Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed VI Investment Fund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 15:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Mohammed VI Investment Fund

Mohammed VI Investment Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article feels like it's built to be WP:PROMOTIONAL, suffers from WP:PRIMARY sourcing and I don't see it passing WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep – I have improved the article by removing wording that could be seen as promotional and making the tone more neutral. I also added secondary sources to address sourcing concerns and support notability. Mixinlord (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Keep I found a few WP:SIGCOV out there, and seeing the recent fixes, I think it no longer falls under WP:PROMOTIONAL. JLN2026 (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:NCORP. The first source is a brief mention, the second is about the establishment of the Fund by the Moroccan government, and the third is about a partnership the Fund entered. The last two fail WP:ORGIND. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    There are 14 sources cited in the article itself. It may be more helpful to assess notability based on the full set of sources in the article rather than a limited subset mentioned in this discussion. Mixinlord (talk) 01:10, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    Which sources do you think demonstrate notability the best, then? Maybe this, but I don't see anything more. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks