does not meet any relevant WP:SNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Venezuela. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment I tried to find coverage on her to inform my !vote here, but hit a wall. It seem that the Calgary Herald wrote about her in 1999 https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/485963792/ 7 July 1999 page 47, of course it could be a passing mention. If anyone can access, please consider this. CT55555 (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• It's just a score summary. Hack (talk) 01:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG as there does not appear to be any significant coverage beyond score summaries and a passing mention in one article. Fails WP:NTENNIS, only tournament win was a doubles ITF $10k event in 2001. Bonoahx (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Rose Liu

Rose Liu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer. References do not adequately satisfy subject's notability criteria for singer. Fails WP:NSINGER. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nominator fails WP:NSINGER; also fails WP:GNG. See WP:NOENG: editors arguing for Keep are requested to provide translations of claimed significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Springnuts (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, poorly sourced and not notable. Hughesdarren (talk) 12:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN, and note that #9 requires high placement in "major" music competitions. This singer has a few mentions of placement in contests that are not notable in themselves, and her other achievements have not received reliable coverage. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep: I haven't done a search for more sources because I think the sources in the article its self and the zh-wiki article would already make quite a strong case for meeting GNG. The best source currently would be this article by Yahoo. This article from Qilu Evening News would probably be reliable if WP:XINHUA applied, more questionable sources exist, this Apple Daily article appears to give significant coverage but its reliability is questionable outside of Hong Kong per RSPS and this article by Tencent would likely be reliable (again, under WP:XINHUA) and give significant coverage but potentially has a COI due to the article focusing on the subject competing in The Voice of China which Tencent also gained the streaming rights to. Justiyaya 15:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

  @Springnuts: who requested a translation of the sources, I will try to provide a translation of the title and list the amount of mentions of the subject below for what I think are the 2 best sources (for reference the subject's Chinese name is 劉明湘 (traditional Chinese) or 刘明湘 (simplified Chinese)):

  • Yahoo: 9 mentions + referred to as 她 (she in Chinese) 6 times. "Second place winner in One Million Star season 5 Rose Liu decides to create her own portal to success *figurative language, I tried doing planning and finding business opportunities herself."
  • Qilu Evening News 15 mentions + referred to as 她 8 times. "Rose Liu sang 'Across The Ocean To See You' and captured the attention of Na Ying" Justiyaya 16:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

  • Thank you, Justiyaya (talk · contribs), for your analysis of the sources and translation of the titles which I've used below in my list of sources. Cunard (talk) 10:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. "Rose Liu achieves a string of successes with 'The Voice of China' competition". The China Post. 2014-09-08. ISSN 1607-4343. ProQuest 1560493269.

     This is an 822-word article about Rose Liu. The article notes: "Liu, a native of San Francisco, California, is a graduate of New York University with degrees in economics and psychology. Following her graduation, Liu initially worked for her mother back home in Oakland, California, which gave her the opportunity to come to Taiwan and study Mandarin. Liu is no stranger to Taiwan, as it is not only the country where her mother came from, but also the one in which her maternal grandparents still reside, in the Sihhu Township of Yunlin County. During summer holidays in the United States of America, Liu would return to Taiwan to stay in Sihhu and spend her summers."

  2. Chyan, Amy (2016-08-08). "7 Years After She First Sang on TV, Rose Liu Set to Debut Mandarin Album. A former contestant of "Voice of China" and "Super Star Avenue," Rose Liu is scheduled to release her first Mandarin album in October". NBC News. Archived from the original on 2022-04-03. Retrieved 2022-04-03.

     The article notes: "Practicality led Liu to New York University and degrees in economics and psychology. She began working in real estate and then accounting. But during a 2009 trip to Taiwan to study Mandarin in preparation of taking over her mother’s business, her cousin convinced her to sign up for the 'Super Star Avenue' competition at the height of the show's popularity."

  3. "刘明湘"漂洋过海"征服那英" [Rose Liu sang 'Across The Ocean To See You' and captured the attention of Na Ying]. Qilu Evening News (in Chinese). 2014-08-22. Archived from the original on 2022-04-03. Retrieved 2022-04-03.

     The article notes from Google Translate: "Rose Liu is more in line with everyone's definition of "good girl". Born in the United States, she has always obeyed her parents' arrangements and plans. First, she was admitted to New York University with double majors in psychology and economics. After graduation, she became an accountant. ... Although her participation in the singing competition did not get the full support of her parents, Rose Liu won the runner-up by virtue of her strength."

  4. 楊智雯 (2016-10-08). "優雅公主劉明湘 愛逛雜貨 天天健身" [Elegant princess Rose Liu loves shopping for groceries and works out every day]. Apple Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2022-04-03. Retrieved 2022-04-03.

     The article notes from Google Translate: "Rose Liu, who won the runner-up in One Million Star 5, has participated in programs such as "American Idol" and "Sing! China". Rose Liu, who grew up in the United States, often goes shopping at MRKT5 in private, as if she is in a foreign country."

  5. 林政平 (2021-06-01). "《星光5》亞軍劉明湘自立門戶 企劃、談案子全包...中文不好慘碰壁" ["One Million Star 5" runner-up Rose Liu set up her own business. She planned and talked about her case extensively. Her Chinese is not good and she encounters difficulties.] (in Chinese). Yahoo! News. Retrieved 2022-04-03.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)

     The article notes from Google Translate: "Rose Liu was the runner-up of "One Million Star 5". Her 12-year career in acting was not smooth. After 3 years of not doing well, she set up a new music brand "Xiangxiang Studio" and became the principal and struck the bell. She shouldered the responsibility of garnering corporate publicity, doing administration, accounting, price negotiation and other work, and is expected to release a new EP in July."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Rose Liu (simplified Chinese: 刘明湘; traditional Chinese: 劉明湘) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 10:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep as passing WP:NSINGER #1 and the WP:GNG. Per sources identified above. gidonb (talk) 14:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep ivo sources above; many thanks for translations: all works for me as now clear WP:GNG pass. Springnuts (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment. In the intro, the nominator indicates that they are basing their nomination on the references. These are the sources in the article. However, per WP:NEXIST: Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. The bold is in the source. So we would not miss out on this important guideline! In other words, per nominator's own intro, this article should not have been nominated for deletion. gidonb (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• CommentThanks for editors who helped with translating sourcces.Addisonson (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Himachal Regional Alliance

Himachal Regional Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable political party. fails GNG. Lack of significant references. DMySon (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: fails WP:NORG. No detailed coverage in independent media. Venkat TL (talk) 12:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: no notability and relatively new. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON? Taiwanesetoast888 (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to Rajan Sushant, party of sitting member of a parliament. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Joe Slick

Joe Slick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Couldn't find any significant coverage on the subject. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 11:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Czello 07:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ukrainian crisis

Ukrainian crisis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Descriptive terms are not within the scope of disambiguation pages. Dangerous mountains and Fastest flowing rivers don't exist for a reason. Also, "crisis" is vague and broad. A country has numerous crises, financial, religious, demographic, etc. For example, why isn't Koliivshchyna, a 1768 peasant revolt, included? How about the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine from the Soviet Union? Clarityfiend (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:

Russian crisis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations, Russia, and Ukraine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment – The former article became the dabpage as result of the RfC discussion. George Ho (talk) 11:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment – The reason this page doesn't include a list of endless potential 'Ukrainian crises' is because that's not how DAB pages work. Only things actually called 'Ukrainian crisis' in RS can be included. While this is a 'descriptive term', it has also been extensively used as a specific name for the recent crises, and is a plausible search term. I think we must retain the ability to point readers, who will no doubt use this as a search term, in the direction of the articles they want to find. RGloucester — ☎ 13:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Rebuttal. Can you provide examples of these "specific names", not just mentions of "a Ukrainian crisis" or "crisis in Ukraine"? If not, then there's a WP:OR issue here. You are trying to read the minds of readers to figure out what they're thinking/looking for. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, see for example either of these articles. And there are many more available in Google Scholar. RGloucester — ☎ 15:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Crisis is a nebulous, poorly defined term. As I noted in a related Afd discussion, Crisis links to International crisis, which states that it is "a widespread term without a single common definition." (bolding mine) Things like 2008–2009 Ukrainian financial crisis and Ukrainian political crisis (disambiguation) would also have to be included, along with who knows what else. IMO, the inclusion criteria is simply not sharp enough to be meaningful. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

