Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 25

Manipur University of Culture

Manipur University of Culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried improving this article but not much here to merit notability. Coverage from Imphal Times (2015), Sangai Express, Imphal Free Press, and E-Pao cover only the university's opening and inaugural session, not the institution itself in any depth. These are routine announcements, not significant coverage. WP:GNG requires sources that provide "significant coverage" beyond "routine news coverage." Plus India Code is a government gazette reprint, a primary legal document, not independent secondary coverage. No source in the article provides the sustained, independent, secondary coverage that WP:GNG demands. I will say that this university may warrant a brief mention at Manipur University or Education in Manipur but by itelf does not merit a standalone article under current sourcing. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture, Education, Schools, India, and Manipur. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of institutions of higher education in Manipur#Universities as an ATD-R. Additional searches found no SIGCOV. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of institutions of higher education in Manipur#Universities as an alternative to deletion. Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of institutions of higher education in Manipur#Universities per BhikhariInformer sounds like a good idea. ScottyNolan (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Manipur International University

Manipur International University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE search returns only primary sources (state gazette notifications, UGC listing, routine press coverage of the bill's passage). No significant independent coverage of the institution itself. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Statutory recognition by a state government and inclusion on the UGC list do not establish notability on their own. Article content is essentially a restatement of the founding ordinance with no substantive coverage. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Manipur. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of institutions of higher education in Manipur#Universities as an ATD-R. No SIGCOV found; just MoUs and ROUTINE reportage. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

  Hi I have tried to improve the article. Can you take a look? SamBordoloi (talk) 10:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Article can be improved. The university is notable in NE India. I have tried to improve the article by adding Ahmedabad Mirror article https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/manipur-international-university-achieves-global-first-publishes-genetic-blueprint-of-fermented-fish-utong-ngari/81897256.html which is a popular and reliable source from India. Can you take a look @Flyingphoenixchips and @BhikhariInformation.? SamBordoloi (talk) 10:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  @SamBordoloi Thanks for the addition, but a single article on one research output doesn't satisfy WP:NORG. It's essentially science-PR coverage of a genome publication, which falls under ROUTINE. NORG/SIRS requires multiple independent sources with significant coverage of the institution itself.

  Also I went through the article and it looks like an advertorial or paid PR. will not be independent coverage. Indicators: PR dateline, an "About MIU" boilerplate paragraph, a Media Contact block listing the university's own email, and naming of the VC, Pro-VC, Registrar, AO, and research team in the standard internal-comms format. Per WP:ORGIND, content "substantially influenced by, or originated from" the subject is not independent regardless of the publishing outlet. Per WP:NEWSORGINDIA, Indian outlets routinely run undisclosed paid/sponsored placements, requiring heightened scrutiny Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 12:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @Flyingphoenixchips , thank you for looking at the source. Ahmedabad Mirror is actually a popular outlet in India. The article looks like news. It is difficult to understand that it is an advertorial. SamBordoloi (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @SamBordoloi thanks for engaging on this. Even with a reputable outlet like Ahmedabad Mirror, what matters is whether the content is independent. A rule of thumb is to see how it is written and also look at indicators here (boilerplate, internal contacts, staff listings) which are very typical of PR-origin material.

  You might find these helpful: Wikipedia:ORGIND, Wikipedia:NEWSORGINDIA

  They explain how to assess independence and why some news-style pieces still aren’t suitable as independent coverage. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 14:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for explaining @Flyingphoenixchips SamBordoloi (talk) 07:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - Changing my above vote from Keep to Delete. Sorry for confusion.SamBordoloi (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Department of Manipuri, Assam University

Department of Manipuri, Assam University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant independent coverage. No independent, secondary source provides significant coverage of this department as a distinct subject. Citations 1, 2, 3, 7 mention the department only in passing within broader works about universities or regional higher education. Citation 4 is the department's own university webpage, which is a primary/self-published source and explicitly excluded from establishing notability under WP:GNG. Citations 5 and 6 discuss Manipuri as a language, not the department specifically. Coverage of the subject itself is required, per WP:GNG. Citations 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 are pages from affiliated college departments or archived institutional pages, which are primary and self-published sources. WP:GNG requires sources to be "reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Per WP:GNG, notability is not inherited from the parent institution (WP:NOTINH). The article should be merged into the Assam University article or deleted. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Schools, India, Assam, and Manipur. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Assam University as an ATD-M. Agree with the source analysis provided by the nominator, there is barely any WP:SIGCOV containing sources about the department itself. So, a separate article isn't warranted; it can be accommodated in it's parent article. (WP:PAGEDECIDE) -- BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Assam University per nom and BhikhariInformer. ScottyNolan (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Department of Manipuri, Manipur University

Department of Manipuri, Manipur University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some of the sources talk only about the language, instead of the department. others are primary sources from university newsletters and self published platforms like e-pao. Also no independent coverage exist which can be considered significant beyond trivial mention. Fails WPːGNG guidelines Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Manipur. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Education. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:27, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep : The article's sections, "Achievements", "Courses", "Annual events" provide enough information about the department with relevant direct-to-verify citations from the third party references. Therefore, the article passes WP:GNG. Nothing questionable! Thank you! :) Haoreima (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, I know there is enough information. There is enough information for almost everything. This however is not the same as meeting WP:GNG. WP:SIGCOV requires sources that address the department itself directly and in depth, not sources that merely mention it in passing while reporting on something else. Going through the cited references, the bulk fall into three buckets: (1) routine local news about faculty members receiving awards, attending seminars, or being appointed elsewhere, where the department is named only as an affiliation, (2) event notices for Mother Language Day, book releases, and similar functions hosted at the venue, which are routine announcements , and (3) primary or quasi-primary outlets like thesangaiexpress.com, Imphal Free Press, and e-pao headlines that recycle press releases. None of these constitute independent, secondary coverage of the department as a subject. The "Achievements" section is essentially a list of things faculty did, not coverage of the department, and notability is not inherited from individual professors, the parent institution or the Manipuri language. You are conflating verifiability with notability. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 01:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Manipur University as an ATD-M. Agree with the nominator. There is nothing in-depth coverage about the department itself, to warrant a separate article. Existing information can be easily accommodated in the parent article. (WP:PAGEDECIDE) -- BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Manipur University per nom and BhikhariInformer. ScottyNolan (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sogaria railway station

Sogaria railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LLM generated nonnotable station. Fermiboson (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, India, and Rajasthan. Fermiboson (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Enough SIGCOV is there to meet WP:NSTATION and GNG. LLM issues can be fixed through editing, cuz AFD ain't cleanup after all. Here are the sources - . There's also some coverage about a parking lot controversy. Notable topic for sure. But if the consensus indicates that it's beyond redemption, then WP:TNT could be applied. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete As WP:NEWLLM violation; no prejudice to a human rewrite for a likely notable subject. Jumpytoo Talk 04:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 21:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep I think TNT over the LLM issue is unnecessary when the page is this small, and it looks like enough sources have been found to make it notable. Samuelshraga (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Paxton Airport

Paxton Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubt article meets GNG - very limited coverage, essentially just a general aviation airfield stub Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, United States of America, and Illinois. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  Courtesy pinging @Bearian as the other editor involved in the original PROD. The editor that removed the PROD notice has been notified on their talk page. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep I think we have enough significant coverage here. This 1946 article from The Paxton Record documents that calls for an airport in the town were made early on. This article from The Pantagraph chronicles the early construction and funding the airport received, with this one documenting applying for a landing permit. Here we find some opposition to the proposal. A 1976 article discusses potential annexation, and this article confirms the annexation by the city— there are plenty more across the 70s, 80s, and 90s that I can add. We even have an accident that occurred here. I think the Flying source currently in the article counts for some significant coverage, even if its not the focus, but this article from the Iroquois County Times-Republic also mentioning the sale definitely counts. Jordano⁵³ 16:38, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. The Flying Magazine and News-Gazette articles combined with the articles discovered by Jordano53 get it across the bare minimum for inclusion. Could probably use some expansion, though. nf utvol (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
• Keep while it's not the most in depth coverage, I agree with nf utvol that what we found is enough to save it, especially following the wonderful work of Jordano. ScottyNolan (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Bihar Aur Sufivad

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or{{subst:csp|sock username|sockmaster username}}.

