Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad City (game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Mad City (game)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mad City (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. The only reliable secondary source I could find about this game was this article from Business Insider. This article from The Toy Book does bring up that an official toy based on the game was released, but the game's only a trivial mention. Because only a single reliable secondary source with significant coverage could be found, this may not qualify for merging with List of Roblox games. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 13:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related AfD discussions. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 13:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Most of the article is paraphrased from the one Fandom wiki page cited. It doesn't look like this will be able to meet notability. StartOkayStop (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Some Roblox games do in fact obtain notability. But they do so through significant coverage from reliable sources. Which is largely absent here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, not notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources do not demonstrate notability. I'm unfamiliar with RobloxGo but judging from the discussion above it seems to be a Fandom wiki, which if accurate would make the lone source in the article fail WP:USERG (see WP:FANDOM too). Gommeh (talk! sign!) 15:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.