This is not how DAB pages work. Only things named in reliable sources as 'Ukrainian crisis' specifically can appear on a DAB page. See WP:DAB. RGloucester — ☎ 18:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect to Russo-Ukrainian War. 92.113.168.56 (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Florian Tirnovan

Florian Tirnovan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD removed "because it had a claim of significance" with the zero sources in the article and one interview. The web is filled with database sources (, ) about the subject, but nothing of significance. ~Styyx^Talk? 10:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~Styyx^Talk? 10:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. ~Styyx^Talk? 10:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Del - A search of Wikipedia Library did not uncover any usable sources.--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete I can find nothing to show any notability. KylieTastic (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - This article has no references, and so would qualify for BLPPROD, but we are here. An article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, and this article does not. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment. There is a number of hits in Swedish newspapers, but not really as a comedian. The most ambitious ones are about a discrimation case where he was not allowed to speak (sign) at the table a casino, in between the rounds when others were allowed to (without signing). In others, he is quoted in passing as a representative of the Swedish Deaf Youth Association. He is metioned as a comedian, too, mainly in passing ("Swedish only deaf stand-up comedian, Florian Tirnovan"). There is a slighly longer mention in w:sv:Dövas Tidning where there is a couple of paragraphs about him in a shorter article on a popular Youtube video where he participated, and where he is called "known from his successful [succéartade] humour site Flow TV". The best source I've been able to find is this article, also from w:sv:Dövas Tidning, which talks a little bit more about one of his projects. //Julle (talk) 01:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Chrysanthos Mantzalos

Chrysanthos Mantzalos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

91 minutes of football then has played as an amateur since. Technically meets the version of WP:NFOOTBALL that was valid when it was created but no evidence of WP:GNG presented. Zero hits in Google News. A Greek source search yielded nothing decent either. Phile News and Kerkida both have brief contract renewal announcements but this is routine coverage that sportspeople at all levels get and doesn't justify a stand-alone article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Cyprus. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with a handful of appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Aethel Mining

Aethel Mining (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

, no independent anlysis, not a news even, just a line. based on pr paterial, lusa etc. Editor is blocked for promoting the organisation and its founders. It fails WP:ORG Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Amir Hamza (poet)

Amir Hamza (poet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already addressed here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amir_Hamza_(poet). The subject is not notable enough for a separate article. It either should be deleted, or as other users suggested, should be Merged (selectively) to List of Independence Day Award recipients (2020–2029). In any case, this requires a thorough discussion and should not go "without consensus." Tame (talk) 08:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, Crime, and Bangladesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - An AfD nom for this article was closed yesterday. Nothing has changed still notable for WP:GNG and good sourcing.BabbaQ (talk) 12:43, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• speedy close as wrong venue. This AfD contests the no consensus result of the previous debate. If the nominator feels the previous closure was wrong, they should take the matter to deletion review. The previous debate certainly didn't show a consensus to delete, and resubmitting less than 24 hours after closure is unlikely to produce such a result either. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Simba Nagpal

Simba Nagpal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Tv reality star and actor that both fails WP:ANYBIO & WP:NACTOR respectively. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a GNG fail also. Furthermore a WP:BEFORE search shows hits in deprecated sources such as TOI & other hits in order WP:QS most of which are mere announcements and the others certainly do not meet WP:SIGCOV. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Simba+Nagpal&iar=news&ia=news gives a bunch of sources. Are you sure all of them are not reliable? Rlink2 (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Keep - I have upadated the page with reliable sources and articles passes WP:NACTOR. 223.235.216.36 (talk) 16:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

• Delete None of the sources help the subject pass WP:GNG. Subjective criteria isn't met either. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 21:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - The subject of the article is not notable and there's no significant coverage of the subject. Repetitive information is included. Lillyput4455 (talk) 07:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to Naagin (2015 TV series): WP:TOOSOON, redirect to their only real significant role. Sources aren't really there to meet WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 06:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Daniel J. Earheart-Brown

Daniel J. Earheart-Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one local reference for over a decade, and clearly out of date, as a search shows that the current president of Memphis Theological Seminary is Jody Hill (but not the Jody Hill for whom we have an article). Being president of a seminary, so far as I am aware, does not confer notability, and nothing else suggests that here. BD2412 T 05:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Tennessee. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP:Basic or WP: GNG. Article is no more than a lead with one source, and outdated for presumed cause of notability. NiklausGerard (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

United Precious Metals Association

United Precious Metals Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page on the United Precious Metals Association (UPMA) have several problems, and should be deleted in light of those.

Firstly, the background section of the page does not focus much on the UPMA, if at all. Its first paragraph covers the history of American gold confiscation (1933-1974), and has a "Citation needed" tag to it. Its second paragraph ("Despite this revitalization… United Precious Metals Association") contains unsourced claims such as mentioning a "revitalization of traditional gold and silver money", and uses weasel words such as calling a lobbyist (Lawrence Hilton, Esq.) for the UPMA a "sound money advocate".

The articles then mentions the UPMA's business model - however, it went to excessive depths to explain the UPMA's business model, dedicating two paragraphs for the purpose. It also contains phrases unsuitable for Wikipedia (e.g. second- and first-person pronouns, like "you can keep it in a UPMA account", emphasis mine). The header's "Special dollar conversion" sub-section contains conjectures such as the existence of "no less than six different flavors' of the dollar" (precious metals and fiat money), again using weasel words (e.g. "sound money" to refer to precious metals) and biassed statements like mentioning the "steadily depreciating value of the paper dollar", or claiming that exchanging 1000 silver dollars for a car constitutes a "trade" instead of a "purchase".

The rest of the article reads like a paean to the UPMA, complete with a fare table for their services. The "Ongoing lobbying efforts" section lists the UPMA's lobbying success, although it has little bearing to the UPMA's business.

Overall, this page should be deleted because it is either not focussing on the UMPA, or focusses on its trivial aspects.

--NotReallySoroka (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Utah. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete this slightly interesting piece of WP:OR which by its title would be about a non-profit trading group, but is in fact about the circumstances within which they conduct their business. Unfortunately the absence of significant coverage of UPMA in reliable sources that are independent of the subject mean that we wouldn't have an article about the UPMA. Springnuts (talk) 12:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC).
• Delete. The problem here is that the association isn't notable. The article attempts to solve that problem by adding tangentially related information about precious metals and the law, but that doesn't resolve the lack of notability (and it also creates a WP:COATRACK problem). To establish notability, we need significant coverage of the organization itself, but I couldn't find much more than a few blog posts and passing mentions in the press. The UPMA thus fails WP:NORG, and given the poor sourcing and apparent original research I don't think a merger or any other alternative to deletion would be appropriate. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Karen Shelton Stadium

Karen Shelton Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBUILDING, lacks any coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. Previous PROD notice was removed by article creator without providing any independent sources. Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Delte for failing WP:NBUILDING, where structures "..may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." While the university is notable, there are no sources given to establish independent notability for what appears to be one of its athletic fields.Blue Riband► 12:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Redirect to North Carolina Tar Heels field hockey as a valid WP:ATD- it appears to be the main stadium for that team, and is mentioned there. Just because some matches in a notable tournament took place there, that doesn't make this stadium notable per WP:NOTINHERITED. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, the building itself is not notable. Relevant material could be added in North Carolina Tar Heels field hockey but the article about the stadium itself should be deleted. SunDawntalk 02:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Am I a Hindu?

Am I a Hindu? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. - Owais ^Talk 01:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Religion, Hinduism, and India. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
• Weak Delete lots of the 2nd lead section needs citations. No after search found. Maybe little notable but I doubt it passes WP:NBOOK. @@@XyX _talk 22:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. The Times-Picayune articles:
     1. Parikh, Arvindkumar (1997-02-27). "Question on Hindu religion answered". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2022-04-06.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)

        The book review notes: "Ed Viswanthan, an electrical engineer for the city of New Orleans, took this challenge and wrote a book titled, "Daddy, Am I a Hindu?" It was published in India in 1988 and republished in the United States in 1992 by Halo Books of San Francisco with a new title, "Am I a Hindu?" Using a question-and-answer format, the author tries to address hundreds of aspects of the Hindu religion, mythology and way of life."

        The book review further notes: "For Hindus, the book can serve as a resource for information about their faith. For non-Hindus, it is an introduction to one of the world's most fascinating religions. Both Library Journal and Booklist magazines have highly recommended this book. It is available at Golden Leaves Center in Metairie."

     2. Faciane, Valerie (1984-04-01). "Book takes big view of Hinduism". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2022-04-06.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)

        The article notes: "It took four years and research, but last year Viswanathan's book, called "Daddy, Am I A Hindu?" was published in Bombay, India, and all 2,000 copies have been sold in India. ... The book also deals with customs in India, including the caste system, the status of women in Hinduism, the diet code and Hinduism as a basis for the birth of other related religions. ... Viswanathan said the book was published in India because he couldn't find a publisher in the United States. A second edition will come out by June and will be available locally, he said."

     3. Parikh, Arvindkumar (2004-11-25). "Jindal making mark in American politics". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2022-04-06.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)

        The article provides four sentences of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "The book "Am I a Hindu?" first published in English in India in 1988 and reissued in the United States in 1992, has been translated into the Hindi language for Indian readers. A Gujarati version is in the works."

  2. Nagarkatti, C S (1988-10-28). "'Daddy, Am I a Hindu?'". India West. p. 73. ISSN 0883-721X. ProQuest 371429340.

     This is a 306-word review of the book. The book review notes: " Appropriately titled "Daddy, Am I A Hindu?" the compact 182-page book, written by Ed Viswanathan, sets out to answer basic questions on Hinduism as well as clear up old misconceptions.  ...  Written in an easy-to-read, conversational tone, "Daddy, Am I A Hindu?" uses a question-and-answer format between a middle-aged parent and a teenaged offspring to great effect.  The book, published by the renowned Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan institution, covers every aspect of Hinduism from the Vedas to Tantra in a lucid manner without becoming too simplistic.  ...  Modestly priced at Rs. 45 in India, the book has been favorably received by even The Hindu which has called it 'the need of the hour...not only for those overseas but even here in India.'"

  3. "Hindu book review: Daddy, Am I a Hindu?". Hinduism Today. Vol. 11, no. 1. 1989-01-31. p. 17. ISSN 0896-0801. ProQuest 220862552.

     This is an 89-word review of the book. The review notes: "This is liberal, Smarta-sect Hinduism digested to an intelligent 14-year-old level as stylized in a question/answer series between a father and his teenage son. ... There are some things to disagree with: namely the author's constant referencing of Christian scripture and his promise to turn over the book's profits to Mother Theresa's shelter. "

  4. Craft, Carolyn (October 1992). "Am I a Hindu?: The Hinduism Primer". Library Journal. Vol. 117, no. 16. p. 92. ISSN 0363-0277. EBSCOhost 9211166824.

     The book review notes: "This primer, serving some of the vast sweep of Hindu belief and practice, takes the form of dialog between a Hindu father and his American-born son. ... The book is s useful not only to American Hindus but to those who want a nontechnical introduction to Hinduism as lived today."

  5. Deeley, Mary (1992-10-15). "Am I a Hindu? by Ed Viswanathan". Booklist. Vol. 89, no. 4. p. 382. ISSN 0006-7385. ProQuest 235311307.
  6. Quinn, Mary Ellen (1997-12-01). "Historical Dictionary of Hinduism". Booklist. ISSN 0006-7385. ProQuest 235402567.

     This is primarily a book review about Historical Dictionary of Hinduism by Bruce M. Sullivan. The article provides one sentence about Am I a Hindu?. The article notes: "An informal, useful introduction that public libraries might consider is Am I a Hindu? The Hinduism Primer by Ed Viswanathan (Halo, 1992), which is organized topically with a question-and-answer format."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Am I a Hindu? (previously published as Daddy, Am I a Hindu?) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per excellent research by Cunard. Jhy.rjwk (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep but tag for cleanup due to lack of citations, with a link to User:Cunard's comment somewhere. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 23:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep per reviews found by Cunard -- Ab207 (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hanieh Mohammad Bagher

Hanieh Mohammad Bagher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. Seems more like WP:PROMO. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. I could not find any indication that she meets WP:NARTIST either, and my search for sourcing that would satisfy the GNG was also unsuccessful: although she's been mentioned a few times in passing by various Iranian news outlets, there does not seem to be any coverage that describes her directly and in depth. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.