Bihar Aur Sufivad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion as it clearly fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. The book is self-published via "Rajmangal Publishers".

The provided sources aren't independent, in-depth reviews; they are simply local news blurbs, minor web portals, and PR-style announcements about the book launch. This appears to be a cross-wiki promotional effort by a single-purpose account. it should be deleted. AMAN KUMAR (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Islam, Literature, History, and India. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: I think this nomination may stem from a misunderstanding of the notability and sourcing requirements. Looking at the article, the subject meets WP:NBOOKS, as it aligns with at least one of the criteria. It also meets WP:GNG, since there is coverage across several reliable, published sources. The point about the book being self-published doesn’t seem to have strong evidence. Having a ‘Manuscript Submission’ page (see ) on a publisher’s website is common and, by itself, doesn’t prove self-publishing. Without a reliable source clearly stating this, it feels more like an assumption than a fact. Regarding the sources, I don’t think it’s fair to claim they are not independent or lack depth. The article includes coverage from notable and established outlets (newspaper and websites both) like Dainik Bhaskar, Rajasthan Patrika, Prabhat Khabar, News 24 (Indian TV channel), Punjab Kesari, TwoCircles, Countercurrents.org, Muslim Mirror and Millat Times. At least some of these provide more than just brief mentions, which aids in establishing notability. The concern about my account being single-purpose doesn’t really address the main question of whether the subject itself is notable. In any case, I have worked on other articles as well, including creating Maniguh and Nishant Kumar (politician), among other contributions. Overall, it seems the nomination relies on assumptions that are not clearly supported by evidence. Based on the sources available and the relevant guidelines, the article meets Wikipedia’s standards for inclusion. Wanderer (talk) 03:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep and recommend reading these sources:. They can be used for improving the article. Koshuri ^(あ!) 05:08, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I understand why the sources in the article inspired skepticism: several are publication announcement or "book launch" coverage that do not contribute to NBOOK; many sources are from advocacy / special interest publications, which may have a biased reason to promote the book; and the problems at WP:NEWSORGINDIA can make it hard to be confident that coverage is not promotional. In this specific case, I am not convinced either way.

The only article in Patrika News is a mere announcement without even a publication date; the three in Dainik Bhaskar are similarly event-based and not relevant to NBOOK.

The three articles linked by Koshuri are at least book reviews (ie, sigcov), but I am not sure if they really meet our standards as RS. I find two discussion at RSN casting doubt on OneIndia: . Muslim Mirror and Millat Times I am less certain about; I don't have to context to know if these are just natural review venues (the way we'd simply expect The Advocate (magazine) to review major works of queer literature) or whether there is reason to see them as non-independent. All the reviews are so intensely glowing it's hard not to be suspicious.

But the submission guidelines at Heritage Times (review here) do say that they have a thorough editorial review process, and Millat Times states that they explicitly identify sponsored content when they run it. Those look like the best option for an NBOOK pass; I wasn't able to find any better sourcing elsewhere. I would appreciate hearing from someone who knows the area better, how reliable these sources are. ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Multiple book reviews are present to pass WP:NBOOK. IDK why it is here at AfD. --SatnaamIN (talk) 22:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as paid promo. User:LEvalyn Thanks for your request above. The author of this book Syed Amjad Hussain is a glocked sockpuppet and a serial spammer blocked multiple times on wikipedia for socing and upe. Please sse Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syed amjad08. As far as I can see all the sources are paid promo by this long term spammer to popularise himself per WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Since I can read Hindi, this book appears to be a very lazy effort and probably chatgpt generated, not at all useful, this is not THE first time, please see deletion log at Draft:Syed Amjad Hussain, another effort to popularize himself. I suspect all the keep votes are either from the same sock master or from his meat puppets, requesting checkuser here to vanish this long term nonsense. I will ping @bonadae who had earlier sent this to draft space, but from blackmail from the newbie new page patroller and this spa account to take this matter to ANI, Bonadea reluctantly send this to mainspace. Requesting administrator attention here. If this banned sockpuppet is so popular then why none of the professor from western world is citing him or reviewing his book unlike the paid jargons? Thanks.~2026-25560-23 (talk) 01:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  I am not sure how an IP editor can make detailed claims with this level of certainty. It appears likely that this is a registered user commenting anonymously especially since similar points have been raised elsewhere including the articles talk page, where I responded but the IP editor has not replied for over twenty five days.

  That said, speculation about who's the author is not something that can be resolved here and is not directly relevant to the notability of the book. The book is what matters. If the author of the book has been blocked, that in itself does not affect the notability of the book. Wikipedia assesses subjects based on reliable sources not on the editing history or status of individuals associated with the book.

  Regarding comments on the content or quality of the book this is not a review forum. Personal opinions about whether the book's good or useful are not relevant here. The book has already been. Reviewed by multiple writers and sources. For instance as cited in Dainik Bhaskar, the foreword of the book is written by Dr. Muhammad Sajjad Alam Rizvi, Head of the History Department at Presidency University, Kolkata. Another report in Dainik Bhaskar mentions that the book received a review from Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Government of Bihar IAS Dr. Shahid Raza Khan (IAS 2019 BATCH).

  Dainik Bhaskar is among the widely read newspapers in Bihar and it regularly covers regional literary and cultural developments so its coverage of the book is relevant in context. The book is what we are talking about.

  The argument that recognition must come from professors in the world is not aligned with Wikipedias guidelines. The book is in Hindi and coverage from Indian publications is entirely valid for establishing notability of the book. Additionally recent coverage shows that the author has been invited to the Madina Books Fair by the Literature, Publishing and Translation Commission under the Ministry of Culture Saudi Arabia. While this alone does not establish the notability of the book it is context in response to the claims being made about the book.

