Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quetta Gladiators–Peshawar Zalmi rivalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:57, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Quetta Gladiators–Peshawar Zalmi rivalry

Quetta Gladiators–Peshawar Zalmi rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quetta Gladiators and Peshawar Zalmi are playing for 11 years now and all the article offers is head to head record (which is also available at statistics page WP:DUPLICATE) and nothing on why a rivalry exists. No WP:SIGCOV to justify rivalry's notablity. 𝘼𝓷𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓐 𝙇𝓪𝓻𝙠𝓐 𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨 13:29, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Draftify - I'll relent on trying to keep this article. Let common sense prevail and send the article to drafts. There is no reason why it can't be reuploaded in the future when coverage according to your standards is made available. XXSniperXX12 15:30, 2 May 2026 (UTC)—
    If 11 years hasn't produced any significant coverage on rivalry I doubt there will be any in near future and drafts older than 6 months without any edits are deleted automatically so it will be deleted now or in comings months anyway. 𝘼𝓷𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓐 𝙇𝓪𝓻𝙠𝓐 𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨 06:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
    I'd rather it be deleted in a few months than now. XXSniperXX12 (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Cricket, and Pakistan. 𝘼𝓷𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓐 𝙇𝓪𝓻𝙠𝓐 𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨 13:29, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Delete or Draftify. I couldn't find any sources calling this a "Rivalry", but if XXSniperXX12 wants to do more work find sources to improve the article, I would not oppose as drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom; no need to draftify also per nom. Vestrian24Bio 10:38, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    That's nonsense, there's no advantage of deleting the article instead of draftifying it. Also, the statement made in the nomination that the head-to-head record between any two sides, let alone these two sides, is completely wrong and cannot be found anywhere else on Wikipedia. It only offers every respective side's complete win percentage and matches played, etc. XXSniperXX12 (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    Stop the WP:BLUDGEON behaviour. Vestrian24Bio 11:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
    Not forcing anything lol, just stating the facts and that there is no point of deleting the article when you can draft it. It's not like it can get secretly published from there. It has to be reviewed and then published or denied. XXSniperXX12 (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks