Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megalon (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Valid arguments from both sides, but no consensus. Owen× ☎ 12:38, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Megalon
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Megalon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This merge proposal was originally opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.
- Proposal to merge Megalon article
Megalon only appeared in one film and is nowhere near as notable as other Kaiju that should have their own articles, like Rodan and King Ghidorah. I think it would be best for the existing article to be merged here. Additionally, there was consensus to merge / delete the article back in 2008, but it looks like it wasn't actioned. Additionally, other kaiju that I would argue are more notable, like Destoroyah, do not have their own articles. IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Film. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Merge, though to a different article. Barring the nominator's Wikipedia:ITSNOTIMPORTANT rationale, this merge is to a draft article, which I feel isn't particularly helpful at this point since that draft is nowhere near fleshed out enough for mainspacing yet. While I am not opposed to merging myself this feels better off being done once the list is in a mainspaced, complete state, rather than a heavily WIP draft article.
- However, I have no opposition if editors want it merged to Godzilla vs. Megalon, a mainspaced article and Megalon's one significantly notable appearance. Given Megalon's one film role, all information about him is entirely tied to that film role, so it doesn't really quite make sense to keep him separate. Even later appearances tend to just reference it as an extension of the film rather than of the character in particular.
- I would also be remiss not to point out that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megalon (2nd nomination) was closed as Keep. Not to say it inherently should be, but there are some points there that may be helpful to look into (Notably User:Paleface Jack/Megalon (revision) which is a WIP rewrite of the article). Paleface Jack has done some fantastic work so far, but I personally feel as though there still isn't a lot of separation here since most of the article is largely about the film's development and subsequent reception, rather than discussing in particular the character of Megalon's significance. Reception-wise I can't find much that isn't just covering the one film instead, and given his lack of major further appearances there isn't more dev info that would make a split more helpful (Such as to track the overall development timeline of the character following this film). If other editors would prefer this worked on first I am not opposed since at worst it just leaves us with a quality article once it is finished, but for now I am still of the mind that I do not see a separate split rationale here, and much of the sourced information above would likely benefit the main film article more significantly than a split would. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose merge, and keep article - The suggested merge point is currently a draft, and not in the mainspace, which doesn't qualify a reason to merge the content at all. It just feels unnecessary to merge content into a draft that is currently sitting in the draftspace. GojiraFan1954 (talk) 11:44, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
- Merge to Godzilla vs. Megalon - The kaiju only had one major film appearance and pretty much all sources are in regards to its development and portrayal in that one film. Per WP:NOPAGE, the titular character should be covered in the article for its one starring role. Rorshacma (talk) 23:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per the claims of @GojiraFan1954: in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE and the fact that we don't have a List of Kaiju page to merge it to anyway. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:35, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Rtkat3 do you have thoughts on the proposed merge to Godzilla vs. Megalon? That article would allow for a preservation of Megalon's content while being a mainspace article. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- That would be a secondary target until further notice....especially in the event that someone starts a List of Kaiju page that would also include the Kaiju that are exclusive to the Monsterverse projects. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Rtkat3 do you have thoughts on the proposed merge to Godzilla vs. Megalon? That article would allow for a preservation of Megalon's content while being a mainspace article. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:01, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Weak keep per the revised draft from the previous deletion discussion, which fleshes out Megalon heavily. The reception is still rather weak and uses some content farm sites in its sourcing that should be removed, but clearly demonstrates Megalon's impact on subsequent media and culture as an iconic Godzilla kaiju. Arguments that things that only have one "major" appearance should be merged are unconvincing and not based in any form of policy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:31, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Its a distinct character from the godzilla franchise that has shown up in multiple movies. Agnieszka653 (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Keep: Article meets WP:NFICTION. Landlord of Everywhere (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.