  Overall these points are being raised to clarify the inaccuracies in the comment about the book. The discussion should remain focused on sources and notability of the book than assumptions or personal remarks, about the book. Wanderer (talk) 05:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  @IAmTheOnlyUnknownWandererInIndia, Come-on we all know, how easy it is to purchase all such fake reviews in India. I think English Wikipedia administrators and other moderators are intelligent enough to diffrentiate between the paid spam and the legit reviews. Based on the decade long spamming history by this banned serial spammer we can not trust him for anything legit. To strengthen my case I would like to post his linkedin profile, here, https://in.linkedin.com/in/syed-amjad-hussain-41b800228 where he explicitly stated that he is a contributor to Wikipedia since 2016. Admins, now it is time to end this decade long spamming, please. ~2026-25709-48 (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  I don't know who you are, but posting comments from an IP address and making the same claims over and over again without clear proof is making the conversation more difficult to follow. That being said, we can't settle any speculation about the past editors here. The article itself should still be the main focus. Currently, several editors have commented "keep," and it has also been pointed out that WP:NBOOKS allows for the consideration of more than one source when determining notability. That assessment doesn't change if you keep saying things that aren't true. General assertions that all such coverage is “paid” are grave and necessitate unequivocal evidence, rather than mere assumptions. You can't just dismiss well-known publications like Countercurrents.org, Dainik Bhaskar, Dainik Jagran, Millat Times and others mentioned in the article without showing that they aren't independent or promotional. Mentioning supposed past behavior or external profiles of the author of the book does not make the subject important. AfD isn't about who wrote it; it's about whether the subject meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOKS based on reliable, independent sources. Generalizations about "fake reviews in India" do not replace analysis based on sources. You should judge each source on its own. The conversation should stay on track with policy and evidence that can be checked. The subject meets Wikipedia's standards for inclusion based on the coverage that is available. Wanderer (talk) 10:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  Comment by Nominator: Stepping back in to focus on the actual sources. I completely agree with User:LEvalyn—the Bhaskar and Patrika pieces are just routine book launch coverage, not reviews. The articles from smaller portals read exactly like glowing PR summaries. Given the well-known issues with paid coverage, these are massive red flags for a self-published book.

• Also, to address Wanderer's point: a foreword by a professor or a comment by an IAS officer is part of the book itself. They are primary sources, not independent coverage.

• Finally, the serious COI and sockpuppetry concerns raised by the IP only confirm the suspicion that this is a coordinated promotional effort. We still lack the truly independent, critical reviews required by WP:NBOOK. The nomination to delete stands. AMAN KUMAR (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  See WP:AGF and stop casting WP:ASPERSIONS. Koshuri ^(あ!) 15:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

• Update: This self-promo has recently been quick deleted in Hindi wikipedia as pure spam. See the deletion log ~2026-26106-25 (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Agree with others. Nothing but blatant self promo here also we might be in WPːNewsorgindia waters so I am not convinced by the references Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: There is sufficient media coverage and reviews to establish the book’s notability, and it also meets WP:NBOOK criteria. Mehru13 (talk) 17:39, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep meets WP:NBOOK. As for, "serious COI and sockpuppetry concerns raised by the IP only confirm the suspicion that this is a coordinated promotional effort", I would say NO, and add that the IP user himself appears to be a sock. Shankargb (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. It is not unlikely that a promotional campaign has been undertaken. But the reviews included in the article do not contain many of the hallmarks of churnalism - they offer varying verbiage, for instance. As such I'm not willing to wholly discount pieces from otherwise reliable sources. This meets NBOOK. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Skin pop scar

Skin pop scar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged with being a dictionary definition for 14 years, hasn't been fixed. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Delete for WP:DEL14, coincidentally... 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 20:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related AfD discussions. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 20:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep because Nobody's been working on it is on the list of arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Subjects are notable, and therefore qualify for a Wikipedia:Separate, stand-alone article when the real world has suitable sources. Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup, so it doesn't matter if the Wikipedia editors haven't yet written more than a sentence. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but the solution is to hit the [Edit] button, not to delete the article. Sources exist, and the article could be expanded with any of these:
  • Jones, Nancy Lynne (1996). Atlas of Forensic Pathology. Igaku-Shoin. ISBN 978-4-260-14315-8.
  • Wakeman, Sarah E.; Rich, Josiah D. (2021-09-13). Treating Opioid Use Disorder in General Medical Settings. Springer Nature. pp. 147–148. ISBN 978-3-030-80818-1.
  • Freye, Enno (2009-09-21). Pharmacology and Abuse of Cocaine, Amphetamines, Ecstasy and Related Designer Drugs: A comprehensive review on their mode of action, treatment of abuse and intoxication. Springer Science & Business Media. Color photos on p. 249. ISBN 978-90-481-2448-0.
  • Schneiderman, Paul I.; Grossman, Marc E. (2022-05-14). The Clinician's Guide to Dermatologic Differential Diagnosis. Springer Nature. Color photos on p. 2314. ISBN 978-3-030-63527-5.
• Alternatively, it could be merged into a new section at Skin popping (which would require not deleting the original, for license/attribution reasons). WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Skin popping as an alternative to deletion; and more positively for short text and context. Klbrain (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge per above. SenshiSun (talk) 01:59, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Skin popping sounds like a good idea. ScottyNolan (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Costas Andreou

Costas Andreou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing but WP:PROMO external links in this article and not a single reference in the entire WP:BLP Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  Here are some links from Google that confirm the information in the article:

  https://www.athensinsider.com/costas-andreou-presents-live-ambient/

  https://www.xpatathens.com/what-s-on/events-in-athens/music/item/6264-costas-andreou-live-ambient

  https://athens.czechcentres.cz/program/jazz-and-vino-cesky-jazz-v-reckych-vinicich-dj-set-kostas-andreu-1

  https://www.stockholm-athens.com/

  https://www.musique.gr/en/dj-set

  https://www.last.fm/music/Costas+Andreou

  https://www.costasandreou.com/music-sound-design

  https://filmcommission.gr/company/costas-andreou/

  https://www.academia.edu/88703445/HELLENIC_MUSIC_PUBLICATIONS_VOLUME_1_A_B_

  https://fournos-culture.gr/el/class/%CE%BA%CF%89%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B1%CF%82-%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B4%CF%81%CE%B5%CE%BF%CF%85-%CE%B9%CF%80%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%85%CF%82/ ArgyBetson12 (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  The correctness of the information is not the issue here. It's the fact that the article is blatantly WP:PROMOTIONAL and contravenes the WP:EXTERNALLINKS guideline.

  Further, articles that are biographies of living persons need to be supported by inline citations throughout the article. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:PROMO and WP:BLOWITUP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 00:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

I will add that the bizarre WP:REFBOMBing by User:ArgyBetson12 actually makes this article worse. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep the article has a lot of sources, @SnowyRiver28 did a great job sorting out the references table. Vincentvarc (talk) 12:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

— Vincentvarc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

I understand the concern. I’ve mainly edited this topic because I’m familiar with it, but I’m committed to maintaining a neutral point of view and using reliable sources. I’m open to feedback on any specific edits. Vincentvarc (talk) 17:22, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

I found the corresponding ISNI for this artist:

ISNI: 0000 0003 7246 304X

Vincentvarc (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: looks like PROMO and CITEBOMB. ROY is WAR Talk! 22:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  Could you share what parts come across as promotional or “citebombing”? I’d like to understand so I can fix it properly. Vincentvarc (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  @Vincentvarc: you need to read citebomb as the entire article fits the bill. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for the note. Do you think bundling some citations would be a better approach here?

  Thanks again for your guidance. Vincentvarc (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

  I’ve taken a pass at narrowing down and refining the citations for this article. I’d really value your feedback.

  Vincentvarc (talk) 22:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

• Checkuser note there have been a number of socks editing this article. The following accounts are all part of the same promotional sock group: Vincentvarc, MaryGuen, ArgyBetson12, Petroselectricity12, YannisKalyvas, Abbizomiz, Nikolaievichborrod, Peterkl28, Fran2qfran and Dipl2201marc. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:51, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Valmiki caste

Valmiki caste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed merge, from what I can gather after a few searches, the Valmiki caste article and the Chuhra article are referring to the same community, I am nominating this one because it is the smaller of the two, altough it could be merged vice-versa since "Valmiki" seems to be the current preferred term. nahle.ghini (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Religion, Social science, India, and Punjab. nahle.ghini (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: A cursory look at some of the sources seems to support the notion that it's a single community, though both names have different connotations—the older label is considered derogatory. Since the current common name is Valmiki, that should be the title and the other article merged into it. regards, TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 20:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Noting that I refactored the AfD template with the new merging parameters and added the {{merge-from}} template to the proposed destination article to better reflect the nomination. @User:Nahleghini feel free to revert that if you prefer the old deletion version of the template. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Merge Chuhra into Valmiki caste. As TryKid mentioned, Chuhra is a pejorative term and the WP:COMMONNAME is Valmiki. Essentially, both are the same group of people. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Support merging Valmiki into Chuhra, not the reverse. Chuhra is the original term for the caste and used in sources. It may be used as a pejorative in India in some contexts but Wikipedia is not censored. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Support merging of Valmiki caste into Chuhra. The Chuhra caste already combines Valmiki and Balmiki and there is no need for additionaal page as the article of Balmiki is redirection to Chuhra. Himankshu (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

FinServe Pro

FinServe Pro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of in-depth coverage. All sources are promotional, don't provide WP:SIGCOV, simply regurgitate the founder's words, and/or are AI-generated slop. JTtheOG (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Nigeria, and Maryland. JTtheOG (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, as stated above - no SIGCOV, promotional slop. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MILL and WP:PROMO.MitYehor📘^^talk 21:17, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of people and animals from Thomas & Friends

List of people and animals from Thomas & Friends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies extensively on original research and possibly contains fancruft. Looking at the sources for the page i am 99% sure this article has no reliable sources attached to it. (the Youtube links could possibly be reliable? if we really want to stretch it out that far). Theres very few limited sources discussing Thomas characters, so if anything these issues have close to a 0% chance of being fixed (and there are certainly not enough reliable sources to cover all of the trivia in the article). Similar to what happened with the List of Thomas & Friends characters article earlier this month, either a full on deletion or a page merge with List of The Railway Series characters sound like the more probable options for this article. Gavetheman555 (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with List of The Railway Series characters: Per nom. The sourcing here is very poor. At the very least, Sir Topham Hatt should be included at a merged character list as he is a major character in the series, but the rest can probably be discarded. MidnightMayhem (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Lists, and United Kingdom. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 20:59, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge per MidnightMayhem. Clearly non-notable and lacks good sourcing, but some of these characters may be merge-worthy for the wider list. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

:Merge It was also discussed in the List of Thomas & Friends characters deletion that it should be merged into the List of The Railway Series characters as well. With a some users supporting this. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge per all. These two lists largely overlap, and we can leave it to editors to verifiably note which characters appeared in which series. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Peter Mackler

Peter Mackler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Garbage. Notability missing. Speedy delete. Dannypopmnm (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Dannypopmnm (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United States of America. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

This seems like an awfully dismissive nomination statement for the page of someone who had an obituary in the Sydney Morning Herald (already cited) and the Washington Post (not in the article yet). Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 22:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• This nomination is blatantly neglectful to WP:BEFORE, and to the legacy of a man who has entire award in his name, covered directly and indirectly (example). Since his recognition seems to pass WP:ANYBIO, I prone to vouch for Keep. MitYehor📘^^talk 21:07, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Pop På Svenska & Plan 714 till Komeda

Pop På Svenska & Plan 714 till Komeda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album per WP:GNG. Redundant article for a reissue with one Allmusic review. Merging per WP:MERGEREASON as an WP:ATD sounds attractive, but ... there's nothing to merge, the Pop På Svenska already says it got a reissue. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 18:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Pop På Svenska. The nom makes good points about the reissue. The album in question was combined with another EP for the reissue, but that can be covered at the main article for the original album. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Marilyn Manson 2019 Tour

Marilyn Manson 2019 Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The sources that I can see are for Twins of Evil: Hell Never Dies Tour with Rob Zombie in 2019, nothing worthwhile can be found for his solo 2019 tour. Failed WP:NTOUR and WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

You seem to be right: if Rape of the World Tour was considered not notable, then this one shouldn't either. Maybe instead of deleting it, we could have a redirect to the band page (like in the other tour mentioned here)? Mind Booster Noori (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Redirect is fine. Non-notable songs are often redirected to the album or artist, non-notable tours can be treated the same way. Hzh (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, and United States of America. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per above discussion. Lorstaking (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Malarana Chour

Malarana Chour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biased geostub article where the only sources are from wikimapia... Which is user generated. Searching malarana shour on Google does give me a very detailed article from Onefivenine, but that is also user generated. Searching more does not give me anything of interest. Normally I'd give very extreme geostubs a pass because of how relaxed the notability guidelines of geographic places are, but this is way too extreme. All content that does exist on this random indian place are all user generated. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 17:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related AfD discussions. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 17:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: This village has no notability and fails verifiability and WP:POPULATED. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Alex Roshuk

Alex Roshuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of these sources show a GNG/SNG pass:

1. is a two line piece, slightly longer on the modern website, (though using a different first name), but glancing at the site's about me page reveals that it works much more as a distribution platform for Canadian artists than an independent source with a reliability for fact checking.
2. Wikipedia mail list archive.
3. Local interest story, very quote heavy, so there's not much independent content to pull from, but not bad.
4. passing mention, gives middle initial, quotes him, and gives his age + one thing he did for Wikipedia. Hardly SIGCOV
5. blog post from "Concurring Opinions, LLC, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company" Some stuff might be okay from a SME point of view on legal topics, but it's from the same author as the Emory journal and the vast majority of the blog post is just a quote from Roshuk
6. NYFA profile appears to be an OK source (though dead), though from the tone of the bio I have a sneaking suspicion that it's not independent. Let's assume it is, though.

Other sources I found include a passing mention from the 80s listing him as one of 82 award winners, a passing mention of an award I think he won as a teenager (along with several hundred other students). But I can't really find anything else, and two sources (one fluffy human interest, one NYFA profile) isn't, imo, enough to prove notability. I'm open to a redirect to Arbitration Committee (Wikipedia)#History as an WP:ATD. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 04:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Internet, and New York. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 04:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

  And sorry, Signpost writers, but I didn't entertain the source suggested on the talkpage: WP:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-08-28/Board_candidates#Alex756. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 04:34, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

  Delete – Fails Wikipedia:General Notability Guideline. The cited sources provide only brief mentions and do not offer significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Therefore the subject’s notability is not established. CK (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

  — Ck Fatima (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Star Mississippi 13:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Engineering. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I am not seeing enough articles to establish notability. IMDB, Goodreads and Bio type websites do not work towards notability. Goodboyjj (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Kelob2678 (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to a User page, and as reasonable. Obviously, we all have connections with this late Wikipedian, so it's everyone's conflict of interest. Bearian (talk) 06:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that a cross-namespace redirect to User:Alex756 is not a valid ATD, and will likely get speedied per WP:R2. Any support for the redirect proposed by the nom?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:22, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last chance to see if we can garner some input. I 've also semi'ed it to stop the nonsense
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Magoosh

Magoosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disclosure: I have a tangential connection to this company in my professional life (higher ed admissions). But this nomination is based strictly on a policy-based review of the article's sourcing.

