Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qutlug Qiya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Qutlug Qiya
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Qutlug Qiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is entirely about the subject's familial relationships, therefore failing WP:INVALIDBIO as notability is not inherited. Google Books searches with a couple different spellings of their name do not show significant coverage, and so also fails WP:GNG. Alivardi (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Mongolia, and Central Asia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- if we found someones names on textures withen Barlas Subgroups peoples then its a parts of historical sources, rather then semi-historical figures who just have informations on pre-anceint sources or, Tablets mixed with legend things, however Alivardi if u saw that as historical character then u dont have to objections on this at all without proper sources against that things which real existence character. Ajrun Amir'za-da (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- delete for both the reason of no inherited notability (since the article doesn’t seem to be asserting any individual notability at all, as currently written - it’s all about his genealogical relationships to others, but also total lack of significant coverage to establish even the reflected notability. Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.