Magoosh fails to meet the heightened sourcing standards of WP:NCORP. While the company has received media mentions, they do not constitute "significant coverage" from independent, secondary sources:

-A significant portion of the "Recognition" section (Inc. 500, Bizjournals, Entrepreneur 360, SF Business Times) consists of tabular data and formulaic rankings. Per WP:NCORP, being listed in a ranked table is considered routine and does not establish notability.

-The Inc.com and Daily Californian sources focus on the tragic passing of co-founder Hansoo Lee. These human-interest stories provide biographical coverage of the individual, not the required depth of coverage regarding the company's own business operations or impact.

-Sources like Killerstartups and Xconomy are essentially interviews or brief product announcements. These lack intellectual independence required by NCORP, as they rely heavily on the company's own narrative.

The article has been tagged for "additional citations" and "excessive reliance on closely associated sources" since at least 2018 (and recently updated in 2025), indicating a long-term inability to find truly independent, high-quality secondary sources.

As it stands, the article functions more as a corporate directory than an encyclopedia entry. IdealNewst (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. IdealNewst (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Internet, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is a marketing page. Wikipedia:PROMO.HerrProfDrM (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Twilight of the Gods (song)

Twilight of the Gods (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG, I didn't find significant coverage in English or German. Only brief news stories: , . Redirect to album article Beyond the Red Mirror? Mika1h (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Germany. Mika1h (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect : It fails to be a standalone article under WP:NMG however it can be redirected to WP:Beyond the Red Mirror which was the subsequent album. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Beyond the Red Mirror per WP:NSONG. Not enough material or coverage to justify a standalone article. Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 18:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Twilight of the Gods#Music per Geschichte's comment below. Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 21:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

    I do support that redirect target. Geschichte (talk) 21:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Not in favour of redirect - ambiguous title - also found on Keeper of the Seven Keys: Part I, Twilight of the Gods (album) etc, just to mention European metal. Geschichte (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wild Hive Farm

Wild Hive Farm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mentioned in sources in passing, does not pass WP:NCORP. Whonting (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies. Whonting (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Stadium Special line, Perth

Stadium Special line, Perth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not meet the general notability guideline. There isn't any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Steelkamp (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. Steelkamp (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I cannot find evidence that there is a line by this name. The sole source does not use the name "Stadium Special line". There appears to be a train that runs this route, but it follows two existing routes. That doesn't mean there is a whole new route (meaning the full infrastructure from tracks to signals to catenary). We cannot be inventing new terms that don't exist in reliable sources. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: User:Trainsandotherthings is right, I could not find source for this as well independently. As part of engineered constructs it fails general notability guidelines. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 22:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Steve Oatley

Steve Oatley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, article orphaned since 2021. Gamapamani (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Gamapamani (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Massachusetts. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: That the article is orphaned, while a longstanding maintenance tag on this article, is not considered a reason to delete as long as there is sufficient notability and sourcing (but on that front, I have no opinion at this time). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, of course. The reasons are lack of notability and coverage, this was just an additional tidbit (it was what prompted me to look into his notability); I guess I should have semicoloned or parenthesized it. Gamapamani (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  Looking at this article, it doesn't look there there ever has been sufficient sourcing, but also its spent most of its history being vandalized, I have no idea if this person would be considered notable, as I don't really know anything about them, and the lack of information doesn't help. When googling this person the first link is this page, which isn't helping matters either.

  Looking through the page's history, I don't think there's ever been a time where this page had any sense, for that reason I'd recommend Delete

  I can't even revert the vandalism to a state where the page wasn't biased, full of weasel words, and clearly also vandalized by someone else. I don't think this page is fixable. Emasterbuild (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Not sure how this would even be salvageable without a full makeover, considering it's a WP:BLP it seems like a good candidate for the blow it up and start over treatment. nf utvol (talk) 19:35, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete can't find coverage. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 22:34, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Timeline of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting

Timeline of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this to be an unnecessary content folk from the main article, Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, as it adds information from that article and the Adam Lanza article while adding nothing new to the subject. BretHarteChitown (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Schools, and Connecticut. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Of any section(s) that could be split off from the main article, this is among the worst choices. A timeline of the shooting is essentially the shooting itself (i.e. the core event that influenced everything else), so there's no reason for it to be a separate article. Zero Contradictions (talk) 02:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Appears to be largely a copy-paste duplicate of content. Why? Reywas92^Talk 00:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
  • User:PatsyCIA also copied and pasted info from Uvalde school shooting to Uvalde school shooting police failures and from Columbine High School massacre to Motives for the Columbine High School massacre. I am baffled what the point of just duplicating content to redundant pages would be and have redirected these. If you want to propose a WP:SPLIT, please do it the proper way. Reywas92^Talk 00:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

    I can fix the amount of errors on those articles, and other editors can help. The same goes for this one which I will also be fixing. Also, many people have agreed to have an article that breifly explains the motives for the Columbine High School massacre. PatsyCIA (talk) 03:16, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

    I'm not sure what you think the errors are or how you would fix them – again, you just copied and pasted content from one page to another, making a WP:REDUNDANT WP:DUPLICATE. Content forks like that should be avoided. There's a "Motives" section on that page, and putting it on another article does not improve anything. — Reywas92^Talk 04:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

    Yes, that's exactly what I said I'll fix. I suggest you stop arguing with me. PatsyCIA (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete under WP:G5 as page creator is a sockpuppet. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 19:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Page has been deleted by User:Izno per above. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 19:47, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wanda Cornelius

Wanda Cornelius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former county school board member and onetime statewide candidate in Kentucky. No claim to notability and no significant news coverage. This article was previously nominated and deleted way back in May 2009, then promptly re-created 5 months later. I'd suggest a redirect to 1999 Kentucky gubernatorial election. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Conservatism, and Kentucky. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to 1999 Kentucky gubernatorial election. Clearly doesn't have the office and clearly doesn't have the WP:SIGCOV. I see no reason why the consensus from 2009 shouldn't continue to hold. DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 05:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hades (band)

Hades (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondery references to meet notable. Too short content. GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Redirected to Hades Almighty. No idea why tf there wasn't already a redirect for this. They changed their name in 2004 (correction: 1998) apparently. Case closed. Lofi Gurl (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Are these not two different bands? The one that you wrote about is an American band from the 70s featuring Dan Lorenzo formed in New Jersey. Why does this now redirect to a completely different Norwegian band that formed in the 90s? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh shit you're right. Um, I'm keeping the redirect because the American band is mentioned in the Norwegian band's article, and we don't have an article for the American band yet because I havent gathered enough sources for it yet. The Norwegian band was still originally called Hades, so the redirect should stay regardless of whether or not I can prove the American band's notability. Lofi Gurl (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• THE ALLMUSIC SOURCE IS WRONG. The site has some of the Norwegian band's early releases listed under the American band's profile. The American band formed in 1978 and plays speed/thrash metal. The Norwegian babd is black/viking metal, and they formed way later and changed their name because of the American thrash band. I'm hoping I have this figured out correctly. Lofi Gurl (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Shri Ganesh Rai Post Graduate College

Shri Ganesh Rai Post Graduate College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect: It fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG, can be redirected to WP:Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh#Education as an ATD-R. Against the redirect suggested above since this isn't mentioned at the suggested target. BhikhariInformer (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Buddha Institute of Technology, Gorakhpur

Buddha Institute of Technology, Gorakhpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, Technology, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to WP:Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Against a redirect since this page isn't mentioned at the suggested target. BhikhariInformer (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sarsuna Law College

Sarsuna Law College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Education, Schools, and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to WP:Bankura University although it fails WP:GNG Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Bankura University#Affiliations as an ATD-R. BhikhariInformer (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Bad Boy Karthik

Bad Boy Karthik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed drafification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. The draft has now been moved twice to mainsapce. In the intervening period a copy and paste move created a new article. This was all performed by the same determined editor. No version of this passes WP:NFILM. Sourcing is dubious. WP:TIMESOFINDIA merits examination. Likely WP:TOOSOON, but is at present WP:ADMASQ 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep — TOI is certainly on the thin side and TeluguCinema is of marginal reliability. However, a cursory search reveals additional reviews from 123telugu Review and ABP Live Review. EmilyR34 (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

This is not a review. It is a bullet point overview of the film. Same as the other. Where do either actually review the film? --CNMall41 (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Good catch. I've struck 123telugu per consensus on its reliability. I've updated the ABP Live link to the actual review. TOI is a short and likely misses the NFILM "full-length" mark. I'm still counting TeluguCinema toward notability; despite being unattributed, the critical tone and depth confirm independence. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep references 8 and 9 in the article are definitely reviews and as they are negative they show independence. The TOI is no consensus on reliability but film reviews are uncontroversial content particularly when they are negative. 123 Telegu is definitely a negative review if you read the whole article but 123 Telegu is an unreliable source as per WP:ICTF while I agee the ABP piece is not a review unless the translation is very wrong, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The ABP link was wrong, the corrected link shows a proper review, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep All the references are reliable. While creating the article, I have noticed that there is a draft already existingso I have moved the article to the mainspace and then published it with reliable sources. The nominator here is pointing out about copy and paste, let's say if I want to create the same article the same content what else conetent is to be included. The cast, music and all the details will remain the same. I had previously created many new film articles directly on the mainspace with reliable sources, so what's the need to edit the draft article here. Check WP:ICTF. In the comments column it is clearly written "Uncontroversial content such as film reviews are usable". Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep: Meets WP:NFILM since it has released and has multiple reliable reviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per Kailash29792. Aqsis Bey (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Released, article mentions several reviews. It's barely above stub and if this wasn't released without reviews I'd support a different action here. Ravensfire (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Cause célèbre (disambiguation)

Cause célèbre (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only two topics with a clear primary topic. Previous AfD in 2014 hinged on the see-also entry, Cause Celeb, and refuted WP:PTM guideline despite citing it. I don't think this argument would fly by modern standards. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related AfD discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:TWODABS. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:HEY. Clarityfiend (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• In the previous discussion, my comment was "No objection to deletion, although I think it would be harmless to keep". I continue to feel exactly that way.= BD2412 T 15:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep, on second thought. @LaundryPizza03 and Clarityfiend:, I have rather easily found additional uses of the term meeting WP:DABMENTION. BD2412 T 15:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:HEY. Well done, @BD2412:! PamD 18:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Phygital basketball at the 2024 BRICS Games

Phygital basketball at the 2024 BRICS Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to 2024 BRICS Games unless significant coverage can be found. JTtheOG (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Russia. JTtheOG (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, no indication of notability. Geschichte (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to 2024 BRICS Games where this is mentioned as a WP:ATD. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

DXSA

DXSA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another potentially dubious article on an alleged radio station from the Philippines. I can't find anything online about DXSA and I am extremely concerned by this edit. Note that the edit removed a comment that said Prime FM Tacurong is NOT licensed by the NTC per recent listing. Therefore, it DOES NOT have an official callsign. DON'T MAKE ONE UP. OR ELSE it will be reverted immediately. Based on that, I am concerned that this callsign may be a hoax but I am happy to withdraw if independent WP:RS can be provided for this callsign. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Barely found anything about the station. It does exist, but its frequency is not in the recent NTC listing, not even in the listing from June last year. Based on those listings, the call letters belong to a station based in Malita. Rather than redirect the article to its owner, MBC Media Group, it should be erased. ASTIG _{(DOOBIE • STEELY)} 22:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: per nom. Scoria (talk) 06:16, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

DXSB

DXSB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has a very confusing history. It was created with WP:A7 already in place and Talk:DXSB shows that the creator used what appears to be a sock account to contest their own speedy deletion request.

Furthermore, the article itself is called 'DXSB' but also talks about a different radio station called 'DXQC' at one point. My searches can't find evidence that either radio station exists. The article talks about 'Infinite Radio 93.3' as well, which is DXSJ, which already exists as a redirect.

I can't find evidence that the radio station 'DXSB' meets WP:GNG and I think that there is also a fair argument for WP:TNT based on all of the above. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Barely found anything about the station. It does exist, but its frequency is not in the recent NTC listing, not even in the listing from June last year. Based on those listings, the call letters belong to a station based in Pantukan. The call letters DXQC isn't in either of the listings. Rather than redirect the article to its owner, MBC Media Group, it should be erased.

To add, Giancarlo1928 has made disruptive edits on St. Jude Thaddeus Institute of Technology, which I reverted and warned the user several times. It's also evident in their former aliases 1851 and 1848. They created another account, perhaps to escape the three-revert rule. ASTIG _{(DOOBIE • STEELY)} 22:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Absolutely no reason to be an article if it were real, and it sounds like the station may not exist anyway. I think an SPI is likely required for the Giancarlos. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 15:47, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. Scoria (talk) 06:17, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

DXAJ

DXAJ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and fails WP:V. I have checked Draft:DXAJ and the sources there don't mention a radio station called DXAJ. Even if it does exist, I presume it would still need to meet WP:GNG.

This article was previously deleted back in 2013 for being a hoax radio station. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Barely found anything about the station. It does exist, but its frequency is not in the recent NTC listing, not even in the listing from June last year. Based on those listings, the call letters belong to a station based in T'Boli, South Cotabato. Rather than redirect the article to its owner, MBC Media Group, it should be erased. ASTIG _{(DOOBIE • STEELY)} 22:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Absolutely no reason to be an article if it were real, and it sounds like the station may not exist anyway. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:08, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: per nom. Scoria (talk) 06:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Comparison of XML editors

Comparison of XML editors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR and not suitable for an encyclopaedia Dncmartins (talk) 08:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy close without prejudice to later renomination. There is a central discussion about the correct handling of "comparison of" articles at at the Village Pump here and a discussion of the nominator's behaviour at ANI here. Holding AfDs while these matters are still unresolved is disruptive and likely to lead to inconsistent and suboptimal outcomes. Let's get a decision that can help us decide which of these tabular comparison articles are legit and then implement that coherently, not as hundreds of individual AfDs. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

  Please, stop adding these speedy close comments and let other editors post their votes. Dncmartins (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

  No. Please read WP:OWN. The idea that you can do whatever the hell you like but that other people can't call you out on it is unacceptable arrogance. You have to stop pending the centralised discussions. You have been warned over and over about how you are on thin ice. It is beyond my comprehension that you have been allowed to continue like this for so long. DanielRigal (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

  This issue was settled at ANI weeks ago, and you have no authority to tell people that they "have" to do anything. Please stop wasting my screen space with your personal beef. Thank you. HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  Was it? DanielRigal (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  We're not litigating this here. Take your spam somewhere else, preferably far, far away from this discussion. Goodbye. HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

  It wasn't. It is still under discussion there. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:52, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete: The rationale is correct. I cannot find any source that compares these XML editors in the way that the article does (e.g. across payment models, whether they support XPath search, when their latest release was, and/or what licence the editors were released under). The choice to compare these editors across these specific features is a choice made by an individual editor, which is original research. Per WP: DELREASON, we have a broad mandate to delete any content that is unsuitable for an encyclopedia. An article that consists entirely of original research meets that bar, so this article should be deleted. HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per HyperAccelerated. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete poorly sourced, very out of date, no attempt to make an exhaustive list and choice of comparision criteria by an editor constitutes WP:OR. Orange sticker (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mustazhiriyya

Mustazhiriyya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for notability shown, all that is mentioned is her relatives, which per WP:INVALIDBIO is insufficient PeriodicEditor (talk) 08:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, Royalty and nobility, and Middle East. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, the only claim to notability is her relations with the people mentioned either as wife or daughter with no historical significance. If more sources with significant coverage about her are found ping me, I will change my position. Santa Saana (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - See this comment for WeAreNicePeople's argument

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Mmadinare Senior Secondary School

Mmadinare Senior Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable school fails WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL. Saahil Vats (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Schools, and Botswana. Saahil Vats (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Asha Jadeja Motwani

Asha Jadeja Motwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV Saahil Vats (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and United States of America. Saahil Vats (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Prasanna Ketkar (actor)

Prasanna Ketkar (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Previously redirected at Tanhaji. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:48, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, found nothing close to establishing WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Santa Saana (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: With notable roles in the first three films, he meets WP:NACTOR. But with no SIGCOV at all, he fails in GNG and hence, doesn't get standalone notability. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails to meet WP:NACTOR. RangersRus (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Retro music11 (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tanhaji — he was already a redirect to the Tanhaji article, and that should be restored rather than a hard delete. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:06, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Abdelnasser Abdelfattah

Abdelnasser Abdelfattah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COI, Fails WP:GNG Saahil Vats (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Egypt. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nikita Bier

Nikita Bier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional biography of an American Entrepreneur. No indication of notability, Expired PROD. Looks like resume Saahil Vats (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United States of America. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete The only time I ever hear of him is when he tries to introduce/speak about new features and policies at Twitter (only for the owner to undermine him and go 'lol no' because they always seem to be about reducing the crap and bluecheck garbage there and of course he doesn't like that), and we don't have a personnel article regarding the company. Otherwise getting your unnotable WP:SERIESA companies picked up by a bigger company (and sketchy ones targeted towards teens no less) is of niche interest, nor being an ego massager. Nathannah • 📮 00:35, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Withdraw per above. Nathannah • 📮 23:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Yael Foundation

Yael Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Cyprus. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Judaism. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

RJ Palak

RJ Palak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Radio Jockey, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:56, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, India, and Maharashtra. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Radio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Couldn't find anything in additional searches to meet GNG. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - There's no indication of a WP:GNG pass. Retro music11 (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete — sourcing is insufficient to meet WP:GNG. Ref #9 is actually about an entirely different person. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Most of the source PR articles do not resemble the person. Mehru13 (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

DJ Holographic

DJ Holographic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable DJ, does not establish notability as a DJ. I also can't find any coverage towards WP:GNG. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Entertainment, and Michigan. Saahil Vats (talk) 07:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#1 and WP:BASIC. See citations in the article, and further coverage when searching 3 WP:RSMUSIC sources DJ Mag, Mixmag, and Billboard. ResonantDis_tortion 16:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Burton Richardson

Burton Richardson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources in article are IMDb, a single Gannett article on the 1994 version of The Price Is Right, and YouTube uploads of episodes. A WP:BEFORE found only a couple passing name-drops of the Arsenio role, which confirm literally zero biographical information. The only post-Arsenio hit was the aforementioned Gannett article, which says nothing except for The Arsenio Hall Show's former announcer, Burton Richardson, is the guy yelling "come on down!". I found no coverage of his roles on WinTuition or Russian Roulette, and any other mentions after the fact are one-sentence name-drops of him briefly returning to Price (namely, television Q&A columns or "local contestant to appear on game show" articles that happened to fall on an episode where he was filling in). GBooks gave only routine directory listings in books on game shows, one-sentence mentions of him announcing Arsenio, books composed of Wikipedia articles, or false positives. JSTOR gave entirely false positives for other people with the same name.

I haven't found a single scrap of biographical information anywhere. I could not confirm the DOB or place of birth, nor so much as the fact that he even existed prior to Arsenio. Suggest deletion or redirection to The Arsenio Hall Show as his most notable role. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oregon. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Found two articles about him on newspapers.com. This, together with WP:CREATIVE considerations, is enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect as suggested, to The Arsenio Hall Show, and as reasonable. Bearian (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we discuss Kelob's sources and whether they are ONEEVENT territory
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Golden Corridor

Golden Corridor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar rationale to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakeshore Corridor. I tried searching for secondary sources that mention and describe the term, but they are very limited, and what few that do exist are commercial journals, industry publications, and news stories about local businesses. None of them are what I'd call reliable sources, nor do they really describe the area, aside from a few mentioning at best that it's a (vaguely if defined at all) area around Interstate 90 in Northwest Chicago. Therefore, it fails WP:N. My interpretation is that it appears to be a WP:NEO created by local businessmen and investors as a marketing/branding term that hasn't really been promoted outside of those circles. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:01, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:01, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:11, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The first nomination from 2005 appears to have been about a different Golden Corridor in Dallas. (The Chicago one was actually mentioned there as having far more Google hits back then than the Dallas one, but that metric is less relevant to AfD in 2026 than back then.) No opinion at this time on the current subject's article. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:34, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls, Entertainment, Health and fitness, Education, Economics, and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete 20 years to find sources and none of the currently cited ones even mention this place. I saw a few very passing mentions in news archive searches but no articles actually about this as a distinct area. --Here2rewrite (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Samsung SCH-U700

Samsung SCH-U700 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCOMP, should be redirected. Bryce M (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related AfD discussions. Bryce M (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Note that this has been tagged as a potential NPRODUCT failure since 2013. No opinion, other than that redirection is not likely to happen without an identified target (but I have nothing to offer on that front either at the moment). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Products-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable older phone model. Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, without a clearly identified redirect target which would have served as WP:ATD the only option left is to let the article go. Santa Saana (talk) 11:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: No notability established for this phone, article has remained a stub since 2013. No good redirect or merge target. MidnightMayhem (talk) 23:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Do Duniya Ek Dil

Do Duniya Ek Dil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Entertainment. Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify as an ATD-M. Doesn't neet WP:NTV as of now. BhikhariInformer (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify since it seems WP:TOOSOON nahle.ghini (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Dave Abels

Dave Abels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be enough here for WP:NBIO/GNG KH-1 (talk) 03:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - searching for his brother is a WP:BLP1E situation. He fails my usual standards for lawyers. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - Abels is a leading figure in relation to both the Thai tsunami search and in the Chicago diocese scandals, his article should be kept.

Bigsteve27 (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Delete not enough notability Stationsation (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, notability is not established with the available sources. Reporting relating to his legal practice give him passing mentions not enough to pass WP:NBASIC. Santa Saana (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

SmarterPhone

SmarterPhone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be enough for WP:NORG KH-1 (talk) 02:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Technology, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: not able to find significant coverage in WP:RS for a standalone article. Asteramellus (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Underground Garage

Underground Garage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason MTAFOfficial (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Fails WP:GNG. Most of the citations are from primary sources. The Engadget citation is promising but the station is not referred to by name in the article. Has been tagged since 2008.

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:31, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: meets WP:GNG - searches shows coverage and most likely more significant coverage exists due notability and ties to SiriusXM channel and Steven Van Zandt - current primary sources issue can be fixed by adding more WP:RS Asteramellus (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Vendula Pizingerová

Vendula Pizingerová (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had doubts about the subject’s notability, though I would be glad if the credibility of the award she received, the Order of Laurels, could be established. The “Life” section is about her family and includes nothing about her career, which I have been unable to verify through a quick search. Most of the available coverage concerns childbirth and reports about her and her husband. (I also checked the WiR redlist but could not find her name there; please point me to it if it does exist.) Htanaungg (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Czech Republic. Htanaungg (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - this was in the WiR redlist from 2-9 April and subsequently created. C679 17:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: she was on the Women in Red redlist, but the entry disappeared after I created the article. I have also added a source for the Order of Laurels award and expanded the article with sourced information about her work with the Kapka naděje Foundation Fund MonikaKubasakova (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@MonikaKubasakova: You can certainly make this comment as a keep !vote. ^^ I will also wait to hear other editors’ opinions on the matter. Thanks. Htanaungg (talk) 11:03, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - the article is in improved condition from when it was listed so WP:HEY applies here. C679 10:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nankai earthquakes

Nankai earthquakes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article's title is ambiguous with Nankai megathrust earthquakes, and that's because this article is merely about a subset of the other topic. Both of them are about Nankai megathrust earthquakes. I don't see a reason for this to exist as a separate article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Japan. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: ATD Merge to Nankai megathrust earthquakes, anything sourced and unique. The lead states, "are great megathrust earthquakes." Improper split as too similar. The lead of this article states, "are major megathrust earthquakes". -- Otr500 (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or be consistent and merge all three applicable articles to Nankai megathrust earthquakes. There are three types of Nankai megathrust earthquakes, distinguished by the region of the Nankai Trough in which they occur. The three regions are Tōkai, Tōnankai, and Nankai, so we have different articles on Tōkai earthquakes, Tōnankai earthquakes, and Nankai earthquakes. While both Nankai earthquakes and Nankai megathrust earthquakes have "Nankai" in the title, Nankai earthquakes is no less notable and no less distinct a topic than the other two. Dekimasuよ! 19:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

  If we're going to keep it, the article should have a clear and distinct title. Right now it has a title that is completely confusing with the Nankai megathrust earthquakes topic. Both articles say they are about megathrust earthquakes of Nankai. Should the four articles be merged? How about Nankai megathrust earthquakes of the Nankai region or Nankai Trough earthquakes of the Nankai region? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:31, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect or merge. It looks like the redundancy issue would be settled by just having one article at least for the two main articles in question. My first thought is that Nankai earthquakes actually might be a good target overall (which would include content from the megathrust article). That way you could have the article split itself up by the subtopics discussed so far internally or have a sort of WP:NATDAB. Basically get people to the general topic through the search bar first and then figure out additional navigation like explaining the megathrust content, etc. I'm not an earthquake person though, so do you think that approach would work ⁠BarrelProof? If it's too generic of a title to house the two I could understand that, but at least in my first superficial glance through, this seems like it works. KoA (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not an expert either. Dekimasu had some good comments. I just don't think things should stay the way they are. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 07:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Eric Jones (political candidate)

Eric Jones (political candidate) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unelected candidate. Does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges ("Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline.") or Wikipedia:Notability (people)/Subnational politicians. There does not appear to be anything here, other than advertising his candidacy, to indicate notability and he fails the general notability guideline. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 02:39, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, California, and Maine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, obviously without prejudice against recreation if he wins the seat in November. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in future elections — the notability bar at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while an unelected candidate gets an article only if they were already notable for other reasons (e.g. preexisting notability as a writer or actor or athlete) besides being a candidate per se. As well, the existence of some campaign coverage (a thing which every candidate in every election everywhere can always show) is not sufficient in and of itself to claim that the candidate is exempted from NPOL on grounds of having passed GNG — we're writing history here, not news, so the test isn't "how many hits does his name get in the current news cycle?", it's "are those hits demonstrating that he's accomplished anything permanently significant enough that an article about him will still need to exist in 2050?" Winning election to a notable office passes that test, while being an as yet unelected candidate for office does not. Bearcat (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, I agree, but this is also a bit of a questionable interpretation of WP:NPOL. The guidelines say nothing about candidates needing to be "already notable for other reasons," and precedent has made quite clear that candidates who receive a greater than WP:ROTM amount of WP:SIGCOV may indeed qualify as notable. See Amy McGrath, Graham Platner, Dan Osborn, India Walton, and of course the Theresa Greenfield debacle. DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 05:36, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Candidates for political office are not inherently notable and sourcing does not rise above routine election coverage. Esolo5002 (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

  For the record, I am strongly opposed to a redirect. We do not redirect every candidate to every election. This person has only recieved routine coverage and there is no reason why they deserve a redirect over any other political candidate. If we redirected every candidate that went through AFD, that would end up being a great workaround for these candidates. Esolo5002 (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NPOL and does not have WP:SIGCOVEaglesFan37 (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California § District 4 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 08:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Currently campaigning candidate who fails WP:NPOL.TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect - candidates for political office are not automatically notable, although a redirect might be appropriate to the election article: 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 4. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per Bearian. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Godzilla Earth

Godzilla Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A variant of Godzilla that appears in a trilogy of anime films. A brief search yields very little that isn't just plot summary, and the current article contains little bar a brief paragraph on its design. A viable AtD is to Godzilla: Planet of the Monsters, which is the character's debut film appearance and where most of the info relating to it pertains to. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Film, Anime and manga, and Japan. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Godzilla: Planet of the Monsters - A minor variant of Godzilla that has no notability or coverage outside of the general coverage of the trilogy of animated movies it appeared in. What little actual coverage there is involving its design and marketing can easily be included in the article for the movies themselves, rather than spun out into a separate article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Godzilla: Planet of the Monsters, I agree with Rorshacma and the article should be a redirect to the page in which most of the information about the subject is held. FranticSpud | sit down and have a chitter | 19:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)